) Institute”. A certified coach, Grant consults and empowers STEM individuals at all levels in the academy towards excellence in career and professional development. Her workshops on mentoring and academic career development for NSF ADVANCE programs at Purdue, Cornell, Texas A&M, University of Toledo, UVA, Prairie View A&M, and the ADVANCE Annual PI meetings pro- mote STEM faculty development while providing diverse role models for students. She has mentored and empowered hundreds of faculty, students and postdocs.Dr. M. Claire Horner-Devine, University of Washington and Counterspace Consulting Dr. Claire Horner-Devine is the co-founder and co-director of three, federally funded, national programs (BRAINS, WEBS
-socioeconomic students as an often understudied population. Justin has served as the ASEE Student Division Co-Program Chair and is a current Director of Special Projects for the Educational Research & Methods Division.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical
arenot interested in having the same kinds of social experiences in college as first time freshmen[21]. These students were more interested in activities related to the goal of achieving thebaccalaureate degree, such as undergraduate research, academic clubs, or pre-professionalorganizations. In their study of student experiences at geographically-isolated campuses, Nuñezand Yoshimi [22] found that two years after transfer, students emphasized academic involvementover social involvement, and identified institutional agents, and academic and career goals asimportant. Participation in academically-oriented activities contributed to their socialengagement in the institution. Deil-Amen [23] found that for current community collegestudents, in-class
degree in Computer Science at Mississippi State Univer- sity, and her PhD in Computer Science at the University of Memphis. She brings software development and project management experience to the classroom from her career in industry. Her research interests include interdisciplinary project and team-based learning to promote gender equality in digital literacy and human and social aspects of software engineering.Tori Holifield, Mississippi State University Tori Holifield is an English graduate student at Mississippi State University pursuing an emphasis in Linguistics. She is a teaching assistant for the English department and a tutor for Academic Athletics. c American Society for
feedback about specific elements of the LLC program. Wehave found that our first two cohorts of female engineering students, currently in their secondand third years, express significantly higher levels of career expectations, self-efficacy, feelingsof inclusion and coping towards engineering than when they first entered. !IntroductionEngineering remains an academic area where women obtain a small fraction of bachelor degrees,and this trend does not seem to be changing in the near future. A recent report by the NationalStudent Clearinghouse found that although more students are pursuing S&E degrees, women’sshare of these majors has failed to increase over the last ten years.1 Researchers’ assumptions thatas women claimed more of the
faculty to use student-centered learning strategies and whether this varied by gender (Ross et al., 2016).Outside of these four categories, we found purposes that may not have directly aligned with thembut asked important diversity questions. For example, understanding why women leave theengineering workforce (VanAntwerp & Wilson, 2015), how to improve the experiences oftransfer students from community colleges into 4-year institutions (Pieri et al., 2015), andstrategies for dual-career couples searching for employment in academia (Ciston et al., 2015). 4.4. Publication DemographicsThe overwhelming majority of publications in our sample studied demographics via two maingroups: gender-based groups and racial and ethnic minorities. Other
development and career preparation, he received many of the highest honors in the National 4-H and National FFA Organizations. During his year of service as the Na- tional FFA Southern Region Vice President, Stephen was trained as a professional facilitator and keynote speaker while representing the National FFA Organization on his visits to more than 30 states and Japan. He is passionate about student development and connecting students with the resources and training they need to achieve their career and professional goals.Joseph Vincent Rispoli, Purdue University Joseph V. Rispoli graduated from Punahou School in Honolulu, Hawaii, in 1998, earned the BS degree in Electrical Engineering, BS degree in Computer Engineering
relation to thetransition to higher education and/or adulthood and for a focus on students with disabilities.Most retained items discussed transition planning, setting and achieving post-secondary goals, orexperiences of students pre- and post-transition. Additionally, to gain a fuller understanding ofthe post-secondary transition as well as the skills and supports necessary to help students withdisabilities succeed in higher education, included items covered the following: 1. Broad exploration of students with disabilities setting and achieving post-secondary goals and ambitions, such as careers and higher education. 2. Examinations of adult skill development as students in higher education often must live independently and develop
