. Page 24.1401.8Dissemination through conference presentation and conference proceedings articles The project PI, Co-PIs, key personnel, and participating students presented conference papers related to project activities at various conferences. Following is the list of papers. Fathizadeh, M. (Accepted for Publication, 2013 ). Implementation of a New Mechatronics Engineering Technology Degree Leveraging Industry. Technology Interface International Journal. Paper No.:T13-S-14 M. Fathizadeh, G. Cabrera, M. Werthman and G. Zawislak, (2013), “Implementing Industry Leverage to Establish a New Automation Equipment Training Center.” Conference Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Mid-Atlantic Section
engineering activities (Table 4, #5). Participants then engaged inan altered version of the sail engineering activity from Day 1, which we had modified to moreclosely align with Common Core Math Standards for Grade 2 (Table 4, #6). Specificimplementation of the math standards in the activity can be found in Table 7.Participants created a line plot to analyze their data from Day 1 to evaluate the success of thesails they had designed. This activity modeled meaningful integration of math and engineeringand demonstrated s that using math to evaluate the criteria for the success of a design canenhance an engineering activity (addressing Key Component 3).To further model for teachers how we planned the lesson to integrate the CCSS with theengineering
Research & Development, Vol. 26, Issue 4, 2007, pp. 425-442.7 Fu, K., Reid, T., Terpenny, J., Thurston, D., Vance, J., Finger, S., Wiens, G., Kazerounian, K., Allen, J.,and Jacobson, K., “Broadening Participation: A Report on a Series of Workshops Aimed at Building Community and Increasing the Number of Women and Minorities in Engineering Design,” 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, June 23 - 26, 2013 Atlanta, GA. Page 24.885.108 Collins, Lynn H., Joan C. Chrisler, and Kathryn Quina, eds. Career Strategies for Women in Academia: Arming Athena. Sage, 1998.9 Klenke, K., “Cinderella Stories Of Women
thiseducational effort can be expanded outside the classroom to involve the entire student body, inthe hopes of motivating students to enroll in elective courses in the future. The classroomstudents can then analyze the data obtained from this school wide challenge to determine ifmathematical models can be used to help understand human intuition. Ultimately, this week longexperience helps students realize the practical applications of mathematics, and demonstrates thata systematic analysis in lieu of intuition can give your bracket the statistical edge.References 1. Jacobson, S. H., Nikolaev, A. G., King, D.M., Lee, A. J., 2011, “Seed distributions for the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament”, OMEGA, 39(6):719-724. 2. Lunardi, J
. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes andImplementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.8. Marshall, J. and Marshall, J. (2007). In Search of Teaching Excellence. American Society for EngineeringEducators, June, 2007.9. National Joint Apprenticeship Training Commission (2008), Course 42, International Brotherhood of ElectricalWorkers.10. Michaelsen, L., (1998). Three Keys to Using Learning Groups Effectively. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”.Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9, No 5, 1998.11. Price, P.C., (2006). Are You as Good A Teacher as You Think? Thought & Action, Vol. 14, Fall 2006.12. Gibbs, G., (2001). Changing Student Learning Behavior Outside of Class
overall sitehits and time spent on the site with the final grade. Results are shown in Figures 8 and 9. Figure8 relates total site time in hours to final grade and showed a positive relationship (R2 = 0.1717) infigure 8 similar to Figure 6 (R2 = 0.182), final grade and number of chapter s with videosaccessed. Figure 9 relates final grade and the overall number of site log-ins and provided thebest relationship we found (R2 = 0.3123). In general, this may indicate that the level of overalluse of the various tools of the Blackboard site as represented by the total hits or log-ins docontribute to the final grade. The learning tools the course provided were sufficient to learn the materials (videos, respondus
