engineering design process on it from technical design, mockups, testing, 2 refinement to improvement. Students develop mockup designs based on an engineering problem. Students design an experimental plan for the engineering design problem (e.g., building a floating assembly with a portable charger). Then they conducted experiments, collect and analyze data that is compared to the theoretical design. Thereafter they make conclusions and observations on the outcomes based on engineering and math concepts (e.g., Buoyancy and stability). They finally use conclusions to draw improvements to the components, system, and processes
Industry Engagement versus Faculty Mentorship in Engineering Senior Capstone Design CoursesAbstract:The senior design capstone course is an important experience for engineering undergraduatestudents. This course prepares students for industry by having students solve open-ended real-world problems. During the course, a student team defines a problem, plans an approach,develops a solution, and validates their solution, which culminates in oral and writtendissemination. Typically, undergraduate programs have provided students with facultymentors to develop a solution for a specific project. In order for projects and teams to besuccessful, the mentors must provide invaluable support, collaboration, and interest in
thereafter, approximately 4 of the student mentors were past participants (and then say what % of the mentors were returnees? ● Fall Social, (of 15 who RSVP’d to come, only 2 attended) ● Spring social planned, along with multi-Cohort Reunion eventWomen returning as mentors for LWE preLUsion 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 preLUsion participants Mentors 17 We have approximately a 1:3 to 1:4 peer mentor to participant ratio, with approximately 8 peer mentors each year, for cohort size on average of 22.Women returning as mentors for LWE preLUsion 2015 2016
the students tocollaborate on their research experiments, help them learn how to participate in scientificquestioning, and provide them with a framework for their research experience. It also fostersstudent-student relationships as they work together to plan their presentations and regularly learnabout the group members’ research experiences. In one expanded weekly meeting, the REUgroup takes a half-day field trip to tour a local industry or governmental partner to focus oncareer options.At the conclusion of the 10-week research experience, the students present their researchfindings in a competitive formal poster session to research faculty, staff, and students at the RiceUniversity Summer Research Colloquium. Participants complete
Institute, which is a two-day teachingworkshop that introduces community college engineering faculty to the CALSTEP curriculum,and assists faculty in implementing the curriculum and developing alternative teaching andlearning strategies to increase enrollment and improve teaching effectiveness. Results ofcurriculum development and the implementation of the Summer Engineering Teaching Institutewill be highlighted in this paper, as well as future plans to maximize the impact of the program inincreasing access to engineering education among thousands of community college engineeringstudents and strengthening engineering transfer programs in the state.1. IntroductionAddressing the retention problem in the first two years of college is one of the
motivation(expectancy, value, and lowered cost) and reported and planned use, with the highest gains forreal-world applications of 8% to 12%. Teaching with more EBIS student-centered classroom prac-tice was assessed with classroom observations with a tool called Reformed Teaching ObservationProtocol (RTOP) which has 25 items related to EBIS practice and is used by trained observers toassess classroom practice. There was a positive gain of 22% for all faculty from pre (early fall) topost (late spring) observations indicating a significant shift toward EBIS classroom practice. Forthe CoP sessions there was a short post-session quantitative and qualitative survey given for all sixsessions. All results were quite positive across the six meetings with
Paper ID #20321Use of Model-Based Definition to Support Learning of GD&T in a Manufac-turing Engineering CurriculumDr. Derek M. Yip-Hoi, Western Washington University Dr. Yip-Hoi received his Ph.D. from the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan in 1997. His dissertation research focused on developing Computer-Aided Process Planning methods and software tools to support automation of machining on Mill/Turn machining centers. Follow- ing his Ph.D., he worked for several years with the NSF Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Machining Systems at the University of Michigan. His work
Undergraduates (REU) programs shows that 91% of these research experiences are provided tojunior and senior students21. Developing successful research programs is particularly challengingin community colleges, most of which do not have on-going research programs. Establishingcollaborations between research universities and community colleges is key to engaging studentsin research early in college.This paper is a description of how a small engineering program in a Hispanic-Serving communitycollege has developed a research internship program that is specifically designed for communitycollege students. The paper will also highlight the results of the first year of implementation of theprogram and future plans for improvement.2. Overview of ASPIRES Program