PathwaysEngineering education is typically described using a “pipeline” metaphor, wherein students are shuffledalong pre-determined pathways toward a narrow set of career outcomes. However, several decades ofresearch have shown that this pipeline model does not accurately describe engineering trajectories andmay exclude students who enter the pipeline at different times and have other career outcomes in mind.Similarly, qualitative studies have shown that normative identities in engineering feature masculinestereotypes such as “geeks” and “nerds” that reproduce technical/social dichotomies. Several studies havesuggested that broadening the expected outcomes and identities in engineering to include “alternative”pathways and identities may contribute to a shift
, fluid dynamics and bio-transport, with a focus on bio-fluid dynamics (vascular blood flow) and on front propagation both in biological tissue (avascular-tumor dynamics) and in reacting gaseous mixtures (flame propagation). He has developed computational algorithms and software for simulation and analysis of flame propagation, including an iPhone/iPad application (the Level-Set app). Dr. Aldredge received a BS degree in Mechanical Engineering and French at Carnegie-Mellon University and his Master’s and PhD degrees in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Princeton University. He completed postdoctoral fellowships at UC San Diego and Caltech prior to arriving at UC Davis to begin his teaching career
-on practice and feedback showing greaterimprovements in training outcomes over hybrid, flipped and virtual course modalities.Furthermore, introduction of low, medium, and high level “challenges” along with in-persontutoring was found to be impactful in building a common foundation to span expertise levels andfor engaging students across entry and advanced levels. Training impacts peaked during yearfour with cumulative implementation of revised strategies. Innovative training revisions andinclusion of critical elements was strongly linked to program satisfaction and ratings of advancesin technical, professional and career skills as well as post-training carry over into trainees’ ownresearch and leadership in their labs and careers
. She completed her post-doctoral work at Columbia University between 2005-2008. She joined University of Missouri-Columbia, Chemical Engineering as an assistant professor in 2008 and has moved to Stevens in 2010. She is the recipient of the 2010 NSF-CAREER award and has received several grants from NSF-DMR, -CMMI and ACS PRF. She currently serves as the coordinator of the Nanotechnology Graduate Program and the PI of the REU/RET Site program (2021-2023) at Stevens. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A New Mentoring and Undergraduate Research Experience Model between REUs and RETs at the Stevens REU/RET Site Program on Sustainable Energy and BioengineeringAbstractThe Stevens REU/RET
changesappear during a period of over a year?Connected learning and supports for social capital in STEM Social capital is an important support for young people’s interest and persistence inSTEM fields so the lack of it is a key reason why youth from underrepresented groups do notpursue STEM interests and careers. Youth from underrepresented groups are much less likely tohave family, friends, and mentors involved in STEM fields and interests, and to encounter STEMrole models who share their cultural identity [5]–[7], despite the fact that they benefit morethan mainstream youth when they have positive mentoring relationships [8], [9]. RicardoStanton-Salazar’s research focuses on the unique barriers that immigrant youth face in gainingaccess to
Paper ID #39328Board 395: Testing the Performance of Outcome Measures for LGBTQ STEMStudents and Their PeersDr. Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University, Bozeman Bryce E. Hughes is an Associate Professor in Adult and Higher Education at Montana State University. His research interests encompass diversity and equity in engineering education, with a focus on LGBTQ students. He was recently awarded an NSF CAREER grant to study the experiences of LGBTQ under- graduates in STEM fields. He holds a Ph.D. in education from the University of California, Los Angeles, an M.A. in student development administration from Seattle
Paper ID #40096Board 164: Engineering Interventions in My Science Classroom: What’s MyRole?Dr. Cheryl Carrico, E4S, LLC Cheryl Carrico is owner of E4S, LLC. E4S, LLC conducts external evaluations, engineering education research, and industry consulting. Her current research focus relates to STEM career pathways and con- ceptual understanding of core engineering principles.Dr. Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Holly Matusovich is the Associate Dean for Graduate and Professional Studies in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech and a Professor in the Department of Engineering
