informationis stressed - data about the company, the project, and the impact on the business is required. Inaddition, as with the performance appraisal, a focus on ABET learning outcomes using aquestion/answer format has been added. This approach captures and summarizes the relevancyof the co-op learning experience with respect to ABET learning outcomes, for the student and thefaculty reviewer. A sample of a co-op report in the new format is included in the Appendix.Exit Interview: Feedback to the student and reflection by the student on the co-op experience is Page 15.515.7a critical element of the learning process. An in-depth exit interview with the
course involves between 6 to 10in-class presentations by professionals that are successful in Technical Sales. These professionals are synchronized with thecourse syllabus, such that they are able to reinforce the specific material being taught around the time they are speaking. Inthe Technical Sales 2 course, students are required to individually be assigned to a specific company which they present tothe class (every two weeks), and attempt to improve, that company's sales organization to the other students in the class.Therefore, the final project for students in the Technical Sales 2 course is to design an improved process for part of that salesorganization's function.Another element of the structure of both courses is the addition of inter
the performance of a digital system depending on the application need (i.e., performance, power, size, or fault tolerance). LaMeres’ research is sponsored by NASA, the National Science Foundation, the Montana Space Grant Consortium, the National Space Grant Consortium, and the Office of Naval Research.Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University Carolyn Plumb is the Director of Educational Innovation and Strategic Projects at Montana State Univer- sity. She has been involved in engineering education for over 20 years. Page 22.26.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A
experience.Multiple instructors have effectively used the process to assign valid grades to team members inintroductory engineering design and physical science classes. All of these courses featurecooperative learning activities and open-ended projects throughout the term.IntroductionThere are numerous methods that have been used to determine team scores. The methoddescribed in this paper engages the entire team with the instructor or graduate studentcollaboratively to determine a team midterm or final grade. It takes about thirty minutes per teamto complete.The team interview session is a formal process that is designed to measure soft skills such asparticipation, communication and team process. Individual elements include sharing theworkload; participation
concern that the current electronicscourse was not significant nor applied enough to enable them to participate in multidisciplinaryprojects and co-op opportunities involving electrical and computer components, sensors, dataacquisition software or controls. Students suggested that more hands on data acquisition andanalyses projects throughout the curriculum, would be extremely valuable in preparation for theworkplace.RIT is addressing these needs by developing a new curriculum based on the EnhancedEducational Experience for Engineers Program (E 4) which was pioneered by Drexel in 1988 3. Acritical component of E 4 is the Engineering Test, Simulation and Design Laboratory (ETSDL) 4,the adaptation of which defines the scope of this paper. The ETSDL
based on authenticlearning theories. The course is designed to breed new students with new ways of thinking and Page 7.828.1problem-solving skills. Our approach incorporates the hands-on practical projects from early Proceedings of the 2002 American society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright @2002, American Society for Engineering Educationdays of the program. In addition, we actively make students aware of their own learning processand work with them with a learning theory originally developed and proposed by Habermas andGrundy4-5. The goal is to make lifelong learners. We
recruiting components from 2-year technical colleges and 4-year28 universities. Through strong collaboration with advanced manufacturing industries in Kentucky,29 we find an inventive way to engage with industry partners to bring hands-on and experiential30 learning projects to students in the Fujio Cho Department of Engineering Technology at the31 University of Kentucky. Based on extensive hands-on training, a new curriculum is designed to32 solve practical problems at its center to prepare the future workforce. Most importantly, a new33 curriculum supports not only disadvantaged student groups but also more diverse and34 underrepresented student groups than other programs in the Pigman College of Engineering35 (UK-COE).36 Demand
learned structures knowledge to projects in the design studio. This paper posits that the application of structural knowledge in design studio is essential to an integrated design approach and as such, the structures curriculum should be directly linked to individual studio projects. Through analysis of the structural debates listed above, the paper discusses flexible curriculum components and multiple half-term courses to suit the needs of individual student schedules and correspondence to design studios. It also discusses strategies toward developing studio links that reinforce the design of structural systems from the concept phase of a project.Structures and the ArchitectArchitects do not strive to
curriculum development project. This reflection was guided by three overarchingquestions: 1) how were theoretical course concepts applied in the development of a newgraduate-level online engineering course, 2) what were the challenges in developing this course,and 3) what lessons were learned that will aid in the development of future courses? Thesequestions were answered by examining the contributions made by different bodies of literature,and how these were synthesized during the development project. This paper is intended toprovide graduate students new to curriculum development with insights on the process andchallenges of developing their first course. II. Contributions of CAP Course and LiteratureThe CAP course was
. Page 23.1375.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 WISEngineering: Integrating Common Core Math Concepts in an Informal SettingAbstractWISEngineering is a free, online learning environment that guides students through engineeringdesign projects geared toward improving student learning in middle and high school science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subject areas. WISEngineering combines aninformed engineering design pedagogy1 with the Knowledge Integration learning framework2.WISEngineering is an extension of the Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE) at theUniversity of California-Berkeley3.Instructional modules within WISEngineering scaffold engineering design
