. Page 25.487.5 • LEP students will place greater value on the work of individuals from other disciplines.Supporting Objective: DesignCompared to their non-LEP peers, LEP graduates will be more skilled at: • executing a design process, • designing multicomponent systems including the ability to manage interfaces between subsystems, and • applying practical design skills such as reading specifications sheets for electrical components or selecting parts from distributors for an integrated design.The research question to be addressed by the research strategy described in this paper is asfollows: Are LEP graduates different than their non-LEP graduate peers with respect to theirability to perform interdisciplinary work as described
Mechanical Engineering and the Deputy Director of the Center for Innovation and Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy (USMA). He holds a BS degree in civil engineering from USMA (2001), and MS and PhD degrees in civil engineering from North Carolina State University (2011 and 2019). Brad is a licensed Professional Engineer (Missouri). His research interests include sustainable infrastructure development, sustainable construction materials, and engineering education.Col. Aaron T. Hill Jr., United States Military Academy Colonel Aaron Hill is an Assistant Professor and Design Group Director in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. He holds a
brought in and disassembled hand-held electronic devices. In their design groups,students identified best practices for integrating the PCB with the package, in terms of mountingthe PCB, attaching the batteries, and designing/placing switches and controls. At the end of theexercise, groups gave brief presentations to share their findings with the class.Module administration also changed as needs and weaknesses were identified. The gradingrubric for ECE 483 was changed in 2013 because the instructor perceived that the original rubriccontained too much detail. This led students to work towards checking items off the list ratherthan mastering skills through quality work. Also in 2013, students in both programs wererequired to develop a user’s manual
, “Effect of peer‐led team learning (PLTL) on student achievement, attitude, and self‐concept in college general chemistry in randomized and quasi experimental designs”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 319-346, Mar 2015.[5] A. E. Dreyfuss, and A. Fraiman, “Peer-Led Team Learning: an Active Learning Method for the 21st Century”, in Proceedings of ICERI 2015 Conference, Seville, Spain, 16th-18th November 2015.[6] I. J. Quitadamo, C. J. Brahler, and G. J. Crouch, “Peer-led team learning: A prospective method for increasing critical thinking in undergraduate science courses”, Science Educator, vol. 18, no. 1, 2009.[7] V. Roth and L. Tien, “The impact of the PLTL experience on Workshop leaders: An
coauthors were awarded the Wickenden award (Journal of Engineering Education, 2014) and Best Paper award, Educational Research and Methods Division (ASEE, 2014). He was awarded an IEEE-USA Professional Achievement Award (2013) for designing the B.S. degree in Engineering Education. He is a co-PI on the ”Engineering for Us All” (e4usa) project to develop a high school engineering course ”for all”. He is active in engineering within K-12, (Technology Student Association Board of Directors) and has written multiple texts in Engineering, Mathematics and Digital Electronics. He earned a PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University, is a Senior Member of IEEE, on the Board of Governors of the IEEE Education Society, and
from minority student population groups [15].Prior researchers have noted the benefits of REU in improving the research competencies ofundergraduate students [4] [12]. However, it has also been suggested that students are sometimesconfused as to whether they should continue in academia or get some experience in the industrybefore deciding about graduate school [16] [17]. To that end, REU sites provide a great platformfor students to understand what graduate school and research look like, opportunities thereafter,and how to prepare for them. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the impact of differentprofessional development activities in a REU program on overall student experiences andoutcomes. More specifically, this paper presents a
researchers and the industry fail to properly understand the negativeimpact of declining enrollment and a shrinking, aging workforce, it is expected to have astrongly negative impact on the future development of the machining industry [4].Addressing the aforementioned issues related to an aging and shrinking machinist workforcenecessitates devising new methods and approaches to attract the younger generation ofprospective professionals to the industry and to retain them as long-term workforce. Currently,instructor-led and hands-on practical training methods are employed in machining workforcedevelopment programs. However, the aspect of student motivation, involvement and satisfactionis often ignored, which is one of key potential reasons for dropping