managingtheir time. These students described struggling with scheduling time for work relating degreeprogress, balancing multiple responsibilities such as teaching or service, and planning theiractivities adequately for progress success. The fourth category was students that experiencedsocial isolation within their program and/or their institution. These students expressed in theirapplication struggling with specifically with being an ethnic and/or racial minority in adominantly white space.Year 3: As we plan for year three, we intend to continue having participants and advisors self-diagnose struggles as this approach has provided us with valuable information for tailoring theDI to incoming participants. Such information has allowed us to have a
ofthe economy, from scientific investigation and engineering to finance, health, and nationalsecurity, demands a high quality professional computing workforce that includes the meaningfulparticipation of diverse perspectives and experiences. These perspectives and experiencesinform how personnel approach and solve a wide variety of difficult problems. Computingoccupations and degree programs, however, struggle with generating gender diversity. In 2015,only 18 percent of computing bachelor’s degree recipients were women, despite womencomprising 57 percent of bachelor’s degree recipients across disciplines [1]. Embeddingevidence-based interventions in a strategic plan is an effective approach to increasingenrollments and ultimately attaining
. One course had the central focusto help engineering students develop professional skills based upon communication while theother course aimed to help underrepresented women in engineering to understand and plan forcareers in engineering. Both cases are uniquely positioned to help engineering educationresearchers to understand how professionally-focused and career-planning engineeringcourses could guide students’ perceptions about engineering. A sub-element of this work wasto understand if there were any time-dependent (e.g., freshmen versus junior) or gender-dependent differences in their perceptions. Finally, we aimed to understand if the instructors’perception of engineering varied or paralleled their students’ perceptions about the
earlierinquiry opportunities. Students were also told that the sound output by the instrument wouldneed to come from a program that they created in their teams within Scratch. During this firstday, students brainstormed, planned, and began to create these instruments within their groups.The second session was a continuation of the first as students completed and presented theirinstruments. Participants were given project expectations of the instrument as well as time andmaterial constraints: required to use Scratch, Makey-Makey, and had to have a sound output ofmusic, whatever way that was interpreted as shown in Image 1. The rest of the requirements andproject details were open-ended, spurring a wide variety of finished instruments. These
users. The Disabilities, Opportunities, Internetworking, and Technology (DO-IT) center at the University of Washington [6] provides an extensive repository of resources related to accessibility and universal design, in particular guidelines for both engineering labs [7] and makerspaces [8]. The Accessible Biomedical Immersion Laboratory (ABIL) at Purdue University [9] and the Seattle Lighthouse for the Blind [10] also provide excellent recommendations and models. Recommendations are broken down into guidelines for physical environments, tools and hardware, and instructional and support resources. Open floor plans with clearly marked and accessible routes of travel are a priority in accessible work spaces, with reconfigurable and height
gender identity, race, national origin, ethnicity, religion, age, sexual orientation, disability, political affiliation, or family, marital, or economic status. a. Engineers shall conduct themselves in a manner in which all persons are treated with dignity, respect, and fairness. b. Engineers shall not engage in discrimination or harassment in connection with their professional activities. c. Engineers shall consider the diversity of the community, and shall endeavor in good faith to include diverse perspectives, in the planning and performance of their professional services [1].Prior to Canon 8's adoption
students enrolled in the After School STEM Practicum Course duringthe Spring 2018 semester participated in this study. All participants were enrolled asundergraduates in a large public university in the Western region of the United States, but variedin their academic year (2 sophomores, 4 juniors, and 11 seniors). Participants were primarilyfemale (16 female, 1 male) and liberal studies majors (16 liberal studies majors; 1 engineeringmajor). A majority of the students (11) stated on the first day of the semester that they hadalready planned to apply to a multiple subject (elementary) teaching credential program aftergraduation and the rest reported that they were considering teaching as a career.The course was taught during this semester by one of
