: Learning and Retention Benefits in Introductory Psychology," Teaching of Psychology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 303-308, 2014.[14] D.-p. Cao and X.-y. Yin, "The BOPPPS Teaching Mode in Canada and Its Implications for Higher Education Reform," Research and Exploration in Laboratory, vol. 2, no. 49, 2016.[15] T. A. Angelo and K. P. Cross, Classroom assessment techniques: A handbookfor college teachers. Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1993.[16] B. K. Morris and S. Savadatti, "Analysis of Basic Video Metrics in a Flipped Statics Course," presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.
advantages are recognizedfor computer modeling over physical prototyping such as convenience of workplace which is notlimited by laboratories or equipment. Another advantage is the freedom of time which isavailable whenever a computer is available. In addition, the time to achieve the task is alwaysreduced when working with computers [9]. Moreover, one of the predominant advantages ofcomputer modeling is allowing for fast modification swiftly and economically. This fast and easymanipulation of the parameters is very helpful to show the students how little compromises inone’s lifestyle may lead to significant sustainable merits. Finally, research is assigned to thestudents aiming to ensure feasible modeling and exposing the importance of
valves. Dr. Amini has served as an assistant professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at The University of Akron since August 2013. The overall goal of his research laboratory is to improve human health by studying the multi-scale biomechanics and biotransport in cardiovascular, ocular, and digestive systems. Dr. Amini’s research has been funded by the National Science Foundation, Akron Children’s Hospital, Firestone Foundation, and American Heart Association. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Project-Based Active Learning Techniques Enhance Computer ProgrammingAcademic and Career Self-Efficacy of Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering
living conditionfor a complete immersion into the local culture. During the visit, students also participate in someregular classes with their teammates (both lectures and laboratory work), even though the classesmay not be in their nature discipline. The reason for participating in classes is mostly to get an ideaof their teammates students’ competencies, but also to experience the educational methods andcustoms in other country. All the students involved in three projects appreciated very much thisimmersion, to see and experience similarities and differences at both universities. It also helpsstudents better to understand culture of their teammates.Intercultural Competencies Training our students to become “global engineers” includes improving
lectures, homework, projects, and laboratory activities. However, inevery engineering discipline the curriculum is growing, and there seems to be so much thatneeds to be covered. Classes are packed with material and assignments and do notnecessarily have the creative overlap to promote synergy of the material and understanding.Our research question is whether student autonomy (even if it is partial for selected parts of theclass) and engagement of inquiry-based approach would be more beneficial for students andwould help facilitate the journey of an engaged student with a connected knowledge base.Would an inquiry-based approach, with providing students’ autonomy to create their connectedknowledge and an ability to create their story and path of
]. Thetraditional engineering courses are enriched by trips to Michael Faraday’s Laboratory, KewBridge Steam Museum, Bletchley Park (where the earliest computers were developed),Greenwich Maritime Museum and Royal Observatory (home of the zero meridian), amongothers. Group travel facilitates scheduling a large number of contact hours within a short timeframe; the trade-off is fewer recreational hours for the students to experience the travel locationunsupervised. The Engineering in London program remedies this by remaining in one locationwhere the students have easy access to experience city life.Not all global seminar descriptions explained how the travel component enriched the course.Some descriptions were general, for example: • CES Faculty-Led
Education, New York, 2015.[4] Correlation of Critical Heat Flux in a Bundle Cooled by Pressurized Water, BAW- 10000A, Lynchburg, Virginia, Babcock & Wilcox, 1976.[5] M. Mikofski, IAPWS_IF97, https://github.com/mikofski/IAPWS_IF97. Obtained from https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/35710-iapws-if97- functional-form-with-no-slip. Accessed August 31, 2017.[6] D. Rowe, COBRA-IIIC: A Digital Computer Program for Steady State and Transient Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis of Rod Bundle Nuclear Fuel Elements, BNWL-1695, Richland, Washington, Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, 1973.Appendix – Learning AssessmentThis is a multiple choice assessment. The questions and potential