build their capacity to participate in the science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and information and communicationstechnology (ICT) workforce of the future. The ITEST program is unique in that it is the only NSFprogram devoted to STEM workforce development at the primary and secondary school levels.With a focus on populations traditionally underrepresented in STEM fields, it aims to develop adiverse and innovative pipeline to STEM careers. Funded by revenue collected from the H-1B visaprogram, which permits U.S. businesses to use overseas workers to fill vacant positions U.S.occupations, ITEST aims to remedy the shortage of highly skilled workers while also addressingthe diversity issues and inequities present in STEM fields
learning opportunities for youth. There is a breadth of research on the impact ofthe programs on the participants, but very little on the impact of the experience on theundergraduate student instructors and the transferability of skills developed in their outreachwork to their future academic and career opportunities. The goal of this project is to address thisgap, through the development and assessment of a “Future Skills” framework for transferableskill development.This work in progress paper documents our efforts towards this goal, in the context of theemployment of undergraduate students associated with Actua, which is a large, national STEMoutreach organization. Actua partners with universities and other organizations to support andfacilitate
of globally engaged scientists/engineers that seek career opportunities andcollaborators throughout the world. Prior to the start of the program, accepted students will be required to attend ten 90-minute weekly training sessions over Zoom. These training sessions will focus on material that issuitable for virtual delivery. As such, these sessions will consist of lectures and activitiescentered around the culture of the host country (inside and outside the lab), genetics, genomics,and computer programing. In addition, this training program will include a journal club in whicheach student will present a paper from the lab they will be joining at SciLifeLab. Students willlead a discussion of the assigned article. This activity will
Americans underrepresented in science, technology, engineering,and mathematics (STEM) professions [3]. Research shows that students’ career interests inmiddle and high school are predictive of whether they pursue and attain STEM degrees [4] – [6],so efforts to increase the representation of women and non-Asian minorities have often focusedon providing students with early authentic opportunities in engineering. This pilot studyinvestigates a university-based summer camp for students entering grades 9-12 and addresses theresearch question: How, if at all, are biological sex and grade related to student dispositionstoward STEM following an engineering summer camp?Brief Literature ReviewStudents’ interest in engineering and other STEM fields often
researchers. By playing the greetings’ gamewith the first person they meet in the classroom, by improvising around their well-craftedintroduction, and by tailoring their pitches, they can make these interesting, succinct, andmemorable. These assessment-based activities can be incorporated in the first-year engineeringdesign, communication, writing, professional skills development, or career related curriculum.Thus, the concept of connecting and engaging our first-year engineering students throughelevator pitches could be an innovative yet fundamental pathway for us to build our futureengineers into better team players and global communicators.
University, Will participates in robotics, is the past president of his school’s ASEE chapter, and is a member of Tau Beta Pi, IEEE and ACM. His engineering interests lie mainly in the fields of electrical and computer engineering. Upon graduation, he hopes to begin teaching engineering to high school students and to serve as both a role model and advocate for pursuing STEM, and specifically engineering as a field of study and career. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Lessons Learned from a First-Year Engineering Wind Turbine Project Project Description Learning Objectives
engineering self-efficacy (ESE). Students were asked to indicate frequency oftypes of interactions with faculty (e.g., discuss plan of study; discuss future career plans)and extent to which they experienced negative attitudes from faculty. Engineering self-efficacy (e.g., succeed in engineering curriculum; excel in engineering major) was assessedusing items from a published instrument on engineering self-efficacy, and the scaledemonstrated internal consistency. Overall, students who reported more frequentinteractions with faculty (more than once), and lower perceived negative attitudes fromfaculty indicated higher levels of engineering self-efficacy. Further, we examined resultsfor sub-groups of specific underrepresented students (women; transfer
minority students is < 3% in the CEAS programs in a college with a 40% attritionrate. An aggressive retention strategy was created for underrepresented minority students.In order to increase the number of students who persist to complete a bachelors degree, theretention plan includes strategies for making sure that a diverse group of selected students have ahigh probability of being successful throughout their academic careers, are properly motivatedfor that entire span, maintain a sense of comradery and graduate from an engineering program oftheir choice. The Choose Ohio First Program is a collaborative program between CEAS, Artsand Science and Allied Health. The strategies are presented in the order that students will seethem applied.Program
