Marasco is a Ph.D. student at the University of Calgary. Her research focuses on creativity and cross-disciplinary curriculum development for engineering students as well as for K-12 and community outreach programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Maker: Light-Up Star FloorA local engineering and art festival encourages engineers and artists to work together to createbeautiful and interactive displays with a science and engineering theme. These displays aim tobring the joys of science and engineering to the general public and inspire others to create theirown artwork. One such project was the art car Star Car 2015, which was updated from its 2014version to
Paper ID #14540MAKER: Piezoelectric Crystal Experiments for High School Science and En-gineering StudentsMr. William H. Heeter, Porter High School Engineering Dept. My name is William (Bill) Heeter. I graduated from Texas A&M with an Engineering degree in 1973. I worked in Industrial Distribution for over 30 years before becoming a high school pre-engineering teacher. I have been teaching engineering and technology for the past 13 years. I have been a Master Teacher for ”Project Lead the Way”, CTE co-Director, CTE Building Chair, Technology Teacher. My students have received many awards and college scholarships. One
effective performancesof underrepresented groups in science, Active Reflectivetechnology, engineering, and math graduate Experimentation Observationprograms 5. Industry field trips have beenshown to increase students' engagement andaffective learning 8. Wong et al. 32 also Abstractreported the effectiveness of experiential Conceptualizationlearning in the Project Haiti program.Exeriential learning activities are used by Figure 1. Kolb 1 Model of Experientialseveral engineering educators. For instance, recent course
Paper ID #15207Making Changes: Application of an NSF-ADVANCE PAID Grant at a Pre-dominantly Undergraduate Institution (PUI)Dr. Theresa M. Vitolo, Gannon University Theresa M. Vitolo is an Associate Professor in the Computer and Information Science Department, Gan- non University (Erie, PA). Teaching in systems-related fields since 1986, she joined the Computer and Information Science Department at Gannon University in 1999. In addition to teaching, she has worked as a systems analyst / programmer on a variety of systems development projects. Her academic background includes a B.S.E. in industrial engineering and a Ph.D. in
what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Dr. Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alejandra Magana is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer and Information Technology and an affiliated faculty at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.E. in Information Systems, a M.S. in Technology, both from Tec de Monterrey; and a M.S. in Educational Technology and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education
factor ‘Q’ and the Voltage gain ‘GV’ arethe basis of electrostatic assist (ESA) no-shake algorithm used in designingMicroeletromechanical sytems(MEMS) which I have been working on forthe last ten years. This example excited the students of mechanicalengineering to the extent that seven students out of forty made straight A’s,especially when I pointed out that the lead engineer of MEMS at AnalogDevices is a Mechanical engineer. The ‘f0’ and ‘Q’ are of paramountimportance in designing and testing bulk acoustic wave (BAW) filters, aresearch project I was involved at Skyworks Solutions for seven years. Atthe moment I am involved as a collaborative research endeavor with theSkyworks at replacing or minimizing the wet processing with dry
University Colin received his B.S. in Physics in 2010 and M.S. in Science and Technology Studies in 2011, both from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. After that, he taught high school Physics in Newark NJ. He is currently a Ph.D student at NYU in Science Education, working on multiple projects which focus on urban science education. Colin’s interested in studying urban science education around issues of equity, learning in and out of school, teacher preparation and students from multiple lenses.Dr. Jennifer B. Listman, New York University Dr. Jennifer Listman is the Assistant Director, Program Development and Evaluation, Center for K12 STEM Education, New York University Polytechnic School of Engineering. As the Center’s
laboratories.Dr. Matthew Garratt, University of New South Wales A/Prof Matt Garratt is the research admissions coordinator for the school of Engineering and IT and is based in the Canberra campus of UNSW Australia. His main research areas focus on sensing, guidance and control for autonomous systems. Some of his research successes include demonstration of terrain following using vision for an unmanned helicopter, landing an unmanned helicopter onto a moving deck simulator and control of helicopters using neural networks. Some of his current research projects include achieving autonomous flight in cluttered environments using monocular cameras and range sensors, land- ing UAVs on moving platforms, formation satellite control
