effectively organized teams canaccomplish tasks that are well beyond the abilities of individuals, and teach students to think innew and creative ways4-8. Students, however, are typically somewhat resistive to these grouptechniques for the following reasons: 1) Workload and credit are not fairly distributed amongst group members. 2) Scheduling group time together outside of class is very difficult. 3) Students do not know or trust other group members.It is interesting to note that the majority of these concerns are related to organizationaldifficulties, rather than an inherent dislike of cooperative learning. Instructors also typicallyexpress concerns over their ability to cover sufficient material and in managing group activities9.These
in their C21 skills. Observations and rubrics used by customers from thethree museums, instructor and teaching assistants have also shown improvements in students’C21 skills. Activities such as communicating and collaborating with customers with limitedengineering knowledge and refining design decisions based on feedback and performance, aresimilar to how engineers work in the industry. Incorporating such style in engineering pedagogycan help better prepare students for the workforce.IntroductionSeveral national reports have drawn attention to the need for qualified science, technology,engineering and mathematics (STEM) graduates for the advancement of innovation inSTEM.1,2,3,4,5 The need is not only to increase the number of STEM graduates
inclusive excellence program with a rewards structure.Start a book discussion over lunch – the topic could be around inclusive teaching, inclusiveleadership, women in leadership etc. There is not one right solution. These are all strategies thatour university is currently participating in. Remember Ruth Bader Ginsburg: "Real change,enduring change, happens one step at a time."Panelist #5: • Diversify your own team or laboratory. Lead by example. • Use power, influence, and privilege to change culture and climate for the better by implementing policies that create inclusive environments that allow women to thrive. Abolish patriarchal framework. Become anti-sexist, anti-mysogynoirist, anti- misogynist. • Be an active bystander
level workshops and seminars, and a high level research experience in NYU faculty labs. Her commitment to diversity and equity is paramount to her work in STEAM and activism. As a former Adjunct Professor at Teachers College, Columbia University and biomedical scientist in immunology Dr. Borges balances the world of what scientists do and brings that to STEAM education in order to provide culturally relevant profes- sional development and curricula that aligns to the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). More- over, Dr. Borges is treasurer and co-chair of the Northeastern Association of Science Teacher Education (NE-ASTE) where faculty, researchers, and educators discuss present STEM teaching and learning and
Systems, and Lead Faculty of the Master of Science in Wireless Commu- nications; as well as Principal Investigator for two HP Technology for Teaching grants. From 2000-2005, he was President/CEO, SegWave, Inc., an educational technology systems company he founded. Previous positions include Vice President for Russia and Eastern Europe, Qualcomm Inc., 1995-99, with offices in San Diego and Moscow, Russia and multiple positions with Northern Telecom and Bell- Northern Research in Ottawa, Canada and Richardson, TX during 1978-1995, including Director, Intelli- gent Network Solutions and Director, Asia/Pacific Strategic Marketing. He is one of several ”Fathers of email”; based on work he did with the US Army and DARPA in
transformedrules and responses to the realities of the competitive marketplace. A university, like any otherorganization refusing to respond to the needs of the dynamic world in a timely manner, canbecome a beautiful higher education museum if its brain bank does not respond in ways thatmatch the creative far-sighted vision of global leaders. New knowledge, new opportunities, newtechnologies to serve our teaching and administration, new industrial/business partners inresearch and innovation, and new institutional structures in advancing our mission are required inthe new economy. These elements can make dramatically a new engineering school responsiveto the needs of the twenty-first century workplace, while securing core goals and virtues in ahierarchical
Experience committee, chair for the LTU KEEN Course Modification Team, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team.Dr. Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Donald D. Carpenter, PhD, PE, LEED AP is Professor of Civil Engineering where he teaches courses on ethics/professionalism and water resources. Dr. Carpenter is an accredited green design professional (LEED AP) and practicing professional engineer (PE) whose expertise includes Low Impact Development (LID), innovative stormwater best management practices (BMPs), hydrologic and