value beliefs better predict plans to continue into an engineering career. Afterthe first year of engineering school, both expectancy and value beliefs decreased. The decreasein expectancy belief was expected since during the first year of college, students are transitioningfrom high school to harder college-level courses. The decrease in value belief was not easy toexplain. The paper notes (bold added): “What is more difficult to explain, however, is the finding that at the end of the year, students reported enjoying engineering less and viewed it as less important and useful than they did at the beginning of the year. One explanation may be that freshmen are idealistic at the beginning of their college careers and that
of deep engagement.The Instructor breaks the silence, “What are your impressions of Jon’s story?” Classmates in graduate engineering, design, business, law, and humanities make itclear to Jon that he is a natural “conversational storyteller.” One classmate explained,“Everyone can’t do what you just did. You make it understandable and comfortable. Andit’s a meaningful, memorable story – it’s clear to us that you didn’t do the start-up just tosay you did it. ” They all left the classroom that day, planning to do the homework Joninspired: create pages of short stories from every part of your life. Be so comfortablewith the stories that they become second nature, a natural way to respond, and reliablepreparation for a conversation with a
historically underrepresented within higher education and engineering. Cathryne earned a BA in Speech Communication, Masters in Public Affairs (MPA), and is currently pursuing an Ed.D. in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies.Dr. Matthew Dunbabin, Queensland University of Technology Dr Matthew Dunbabin joined QUT as a Principal Research Fellow (Autonomous Systems) in 2013. He is known internationally for his research into field robotics, particularly environmental robots, and their ap- plication to large-scale monitoring. He has wide research interests including adaptive sampling and path planning, vision-based navigation, cooperative robotics, as well as robot and sensor network interactions. Dr Dunbabin received his
transformative, cyclical mixed-method research model to provide a basis forsocial change. The transformative research generates new knowledge of engineering culturethrough surveys of engineering deans, faculty and students as well as ethnographic participantobservations during Safe Zone training sessions with engineering faculty. The cyclical aspect ofthe project plan integrates this new knowledge into another level of Safe Zone training sessionsthat address engineering culture more specifically.1. IntroductionIn its 2012 “Engage to Excel” Report to President Obama, the U.S. President’s Council of Advi-sors on Science and Technology (PCAST) called for producing one million more STEM profes-sionals over the next decade than would be produced at the
advisory board for ChSCC’s general engineeringprogram. By meeting at the start of every semester, each institution can be updated on thechanges at the other, ensuring that any planned or proposed curriculum changes are mirrored atthe neighboring school. Issues students encounter while negotiating the transfer process arediscussed. An articulation agreement exists between UTC and ChSCC negating the need forstudents to petition individual courses. Further cementing the relationship, UTC graduates havebecome adjunct professors at ChSCC and ChSCC instructors have become UTC graduatestudents. UTC has begun further outreach with nearby community colleges to build similarrelationships.Lessons learned from interactions between the institutions include the
the virtual product, and numerically testvirtual components and virtual assemblies. It follows that capstone courses inengineering management also should have a set of key features and every capstoneproject should satisfy these key features.2.6 Course or Curriculum DevelopmentAt the planning level of a program, the university in collaboration with theconstituencies, establishes the addition to the student’s skill set, as a result offollowing the program. These are called student outcomes. Course Outcomes on theother hand are expressions describing the desired abilities, in comprehension,application and integration, the student achieve during a course that is part of theprogram. These are defined and derived to achieve the student outcomes of
in solving design challenges, and believe that they can go on to be good scientists and/or engineers. Parents have also developed positive attitudes towards STEM programs as well as positive perceptions of STEM jobs and careers, and their STEMrelated childrearing practices improved (including athome exploration and experimentation, the quality of questions asked at home, and building together). Evaluations also indicate that Engineering students benefit by learning how to create lesson plans as well as engineering design challenges, sharpen their own understanding of engineering concepts in the process of breaking them down to explain to a nonprofessional or
administered during summer camps.Evaluation MethodologyEvaluation Questions Data Sources Data Evaluation Methods1 What NASA themes were selected Teachers' and students' self-reports Description of percentages offor LRGV SoI activities during the of NASA theme of the summer participating teachers and studentsproject? camps 2011 and 2012 by theme2a Did teacher training activities Participants' responses to workshop Comparison of diversity against thereach the planned diversity of questionnaire demographic items plan and against published data oncertified teachers
