Conference Session

Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rongrong Yu, Virginia Tech; Denise Rutledge Simmons PE, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.4. Atman, C. J., Sheppard, S. D., Turns, J., Adams, R. S., Fleming, L. N., Stevens, R., . . . Lund, D. (2010). Enabling engineering student success: The final report for the center for the advancement of engineering education. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.5. Whitt, E. J. (2006). Are all of your educators educating? About Campus, 10(6), 2-9.6. Lichtenstein, G., McCormick, A. C., Sheppard, S. D., & Puma, J. (2010). Comparing the undergraduate

Conference Session

Broadening Participation in Engineering

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marie Anne L Mundy, Texas A&M Kingsville; Sel Ozcelik, Texas A&M University Kingsville; Mohamed Abdelrahman, Texas A&M University-Kingsville; David Ramirez, Texas A&M University-Kingsville

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

capstone design project, but will help build their identity as engineers and better preparethem for professional practice 41, 42. Research points to several contributing factors which play arole in improving student learning during engineering design experiences, including the impactof active, project-based, and hands-on learning methodologies, and the development of a sense ofcommunity and a peer support network23, 43-45. Cooperative learning approaches that are hands-on and interactive are particularly appealing to underrepresented students 46-49. First-yearengineering design was highlighted as one of six key areas in engineering education innovationat the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference 50. Pioneered in the 1990’s and implemented in severalNSF

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Fundamental: K-12 Student Beliefs, Motivation, and Self Efficacy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

J. Jill Rogers, University of Arizona; Rebecca Primeau, University of Arizona; Noel Kathleen Hennessey, University of Arizona; James C. Baygents, University of Arizona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

. Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1986.Besterfield-Sacre, M., Atman, C.J., and Shuman, L.J. (1997). Characteristics of freshman engineering students: Models for determining student attrition in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 139–149.Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A

Conference Session

Potpourri: Various Issues and Topics in Graduate Studies

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ekembu Kevin Tanyi, Norfolk State University; IRVING K CASHWELL Jr, Norfolk State University; Tasha Zephirin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

Conference Session

Trends in Accreditation and Assessment

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donna M. Riley, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

allow as little as half a year. WhenEC 2000 abandoned credit-hour bean counting, the language shifted to require “adequateattention and time” for general education subjects (while retaining numerical requirements of ayear for fundamental science and math courses and a year and a half of engineering content).Nevertheless, regardless of whether one casts EC 2000’s advancements for liberal education ofengineers as meager, incremental, or transformative, there is no doubt that the current proposedchanges, by omitting the requirement of “adequate attention and time” for educational breadth,drops the floor on well-rounded education of engineers. This change threatens to send thecountry back not just 20 years to the 1990s before EC 2000, but more than

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Student Empathy & Human-centered Design

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Colin Dixon, Concord Consortium; Corey T. Schimpf, The Concord Consoritum; Sherry Hsi, Concord Consortium

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Theresa Green, Utah State University - Engineering Education; Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University; Amy Wilson-Lopez, Utah State University, Teacher Education and Leadership

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

completely different adhesive with a differentspecification (Table 5).Socially Situated ActivitiesAs shown in Table 6 in the Appendix, we identified six socially situated activities. Similar to theevaluative frameworks, we found that all of the socially situated activities we identified wereused by engineers from both disciplines. For example, these activities include troubleshootingroot cause(s) of failure and multimodal communication as shown in Figure 2.In discerning relationships between the three layers of literacy practices (i.e., genres,frameworks, and socially situated activities) shown in Figure 2, we noticed two things. First, thegenres that an engineer chose to engage with were mediated by the interpretive or evaluativeframework they were

Conference Session

Expanding Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Engineering Cultures from a Theoretical Perspective

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brianna Benedict McIntyre, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Dina Verdín, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Rachel Ann Baker; Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Thaddeus Milton

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. The authors wish to thank the STRIDE team and the interview participantsfor their participation in the study.References[1] The United States Department of Education, “Stem 2026 A Vision for Innovation in Stem Education,” U.S. Dep. Educ. Work., p. 55, 2016.[2] D. P. Giddens, R. E. Borchelt, V. R. Carter, W. S. Hammack, L. H. Jamieson, J. H. Johnson, V. Kramer, P. J. Natale, D. a. Scheufele, and J. F. Sullivan, Changing the conversation: messages for improving public understanding of engineering. 2008.[3] N. S. Foundation, “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Endeavors: Engineering and Liberal Arts

