department chair.Spring 2020Figure 2. Prior to the interview, we ask each student to complete a journey map indicating theirhigh and low points throughout the semester. The high and low points (as seen on the Y axis)represents their positive and negative experiences. Adriana’s Journey Map for the secondsemester of Year 3 in engineering. In November of 2019, I went to a SWE conference and that was a huge high for me because I got multiple internship offers for this summer. It was unlike anything I had been to before; it was amazing. That conference is such an incredible opportunity because there ’s hundreds of companies there and they’re all there to hire women, which is not something that you get usually in engineering. There were some
diverse and inclusive field ofengineering capable of attending to the plural interests of diverse communities and the complexchallenges they face.References[1] W. J. Baumol, "Education for Innovation: Entrepreneurial Breakthroughs Versus CorporateIncremental Improvements," vol. 5, (1), pp. 33-56, 2005.[2] K. Kazerounian and S. Foley, "Barriers to Creativity in Engineering Education: A Study ofInstructors and Students Perceptions," vol. 129, (7), pp. 761-768, 2007.[3] A. E. Zaghi et al, "Unique potential and challenges of students with ADHD in engineeringprograms," in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016, pp. 1-15.[4] L. D. Goegan and G. L. Harrison, "THE EFFECTS OF EXTENDED TIME ON WRITINGPERFORMANCE," Learning Disabilities (Weston
coordinator for an NSF S-STEM program to prepare students for gateway courses across differ- ent disciplines of engineering to support and retain students in these disciplines. His research focuses on techniques to collect and analyze the electrical impedance of biological tissues using wearable sensors and their health applications.Dr. Memorie Gosa Memorie M. Gosa is a pediatric speech-language pathologist and board certified specialist in swallowing and swallowing disorders. She is an assistant professor at The University of Alabama and maintains a clinical caseload at The University of Alabama SpDr. Debra Moehle McCallum, The University of Alabama Debra McCallum is a Senior Research Social Scientist and Director of the
performing differently in their earlier academic writing courses such as first-year-composition (FYC) and technical communication/writing. However, it also indicates thatengineering students need to–and frequently make some attempt to–change their language inwriting dramatically depending on the writing assignment.5. AcknowledgementThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant DUE #1914593.6. References[1] D. Biber and S. Conrad, Register, Genre and Style, Second Edition, Second Edition ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 2019.[2] S. Conrad, "A Comparison of Practitioner and Student Writing in Civil Engineering," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 191-217, 2017.[3] D. Biber, S. Conrad and R
, Dittrich Y, Gorschek T, Grahn H. “The success factors powering industry-academiacollaboration.” IEEE Software. 2011 Jul 22(2):67-73[6] Pertuze, J. A., Calder, E. S., Greitzer, E. M. & Lucas, W. A. “Best practices for industry-university collaboration.” MIT Sloan Management Review. (2010) Vol. 51 No. 4[7] ELI Report, “7 things you should know about cross-institutional collaboration.” EduCause,ELI Report, July 2015[8] Beckman, et al. “Closing the Industry-Academic Gap.” IEEE Software. 1997 Nov/Dec: 49-57[9] Jones S, Clulow S. “How to foster a culture of collaboration between universities andindustry.” Higher Education Network, The Guardian, 2012(https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2012/aug/02/the-value-of-research
/index.html, Accessed January 21, 2020Sunfounder (2018). Picar S Manual, https://www.sunfounder.com/picar-s.html, Accessed January 21, 2020DSRC (2007). DRAFT SAE J2735 Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) Message Set Dictionary: Annex B: Traffic Probe Message Use and Operation. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA.Johnson, P., 1999. Problem based, cooperative learning in the engineering classroom. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 125 (1), 8–12Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell biology education, 3(4), 270-277Li, M., & Faghri, A. (2016). Applying problem-oriented and project-based learning in a transportation
wouldalso like to thank Ms. Angela Lanning for her assistance in executing the programs.References[1] G. K. Stahl, M. L. Maznevski, A. Voigt, and K. Jonsen, "Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups," Journal of international business studies, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 690-709, 2010.[2] S. E. Page, The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies-New Edition. Princeton University Press, 2008.[3] A. P. Association, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub, 2013.[4] G. A. Shaw and G. Brown, "Laterality and creativity concomitants of attention problems