-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI Grad: 08/2014 Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX Grad: 08/2007 BachelorDr. Phapanin Charoenphol, Texas A&M University Phapanin Charoenphol is an Assistant Professor of Instruction in the J. Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. She earned her M.S., and Ph.D. from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. She teaches thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, engineering laboratory, and senior design studio courses. Her research interests include engineering education and targeted drug delivery. In 2022, she was awarded the ASME Best Teacher Award and earned the ACUE Certificate in Effective College
engineering education. He previously taught at Bucknell University and Arizona State University. He also teaches NHI training courses on seismic design of foundations and geotechnical features of highway systems for the Federal Highway Administration.Craig M. Shillaber Craig M. Shillaber is an associate teaching professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Northeastern University. He earned a Ph.D. in civil engineering from Virginia Tech in 2016, an M.S. in civil engineering from Virginia Tech in 2009, and a B.S. in civil engineering from the University of New Hampshire in 2008. His research interests include teaching and learning in geotechnical engineering, sustainability education in civil
Paper ID #14947Impact of Elementary School Teachers’ Enacted Engineering Design-BasedScience Instruction on Student Learning (Fundamental)Brenda Capobianco, Purdue University, West Lafayette Brenda M. Capobianco is Associate Professor in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, and School of Engineering Education (courtesy) at Purdue University. She holds a B.S. in biology from the University of Alaska Fairbanks, M.S. in science education from Connecticut Central State University, and Ed.D. from the University of Massachusetts Amherst. She teaches elementary science methods and graduate courses in teacher action
roadways and earth retaining structures. Due to her strong passion for teaching, Dr. Warren pursued educational research opportunities in recent years and was awarded an NSF TUES grant, which she is currently completing with hopes of continuing her work in this area. Dr. Warren has been awarded the UNC Charlotte College of Engineering teaching award for her dedication and excellence in teaching.Dr. Chuang Wang, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Dr. Wang is an associate professor of educational research at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He received a National Science Foundation (NSF) grant, Development, Implementation, and Assessment of Geotechnical Concept Tools, as a Co-Principal Investigator and
project ”The Status, Role, and Needs of Engineering Technology Education in the United States” and the Chevron Corp.- funded project ”Guiding Implementation of K-12 Engineering Education in the United States.” He is also study director for the public- and private-sector funded study ”Integrated STEM Education: Developing a Research Agenda,” which is a collaboration with the NRC Board on Science Education. He was the study director for the project that resulted in publication of Standards for K-12 Engineering Education? (2010) and Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects (2009), an analysis of efforts to teach engineering to U.S. school children. He oversaw the NSF-funded
director of undergraduate studies in the Brian Lamb School of Com- munication.Natascha Michele Trellinger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Natascha Trellinger is a first year PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity. She received her BS in aerospace engineering from Syracuse University. At Purdue, Natascha is a part of the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) and is interested in global teaching and learning at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. Page 24.1406.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014
as esters and biphenyls, are quite unusual. Page 6.666.3The unique properties and the control of the chemistry leading to these properties make thesemethods excellent teaching and learning tools. A typical schematic of liquid crystal types isshown in Figure 2. At Western New England College and the Northeast Center forTelecommunications Technologies, laboratories have been developed involving four distinctproperties (and chemicals) of liquid crystal materials1. An overview of liquid crystal materialsand properties2 is given in the Appendix for use as a pre-lab lecture or as reference for thestudent and laboratory instructor
aspects of the flipped and blended learning environments.Ms. Jacquelyn E. Borinski, Georgia Institute of Technology Jacquelyn E. Borinski will receive a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2014. She is the External Vice President for the Georgia Tech Chamber Choir and volunteer with the Georgia Aquar- ium. Her research interests include pediatric device design and human-robot interaction. She is an Under- graduate collaborator with Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta designing interactive teaching modules for math and science using the patient’s condition as motivation. She was awarded a Women in Engineering Scholarship from Axion BioSystems.Kimberly Danielle Haight, Georgia Institute of TechnologyMs