. Course-related activities are designed to optimize astudent’s potential and chances of success within a chosen career path by providing andsupporting opportunities and experiences that enhance their professional identity and careerprospects (Holland, 2010). In this way, Engineering Problem Solving can be seen as a course thathelps students explore, adopt and/or solidify their engineering identity or by contrast, determinethat engineering is not a preferred part of their identity. Exploration of engineering identity wereencouraged in the course through gaining insights from professionals and developing new skillsthrough projects (Noe & Wilk, 1993). A study by (Holland, et al., 2012) explored how engagingin "capitalization activities
graduate study in the US. He started his faculty career in 2019 at the University of Connecticut. His research interests lie in the field of concrete technology with a focus on finite element modeling of ultra high performance concrete. He is also interested in educational research. He is presently working on inclusive teaching practices considering the experience and needs of neurodivergent learners. This project is a part of an NSF-funded IUSE/PFE:RED grant.Dr. Christa L. Taylor, University of Connecticut Christa L. Taylor, Ph.D., is an Independent Research Consultant and Research Affiliate with the Department of Educational Psychology at the University of Connecticut. Her research is focused on issues in creativity
’ pursuit to ”do good.” Marie received her B.S. in mechanical engineering and international studies from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and M.S. and PhD in science and technology studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. She also earned a graduate certificate in human-centered design (HCD) from the Interdisciplinary Graduate Education Program at Virginia Tech. Marie’s interest in values and engagement in professional cultures also extends to innovation and its experts.With Matthew Wisnioski and Eric Hintz, Marie co-editedDoes America Need More Innovators?(MIT Press, 2019). This project engages innovation’s champions, critics, and reformers in critical participation.Dr. Aneesha Gogineni, Saginaw Valley State University
consists of collecting, selecting, II. DESIGN OF EPORTFOLIOSreflecting, and connecting evidence of learning, provides anorganized digital thumbprint and timeline of knowing, doing, A. Design of a template for internship eportfoliosknowing how you know, and proceeding to the next level of Our goal has been to work with students, faculty and industryinquiry. It allows the owner to synthesize learning, build to develop an electronic portfolio template and process whichknowledge, demonstrate learning connections, and project benefits all stakeholders. Students collect their experiences,evidence of professional skills and abilities
- providing multiple means of engagement, representation, andintegrated homework assignments, the use of AI in brainstorm-ing, sourcing, and writing for group projects, leveraging AI to test expression, catering to diverse learning styles and abilities [6].student knowledge through interactive questioning and feedback, In this course, AI tools were integrated not only into individualand utilizing AI as an interview preparation tool. assignments but also into group projects, brainstorming ses- Pre- and post-semester surveys assessed changes in students’ sions, and feedback mechanisms. These interventions aimed toperceptions and utilization of AI tools, revealing increased con- help students navigate complex
formative assessment of daily concept check points.Every week the next week’s activities are adjusted to ensure the material stayed within thecohort’s zone of proximal development, towards mastery of the content. Projects were designedto reinforce learning outcomes achieved at check points throughout the semester. Summativeassessment included project deliverables, homework based on theoretical problem solving, aswell as a midterm and final that included a take-home portion, a partnered practical lab-basedexercise, and a problem solving section. The primary challenges faced included how to facilitate better connections students madeacross the content and how to assist students in the cognitive shifts necessary in a fast-paced andpedagogically very
University. He has been the PI or co-PI on many of the projects described here.Gail Gotham, SLL BOCES Ms. Gotham is a grant writer and the program director at the St.Lawrence-Lewis BOCES office for several NYS funded University - K-12 Partnership Programs.James Carroll, Clarkson University Dr. Carroll is an Assoc. Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Clarkson University. He has lead First Robotics efforts at the University for several years and has spearheaded the introduction of Lego and Vex robotics competitions for younger students.Douglas Bohl, Clarkson University Dr. Bohl is an Asst. Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering at
students’ innovation-related skills as well as students’ reflections on the class. Themain idea is to develop a student-centered environment that helps students to develop a can-do,proactive, innovative mindset; an environment that will light their spark of innovation, and providethem with resources to translate their ideas from paper to prototype. We have identified four majorgroups of relevant skills, namely, problem solving, “big picture”, personal and social skills, and usedseveral different activities to try to boost them. A variety of projects and challenges, and multi-sensory activities were synthesized to create an empirical, authentic, and multi-disciplinaryexperience. This effort is in line with our college longer term goal to infuse
program initiated the use of a new softwareprogram in several courses. The software is PowerCivil, provided by Bentley Systems Inc.. Thestand-alone program is a comprehensive design solution for site modeling, land development,and planning. It is a multidiscipline tool that provides integrated capabilities for survey,graphical coordinate geometry, digital terrain modeling, site grading and design, street design,water and sewer design, and storm water drainage design. The toolset supports plans preparation, Page 14.775.4plan sheet generation, and volume/material quantity calculation for a wide range of projects,such as commercial and residential