needs of underrepresented students. The project design is grounded ineducational theories including retention/integration, cumulative advantage, engagement, andconstructivism. It incorporates established best practices for working with URM students such asSTEM identity formation through experiential programs including student research andinternships, a focus on critical junctures, training of faculty and staff to enhance culturalcompetency, and building of academic integration and STEM self-efficacy. An extensiveevaluation plan designed around the project logic model will be used as the basis for projectassessment. This paper includes a description of the project, partner institutions, and first yearresearch and evaluation results.Introduction
engineers. Our contact at the smaller organization distributed the survey toall engineers working across provincial locations, while our contact at the larger organizationdistributed it to a sample of (primarily junior) engineers working at the central office. Accordingto our records, 288 employees opened the survey and 175 completed at least the first foursections.Please see table 1 for sample survey questions. Part one of the survey solicited backgroundinformation about the age, sex, discipline, department and leadership roles held by individualparticipants. Parts two to four asked participants to respond to Likert style questions about theirtechnical, collaborative and strategic planning tendencies across time (student, junior engineer,senior
graduate school7. Undergraduates who participate insummer or semester-long research experiences report positive effects such as: “thinking andworking like a scientist”, clarification/confirmation of career plans (including graduate school),and enhanced career/graduate preparation5.Despite these benefits, however, becoming involved with research early in their undergraduateprogram can be difficult for students8. One study suggests that compared to upperclassmen, a muchlower percentage of first-year students consider themselves to be engineers, and the discrepancybetween males and females who consider themselves engineers is the largest among first-years9.In addition, faculty members are reluctant to include new undergraduates in their
devices.Mentoring: The participants interacted with college student mentors, local technologyentrepreneurs and corporate leaders, minority inventors, and other speakers, to encourage self-efficacy. The National Cares Mentoring Network provided training to program staff on thementoring needs of African-American boys.Middle School Teachers: Each of the universities integrated middle school teachers into programactivities. Teacher involvement ranged from being embedded with students who were learningthe new skills, to having teachers develop lesson plans to use for instruction in their schools.Morgan State University hosted a week-long 3D modeling workshop where teachers developedfour transdisciplinary lesson plans based on 3D modeling that could be
and student-driven curricula. The paper provides an overview and describesthe development of the first and fourth component of the curriculum, i.e. the role of technologyand the content for the course planned until the publication of this paper, and it serves primarilyto document the design and initial development phases of the ongoing project.IntroductionOne of the most pressing topics in educational development has been the need for educationalaccess and equity for diverse students and the potential role of technology to achieve thisinclusion. To achieve this objective, the educational context needs consideration, in particularwith respect to available resources and existing social, political, and cultural structures. Todesign an enriching
from 2010 to 2013; 95% advanced one grade level in mathematics,science, or engineering, while 79% of the participants completed the college level mathematicscourses and 85% completed the college level science courses11,12,14.The ANSEP Summer Bridge component is a ten-week summer experience for recently graduatedhigh school students who are planning to pursue STEM degrees14. Summer Bridge studentscomplete a college level mathematics course and a paid internship within an external engineeringor science organization14. Summer Bridge components vary in size from 20 to 30 participants.Between 1998 and 2013, there have been 250 participants of which 95% have continued on toengineering or science 4-year degree programs after participation in the
individuals different from the faculty memberswho actually taught those courses to be evaluated. The intent is to give unbiased evaluations ofthe evidence collected. Furthermore, a set of rubrics is used for each PI so that the raters employconsistent criteria when an article from the same student is being evaluated. Action itemsgenerated from different raters are then summarized as a report and feedback to the programdirector or chair to take corrective actions for improvement. The program director or chair maythen choose to disseminate or generate sub-action items for faculty to act on or to change thecurriculum as a result. This multi-rater methodology is adopted by BlackBoard® [16].Augmented with the above is the assessment plan. The assessment