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ryan C. Campbell, Texas Tech University; Danny D. Reible, Texas Tech University; Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University; Jeong-Hee Kim, Texas Tech University; Chongzheng Na, Texas Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

(Seppet al. 2015; Kim, Campbell, et al., 2019) due in part to the efforts of the Consortium to PromoteReflection in Engineering Education (CPREE, see www.cpree.uw.edu). In the context ofreflecting on experiences broadly, reflection has been defined as “an intentional and dialecticalthinking process where an individual revisits features of an experience with which he/she isaware and uses one or more lenses in order to assign meaning(s) to the experience that can guidefuture action (and thus future experience)” (Turns et al. 2014). This definition is consistent withour conception of skills and habits needed by reflective engineers, though we think it importantto emphasize extending the temporal view to include not only the past, but also the

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division Technical Session 9: Pedagogical Tools

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Martin Imre, University of Notre Dame; Wenqing Chang, Xi'an Jiaotong University; Shuzhan Wang, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications; Christine P. Trinter, University of Notre Dame; Chaoli Wang, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

, and Kyle Weingartner.References [1] The 2015 Gordon Research Conference on Visualization in Science and Education. https://www.grc.org/ visualization-in-science-and-education-conference/2015/. Accessed: 2019-10-16. [2] J. Barnes and P. Hut. A hierarchical O(n log n) force-calculation algorithm. Nature, 324(6096):446, 1986. [3] M. Bastian, S. Heymann, and M. Jacomy. Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Proceedings of International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2009. [4] F. Beck, M. Burch, S. Diehl, and D. Weiskopf. A taxonomy and survey of dynamic graph visualization. Computer Graphics Forum, 36(1):133–159, 2017. [5] J. Berry. Improving discrete mathematics and algorithms

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Learning Tools (Virtual)

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Clara Novoa, Texas State University; Bobbi J. Spencer, Texas State University; Leona Hazlewood, Texas State University; Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Texas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

success in their chosen majors. Thisdecision was also a result of the authors’ interest on SVS literature and the successful experienceof offering a pilot face-to-face (FTF) training on campus to improve SVS for 6 talented, low-income students in an NSF S-STEM scholarship program in Spring ’14. Previous studies in theSVS subject [1], [2], [3] report that well-developed SVS lead to students’ success in Engineeringand Technology, Computer Science, Chemistry, Computer Aided Design and Mathematics.Bairaktarova et al. [4] mention that aptitude in spatial skills is gradually becoming a standardassessment of an individual’s likelihood to succeed as an engineer.Support from industry provided the funds needed to acquire training materials created by Sorby

Conference Session

Biological and Agricultural Engineering Education Technical Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chehra Aboukinane; Daniel N. Moriasi, USDA-ARS; Ann L. Kenimer, Texas A&M University; Kim Dooley, Texas A&M University; James DUPE Linder, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Biological & Agricultural

Conference Session

K-12 Professional Development II

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

So Yoon Yoon, INSPIRE, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Yi Kong, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

DeLean A Tolbert, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

engineering students engaged in an MEA, we were not convinced thatthese activities could elicit the broad range of design thinking activities we were interested inobserving. These activities are heavily dependent on the student(s) developing a mathematicalalgorithm or a mathematical approach to solve the given problem. In order to understand how atask could elicit design thinking, we began to review literature on design thinking and collectedstudio problems from the industrial design program at the college. Studio problems are used tointroduce concepts, vocabulary, and skills applicable to continued study in a variety of visualdisciplines. There are typically used in the introductory design course where students areintroduced to two-dimensional

Conference Session

K-5 Teacher Transformation

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

K. Anna Douglas, Purdue University; Daphne Duncan Wiles, Purdue University, West Lafayette; So Yoon Yoon, INSPIRE, School of Engineering Education, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

could be viewed as an inefficient use of time. Engineeringstandards were not part of the new district standards, yet our experience was that some teachers,particularly cohorts from the same schools, continued to be enthusiastic about teachingengineering and considered it important. The purpose of this study is to explore one suchelementary school’s experience in implementing engineering and the resulting student outcomes.A case study research method is used to illuminate a specific decision or set of decisions throughanswering why the decision(s) were taken, how they were implemented, and with what resulted.4 Page 23.474.2While the final