Paper ID #29366The Role of Timely Actionable Student Feedback in Improving Instructionand Student Learning in Engineering CoursesDr. Petros Sideris, Zachry Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University Dr. Sideris is an Assistant Professor at the Zachry Department of Civil and Environment Engineering at Texas A&M University, since 2017. Prior to joining Texas A&M, Dr. Sideris was an Assistant Professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder, where he also served as the Director of the Structures and Materials Testing Laboratory. He received his Master’s (2008) and Ph.D. (2012) in Civil
provide PD that aligns to The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Since 2008 she has provided teacher PD to science teachers in the tri-state area, including international visiting teachers and scholars. Dr. Borges’ research interests include: building STEM professional-teacher relationships, diversity and equity, and enhancing urban science teaching and learning.Dr. Vikram Kapila, New York University Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a DR K-12 research project, and an ITEST re- search project
eleven years combined. Much of her current work and research focuses on Cognitively Guided Instruction in mathematics.Dr. Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University Gregg M. Warnick is the Director of the Weidman Center for Global Leadership and Associate Teaching Professor of Engineering Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). The center provides oversight for leadership development and inter- national activities within the college and he works actively with students, faculty and staff to promote and develop increased capabilities in global agility and leadership. His research and teaching interests in- clude developing global agility
learning and assessment tool in her introductory physics courses for non-majors. She has been an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) for over 25 years. Dr. Larkin served on the Board of Directors for ASEE from 1997-1999 as Chair of Professional Interest Council (PIC) III and as Vice President of PICs. Dr. Larkin has received numerous national and international awards including the ASEE Distinguished Educator and Service Award from the Physics and Engineering Physics Division in 1998. Dr. Larkin received the Outstanding Teaching in the General Education Award from AU in 2000. In 2000 – 2001 she served as a National Science
disadvantage of this approach is that it does not facilitate early remediation ofperformance failures because necessary outcomes information related to deficient teaching andlearning mechanisms is measured only for mastery level courses. A holistic approach forcontinuous quality improvement in academic learning would require a systematic measurement ofperformance indicators in all three domains and their corresponding categories of learning levelsfor all course levels in a given program’s curriculum.In this research, we present an innovative methodology for engineering program evaluationutilizing significant customization implemented in a web-based software, EvalTools® 6. Uniquecurricular assessments implementing scientific constructive alignment are
the other hand, howethics education manifests in engineering programs is still an open question. There are myriadways in which ethics can be taught, places where it can be taught, and ideas to teach under therubric of engineering ethics. Our paper takes a simple approach to address parts of this issue ofheterogeneity in engineering ethics education by asking one basic question: “what kinds ofpatterns can we observe by looking at how much ethics-related content engineering students maysee in their undergraduate engineering programs?” In order to help the engineering education community have a more detailed view of thestate of engineering ethics education, we collected data from the top 30 engineering degree-granting universities in the
Paper ID #7464An Innovative Two-Year Engineering Design Capstone Experience at JamesMadison UniversityDr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University OLGA PIERRAKOS is an associate professor and founding faculty member of the James Madison Uni- versity Department of Engineering, which graduated its inaugural class in May 2012. At JMU, Dr. Pier- rakos is the Director of the Center for Innovation in Engineering Education (CIEE) and Director of the Advanced Thermal Fluids Laboratory. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineer identity, engineering design instruction and
Design (SUTD). Wood completed his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering (Division of Engineering and Applied Science) at the California Institute of Technology, where he was an AT&T Bell Laboratories Ph.D. Scholar. Wood joined the faculty at the University of Texas in Sept. 1989 and established a computational and experimental laboratory Page 25.752.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 for research in engineering design and manufacturing. He was a National Science Foundation Young Investigator, the Cullen Trust for Higher Education Endowed Professor in