for future engineers are their self-belief and resolve to utilize the skills they learn during courses, laboratories, and projects throughthe curriculum. An important element of measuring effectiveness of engineering education,therefore, is to assess the impact of content delivery methodologies on the resolve and self-beliefof the students as they progress through various courses during the curriculum [7].A very important subject in undergraduate engineering curriculum is engineering modeling anddesign. Success in engineering career largely depends on thorough understanding of engineeringdesign process from problem definition to prototype development, dissemination of results, anddesign review.The engineering modeling and design curriculum
numeroussuppliers.The physics department at Detroit Mercy offers a 3 credit hour, junior-level course—ModernPhysics with Device Applications (PHY 3690). The course is required for electrical engineeringstudents and is offered during the winter term. In order to enroll in the course, students mustsuccessfully complete one year of a calculus-based general physics sequence of courses alongwith the associated laboratories. At Detroit Mercy the first physics course is mechanics and thesecond covers topics in electromagnetism. As juniors, students have taken a course in differentialequations and linear algebra. Engineering students are exposed to the MATLAB environmentduring their freshman year.[9] Electrical engineering students use MATLAB in their
students. The teamprefabricates some portions of the bridge on campus in a laboratory environment but completedmost of the construction on site. Construction related activities have taken 700-900 labor hoursfor these projects. Figure 3 shows images of the bridges constructed during the past three years. 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 Figure 3: Images of bridges from past three years Assessment The assessment of the project was considered with respect to the CE493 and CE494 course objectives and the civil engineering program student outcomes. The rubric in Table 1 below was used to assess student outcomes 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7
sources like thesolar cells, and basic power electronic circuits. A typical day in the camp starts with an hour-longlecture by a faculty member, followed by hands-on learning in the lab under the supervision ofgraduate student instructors. The laboratory activities are designed to demonstrate the practicalaspects of the concepts learned in the lecture as well as exposing students to the complexity ofelectrical engineering problems. Some of the lab-activities are tracking the maximum power pointfor a solar cell using a resistor kit, manipulating electrical switches to control light bulbs, energystorage design with ultra-capacitors. This year as part of one of the design activities of the camp,the students were familiarized with the concepts of
Embedded Systems: Using Microcon- trollers and the MSP430 (Springer 2014). From 2013 to 2018 served as Associate Dean of engineering at UPRM. He currently directs the Engineering PEARLS program at UPRM, a College-wide NSF funded initiative, and coordinates the Rapid Systems Prototyping and the Electronic Testing and Characterization Laboratories at UPRM. He is a member of ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Luisa Guillemard, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Luisa Guillemard is a psychology professor at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez Campus. She has a M.S. in Clinical Psychology from the Caribbean Center of Advanced Studies in Puerto Rico [today the Carlos Albizu University] and a Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from
undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum.Dr. Renee Kaufmann, University of Kentucky, College of Communication and Information, School of Informa-tion Science c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 “All communication is important”: Comparison of Incoming FreshmenCommunication Expectations to
society through investigating community-based learning and its potential impact on students and commu- nities. The goal of this research is to establish knowledge in how STEM CBL can support broadening participation and promote social justice and citizenship through evidence-based approaches.Tanya M. Nocera PhD, The Ohio State University Tanya M. Nocera, PhD, is an Assistant Professor of Practice in Biomedical Engineering at The Ohio State University. She is focused on developing, teaching, and assessing upper-level Biomedical Engineering laboratory courses, with particular interest in improving student technical communication skills. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Comparison of
Lu, West Virginia University Institute of Technology Mingyu Lu received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Tsinghua University, Bei- jing, China, in 1995 and 1997 respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the Uni- versity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2002. From 2002 to 2005, he was a postdoctoral research associate at the Electromagnetics Laboratory in the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He was an assistant professor with the Department of Electrical Engineering, the University of Texas at Arlington from 2005 to 2012. He joined the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, West Virginia University Institute of Technology in 2012, and he is