Education, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 301-306,2006.[2] C. J. Robinson, “First course on biomedical engineering for desperate students”, ASEE Annual Conference,Vancouver, Canada, 2011.[3] C. Ramon, “Teaching Medical Instrumentation at the University of Washington”, MATLAB Digest, 2007.[4] J. Nielsen, J. Boharquez, Q. Shen, “Teaching Virtual Instrumentation to Biomedical Engineering Students”,ASEE Annual Conference, StarkVille, MS, USA, 2012.[5] D. J. Beebe, “Teaching Hands On Biomedical Instrumentation”, ASEE Annual Conference, Washington, DC,1996.[6] T. Pan, P. Fan, H. Chiang, R. Chang and J. Jiang, “Mechatronic Experiments Course Design: A MyoelectricControlled Partial-Hand Prosthesis Project”, IEEE Transaction on Education, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 348-355
; 2005; Jamieson et al., 2009; Mena et al., 2012; Hundley et al., 2012;Knight, 2012; Spinks et al., 2006; Bourn and Neal, 2008). In the Middle East, the GCC, andQatar an investigation similarly has not been conducted, hence this study sheds an importantperspectives bridging an empirical gap in the literature and contributing to better design offuture engineering education in Qatar.There are four main dimensions that are driving Qatar’s economy into a KBE: 1- QatarNational Vision 2030, 2- World Cup 2022 and the associated mega projects, 3- Instability ofOil and Gas prices, and 4- Regional growth and competition for skills, products, andinvestments in the GCC region mainly led by UAE and Saudi Arabia.Qatar is increasingly investing in knowledge
within other engineering topics.Since the course’s development in 2004, many of the laboratory experiments stemmed from atraditional General Chemistry 2 Laboratory. While some biological components were integrated,the overall structure of the class was similar to that of a chemistry laboratory, where a series ofone-day experiments with multiple trials were done. The goal was to integrate the problem basedlearning approach to create an experimental process that would better align with what engineersmight experience in other project based courses using a series of problem based learningexperiments (PBLE) while increasing student engagement in comparison to traditional chemistryexperiments.Laboratory DevelopmentThe experimental topics were
Leadership Training at LSI Corporation and received an award LSI Corporation Worldwide Operations Review 1999 for his significant contributions to the Quality Improve- ment Systems. At LSI Wajid was the PE in charge of the world famous APPLE IPOD 2000-2001 proces- sor WW qualification/production. Over the years Wajid has managed several projects related to stream- lining operations with utilization of state of the art technology and digital systems. This has given him significant experience working with ISO standard quality systems. He is a specialist on ABET accreditation procedures and was appointed by the Dean of Engineering, KFUPM, Hafr Al Batin campus to lead the intensive effort of preparing the EEET program for the
requisite time frame to evaluate material retention.However, formative assessment, helps instructors to save a situation by readjusting teachingmethods and directing students to the main course concepts; thus, both parties (educators andstudents), benefit from the knowledge loop in formative assessment.Summative assessment, an alternative to formative assessment, is well suited for evaluatingmaterial retention. This is usually done at the end of a cycle with a mid-term exam, final exam, aresearch paper or project presentation. Exams are conducted in various forms: take-home, open-notes-open-book, closed-notes-closed-book, closed-notes-closed-book with cheat-sheets. Closed-notes-closed-book exams are the orthodox form of exams which many educators
, Engineering and Mathematics, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award Certificate of Excellence. He served as Project Director a Na- tional Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Education Coalition in which six institutions systematically renewed, assessed, and institutionalized innovative undergraduate engineering curricula. He has authored over 70 papers and offered over 30 workshops on faculty development, curricular change processes, cur- riculum redesign, and assessment. He has served as a program co-chair for three Frontiers in Education Conferences and the general chair for the 2009 conference. Prof. Froyd is a Fellow of the IEEE, a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), an ABET
Paper ID #15876Work in Progress: Evaluation of the Concept Mapping in a Student-CenteredBiomaterials CourseMikayle A. Holm, Arizona State University Mikayle Holm, BSE is a student in the Barrett Honors College and School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering at Arizona State University. Mikayle will receive her bachelor’s degree in Biomed- ical Engineering in May 2016. She has a variety of research experience including a National Science Foundation funded Research Experience for Undergraduates, a Lab Coordinator position for Dr. Michael Caplan’s Type Two Diabetes/Childhood Obesity Lab, and an Honors Thesis project
