, suchas proposing alternatives to a product or different assessment plans based on their ownexpertise and experiences. For example: “When we were deciding on the choice of materials in making the intelligent eraser,whether it should be a wet wipe or a dry wipe, I proposed to use the materials in spongemops to prevent dust of chalks, because I used to use the sponge mop to clean theblackboard when I was in high school. Then, we had a try and decided on using thatmaterial to make our product.” ——Lily “I would search online for useful information first about force transducers in themarket. For example, I’d like to know what is this products made of, how big it is
Paper ID #21837Measuring Broader Impact of NSF-funded Project on Software EngineeringEducationDr. Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University Sushil Acharya, D.Eng. (Asian Institute of Technology) is the Assistant Provost for Research and Gradu- ate Studies. A Professor of Software Engineering, Dr. Acharya joined Robert Morris University in Spring 2005 after serving 15 years in the Software Industry. His teaching involvement and research interest are in the area of Software Engineering education, Software Verification & Validation, Software Security, Data Mining, Neural Networks, and Enterprise Resource Planning. He also
ethics module in Ethics Seminar course by assessing theimpact of the integrated e-learning module on: 1. knowledge of code(s) of ethics 2. using code(s) of ethics for ethical reasoning 3. conducting ethical reasoning 4. FE exam ethics section preparedness 5. ethical behavioral growthOnline Ethics ModuleThe University of New Haven developed a series of 18 online learning modules as part of their effort todevelop the entrepreneurial mindset of their engineering and computer science students [18]. Theuniversity’s plan is to integrate the modules into core engineering, and applied science courses and doesnot plan to use the modules outside off core classes. Content experts developed the modules with an onlineeducation
Tokamak at Columbia University, and created a full-scale model of NASA’s Mars Rover for Honeybee Robotics. He is especially interested in design elements and the mechanics of failure. Prof. Rodas is currently planning a workshop course in universal design for disability. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Teaching Hands-On Racecar Design in a Summer Pre-College ProgramAbstractCompetitive motorsports at the undergraduate level has become an increasingly popular extra-and co-curricular activity at universities throughout the world. The importance of theseexperiential, industry-centered projects has long been understood by serving as a true provingground for students while giving
, taking courses that are taught by both CQUPT and NAU faculties. In their fourth year,qualified students transfer to NAU campus in Flagstaff, Arizona. Successful students receive twoBachelor’s degrees: one from NAU in EE or CE and the other from CQUPT in ElectronicInformation Engineering. As of Spring 2018, 27 students from the first cohort who went to NAUin their senior year have successfully graduated, and another 29 students from the second cohortare studying in NAU right now. In this paper, the current state of this joint program is presented,including course setup & planning, student transfer data, student performance during the senioryear at NAU, differences in teaching methodologies, and student learning styles. The successesas well as
more comfortable participating in computing activities beyond the classroom. Thetechnical practice was immediately useful for some students as described below: It has shown me how to use python and wireshark and even do some web dev. I plan to make my own website using some of this knowledge. I also appreciate learning so much material that I never even knew, now CS is not as intimidating Learned python and got experience using libraries that are crazy, and it helped refamiliarize me with git & git bash. I actually contributed to a GitHub repository because I felt somewhat confident. Been a few weeks now and there aren’t any comments bashing it! :D I have joined more CS activities like the Web
agreed that it increased their interest in the field ofneuroscience. Furthermore, 87.5% of the students reported that the program increased theirinterest in pursuing scientific research as a career, and 91.67% of the students reported that itincreased their interest in obtaining a graduate degree.With advancements in hardware and open source software, the authors were able to develop anovel low-cost approach for introducing neuroscience, BME, and BCIs to high school students.Future work will expand the program to other BCI applications and developing online lecturemodules that complement the laboratory portion of the program. In addition, the authors plan tointroduce the program to other summer programs to assess its scalability and efficacy
professionalpractice module.Ethics at the InstitutionEnhancing skills related to ethical decision making has been recognized as one of the mostpressing needs in society today and Ethics in Action is the focus of The Citadel’s QualityEnhancement Plan (QEP). A QEP is a course of action for institutional improvement thataddresses issues contributing to progress in student learning [6]. The learning outcomes based onEthical Reasoning are aligned with The Citadel’s strategic plan and mission to educate anddevelop our students to become principled leaders in all walks of life by instilling the core valuesof The Citadel in a disciplined and intellectually challenging environment. The process ofselecting and developing the Ethics in Action program involved a