for Engineering Education, 2023 Refining Instructional Modules for Engineering Lab Writing Using a Community of Practice ApproachAbstractLaboratory report writing instructional modules have been developed and refined using acommunity of practice (CoP) approach. Supported by the National Science FoundationImproving Undergraduate STEM Education initiative, researchers at three institutions haverefined and reorganized a series of scaffolded laboratory writing modules based on the work offaculty and graduate students at a CoP meeting. This paper documents the process used at theCoP meeting where draft modules were made available and a model laboratory session wasconsidered. Other published laboratory report writing
which several of the student authors have been involved. Dr. Beyerlein has been active in research projects involving engine testing, engine heat release modeling, design of curricula for active , design pedagogy, and assessment of professional skills.Dr. Matthew John Swenson P.E., University of Idaho, Moscow After graduating from Oregon State University with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 1999, I im- mediately pursued a career in industry, quickly excelling and continuously accepting roles of increasing responsibility. The first five years, I worked at GK Machine, Inc., a small company south of Portland, designing customized agricultural equipment. Next, I worked at Hyster-Yale Material Handling, most re
practice, a skill set that is essential forstudents pursuing faculty careers, may also be a useful metric for graduate training more broadly.In the initial design of the course, we chose to move away from traditional assignments andassessments (such as quizzes and tests) to maximize the accessibility of the course. Given thatour course participants are graduate students with research responsibilities, reducing the timeburden for this course was a top priority. Still, we believe that utilizing a limited number ofungraded assessments will increase opportunities for active recall and spaced repetition without asignificant increase in participant time burden.For (3), one of the driving motivators in the inception of the course was creating
- Page 7.685.12 need commercial breaks.” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2002, American Society for Engineering EducationSeveral researchers conclude that students do become unfocussed or overwhelmed by thefreedom of distance education. It is difficult to follow an instructor even in a live settingfor more than 30 minutes before drifting away. At a distance, the students can get lostmore frequently. Course design and instructor training could make a big difference here.Substantial effort might need to be placed in training distance education instructors topresent new teaching skills and leverage the tools correctly.What features of the
must fully prepare students in the best practices and attributes of teams.Our graduates will be expected to contribute in a collaborative environment such that their effortsyield a competitive advantage for the company. Teaming, rather than individual effort, is how thebusiness world gets work done and effective teaming builds significant human capital for thecompany (Beyerlein, 2001). Unfortunately, a typical engineering student experiences a learningenvironment with high rewards for individual achievement and little or no emphasis on criticalskills such as cooperation, trust, communication and leadership. McAnear and Seat (2001)correctly point out that teamwork skills are behavioral and teaching effective teaming requiresdifferent approaches
AC 2012-3292: DEVELOPING MODEL FOR CROSS-CULTURAL SER-VICE LEARNING IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIESDr. Kurt M. DeGoede, Elizabethtown College Kurt DeGoede Associate Professor of engineering and physics, Elizabethtown College. DeGoede is cur- rently working on developing a collaborative study abroad program in West Africa built around a design course based in service engineering. Many of these projects include work with renewable energy systems. His research interests are in the areas of biomechanics and the modeling of dynamic systems. Current projects include collaborative work with faculty and students in occupational therapy and an orthopedic hand surgeon, developing clinical instruments for conducting therapy and
- tion in computing. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Understanding the impacts of extra credit modules on student learning experience in a 100-level Electrical and Computer Engineering CourseAbstractThis Complete Evidence-based practice paper investigates students’ perceptions regarding thepresence of two extra credit (EC) modules on parallel computing topics in an introductoryelectrical and computer engineering course. Prior work investigating these EC modules showed ahigh participation rate (48-60%) across and high performance (80-88%) on the end-of-module ECquiz across three semesters [1]. The presence of extra credit has long been a topic of