program.References1.) Hirsch, P., and McKenna, A. “Using Reflection to Promote Teamwork in Engineering Design Education.” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 24, 2008, 377-385.2.) Hirsch, P., Shwom, B., and McKenna, A. “Teaching and Assessing Teamwork: Implementing Continuous Quality Improvement.” Proceedings, Association for Business Communication, October 2003.3.) Carr, S., McKenna, A., Colgate, J.E., and Olson, G.B. “IDEA: Formalizing the Foundation for Engineering Design Education.” International Journal of Engineering Education. 22 (671-678), 2006.4.) Lencioni, P. “Overcoming the Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Field Guide for Leaders, Managers, and Facilitators.” Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, CA. 2005.5
mechanics: adaptive eLearning tutorials. Proceedings, ICEE Conference, Australia. Page 24.1076.127. Prusty, B.G., Ho, O., and Ho, S., (2009). Adaptive tutorials using eLearning platform for solid mechanics course in engineering. Proceedings, AAEE Conference, Australia.8. Morin, B., Kecskemety, K., and Harper, K. (2013). The inverted classroom in a first-year engineering course. Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Atlanta, GA.9. Engineering Mechanics: Statics; Meriam, J. L. and Kraige, L. G., Seventh Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2012
recognized "core"of material that has been relatively stable for at least ten years. It has evolved in the field withoutany agency or body attempting to specify such a core. Unfortunately, it is difficult to look backto the early 70’s when the first programs were created to see the evolution to this point.However, the data presented here will provide a point of reference for studying the evolution ofthe undergraduate bioengineering curriculum in the future. Our analyses have emphasized commonalities across BME, but there is clearly alsoconsiderable diversity in BME undergraduate curricula. If we were to investigate certain otherbranches of engineering, at least five or six topics would be expected to be nearly 100%consistent across programs
Engineering Education. (2013). Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering (TUEE): Phase I: Synthesizing and Integrating Industry Perspectives. Arlington, VA3. National Academies Press, (2005). Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century: The National Academies Press.4. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120.5. Felder, R. M., Sheppard, S. D., & Smith, K. A. (2005). A new journal for a field in transition. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 7-10.6. Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the REsearch
. “Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Page 24.1121.12 Environment,” The Journal of Economic Education, vol. 31, no. 1, Winter 2000.6. S. Zappe, R. Lieicht, J. Messner, T. Litzinger, and H. Woo Lee. “ ‘Flipping’ the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course.” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2009.7. R. Talbert. “Learning MATLAB in the Inverted Classroom.” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education, 2012.8. L.W. Anderson, et al. A Taxonomy for Learning
% Page 24.1170.9 Teams are asked to give a 10 minute presentation on their project during exam week. The following slides are suggested, but each team is free to vary this as they feel appropriate: Problem Description Alternatives Considered Final Design (CAD Model and S/W Flowchart) Video of Working Prototype (Approx. 2 Min) Results Problems Encountered/Overcome Lessons Learned Teams are asked to dress in business attire, as they would for an interview, and to make their slides on a CAD system or on PowerPoint. The rubric used for the presentation is shown in Table 4 below with typical results. Table 4: Presentation Rubric
., Small. R.V., and Marsden, J. (2003). op cit.20 Flesher, J., Leach, S. and Wesphal, L. (1996). “Creating effective internships.” Performance Improvement,35(10), 22-25.21 Hager, C.J., Pryor, C.R. and Bryant, J.A. (2003). “A comparison of four domain area standards for internships andimplications for utilization in undergraduate construction education internship programs.” Journal of ConstructionEducation, 8(3), 157-179. Page 24.1225.11
, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.16. Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7 (17). Retrieved 12 June 2013. Page 24.1227.11
24.1290.10 Engineers; 2007: http://www.nspe.org/resources/pdfs/Ethics/CodeofEthics/Code-‐2007-‐July.pdf. 14. Shephard K. Higher education for sustainability: seeking affective learning outcomes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2008;9(1):87-‐98. 15. Parkin S, Johnston A, Buckland H, Brookes F, White E. Learning and Skills for Sustainable Development: Developing a Sustainability Literate Society. London: Higher Education Partnership for Sustainability (HEPS); 2004. 16. Mulder KF. Don't preach. Practice! Value laden statements in academic sustainability education. International Journal of