Central New Mexico Community College where she manages the college-wide accreditation and strategic plan. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020From Q&A to Norm & Adapt: The Roles of Peers in Changing Faculty Beliefs and PracticeAbstractThis research paper reports on the impact of professional development across four years of amajor change initiative. Research suggests students from groups underrepresented in engineeringare particularly vulnerable to poor teaching, drawing inaccurate conclusions about their fit andpotential. However, supporting faculty to make their teaching more inclusive and learner-centered can be challenging. Faculty may not have experienced such
coursework that they may not recall well (e.g., drafting and surveying) in addition torelying on sources of information with which they are not familiar (e.g., building codes,manufacturer’s data sheets, master plans). In short, in our capstone course there are manydeliverables that the students struggle to manage, especially since they may have otherchallenging coursework, and many are holding part-time jobs (e.g., with their co-op employers).Probably the most challenging part of the project is that it is done collaboratively in a team.While we do incorporate teamwork in previous coursework (e.g., lab reports), none of theprevious experiences are as intensive as in the capstone course. Some students struggle with timemanagement and procrastination
stratification of China’s higher educationsystem is the differentiation between elite and non-elite universities. Elite universities aregenerally sponsored and administered by the Ministry of Education (MoE) or the centralgovernment, while non-elite universities are under the provincial or municipal level ofadministration. The premier status of Chinese elite universities can be best illustrated bythe Double First-Class University (DFCU) Plan[9]. ‘Double’ refers to both university anddiscipline. ‘First-Class’ refers to the objective of reaching the WCU standard. In 2022,there are 301,3 universities in China with only 147 of them (around 4.5%) being includedin the DFCU Plan[10].Thus, the elite universities in this study referred to those in theDFCU plan
Appendix section at the end ofthis article. In the first part, prompts focused on interns’ professional goals and interests, highschool academic environment, formulation of career pathways, influences and sources ofinformation, and other factors that influence career direction and professional identitydevelopment. In the second part, prompts focused on the students’ experiences while completingtheir projects, including influences of presentations and site visits, research design choices,obstacles, improvisation, or planning engaged to overcome obstacles or take advantage ofemerging opportunities, communication practices, interactions among interns and instructors,and other factors that relate to the ways engineering practice was enacted throughout
’ persistence through college and career are real.Students’ expectations of success were found to predict achievement and students’ beliefs in theimportance of engineering were found to predict career plans [19].To address these concerns, researchers have identified the impact of storytelling on students’empathy and self-identity [3], as well as their understanding of social disparities [20]. At GeorgiaTech, a dedicated course on storytelling in the biomedical engineering curriculum benefittedstudents by facilitating intentional development of identity and self-concept. As a result of thecourse, the instructors also found that students wanted to share their newfound ideas morebroadly [3]. In addition, the researchers compared self-reported measures for
practices wasto ensure a physically accessible and usable classroom for all students and to pre-plan for anyaccommodations for students whose needs are not fully met by a course’s instructional design.The second categorization groups the practices using the Aspire Alliance’s inclusive professionalframework core domains: identity, intercultural, and relational [12]. We chose these domains tofurther categorize the strategies because they contextualized the practices for specific situationsor focuses. For example, the practices in the intercultural domain focused on supporting studentconnections to content, encouraging students to be their authentic selves, and creatingopportunities for peers to connect [12]. We also developed a supporting
guided byhigh school teachers in the Charlottesville Virginia area, university faculty members andcommunity mentors – a holistic approach involving STEM in the context of students’ respectivecommunities. The team-based Ethics case study project included visits and campus tours at bothuniversities with opportunities to eat in their dining halls as well as delivering presentations ontheir work. The paper discusses the methodology employed in the Engineering Ethics case studyproject, as well as planned future work to expand the project and improve it for the next iteration.IntroductionSummary of STEM Status for African AmericansIn 2021, 24% of all US jobs were in the STEM workforce1. STEM is vital to the US economy andnational security1,2