will benefit his/her academic career, why the applicant should be considered for this program, and what is his/her 5 year plan including academic studies and professional career.Applications are reviewed using a review matrix by a committee in the College of Engineering.Students who accept the SPURS scholarship must graduate from their respective degree programwithin 3 years from receiving the scholarship. Students will remain in the program as long ashe/she is a full-time engineering student and maintains a cumulative GPA of 3.00 or higher.Students must participate in at least two SPURS Workshops each semester, meets with theirfaculty mentor at least two times a semester and COE academic advisor, and career counselor atleast once
information to femalesexploring an education at Embry-Riddle. At least 25% of scholarships, graduate studentassistantships and graduate research assistantships will also be designated for female engineeringstudents. Moreover, increasing the number of female engineering faculty will be supported withplans to create hiring process guidelines for chairs and committees with a goal of hiring sixadditional female tenure-track faculty by 2016. The institute would also provide a central spacefor research opportunities, career/internship/co-op positions and professional conferences andcompetitions across the engineering departments. WEI will establish connections and exchangeopportunities with other professional and academic organizations, like the Institute
Paper ID #13640Work-in-Progress: Moving from volunteering to mentoring K12 students:What does it take?Dr. Lawrence E. Whitman, Wichita State University Lawrence Whitman, PhD, is professor of Industrial Engineering at Wichita State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from Oklahoma State University. His Ph.D. is from The University of Texas at Arlington and is in Industrial Engineering. He has been the Kansas Affiliate Director for PLTW since 2007 and is active in promoting STEM careers and graduates in Kansas. He is Chair of the International Federation for Automated Control Technical Committee (TC) 5.3 on
successfully recruited a group of mathematics, science, and special educators,and engaged them in professional development they find valuable. The Teacher Efficacy andAttitudes toward STEM (T-STEM) survey revealed that professional development successfullyincreased participating teachers’ confidence to teach engineering design, their confidence thatthey can influence their students’ STEM performance, and their knowledge of STEM careers, aswell as the amount they expect to utilize technology and instructional approaches aligned withSTEM best educational practices.Diagnostic Teacher Assessments in Mathematics and Science (DTAMS) for middle schoolshowed that participating teachers initially did poorly outside of their content area focus. Closerinspection
learning experiences to support teachers’ ability to promote mathematical reasoning in middle and high school classrooms. Dr. Lesseig served as principal investigator on an NSF MSP grant designed to support middle grades teachers in implementing STEM Design Challenges. WIP: Infusing Empathy into Engineering Design: Supporting Under- Represented Student Interest and Sense of BelongingnessIntroduction to the Work-in-Progress StudyHow can we utilize our research knowledge to impact our methodology as educators and changethe perceptions of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and who belongsin STEM careers? Some states have adopted the New Generation Science Standards (NGSS) fork-12 public schools
Department of Education rules for federal financial aid • fill out an application that includes, but is not limited to, the following: name, contact information, classification, major, unofficial transcript (with GPA information), one faculty recommendation letter, and three essays written by the applicant addressing: how the SPURS scholarship will benefit his/her academic career, why the applicant should be considered for this program, and what is his/her 5 year plan including academic studies and professional career.Applications are reviewed using a review matrix by a committee in the College of Engineering.Students who accept the SPURS scholarship must graduate from their respective degree programwithin 3
Stanford, Dr. Lynch received his B.E. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the Cooper Union in New York City. His current research interests are in the areas of wireless cyber-physical systems, cyberinfrastructure tools for management of structural monitoring data, and nanoengineered thin film sensors for damage detection and structural health monitoring. Dr. Lynch has been awarded the 2005 ONR Young Investigator Award, 2009 NSF CAREER Award, 2009 Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), 2012 ASCE EMI Leonardo da Vinci Award and 2014 ASCE Huber Award.Katherine A. Flanigan, University of Michigan c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Using