were 59 total papers that included a Portuguese authorwith nearly half of these (26) published in the last two years. Thus, it appears that EERjournal publications are increasing at a rapid pace in Portugal at this time.OutcomesFensham1 argues that the findings from the research should have an impact on its practice;however, in the case of EER, this data is particularly difficult to detect. Borrego et al12foundthat despite the large investment made by the U.S. over the past three decades that theadoption in U.S. engineering departments of approaches like student-centered pedagogies,service learning, and design projects was not as high as might have been expected and madethe comment that “despite decades of effort focused on improvement of
AC 2008-1766: SMALL INTERVENTIONS, BIG IMPACTS: HOWMODIFICATION OF DELIVERY PROCESS OF IN-CLASS ACTIVITIES FORFRESHMEN CAN DRAMATICALLY IMPROVE LEARNINGAly Tawfik, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Aly Tawfik is the VTSTA President and a Graduate Teaching Fellow in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech. He is a doctoral student in the Charles E. Via, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. His research is in the area of transportation systems. He is currently a workshop leader for freshmen courses at Virginia Tech.Janis Terpenny, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Janis Terpenny is an Associate Professor in Engineering Education and Mechanical
to joining ODU in 2013, Dr. Ayala spent three years as a Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of Delaware where he expanded his knowledge on simulation of multiphase flows while acquiring skills in high-performance parallel computing and scientific computation. Before that, Dr. Ayala held a faculty position at Universidad de Oriente in the Mechanical Engineering Department where he taught and developed graduate and undergraduate courses for a number of subjects such as Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics, Multiphase Flows, Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulic Machinery, as well as Mechanical Engineering Laboratory courses. In addition, Dr. Ayala has had the opportunity to work for a number of engineering
; and quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. His teaching focuses on sociology of education, inequalities in education, educational evaluation and policy analysis, research methods and designs, and statistics and evaluation.Uriel Lomel´ı-Carrillo, The University of Texas at San Antonio Uriel Lomel´ı-Carrillo is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Demography at The University of Texas at San Antonio. Prior to his doctoral program, Lomel´ı-Carrillo worked as a statistician and research assistant for the Survey of Migration at the Northern Border of Mexico. Lomel´ı-Carrillo’s research interests include demographic methods, mortality, spatial demography, and the Mexican War on Drugs. He has presented his
Professor in the KU Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering de- partment, with a specialty in structural engineering and bridge structures. She works closely with KU Engineering’s post-doctoral Teaching Fellow and oversees the overall Engaged Learning Initiative in the School of Engineering. Caroline is responsible for overseeing KU Engineering’s active-learning class- room design and usage, prioritizing course assignments in the active-learning classrooms, helping faculty to advance their pedagogy by incorporating best practices, and advancing implementation of student- centered, active-learning approaches in the School of Engineering. Caroline is also active in contributing to university-level discussions
Fall of 2015 taking online courses learning how to construct and de- liver online courses. This resulted in a MSEd from Purdue University in Learning Design and Technology (LDT). This widely varied background prepared me well for my next big adventure. Beginning in August 2018 I became the Texas A and M Professor of Practice for the Texas A and M Engineering Academy at Blinn College in Brenham. Texas A and M Engineering Academies are an innovative approach to providing the planet with more Aggie Engineers. I am focused on enhancing the high school through first-year college experience and am an engaged member of the Texas A and M IEEI (Institute for Engineering Education and Innovation). My foundations were
The University of Texas at Arlington Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationGiven this importance, industries report that students graduating from technical programsare generally not well prepared for the writing requirements of the contemporaryworkplace 1. Industries naturally have their own set of terminology committed to thespecific requirements and situations exclusive to their form of business. Communicatingeffectively within an industry is a direct result of an individual’s ability to understand anduse the industry’s vocabulary and communication practices. Effective writtencommunication skills can assist in the acquisition of sought-after contracts and clients aswell as assist in maintaining
students in terms of community, professional development, andpersistence. The combination of qualitative research data and quantitative evaluation dataprovide an unprecedented opportunity to understand what the impacts of the LLC have been,while also examining why and how students feel the different program components have beeneffective. The LLC best practices for building inclusive environments and retaining womenpursuing engineering majors are discussed.Theoretical FrameworkTinto developed a theory of departure from higher education institutions using the concept ofintegration as a basis for understanding the phenomenon.11, 12 This theoretical model provides anexcellent lens for understanding the impacts of a women’s engineering LLC. Tinto