primarily tasked with the education of undergraduate engineers. In her courses, she employs active learning techniques and project-based learning. Her previous education research, also at Stanford, focused on the role of cultural capital in science education. Her current interests include en- gineering students’ development of social responsibility and the impact of students’ backgrounds in their formation as engineers.Dr. Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a researcher and instructor in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on ways to encourage more students, especially women and those from nontraditional demographic groups
State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The
. Together theseepistemologies interact within his EEE. Evan abandoned engineering design projects for moretraditional physics instruction at times when elements of his EEE conflicted. Understanding howEvan’s EEE affected his use engineering instruction and his participation in NGSS reform effortssheds critical light on the potential successes of the NGSS reform agenda in science classrooms. Introduction In the summer of 2014 I co-planned and co-taught an engineering-themed high schoolsummer camp for science and math enrichment. My co-teacher Evan was a co-planner of thiscamp yet he made a sudden and covert shift away from our planned engineering activity on thethird day of camp towards a more
of programs and experiences that are offered to engineering students include studyabroad, globally-oriented class experiences, global projects, international internships, andinternational research experiences3,4. Study abroad experiences are often accomplished throughshort- or long-term sojourns, or bilateral exchange of students between universities. Someschools also offer global engineering courses that emphasize historical and cultural themes,sometimes through engagement with guest speakers.3 Service projects with global dimensionsare another prevalent program format. These program options vary according to factors such asduration, language requirements, context of work, extent of interactions with natives of the hostcountry, and
AC 2007-1194: 75 UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS OBTAIN MOTIVATINGEXPERIENTIAL EDUCATION BY PARTICIPATING IN A HUMAN CLINICALTRIAL WHILE PERFORMING BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCHVikki Hazelwood, Stevens Institute of TechnologyArthur Ritter, Stevens Institute of Technology Page 12.7.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 54 Undergraduate Students Obtain Clinical Experiential Education as Participants in Biomedical Engineering ResearchAuthor Block: Vikki Hazelwood, Arthur Ritter Biomedical Engineering, Stevens Institute ofTechnology, Hoboken, NJ.Objective: To implement an effective experiential education research project designed to educateundergraduate students
illustration, two specific cases are then highlighted: an introductory energy balancelaboratory that has been conducted for several groups of freshman Chemical Engineeringstudents, and a pool heat-up experiment that was used as the basis for a project in an EngineeringDifferential Equations course. Both these examples focus on the energy transfer and transportmechanisms that are an integral part of the reactor facility. The readily available data allow oneto illustrate a number of fundamental concepts of interest to each course using real informationfrom an operating facility -- and the real-world nature of these applications seems to really Page
key fabrication and characterizationequipment such as pattern generators, evaporators, sputterers, chemical vapor depositionsystems, an SEM, and a surface profilometer. The third course, Design and Characterization ofMicrosystems, is project driven and generalizes microsystems design considerations withpractical emphasis on MEMS and IC characterization, and physical analysis. The class teamprojects emphasize ongoing dissertation research, which produces an additional benefit for somestudents of significant progress on their individual projects. In some cases, project final reports Page 9.117.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society
Session 3268 Laboratory Exercises for Statics and Mechanics of Materials on a Shoestring David Hall, Paul Hadala, Freddy Roberts Louisiana Tech UniversityAbstractThis paper outlines the design, construction, and fabrication of seven laboratory exercises and adesign project for a sophomore level integrated statics and mechanics of materials course. Theacademic setting in which the course was created is given along with an overview of the coursecontent. Each laboratory and design project is described in detail, including photographs,drawings of the
Technologies, a company started by former students of the capstone class that he teaches. His interests include engineering and entrepreneurship pedagogy and assessment, technology development and clinical applications of biomedical instrumentation.Steven W. Beyerlein, University of Idaho, Moscow Dr. Beyerlein serves as the coordinator for an inter-disciplinary capstone design course in the College of Engineering at the University of Idaho. In this endeavor, he collaborates with five other colleagues from the departments of Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering, Biological Engineering, and Computer Science. He is engaged in multiple research projects associated with engine testing, alternative
AC 2012-3826: THE 2012 STATE OF MANUFACTURING EDUCATIONDr. Hugh Jack P.Eng., Grand Valley State University Hugh Jack is a professor of product design and manufacturing engineering at Grand Valley State Univer- sity in Grand Rapids, Mich. His specialties include automation, design projects, and internet application development. Page 25.1276.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The 2012 State of Manufacturing EducationAbstractThe paper describes the 2012 results of a third annual survey on the state of manufacturingeducation. The survey respondents
. Page 23.883.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Making Sense of Design: A Thematic Analysis of Alumni PerspectivesAbstract:In this paper, we present the findings of a thematic analysis on how alumni make sense of designin light of their undergraduate experiences in the Engineering Projects in Community Service(EPICS) program. These findings are part of a larger embedded, sequential mixed-methods studyon the overall alumni experience in EPICS and how this experience prepared them to enter theworkplace. In this large-scale study, we interviewed a diverse range of alumni (n = 27), whichwere purposefully sampled from participants of a previous survey (n