issues, such as global outsourcing of engineering jobs, as well as understandingthe ramifications of dealing with intellectual property, will require a politicallysophisticated engineering cadre. Many of the problems facing the profession are nolonger technical—they are political and social. Only by addressing such concernsstraight-on can we expect to have our interests represented in the broader societal debate.In order to facilitate this, we must start teaching the appropriate skills in the classroom.And in order to do this effectively, we must learn them ourselves.-------------Next we’ll hear from Lueny Morell:I have given the subtitle to my section: From engineering to economic development:small steps to provide others opportunities in a
: Entrepreneurship education in engineering. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com The Characteristics of Engineering Learning in Communities of Practice: An Exploratory Multi-case StudyAbstract: The Emerging Engineering Education (3E) transformation has been implemented in China tomeet the society’s needs of high-quality talents in science, technology, engineering and mathematics(STEM) fields. The transformation has stimulated some new forms of engineering learning which wereorganized in communities of practice such as engineering studio, engineering laboratory in someuniversities. However, little is known about
IIT Delhi for undergraduate studies and Cornell University for graduate work. He worked for nearly 15 years as a materials scientist at the DuPont company and moved in 2004 to Lehigh University. His research interests are in interfacial mechanical properties.Zilong Pan, Lehigh University Zilong Pan is an assistant professor of teaching, learning and technology, his research focuses on emerging educational technologies and innovative methodological approaches in educational practices and studies in STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) disciplines.Nathan Urban, Lehigh University Nathan Urban is Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs at Lehigh University. Urban earned his PhD
way. In an effort to reach all students, he has consistently deployed a host of teaching strategies into his classes, including videos, example problems, quizzes, hands-on laboratories, demonstrations, and group work. Dr. Kerzmann is enthusiastic in the continued pursuit of his educational goals, research endeavors, and engagement of mechanical engineering students.Veronica RothDr. David V.P. Sanchez, University of Pittsburgh David V.P. Sanchez is an Associate Professor in the Swanson School of Engineering’s Civil & Envi- ronmental Engineering department and the Associate Director for the Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation at the University of Pittsburgh. He serves as the Program Director for the
has grown to serve over 720 participants each summer with multiple one-weekfully residential and virtual sessions. Funding support from industries such as NorthropGrumman, Raytheon, and Boeing has increased allowing EPIC to serve more low-incomeparticipants.Due to the recent COVID-19 pandemic, in 2020, when most universities simply shut down theirengineering summer pre-college programs, EPIC swiftly changed its programming to a fullyvirtual program and served over 400 participants. EPIC created a new curriculum, activities,training, and planned on how to solve issues such as participants' ability to use school-issued orpersonal chromebooks. Intensive home-laboratory activities with mechanical, electrical, andsoftware elements were created
astrong electric field to create thrust. The HET is used for many modern space applications, fromstation-keeping on small satellites to long-term travel to faraway asteroids.Electric propulsion, and specifically the HET, integrates many concepts that are fundamental in anundergraduate education such as electricity and magnetism (E&M), material properties, thermalanalysis, and laboratory experimentation. However, the HET is rarely studied below the graduatelevel. As such, we present a path of feasibility for an undergraduate electric propulsion projectbuilding a small, low-power HET, both as a novel vehicle for engaging with introductory physicsconcepts and as a case study of an advanced self-directed project at the undergraduate level.In this
as a function oftraditional gender relations, that men-dominated industries/sectors are more innovative thanwomen-dominated ones, all rooted in a social perception of technology that is more oftenassociated to men than to women.”18In addition to teaching, research, and publishing, schools of science, technology, engineering,and math (STEM) are more frequently considering patenting, licensing, and commercializationactivities in faculty bids for tenure and promotion.2,6,19 This is particularly relevant to schools ofengineering where a large proportion of research is geared toward real world application. Federaland state agencies, including the National Science Foundation (NSF) are promoting this shift inengineering and STEM through programming