Conference Session

Two-Year College Division Transfer Topics Part I

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Erin Shealy, Clemson University; Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Catherine Mobley, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Clemson University; Richard A. Layton, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

rates.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.0969474. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Page 23.39.13References1 Hossler, D., Shapiro, D., Dundar, A., Ziskin, M., Chen, J., Zerquerra, D., & Torres, V. (2012). Transfer mobility:A national view of pre-degree student movement in postsecondary institutions. Herndon, VA: National StudentClearinghouse Research Center. Retrieved fromhttp://www.studentclearinghouse.info/signature/2

Conference Session

Experiences in Engineering Community Engagement

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Farzana Ansari, University of California, Berkeley; Jennifer Wang, University of California, Berkeley; Ryan Shelby, University of California, Berkeley; Eli Patten, University of California, Berkeley; Lisa A Pruitt, University of California, Berkeley

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

onlydemonstrate engineering skills, but also enabled museum visitors to engage with the engineeringdesign process and “real engineers.” In essence, students worked with their client, the localscience museum, to provide an optimal design for their stakeholders, the museum visitors, whichfurther transferred knowledge of the engineering design process from the student to the public inan interactive exhibit.Lecture topics covered in the leadership module provided a framework for developing the corecompetencies of successful leaders14. One central theme was the three “C”s of leadership:competence, compassion and chronos (time management). The module offered methods fordeveloping personal and team leadership styles; addressed differences in learning and

Conference Session

Build Diversity in Engineering Graduate Programs

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tiffany Simon, Columbia University

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Conference Session

Undergraduate Retention Activities

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Moshe Hartman; Harriet Hartman

gratifying to find that the traditional gender gap inretention is not apparent among Rowan students. Rather, the patterns of gender differences inretention are more like what Huang & Peng11 found for all science and engineering (S&E)students, that is, females having better retention rates and earlier degree completion than males.As explanation for why female students seemed to do better in terms of program switching anddegree completion among S&E students, they suggested that “a very stringent selectionmechanism might be at work in S&E program entry. The selection mechanism—either bywomen themselves or by institutional forces or by a joint effect of both—probably filters out allbut a small group of highly resilient women for S&E

Conference Session

Writing and Communication II

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

John Anderson; Jeanine Casler; Bugrahan Yalvac; H. David Smith; Gulnur Birol; John Troy; Penny Hirsch

. Ultimately, the survey was administeredin five classes, resulting in a sample size of 137 students representing all departments. Thisconstituted approximately 10 per cent of the undergraduate student engineering population. Thenumber of participants and their departmental affiliations are represented in Table 1.For the interviews, we selected eight faculty,1 using a maximum variation sampling strategy.2Maximum variation sampling involves purposively picking a wide range of variation on thedimension(s) of interest. It helps to identify important common patterns that cut acrossvariations. Since our research interest was to identify commonly shared standards in writtenengineering, we used departments as the basic criterion to identify variation. Of the

Conference Session

Assessment Issues I

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Tyler Cummings-Bond; Robin Adams

Session 3230 Career trajectories in engineering education – Where are they now? Robin S. Adams, Tyler Cummings-Bond University of Washington Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE)As part of the newly funded Center for the Advancement of Engineering (CAEE) we aredeveloping year long Engineering Education Institutes to build greater capacity in thescholarship of engineering teaching and learning. Although the National Science Foundation(NSF) and the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) have targeted building capacity as a topgoal, the engineering

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

William MacKunis; Daniel Raviv

location(s) of interest. Once the scout has delivered the message, itcontinues to graze the region looking for more locations of interest. Since all of the agents beginfrom the same starting point, the nest, they are each able to share meaningful goal locationinformation with the others. More importantly, the goal location information is improved eachtime the next robot in succession discovers the goal location. This is due to the fact that everyrobot sends a message to the rest of the group when it discovers the goal location, thus anyimprovements to the original goal location data are passed on. Theredundancy of this process results in the data being improved with each iteration

Conference Session

Teaching Design with a Twist

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Barbara Masi

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Stephen Renshaw; Joseph Ekstrom

andprovided for this service to be provided separate from a server, the PC running thesoftware was called a bridge. Today, we all call a layer 3 forwarding device a router.But this term was not standard across the industry until the 90’s. Tanenbaum’s 1981 11and Stallings 198512 texts on computer networking call these devices Gateways followingthe ArpaNet terminology and don’t include the term “Router” at all (at least in the index),however they do discuss “routing” at length. Though we studied networks in school,each of the authors had been in industry for years when the term Router became the onetrue name for a layer 3 forwarding device. One of us remembers clearly being lecturedand what seemed to be intentionally humiliated by a certain technical