- 193. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/213423278?accountid=14753 2. Stes, A., Coertjens, L., & van Petegem, P. (2010). Instructional development for teachers in higher education: impact on teaching approach. Higher Education, 60(2), 187-204. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9294-x 3. Veitz-Keenan, A., Spivakovsky, S. E., & Lipp, M. J. (2015, January). Considerations in evaluating teaching effectiveness in higher education [Scholarly project]. In New York University College of Dentistry. Retrieved February 05, 2016, from http://dental.nyu.edu/content/dam/nyudental/documents/ADE_whitepaper.pdf 4. Burke, R. A. (2005). Survey of 12 Strategies to Measure Teaching Effectiveness. International
American student or colleague who speaks English very quickly or has a strong regional accent. You’re having difficulty understanding him. A student comes to your office outside of your office hours. You’re very busy preparing for an exam you have tomorrow and you do not have time to help her, but it’s clear that she really needs help. You are suspicious of students cheating or have evidence of such. Consider different instances of cheating: homework, lab report, or computer assignment; exam or quiz; major project report (plagiarism.) A student who is not doing well in your class speaks to you about his progress in your class. During the conversation, he divulges details about some difficulties
’ identified. Thestudent outcomes, l to n listed below, for the ECET program are identical to the outcomes c, dand e of program criteria for Electrical/Electronic(s) Engineering Technology and similarlynamed programs4. The outcomes a and b of the EET program criteria of ETAC-ABET aresupported by student outcomes ‘a to k’ of our ECET program. l. The ability to analyze, design, and implement control systems, instrumentation systems, communications systems, computer systems, or power systems. m. The ability to apply project management techniques to electrical/electronic(s) systems. n. The ability to utilize statistics/probability, transform methods, discrete mathematics, or applied differential equations in support of electrical
Paper ID #15082 Dr. Richard H. Crawford is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin and is the Temple Foundation Endowed Faculty Fellow No. 3. He is also Director of the Design Projects program in Mechanical Engineering. He received his BSME from Louisiana State University in 1982, and his MSME in 1985 and Ph.D. in 1989, both from Purdue University. He teaches mechanical engineering design and geometry modeling for design. Dr. Crawford’s research interests span topics in computer- aided mechanical design and design theory and methodology. Dr. Crawford is co-founder of the DTEACh program, a ”Design Technology” program for K-12, and is active on the faculty of the
second and third laboratory exercises of the semester(Lab 2 and Lab 3, respectively). In addition, a one‐week‐long Lab Practical exercise (Lab 3b) wasperformed after Lab 3, as shown in Table 2. The remaining lab exercises (Labs 1, 4, and a four‐week‐long design project) were conducted with no differences in instruction and were not used asa part of this study. Table 1. Laboratory agenda for M, W, F lab sections and Tu, Th lab sections. Lab Minutes M, W, & F Lab Section Activities Tu & Th Lab Section Activities Week 1: 0–15 TA gives introductory lecturette TA gives introductory lecturette Week 1: 15–45 Students work in groups to prepare Students work in groups to prepare
sectors. Back- ground in engineering, program and project management, managed manufacturing and industrial engi- neering departments and teams in the aerospace, electronics and telecom industries. Educator, with ex- perience managing departments, programs, research and teaching undergraduate and graduate, business administration and general education courses. Authored, published and presented research papers in con- ferences, peer reviewed journals, with multidisciplinary interests in technology, business, quality systems, organizational leadership and education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 AN ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER STARTUP KIT FOR FUNDAMENTALS OF
infrastructure Figure 2: Sample of grouping of "stickie" notesRound 2: Online poll to request ideasof learning outcomes Process – Five members of the CIT-E community, all of whom were PIs on the NSF grant that funded the project, are members of the “management team.” This management team simplified the wording of the outcomes from Round 1 and split the original outcome 3 into two distinct outcomes (3 and 4 in the new list). Furthermore, one additional outcome was added to coincide with exercises that been successfully conducted at University Y in which students go out into the local area and inspect real infrastructure (number 8 in the list below): 1. solve open-ended infrastructure
