] analyzed the “low-choice culture” of engineering curricula, particularly incontrast to other fields of study. In the context of new research demonstrating the value of selfdetermination or autonomy for students in motivating learning, enhancing self-efficacy, andsupporting persistence, the relative inflexibility of engineering curricula stood out starkly. Withinindividual courses, studies have shown the “power of choice” to positively influence studentoutcomes, for example, when students may choose from among a menu of design projects[45, 46], and recommendations have been made for the design of self-determination supportiveengineering-student learning experiences [47, 48]. However, Forbes, et al.,’s statistical analysis ofthe curricula at 46
regarding the need to modify the engineering curriculum in order to betterprepare engineering graduates to face the new challenges that the current engineeringenvironment presented. In 1994, “industry and academe realized that their concerns were thesame, [therefore] they began to mobilize through ABET, the organization responsible for settingthe standards of engineering education” (ABET, 2004, p. 1). As a result, the AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology (ABET) acknowledged this call from industry andeducational leaders, and started working towards changing the standards of engineeringeducation in order to guarantee that engineering students not only have an education in thetechnical disciplines of engineering but also in human
Aid and ReliefDistribution (HARD) Game” as an experiential learning tool that explores the potential for increasedoperational efficiency while balancing decision tradeoffs impacting humanitarian supply chain per-formance, including beneficiary demand satisfaction, operational costs, and transportation resourcesutilization. The HARD game is intended for graduate and undergraduate students in courses dealingwith topics on supply chain management. It allows students to analyze aspects that significantly impacthumanitarian supply chain operations, such as: supply chain coordination and planning, supply chainrisks, demand volatility, and competing objectives. Statistical analysis of students’ survey responsesprovide evidence that the HARD game is
dedicated academic instructors understand the valueof exploring new methodologies in teaching, both to reach different students and to moreeffectively promote mastery of the subjects in others, there are rarely reasons to truly reevaluatewhy we do what we do. This is one of the primary challenges that drove me to volunteer to teachin the prisons system.I have agreed to teach Physics 101, a lab based, conceptual physics course in a local federalprison. This class is offered at our institution in a variety of formats for primarily non-sciencemajors fulfilling their general education requirements for graduation. Despite the range ofclassroom experience I’ve had for this course, 5-15 weeks, 15-350 students, numerous teachingand evaluation modalities
].Although percentages of freshman intending to major in engineering increased from 18.4% in2006 to 26.9% in 2014 for males and 3.5% to 7.9% for females, the increase in the percentage ofbachelor’s degrees in engineering awarded to women rose only 2.5% from 18.4% in 1997 to20.9% in 2019 [16], [17]. These percentages remained far below the graduation rates for males.Additionally, 15% of women never enter the engineering workforce resulting in a larger gendergap [3], [16]. The Literature This research integrates existing work on supporting diversity in the engineeringdiscipline. Specifically, we build on existing literature that examined the barriers and challengesfemale students have to entering
23.633.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Gender Differences in Motivation to Perform K12 OutreachAbstract To continue our leadership role in technological innovation, the United States is callingfor 10,000 more engineering students to graduate each year. While producing more engineers is acomplex systemic challenge, one of the major hurdles is the lack of students entering the pipelineto higher education in STEM fields. Outreach programs are one way to interest young people inengineering, but more engineers need to be motivated to perform outreach. Using the VIE(Valence, Instrumentality, Expectancy) motivation framework, we determine similarities anddifferences between women and men
University Professor, Educational Leadership and Counseling Psychology, and Director, Assessment and Evaluation Center, Washington State UniversityRobert Gerlick, Washington State University Graduate Research Assistant, Engineering Education, Washington State UniversitySusannah Howe, Smith College Director, Design Clinic, Smith College Page 14.237.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Assessing Design and Reflective Practice in Capstone Engineering Design CoursesAbstractEngineering practitioners in the twenty-first century face complex challenges with social,political
mentioned earlier, the design of our study assumes that the body of papers published in theproceedings of ASEE annual conferences is representative of practices and trends in engineeringcommunication pedagogy and research. Following the method used by Neeley and Alley (2020),we used the search function in the PEER repository to identify papers dealing with engineeringcommunication. Specifically, we conducted a title search for “communication or writing orspeaking or presentations.” Papers that served one or more of the four functions listed belowqualified as relevant to engineering communication as we have defined it here:(1) develop or assess the communication abilities of engineering students,(2) assess engineering students’ attitudes and