thinking of drones as toys, but after theexperience viewed them as tools. We conclude that UAVs can be used as a means to provideopportunities for learning engineering that are both highly motivating AND academicallyrigorous.References[1] M. Beckett, G. Borman, J. Capizzano, D. Parsley, S. Ross, A. Schirm, and J. Taylor, “Structuring out-of-school time to improve academic achievement: A practice guide,” US Department of Education, Washington DC, NCEE 2009-012, 2009. Available https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/ost_pg_072109.pdf. [Accessed April 8, 2019].[2] S. Bhaduri, A. Gendreau, V.S. Koushik, T. Sumner, J. Ristvey, and R. Russell, “Promoting Low Income Middle School Students Motivation and Persistence in an
or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References [1] Rakesh Agrawal, Anastasia Ailamaki, Philip A. Bernstein, Eric A. Brewer, Michael J. Carey, Sura- jit Chaudhuri, AnHai Doan, Daniela Florescu, Michael J. Franklin, Hector Garcia-Molina, Johannes Gehrke, Le Gruenwald, Laura M. Haas, Alon Y. Halevy, Joseph M. Hellerstein, Yannis E. Ioan- nidis, Hank F. Korth, Donald Kossmann, Samuel Madden, Roger Magoulas, Beng Chin Ooi, Tim O’Reilly, Raghu Ramakrishnan, Sunita Sarawagi, Michael Stonebraker, Alexander S. Szalay, and Ger- hard Weikum. The claremont report on database research. SIGMOD Record, 37(3):9–19, 2008. [2
. Journal Of Engineering Education 102, 2‐19 (2013). 2 Jonassen, D., Strobel, J. & Lee, C. B. Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lesson for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education 95, 139‐151 (2006). 3 Litzinger, T. et al. A cognitive study of problem solving in statics. Journal of Engineering Education 99, 337‐353 (2010). 4 Henderson, K. On line and on paper: Visual representations, visual culture, and computer graphics in design engineering., (MIT Press, 1999). 5 Moore, T. J., Miller, R. L., Lesh, R. A., Stohlmann, M. S. & Kim, Y. R. Modeling in engineering: The role of representational fluency in students' conceptual understanding. Journal Of Engineering
, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 19-22, Indianapolis IN.8. Brawner, C. E., Camacho, M. M., Lord, S. M., Long, R. A., & Ohland, M. W. (2012). Women in industrial engineering: Stereotypes, persistence, and perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 288- 318.9. Clewell, B. C., deCohen, C. C., Tsui, L., & Deterding, N. (2006). Revitalizing the nation’s talent pool in STEM: Science, technology, engineering and math. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.10. Espinosa, L. L. (2008). The academic self-concept of African American and Latina(o) men and women in STEM majors. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 14(2), 177–203.11. Gunter, R., & Stambach, A. (2005
understanding that students bring to the table can be used as a resourcefor more effective ethics education.References Basart, J. M. & Serra, M. (2013). Engineering ethics beyond engineers’ ethics. Science andEngineering Ethics, 19, 179-187.Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?.Science, Technology& Human Values, 39(1), 42-72.Culver, S. M., Puri, I. K., Wokutch, R. E., & Lohani, V. (2013). Comparison of engagementwith ethics between an engineering and a business program. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19,585-597.Haidt, J. & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generateculturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133, 55-66.Harris Jr., C. E. (2008). The good engineer: Giving
study of problematic reasonings of undergraduate electrical engineering students in continuous time signals and systems courses (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Purdue University, West Lafayette, 2014.[6] Simoni, M., Fayyaz, F., & Streveler, R. A. Data Mining to Help Determine Sources of Difficulty in an Introductory Continuous-Time Signals and Systems Course. American Society for Engineering Education conference and exposition. Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[7] Nasr, R., Hall, S. R., & Garik, P. Student misconceptions in signals and systems and their origins - Part II. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, T4E. Indianapolis, IN. 35(1), 2005.,[8] Chi, M. T. H. Conceptual change within and
. Again, thisis an area of flexibility, where the set of instruments can be customized based on the needs andlearning objectives set forth.Future data collection using the instruments adopted and developed for creative problem solvingwill feature comparisons of (i) upper and lower classmen showing the progression, and (ii) Page 26.1160.10various disciplinary domains for which the emphasis on creative problem solving might bedifferent.AcknowledgementWe gratefully acknowledge the support from NSF grant DUE 1141001.References1. Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., Woods, B. S., Duhon, K. E., and Parker, D