constantly engaged in the planning, execution, and closing phasesby helping design the project and labs with topics similar to those they would give to aCoopthe different engineering disciplines the connection between the academy andprofessional life. Hence, they can feel more motivated to pursue an engineering degree. Inother words, our participants have a small disclosure of what an engineer does in the realworld. Throughout the development of the program, our sponsor is constantly engaged inthe planning, execution, and closing phases by helping design the project and labs withtopics similar to those they would give to a Coop student. 3
in our study, including the data collection and analyses, are articulatedin Section 5. The results of our study and a discussion of our findings are described in Sections 6and 7. In Section 8, we address the limitations of our study. Finally, we present the key takeawaysfrom the Guild workshop and its implications for other researchers who would like to adopt orcontinue similar efforts in Section 9.2 BackgroundWomen have continued to be minoritized in computing fields in the U.S. over multiple decades[1]. Data from the Cooperative Institutional Research Program (CIRP) Freshmen Survey revealedthat while the percentage of men planning to major in computing in post-secondary institutionsrose from 3.3% to 9.3% over a ten-year period ending in
that has guided it are potentially useful for other engineeringeducators who seek to create transformative educational opportunities that promote inclusivity,equity, and social justice within the discipline of engineering. The following report first presentsthe developmental context and key foundations upon which the current version of the programhas been structured. Subsequently, a descriptive narrative is offered that includes organization& coordination of the community, opportunities & resources provided to participants, andperceived key benefits of the program based on the developer's perspective. A plan in progressfor additional data collection to steer another stage of research and change implementation isdiscussed. Finally
coordinator grew to be larger than one person could manageresulting in the position being split. The coordinator was promoted to assistant director, and anoffice support specialist was promoted to coordinator. Under this new administrative hierarchy,the assistant director was charged with focusing on long-term planning, supporting faculty, andcoordinating with units across campus, while the oversight of daily operations became theresponsibility of the coordinator. The CBTF assistant director takes input from an advisorycommittee of faculty and students and also consults with a student committee for feedback.Expanding Testing Capacity The CBTF is one of the most heavily utilized spaces on campusand we regularly receive inquiries from courses
) with an interest and aptitude for engineering and computing degree programs by offering an average of 23 scholarships per year over a 6-year period to at least 43 unique students. 2. Intentional Mentoring - Support scholars’ academic growth with faculty mentors who emphasize the use of an Individual Education and Development Plan to foster student growth and increase student outcomes for persistence, completion, and career aspirations. 3. Engagement in High Impact Practices - Engage scholars in high impact practices, including capstone projects, internships, and collaborative projects. 4. Professional Preparation - Foster professional preparation through common academic coursework, skills workshops, guest
Education Research Council . ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Perception Study of an Online Electricity and Magnetism Course for Working StudentsAbstractTeaching basic sciences to engineering students online, specifically for "working students,"presents a unique challenge. It is contentious whether the conventional method ofinstruction employed in traditional daytime undergraduate programs is the most suitable forsuch a diverse group of students. Working students have limited time and energy due towork and family commitments, weak mathematical and conceptual foundations, and, formost of them, no plans for postgraduate studies or scientific research. This study
experience at UC Davis is situated at the first academic term of the thirdyear within a 4-year study plan in biomedical engineering. A typical student in our program hasfinished first-year design, mass and energy balance, computer-assisted design, and circuits togain eligibility for our program. Through our clinical immersion program, we aim to preparestudents to 1) identify unmet needs in clinical settings and contemporary surgery ORs and 2)propose innovative bioengineering solutions, ranging from the engineering of biomaterials tobiomedical devices, to address these needs. The deliverables of our clinical immersionexperience include a final presentation and report about a student’s original solution to an unmetclinical need they identified. The