Conference Session

Active and Inquiry-Based Learning

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Muhsin Menekse, Arizona State University; Glenda Stump, Arizona State University; Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Michelene T.H. Chi, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

), 339.2. Heller, R. S., Beil, C., Dam, K., & Haerum, B. (2010). Student and Faculty Perceptions of Engagement in Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 253-261.3. Lin, C., & Tsai, C. (2009). The relationship between students' conceptions of learning engineering and their preferences for classroom and laboratory learning environments. Journal of Engineering Education, 98, 193- 204.4. Prince, M

Conference Session

Engineering Professional Development for K-12 Teachers

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Taylor Martin, University of Texas, Austin; Pat Ko, University of Texas, Austin; Stephanie Baker Peacock, University of Texas, Austin; Jennifer Rudolph, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

teaching continues todevelop.AcknowledgmentsSupport for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation through theUTeachEngineering: Training Secondary Teachers to Deliver Design-Based EngineeringInstruction award (DUE-0831811) and the CAREER: Advancing Adaptive Expertise inEngineering Education award (EEC-0748186). The opinions expressed in this paper are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Foundation.References Page 22.1612.161. Martin, T., Petrosino, A., Rivale, S., Diller, K. (2006). The development of adaptive expertise in biotransport. New Directions in Teaching and Learning 108

Conference Session

K-12 Teachers: PD, Implementation, and Beyond

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amber Leigh McFarland Kendall, Tufts University; Kristen Bethke Wendell Ph.D., University of Massachusetts, Boston

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

collection methods. We then present theresults in terms of science teaching self-efficacy, perceptions of program affordances, andperceptions of changes in teaching and learning. We discuss implications for therecruitment of future participants for engineering-based curriculum interventions, and weconsider the sustainability of such interventions after the completion of formal researchprograms. Finally, we suggest directions for future research on the changes over time inteacher characteristics and perceptions when they participate in K-12 engineeringprograms.Previous ResearchStudies since the 1950’s have attempted to capture exactly what teacher characteristicshave the most impact on student learning,6 but despite a multitude of research

Conference Session

Preparing for Practice

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Huff, Purdue University; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education and the recipient of the National Society of Professional Engineers’ Educational Excellence Award and the ASEE Chester Carlson Award. He is a fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education and the National Society of Professional Engineers.Dr. Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette Robin S. Adams is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research is concentrated in three interconnecting areas: cross-disciplinary thinking, acting, and be- ing; design cognition and learning; and theories of change in linking engineering education research and practice

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 19

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lucas J. Wiese, Purdue University ; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

et al.’s [47], and Hess et al.’s [10]extension, scaffolded, integrated/interactive, and reflective analysis (SIRA) framework. Thisstage expects students to consider the “basic facts” of the case—establishing a grounding ofknowledge about the sociotechnical space surrounding the dilemma. In this stage, students areprompted to specify (give a rudimentary definition for) an ethical principle that they identified inthe previous stage. This formulated a more formal procedure for ethical reasoning, based onBeever and Brightman’s [48] Reflexive Principlism approach. Moreover, this procedure ofoperationalizing an ethical principle as students gather sociotechnical knowledge about a casecan set the stage for rational discourse [49].4.4. Small group

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacquelynn Ann Horsey, University of Arkansas; Thomas Hudnall McGehee, University of Arkansas; Mostafa Elsaadany, University of Arkansas; Timothy J. Muldoon, University of Arkansas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

autocoding. Every question that was analyzed exhibited an increase in positivesentiment, directly relating to the advantages the course has to offer. It is important to analyzeour results not only in isolation but also within the current landscape of literature. The ClinicalImmersion program developed by S. Stirling and M. Kotche [7] at the University of Illinois atChicago saw similar results and value in clinical observations. Similar to this study, B.Przestrzelski and J. DesJardins [2] at Clemson University found their clinical immersionprogram to be beneficial for preparing students for their senior design course. This study alsofound the class of students at the time of participation impacted the level of influence theprogram had, with graduate