to self-guided sort of motivation was sort of difficult for me and it hasn’t gotten that much easier, but I’m starting to get the hang of it. Page 26.1173.7 S, 2nd yr I think it’s a lot healthier to work on something you have a passion for, rather than what someone April 2013 else is telling you to do. And I think it’s much more rewarding in really all ways to do something like focus group that. I feel like I’ve had a lot of these thoughts just floating around in my head. And then actually having to talk about
: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24-28, 1997).5. Turner, S.L., A. Alliman-Brissett, R.T. Lapan, S. Udipi, and D. Ergun, The Career-Related Parent Support Scale. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development (American Counseling Association), 2003. 36(2): p. 83.6. Engberg, M.E. and G.C. Wolniak, College Student Pathways to the STEM Disciplines. Teachers College Page 26.1443.11 Record, 2013. 115(1): p. 27.7. Executive Office of the President, Increasing College Opportunity for Low-Income Students, 2014
of systems approaches on biological problems in drug discovery. Nature Biotechnology, 22:1215-1217.2. Emmert-Streib, F., S-D Zhang, and P. Hamilton. 2015. Computational cancer biology: education is a natural key to many locks. BMC Cancer, 15:7.3. Janes, K.A., P.L. Chandran, R.M. Ford, M.J. Lazzara, J.A. Papin, S.M. Peirce, J.J. Saucerman, and D.A. Lauffenburger. 2017. An engineering design approach to systems biology. Integrative Biology, 9(7):574-583.4. Dunn, M.C. and P.E. Bourne. 2017. Building the biomedical data science workforce. PLoS Biol., 15(7):e2003082. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.20030825. Hood, L., R. Balling, and C. Auffray. 2012. Revolutionizing medicine in the 21st century through systems approaches
of these dimensions, are represented in their ecological model thatincludes a cognitive dimension within an interpersonal dimension, within a broadersocietal/cultural dimension.Our team’s larger study builds uponthe work of these researchers whohave characterized different elementsof systems thinking. We representour working definition of systemsthinking in Figure 1, where the“component” is in the center, whichrepresents a potential solution orsolutions to the engineering problembeing explored. The expandingcircles represent the contexts that canand should be considered in makingdecisions about the solution(s) andtheir appropriateness. Many times Figure 1: Elements of Systems Thinkingthis component is part of a largersystem, thus
Page 23.871.14ELLI project. Assessment in Education, 11(3), 247-272.13. Wielkiewicz, R. M., & Sinner, A. S., (2010). A Life-Long Learning Scale for student development research andevaluation, Personal communication held on August 2010.14. Robinson, M., Fadali, M. S., Carr, J., & Maddux, C., (1999). Engineering principles for high school students,Paper presentation at the 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Nov 10-13, 1999, San Juan, Puerto Rico.15. Fadali, M. S., Henderson, N., Johnson, J., Mortensen, J., & McGough, J., (2001). On-line engineeringmathematics testing and assessment, Paper presentation at the 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001,Oct 10-13, 2001, Reno, NV
reflectivity, mechanical robustness, and environmental sustainability, such as carbides, sol-gel coatings, high temperature oxides, and sev- eral polymers. Her research is interdisciplinary in nature and fosters collaborations with Chemical and Biomedical, Mechanical, and Environmental Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, Public Health, Medicine, and the Nanotechnology Research and Education Center (NREC).Prof. Rhonda R. Franklin, University of Minnesota Rhonda Franklin (S’84-M’96) received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Texas A&M Uni- versity, College Station, TX and M.S. and Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from The University of
23.432.14References[1] Carliner, S., An overview of online learning, Minneapolis, MN: Lakewood Publications/HRD Press, 1999.[2] Connick, G. P., 1997, “Issues and trends to take us into the twenty-first century,” In T. E. Cyrs (Ed.) Teaching and Learning at a Distance: What it Takes to Effectively Design, Deliver and Evaluate Programs: No. 71. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, San Francisco: Jossey- Bass, pp. 7-12.[3] Herring, S., 2002, “Computer-mediated communication on the Internet,” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), Vol. 36, pp. 109-168.[4] Hollandsworth, R., “Toward an Instructional Model for Asynchronous Instruction of Interpersonal Communications,” a paper presented at
Logistics research projects, and begin communicating with mentors Orientation and Project Participants attend orientation workshop and prepare 1 W Definition research plans with their mentors Research and Library Literature review and library resource workshop with the 2** W Workshop Engineering Librarian Waste management and landfill design/construction 3 Continued Research S seminar with individual reflection