-assessment/ResearchPaperRubric.pdf, accessed March 2014.20. http://www.cornellcollege.edu/LIBRARY/faculty/focusing-on-assignments/tools-for-assessment/poster-presentation-rubric.pdf, accessed March 2014.21. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., and Maisa, B. B., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification ofEducational Goals, Handbook II, Affective Domain, David McKay Co. Inc, New York, 1964.22. Verzuh, E., The Fast Forward MBA in Project Management, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1999. Page 24.1323.12
Longitudinal Study,” in Journal of Engineering Education, January 2004.3. Starrett, S. and M. M. Morcos, “Hands-On, Minds-On Electric Power Education”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No. 1, pp 93-99, January 2001.4. Higley, K. A. and C. M. Marianno, “Making Engineering Education Fun,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No.1, pp 105-107, January 2001.5. Gabelnik, F., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R.S., and Smith, B.L., editors, Learning Communities: Creating Connections Among Students, Faculty, and Disciplines, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Jossey- Bass, 19906. Goodwin, T. & Hoagland, K. E. (1999). How to get started in research (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.7. Karukstis, K
and Self-Regulated Learning for Freshmen Engineering Students”, Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper Number: AC 2011-1679, 2011.18. David T. Butterworth, “Teaching C/C++ Programming with Lego Mindstorms”, International Conference on Robotics in Education (RIE), 2012.19. L. Johnson, S. Adams, and M. Cummins, Mobile apps. The NMC horizon report: 2012 higher education edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium, 2012.20. K. Brennan and M. Resnick, “New Frameworks for Studying and Assessing the Development of Computational Thinking”, Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2012.21. V. Barr and C. Stephenson, “Bringing computational thinking to K-12
. The Texas Instruments devices have on-board accelerometer and light level sensors. This detailed view is shown in Figure 4(a) 5. CONTIKI THINGSQUARE CLOUD where we are looking at the device PFP-2. PLATFORM The Device Info view has been scrolled down to expose many ofFigure 3(a) shows the current (fall 2014) Thingsquare platform PFP-2's variables. The actual variables defined for a device willstatus screen that offers a complete development and monitoring vary based on the firmware version and past usage. From here allenvironment for inexpensive Thingsquare
Emphasizing Connections Between Technology and Society, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, AC 2010-185, 2010. Available: http://search.asee.org/search/fetch?url=file%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%2FE %3A%2Fsearch%2Fconference%2F32%2FAC%25202010Full1854.pdf &index=conference_papers&space=129746797203605791716676178&t ype=application%2Fpdf&charset=[17] S. Marshall, Sustainable Design and Construction of a Library for Disabled Children of Jamaica, International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-19, Fall 2009.[18] Project CREATE home page, Available: http://www.nysid.org and http://www.createnysid.net/[19] SUNY Maritime Mechanical Engineering Students Design
/integrative_learning/pdfs/ILP_Statement.pdf10 Peet, M., S. Lonn, P. Gurin, K.P. Boyer, M. Matney, M.Marra, S.H. Taylor and A. Daley, Fostering integrativeknowledge through eportfolios. International Journal ofePortfolio, 1(1), (2011). Retrieved fromhttp://www.theijep.com ISSN 2157-622X11 Foundations and Skills for Lifelong Learning Value Rubric,Association of American Colleges and Universities, (2010),Retrieved fromhttp://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/pdf/LifelongLearning.pdf12 Andresen, Lee, David Boud, and Ruth Cohen. "Experience-based learning." Understanding adult education and training ,vol. 2, pp. 225-239 (2000).13 McMullan, M., R. Endacott, M.A. Gray, M. Jasper, C.M.L.Miller, J. Scholes and C. Webb, “Portfolios and assessment ofcompetence: a
for Home, Business & Utility-Scale — SunPower. Retrieved August 29, 2013, http://us.sunpowercorp.com/solar-resources/how- solar-works/solar-technologies/ [5] Watson, A., Giudice, L., Lisell, L., Doris, L., and Watson, S. B., “Solar Ready: An Overview of Implementation Practices”. Contract Volume: 303 (2012-01-01) ISSN: 1530-6224