collaborated with the director of CarnegieMellon’s Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence and Educational Innovation.3. MethodsBecause many students are funded with the expectation that the research experience constitutesfull- or near full-time work, the program was both designed and scheduled to dovetail withinthese students’ scheduling needs. Initially, we had discussed what might be accomplished byhaving a single weekend experience (of the sort that other units on our campus are able toaccomplish through intensive weekend experiences and “micro” courses); however, we quicklydetermined that the kinds of learning outcomes and associated practice activities we wanted forstudents would need to unfold in a more systematically scaffolded way that
community including serving as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, on the FIE Steering Committee, and as President of the IEEE Education Society for 2009-2010. She is an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education. She and her coauthors were awarded the 2011 Wickenden Award for the best paper in the Journal of Engineering Education and the 2011 and 2015 Best Paper Awards for the IEEE Transactions on Education. In Spring 2012, Dr. Lord spent a sabbatical at Southeast University in Nanjing, China teaching and doing research. Dr. Lord received the IEEE Undergraduate Teaching Award.Dr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at
information processing are madeavailable at college campuses (Grasha, 1996).Implementation and Assessment The author utilizes several tools for assessing the data he has collected over the years.The author tries to implement ideas from several researchers and scholars into practice usingmodern technology (Marchese, 1991, 1997). Appendix A shows the five principles that are important while a course is designed,developed and assessed. Appendix B shows the matrix generated by the author for conducting assessment. Inthis particular case, the author chose to assess the subject matter of Industrial Engineering.The author decided that there were 16 important traits that need to be assessed. Appendix C documents this data collected
education.Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt P.E., University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Plus program. She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where students learned about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in en- gineering education include service-learning
graduate also ought to demonstrate 1) ability to manage a project (including afamiliarity with business, market-related, and financial matters), 2) a multidisciplinary systemsperspective, 3) an understanding of and appreciation for the diversity of students, faculty, staff,colleagues, and customers, and 4) a strong work ethic. During Phase II of this project, weidentified several assessment instruments that might measure those outcomes and begansearching for instructional “best practices” thought to promote the 15 desired learningoutcomes. This paper, based on Phase III of the project, provides empirical evidence from andidentifies the gaps in higher education and engineering education journal articles that linkinstructional best practices with
on structural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder.Dr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado - Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She serves as the ABET assessment coordinator for the department. Professor Bielefeldt is the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Aca- demic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning
participated in “CIMER – Facilitating Entering Mentoring” mentor training facilitated by certified Clemson university program coordinators. • Students are required to take a 1hr seminar course that covers tips for being successful in a PhD program.The B2D program at Clemson University is an example of how additional externalfunding can follow and contribute to a foundation of support for domestic, BIPOC,and women graduate students. B2D fellows now comprise a formal and informalnetwork of student support and mentorship across STEM disciplines and graduateprograms. Presenters will share successes, challenges and best practices. B2D Fellowsinclude STEM ALL IN Fellows and together they have created a community of
Paper ID #29194Teacher Leader Engineering Network (TaLENt): A Collective Impact Modelfor K-12 Engineering Teacher Leaders (Work in Progress)Christina Anlynette Crawford, Rice University As Associate Director for Science and Engineering of the Rice Office of STEM Engagement, Christina leads the NanoEnvironmental Engineering for Teachers program. In this capacity, she guides Houston area secondary science teachers in weekly meetings on Rice’s campus to ”best practices” in educational pedagogy. She currently has a B.S. in Biology from Texas A and M Corpus Christi, an M.S.Ed from the University of Houston, and is a Ph.D