Paper ID #37935Work-in-Progress: Redesigning an Introductory MechanicsCourse to Include Meaningful Design ExperiencesDamon KirkpatrickMichael Lawrence Anderson (Associate Professor) Mike Anderson is an Associate Professor and Director of Capstone Programs, Department of Mechanical Engineering, US Air Force Academy. He has pursued research in engineering education for several years in the areas of curriculum design and assessment, capstone design experiences, innovative design methodologies, and enhancing student creativity. In addition, he pursues technical research in autonomous systems, design of terrestrial and
management from Stevens Institute of Technology. Prior to his graduate studies, he held a research analyst position at Salomon Smith Barney. He is a former Robert Crooks Stanley Doctoral Fellow in engineering management at Stevens Institute of Technology, with research interests in the area of management of complex systems. He isthe founder of SystemicNet, LLC, in New York and a Visiting Fellow at the University of Adelaide inAustralia.Prof. Vernon Ireland, University of Adelaide Director of Project Management Page 25.191.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Application of Case Studies to Engineering
that are embedded in how students train in the field and practice of nuclear engineering.We present here an analysis of embedded value systems in core textbooks typically used inundergraduate and graduate nuclear engineering studies in the US, specifically looking at what isconsidered essential to being a nuclear engineer. Key themes discussed are engineering asproblem solving, the relevance of multidisciplinarity, and the authoritative nature of knowledge.The analysis considers the context in which the textbooks were written and how the embeddedworldview found in the textbook shapes the current landscape of nuclear engineering education,research, and practice. We analyze what nuclear engineering students are implicitly taught abouttheir roles
to . . . experts, the use of VR in education can be aimed to provide more attractive, motivating, and much more interesting learning experiences to future students. [Experts] would like to see the novelty, the immersion, the stimulation of the senses, and the feeling of exploration encouraging the student to move from passive learning to active learning. Most of all, they would like to see VR technology supporting the cooperative learning environment we all strive for. (p. 11)While some virtual reality testing of spatial abilities has been accomplished, such researchgenerally has centered on rotational tasks and instruments. Preliminary research has shown thatnot only might VR remove some inherent biases
certaincircumstances encourage deeper learning.34 The paradox is important to engineering educationpolicymakers, practitioners, and researchers both in the West and China, as it seems to challengeconstructivist theories (e.g., active learning and cooperative learning) dominant in Westernengineering education and it thus invites Western engineering faculty to think about how to Page 24.497.14better teach Chinese students. It is also significant for Chinese policymakers and educators whohave attempted to “borrow” Western constructivist pedagogies as potential “best practices.” Insummary, there remains a large and unpredictable challenge whether switching to
, helping men develop a personal motivation forengaging in gender equity efforts, utilizing male roles models, providing opportunities for male-only dialogues, and engagement in solution-building. Barriers include apathy, fear of status loss,and lack of knowledge about gender inequities15. Additional theory and research indicate thatthere are key stages in the development of an ally identity and effective ally behaviors16-21.Overall, there appears to be accord among investigators such that (1) potential allies must firstunderstand unearned advantage and how it works in their own lives as well as how it impacts thelives of systemically disadvantaged persons; (2) successful ally development approacheseducate, inspire, and support members of the
their limitations and potentials are investigated. This paper provides avaluable resource for MRE students and faculty who would like to utilize open-source hardwareand software platforms in their education and research. 11 IntroductionThe field of Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering (MRE), nowadays, involves a synergisticintegration of precision mechanical engineering with electronics and intelligent computer controlin the design of manufacturing processes and smart products. In recent years, MRE hasexperienced tremendous, dynamic growth owing to advances in integrated circuits and electronics,embedded systems and computers, networks, and intelligent systems, as well as democratizationof
Paper ID #26059Development of Curriculum in Technology-related Supply Chain Manage-ment ProgramsMs. Panteha Alipour, Purdue University Panteha Alipour is a PhD student at Purdue University. Her background is in industrial engineering with a focus on supply network analysis. Her research interests are optimization, network analysis, data analysis and predictive modelling.Dr. Kathryne Newton, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Kathy Newton is an Associate Dean of Graduate Programs and Faculty Success for the Purdue Poly- technic Institute at Purdue University. She is a Professor of Supply Chain Management Technology in the
digital signal processing, neural networks, and teaching and learning in higher education. Some recent applications include compression, modeling, and prediction in economics and finance, as well as speech recognition, globalization, entrepreneurship and innovation, and computing and engineering education with emphasis teams, teamwork, collaborative and team-based learning, and cooperative education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Mobile Payments and the End Users' Sensitivity to Information DisclosureAbstract: The adoption of electronic and mobile payments has improved significantly in recentyears. A number of payment channels that