. Suzanne Donovan, and James W. Pellegrino, eds.). 2000, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.12. Clough, W.c., ed. Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. ed. N.A.o. Engineering. 2005, National Academies Press: Washington, DC.13. Engineers), A.A.S.o.C., Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century. 2004.14. Kyte, M., A. Abdel-Rahim, and M. Lines, Traffic signal operations education through hands-on experience: Lessons learned from a workshop prototype. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2003. 1848(-1): p. 50-56.15. Liao, C.F., D.B. Glick, S. Haag, and G. Baas, Development and Deployment of Traffic Control Game
Mathematics, and Environmental Education.[19] Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.[20] Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (Eds.) (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.[21] Canham, M., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 155-166.[22] Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & van Gog, T. (2010). In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli. Learning
is to determine whether or not the implementation of our new app willimprove rider experiences with the transit system. Additionally, the study would also look intoinsights on whether using SmartSAT app can increase the amount of people that took the publictransportation service.AcknowledgmentThis work is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2131193. Any opinions,findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) anddo not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual-2nd Edition, http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/docs/tcrp100/Part4.pdf.[2] Smartphone Applications To Influence Travel
institutecurriculum. A total of three institutes were held—in spring 2021, fall 2021, and spring 2022. Table 2: Curriculum of the ProQual Institute Week Topic(s) Covered 1 Community formation, social realities under investigation, pictorial systems mapping 2 Pictorial systems map refinement, scoping the social reality to investigate 3 Identifying appropriate theories, analyzing published qualitative research 4 Deep dive into the Q3 framework, aligning study design with forms of validation 5 Applying the Q3 framework to participant projects (small working group format) 6 Using methodologies, overview of common qualitative methodologies 7 Qualitative data analysis, analysis software, and coding practice 8 Wrap up
Bachelorˆa C™s and is working on her Master of Science in mechanical engineering. Her research focuses are on undergraduate engineRebecca Holcombe ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Initial findings of engineering faculties’ perceptions of mastery assessment in a project-based engineering programAbstractThe purpose of this work in progress NSF grantees poster is to disseminate initial findings onfaculty perception of mastery-based assessment in a project-based engineering program.It is understood that pedagogical approaches influence more than what students learn but alsoimpact their mindsets, motivation, and how they see themselves as engineers. Mastery-basedlearning has seen
interpret data. Indicators of each criterion are also introduced in Table 1.The level of productive transfer was evaluated based on Yancey et al.’s three transfer modes[11]. Remix is defined as happening when prior writing knowledge is shown to be successfullyadapted and integrated from one writing context into a new writing context; assemblage occurswhen students' transfer of previous writing knowledge into a new writing context is uneven;Critical incident occurs when prior knowledge is over-relied upon and inappropriately applied toa new writing context.Table 1. Student writing sample evaluation instrument Criteria Indicators of each Criterion Level of productive transfer Engineering • Construction of
, pp. 113–125, 1991.[9] J. M. DuBois and J. Burkemper, “Ethics education in US medical schools: a study of syllabi,” Acad. Med., vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 432–437, 2002.[10] G. Baxter and I. Sommerville, “Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering,” Interact. Comput., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 4–17, 2011.[11] P. Kroes, M. Franssen, I. van de Poel, and M. Ottens, “Treating socio-technical systems as engineering systems: some conceptual problems,” Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. Off. J. Int. Fed. Syst. Res., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 803–814, 2006.[12] C. E. Harris Jr, M. Davis, M. S. Pritchard, and M. J. Rabins, “Engineering ethics: what? why? how? and when?,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 93–96, 1996.[13] B. Newberry