and for the future,” U.S Department of Commerce, Economics Computer Physics Communications, 127, pp. 6-10, 2000and Statistics Administration, ESA Issue Brief #03-11, July 2011 [7] F. Esquembre, “Computers in physics education,” Computer Physics[2] S. Hambrusch, C. Hoffmann, J.T. Korb, M. Haugan, A.L. Hosking, “A Communications, 147, pp. 13-18, 2002multidisciplinary approach toward computational thinking for science [8] P. G. Hewitt, Conceptual Physics: The High School Physics Program, pp.majors,” ACM SIGCSE Bulletin - SIGCSE '09, Vol. 41 Issue 1, pp. 183-187, 149-150, Pearson Education Inc., 2009March 2009[3] R. L. Spencer, “Teaching computational physics as a laboratorysequence,”Am
steps mapped to Walther et al.'s Q3 typology Description Making the data Handling the data Validation: How can we improve We present data collection method We document research insights the research findings’ capacity to for collective scrutiny by mapped to analytical step. (Memo appropriately capture and colleagues and research steps.) represent aspects of the social community. (Step 9) reality observed? Theoretical validation: Do the We have designed the interview We regularly return to the concepts and relationships of the protocol to facilitate inquiry into
, Annual Conference,2006.7. Fortenberry, N., Sullivan, J., Jordan, P., and Knight, D., “Engineering Education Research Aids Instruction,” Page 24.882.17Science, Vol. 317, 2007.8.French, J., Leiffer, P., “The Genesis of Transformation: A First Course in Engineering with a focus on Retentionand Developing Professionalism” Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering EducationConference& Exposition, Annual Conference, 2012.9. Bradley, W., and Bradley, S., “Increasing Retention by Incorporating Time Management and Study Skills into aFreshman Engineering Course,” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering
Accrediting Engineering Programs – Effective for Reviews during the 2013-2014 Accreditation Cycle, 27 October 2012, 22 March 2014, .6. Oakes, W., Coyle, E., and Jamieson, L., “EPICS: A Model of Service-Learning in an Engineering Curriculum”. Page 24.1369.12 Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2000.7. Oakes, W. and Thompson, M. “Integration of Service Learning into a Freshman Engineering Course”. Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2004.8. Duffy, J., Tsang, E. and Lord, S. “Service-Learning in Engineering: What, Why and How
representative of the broader engineering faculty population. Future research shouldalso survey faculty directly to find out the extent to which left-of-center grading is deliberatelyemployed since most of our knowledge of the practice is filtered through student perceptions.We also need research that can better understand the motivations of faculty who use the practice.Understanding these motivations can help researchers come up with viable alternatives to left-of-center grading.5. AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1262274. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of
and Development, PDesign, S˜ao Lu´ıs, pages 10–13, 2012.21 Susan Gasson. Human-centered vs. user-centered approaches. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 5(2):29–46, 2003.22 Dorothy Leonard and Jeffrey F Rayport. Spark innovation through empathic design. Harvard business review, 75:102–115, 1997.23 Joseph Lin and Carolyn Conner Seepersad. Empathic lead users: the effects of extraordinary user experiences on Page 24.51.18 customer needs analysis and product redesign. In ASME DETC Design Theory and Methodology Conference, 2007.24 Peter Landwehr. Empathic design vs
;Schueler‐Choukairi,T.2012,StudiesinSecondLanguageAcquisition,pp.35‐66.3.NationalCenterforEducationStatistics.Integratedpost‐secondaryeducationdatasystem,FallEnrollmentDatafile.s.l.:NCES,1999.4.Ninewaystoreducecognitiveloadinmultimedialearning.Mayer,R.E.,&Moreno,R.1,2003,EducationalPsychologist,Vol.38,pp.43‐52.5.Cognitiveconstraintsonmultimedialearning:WhenPresentingmorematerialresultsinlessunderstanding.Mayer,R.E.,Heiser,J.,&Lonn,S.1,2001,JournalofEducationalPsychology,Vol.93,pp.187‐198.6.Richtel,M.Multitaskinghurtsbrain’sabilitytofocus,scientistssay.Seattle:TheSeattleTimes,2010.Article.7.earningviadirectandmediatedinstructionbydeafstudents.Marschark,M.,Sapere,P.,Convertino,C.M.&Pelz,J.2008,JournalofDeafStudiesandDeafEducation,pp.446