asmentoring partnerships and scholarships—while others may focus more on providing communitysupport, such as diversity workshops and social activities. These differences are products of eachsite’s context and driven by local students’ needs and goals.One component of the leadership structure of Access is the Core Organizer (CO) Team. The COteam is responsible for supporting communication, mentorship, and self-reflection in thenetwork. The CO team meets on a regular basis to coordinate mentorship of student leaders,grant and funding applications, and future plans for the network. The team originated from thevarious site leaders that came together initially to write the grant that funded the creation ofAccess. This team has changed and expanded as
98% Leadership meetings—electronic Weekly --on-site retreat for planning Year One, Three --conferences (i.e., ASEE, NSF, Department Heads) Annually Materials and Resources: Number of sites contributing 100% Google portal curriculum units 80% On-site demonstrations/Posters of Use at on-site
paper describes the embodiment of these goals byhighlighting several key features of the seminar. We conduct quantitative and qualitative analysisof several data sources (surveys, instructor reflections, field notes, and coursework) to assess theextent to which the embodiment of our values helped us meet our goals. Finally, we describechallenges and identify areas where we were not meeting our goals and describe some of theaspects of the seminar that we plan to revise in the next iteration.IntroductionEngineering education research has increasingly focused on the learning and teaching ofdesign,1-7 including design thinking and associated “soft” skills such as communication andteamwork. Another trend is the growing number of schools of
interests include the use of machine learning in general and deep learning in particular in support of the data-driven and self-driven management of large-scale deployments of IoT and smart city infrastruc- ture and services, Wireless Vehicular Networks (VANETs), cooperation and spectrum access etiquette in cognitive radio networks, and management and planning of software defined networks (SDN). He is an ABET Program Evaluator (PEV) with the Computing Accreditation Commission (CAC). He served on many academic program design, review and planning efforts. He serves on editorial boards of multiple journals including IEEE Communications Letter and IEEE Network Magazine. He also served as chair, co-chair, and technical
). Addressing these challenges requiresstrategic planning, leadership, ongoing training, ethical decision making, and a genuine effort tocreate an inclusive culture. The purpose of this paper is to highlight some of the strategies usedin building Wake Forest Engineering and what has now become one of the most diverseacademic units on the Wake Forest University (WFU) campus and the highest ranked (US NewsReport 2023) academic unit on campus. Despite WFU being a predominantly white institution,Wake Forest Engineering as one of the newest academic units on campus adopted hiringpractices that enabled the hiring of a very diverse engineering faculty team – over 50% femalefaculty, 25% racial and ethnic diversity, engineering disciplinary diversity, etc
CSCL-tool are considered. However, participants differ in theirinterindividual tool usage, e.g., webcam usage, due to personal or technical reasons. In result, aCSCL-session planned on a web-conferencing platform can unintentionally turn into a session ona spectrum from videoconferencing (all participants use their webcam and microphone) overaudioconferencing (participants refusing webcam usage) to synchronous text-chat (webcam- andmicrophone-refusal). In worst case this can cause misleading conclusions about the didacticmatch between tool and task with negative effect on teaching and learning. To consider theusers’ interindividual tool usage, we conducted an online experiment with 45 undergraduatestudents building 15 three-student groups
presented a reflexive model of an identity-based approach toengineering leadership instruction. Moreover, the model may be applied in a wide variety ofengineering classes, given the central role that leadership plays in training for the profession.That said, in a lower-division setting, the lower-division lesson plan may provide an introductionand contextualization of leadership in the engineering profession. Therefore, it might be mostappropriate for an engineering survey course, as students are introduced to various aspects of theengineering profession.The upper-division lesson plan can provide richer insight into how engineering leadership ispracticed, as well as practical scaffolding for students’ pursuing their own professionaldevelopment
participants already know their education and career intentions before theyparticipate in the program. In that case, the impact of the program on those intentions is usually amatter of reinforcing, rather than redirecting, the paths that students are already on. Results fromthe comprehensive survey appear to confirm this. 89% of WIL participants agreed or stronglyagreed that, after the WIL program, they plan to work in their field of study – a small increasefrom the 85% who agreed or strongly agreed prior to the program. The proportion who “stronglyagreed” rose from 49 to 56%. Among “high-intensity” WIL participants, 88% agreed or stronglyagreed – which marked an increase of five percentage points from the 83% who agreed orstrongly agreed prior to the