Force on Undergraduate Physics Programs (J-TUPP) report released,” The Physics Teacher, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 190–190, 2017. [4] C. Wieman and N. Holmes, “Measuring the impact of an instructional laboratory on the learning of introductory physics,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 972–978, 2015. [5] N. Holmes, J. Olsen, J. L. Thomas, and C. E. Wieman, “Value added or misattributed? A multi-institution study on the educational benefit of labs for reinforcing physics content,” Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 010129, 2017. [6] N. G. Holmes and C. E. Wieman, “Introductory physics labs: We can do better,” Physics Today, vol. 71, pp. 38–38, 2018. [7] D. Scherer, P. Dubois, and B
some time in the university laboratories,contribute their real-life industrial experience and also take some refresher courses. This is also anotherway of technology transfer within a country – between the industries and academia – where both gainvalue: a win-win situation!In knowledge transfer from preceptor to disciple, from mentor to mentee (Guru to Sishya, in Sanskrit),the transmitting and the receiving ends of knowledge and the knowledge itself have to be in unison. Thesame is true in the domain of arts: the artist, the art work and the observer must be in unison. John Deweyemphasized this point particularly in the realm of art education [6]. In technology, the closest that comesto the arts is architecture. In engineering we are just one
Paper ID #29171Cyber-Physical Systems Security Introductory Course for STEM StudentsProf. Sin Ming Loo, Boise State University Sin Ming Loo is a professor at Boise State University with interests in sensor systems and cyber-physical systems security research and education. He is responsible for Hartman Systems Integration and Cyber Lab for Industrial Control Systems laboratories. He holds a joint appointment with Idaho National Lab. He is a member of IEEE/CS, ISSA, Tau Beta Pi, and amateur radio (KI4AKS). nLiljana Babinkostova c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Cyber-Physical
things: Simple experiments in the thermal and fluid sciences, in 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Austin, Texas.7. Moor, S., and Piergiovanni, P., Experiments in the classroom: Examples of inductive learning with classroom friendly laboratory kits, in 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Nashville, Tennessee.8. Connor, J., Goff, R., Assessment of providing in-class, hands-on, activities to Virginia Tech’s first year engineering students, in 2001 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings. Albuquerque, New Mexico.9. Garrison, L., Garrison, T., A demo every day: Bringing fluid mechanics to life, in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Seattle, Washington.10
a master’s degree in engineering management at George Washington University in 2007. In 2016, he earned a Ph.D. in the Minority and Urban Education Unit of the Col- lege of Education at the University of Maryland. Bruk worked at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, where he focused on nanotechnology, from 2003 to 2005. In 2005 he left JHU/APL for a fellowship with the National Academies where he conducted research on methods of increasing the number of women in engineering. After a brief stint teaching mathematics in Baltimore City following his departure from the National Academies, he began working for the Center for Minorities in Science and Engineering (CMSE) in the Clark School of
attitudinal barriers. For example, students withphysical disabilities often face architectural barriers such as laboratory table height, inaccessibleequipment or instrument, and lack of elevators to reach facilities [17]. A non-inclusive schoolculture and negative faculty attitudes toward disabilities greatly impact students’ commitment tothe engineering major and career. Efforts to increase retention of students with disabilities andother marginalized students include curriculum redesign and greater diversity when hiringfaculty [21] [22].Self-Efficacy: Self-efficacy, the belief in one’s ability to succeed, has been found to be a criticalskill for students with disabilities. STEM fields, especially, attract a higher concentration ofstudents with
course, as is technical and plane stress. The realistic constraints reading related to laboratory experience such as economic lifelong learning and will include material factors, safety, ethical responsibility. testing, analyzing, and reliability, aesthetics, troubleshooting. ethics, and social impact. How Design Courses ProgressSurvey MethodIn order to quantitively measure the success and achievements of the implementation of adesigned-based project that challenges freshman students to
Undergraduate Studies in Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and Associate Director in the Honors College at the Univer- sity of Missouri in Columbia. Triplett has won awards for his research, teaching, and service. He directs the Precision Imaging Research Laboratory (PIRL), which focuses on the development and integration of nanomaterials and their applications in biomedical, energy, and physical science. He currently focuses on the capture of signal transduction mechanisms in real time, specifically interactions between amino acid functional groups of proteins with donor molecules and protein kinase using photonic technology integration. He graduated from Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Florida State
.. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engaging Students’ Creativity through Designing a Low-Cost Educational Robotic ArmAbstractRobotic arms have been around for many years and are widely used within industries. In 2010,the availability of low-cost robotic arms increased substantially. These types of robots are idealsolutions with applications in automation, laboratory, and education because of their adaptabilityto various industries and tasks. The objective of this project is to design a low- cost/affordableindustrial robot manipulator including base, arm, wrist, and end effector with similar functions toa human arm and fingers with educational applications. The mechanism of the manipulator
features without size.3. Specify limit dimensions.4. Calculate virtual condition for features.5. Determine the advantage of using different material condition modifiers.6. Apply appropriate datum reference frames to designs.7. Apply appropriate form, orientation, profile, runout, and location tolerances to designs.8. Execute proper inspection set-ups and procedures for checking geometric tolerances.Outline of the CourseTEC333 was designed to provide students an overview of the basic terminology used in GD&T,opportunities to apply GD&T in a design setting for modestly complex parts, activities wherestudents apply GD&T within a CAD environment, and laboratories where students inspect partsusing calipers and coordinate measuring machines
education and/orresearch-based careers. These experiences can take a variety of forms, from a structured REUprogram with a specific cohort to an individually designed experience. Typically the researchexperience occurs in a school’s research lab, however students may also participate in researchinternships in industry or national laboratories as well.In a survey of 651 alumni from the College of Engineering at the University of Delaware, [12]showed that engineering alumni who participated in undergraduate research were much morelikely to pursue a graduate degree. Of the students who participated in the university’s structuredundergraduate research program, over 80% of the respondents had completed or were currentlyenrolled in graduate school
the students’own experiences.Research activityThe greatest change proposed and eventually implemented relates to the teaching process andhow the teacher-facilitator presents the physics concept. In the pre-existing paradigm, teachersintroduce the theory of a new concept prior to running an experiment or discussing contextualapplications of the theory. The physics laboratory objective is solely to verify or support thepresented theory. Teachers then encourage students to extrapolate implementation contextsthrough discussions that follow the lab experiment. The focus of the student lab report is ontheory, procedures, data collection and applying that data to the theoretical equations. Reportconclusions recount how well the experiment matched
an introduction to microcontroller architecture, instruction sets, C languagecompilers, microcontroller interfacing, microcontroller peripherals, and embedded system design.Case studies examined microcontroller-controlled systems as well as simulation and emulation ofspecific families of microcontrollers.Hardware and Software Development Environment: For this project, laboratories were builton an Altium Designerand NanoBoard 3000 [4] aplatform equipped withXilinx Spartan-3AN chip,with Xilinx ISE, andAltium Designer 10software development.Figure 1 shows both aNanoBoard 3000 and an Figure 1 Hardware and Software PlatformAltium Designer. TheNanoBoard 3000XN is an FPGA prototyping board with an integrated color TFT LCD
proposals to address aspecific engineering/design need, work in labs for hand-on practice, and complete a project todevelop a design and/or working prototype to address the need. The class was assessed incompliance with the design control process, documentation, laboratory reports, final design, andanalysis.For the specific group who chose orthopedic implant, the students were asked to design thedevices without consideration of the surgical procedure. After students had a design completed,the surgical procedure was introduced to the groups, and the student groups investigated if therewere needs to revise the design based on the consideration of surgical procedure. At the end ofthe semester, a special assessment was conducted for these groups only
. While these courses differ bydiscipline, all are similar in that they are lecture sections of the course (i.e., no laboratory ordiscussion sections), they are one of the first courses taken in the disciplinary sequence (i.e., asophomore-level gateway course), they typically enroll only students of sophomore status (afterstudents have declared their major), and they enroll a large number of students. Each section hadenrollments of between 73 and 148 students, with an average enrollment of 108 students. Thetotal population sampled was 539 students. No students were enrolled in more than one courseduring the survey administration. I employed a series of two student surveys, which were based on the Student Response toInstructional Practices