Engineering Education Research (CEER) which examines innovative and effective engineering education practices as well as classroom technologies that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on National Science Foundation (NSF) funded projects exploring engineering design thinking. His areas of research include engineering design thinking, adult learning cognition, engineering education professional development and technical training. He has extensive international experience working on technical training and engineering educaton projects funded by the Asian Development Bank, World Bank, and U.S. Department of Labor, USAID. Countries where he has worked include Armenia, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, China
other people's kids.” This was a way for her to integrate her whole self into work.Natasha, meanwhile, is a self-proclaimed “megalomaniac.” She knew that in order for her toremain engaged she must be challenged, “I'm the type of person, when you challenge me, yougive me something to go for, and I believe that's something that entices me, I'm going to goforward balls to the wall.” Knowing this about herself coupled with her “strong will” and“outspoken” nature, have garnered her opportunities to work on complex problems that havepushed her abilities and earned the respect of her peers, […] I came in worked on a project where I didn't know anything about coding really, and I've learned five languages to get a project done. Being guys
Paper ID #16129Engineering Students’ Self-Concept Differentiation: Investigation of Identity,Personality, and Authenticity with Implications for Program RetentionMs. Kylie Denise Stoup, James Madison University Kylie Stoup is a senior honors engineering student at James Madison University. Ms. Kylie Stoup grad- uates with a BS in Engineering in May 2016. She is in the second year of her 2-year-long engineering capstone project so far, involving the design and implementation of a greenway system in Harrisonburg. Her career interests include transportation infrastructure and city planning with a focus in social equity, as
. http://www.cs.wisc.edu/ markhill/DineroIV.[21] Gurpur M. Prabhu. Computer architecture tutorial, 2006. URL http://www.cs.iastate.edu/˜ prabhu/Tutorial/title.html. http://www.cs.iastate.edu/ prabhu/Tutorial/title.html.[22] P. Stanley-Marbell. The sunflower tool suite. URL http://sflr.org/. http://sflr.org/.[23] M. Perner. Mikrocodesimulator mikrosim 2010: the ultimate cpu-simulation program, November 2013. URL http://www.mikrocodesimulator.de/index eng.php. http://www.mikrocodesimulator.de/index eng.php.[24] CSIM. Atl programs. URL http://www.atl.external.lmco.com/projects/csim/. http://www.atl.external.lmco.com/projects/csim/.
engineering education research as a psychometrician, program evaluator, and institutional data analyst. As a psychometrician, she revised the PSVT:R for secondary and undergraduate students, developed the TESS (Teaching Engineering Self-efficacy Scale) for K-12 teachers, and rescaled the SASI (Student Attitudinal Success Inventory) for engineering students. As a program evaluator, she evaluated the effects of teacher professional development (TPD) programs on elementary teachers’ attitudes toward engineering and students’ STEM knowledge through a NSF DRK-12 project. As an institutional data analyst, she is investigating engineering students’ diverse pathways to their success.Dr. Teri Reed, Texas A&M University Teri
unsafeoutcomes.The goal of this paper is to briefly re-introduce the art of estimation in engineering. This isevident when dealing with entrepreneurial thinking where projections and estimations need to bequickly calculated and frequently modified as necessary. Estimation specifically allowsentrepreneurs to make quick inexpensive decisions, which would otherwise cost time andresources. This paper shares research work that involves various, example-based estimationmethods that are useful in engineering. The methods provide rough predictions of expectedoutcome, allowing students to intelligently guess a reasonable range of expected outcomes, givenbasic raw data within its necessary parameters. The methods include: • Segmentation • Fermi Estimation
engineering student populations.Dr. John K. Antonio, University of Oklahoma Dr. John Antonio is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and holds the Howard & Suzanne Kauffmann Chair in the Gallogly College of Engineering at the University of Oklahoma (OU). Dr. Antonio received his PhD in electrical engineering from Texas A&M University in 1989. He was a faculty member at Purdue University and Texas Tech before joining OU as professor and director of computer science in 1999. He has been an investigator for a number of funded research projects. As Associate Dean, Dr. Antonio represents the Dean’s office on matters related to academic programs and services, including outreach, recruiting, scholarships, advising
activities from the pilot program to be leveraged across multiple K-12 age ranges as part of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) outreach activities. To date, this program has been in place for three academic sessions of each course. Thework presented here will cover results and observations to-date, preliminary evaluations ofeffectiveness relative to standard (non-pilot) program instances, and plans for future work. Gradedistribution, pass/fail percentage, and anonymous student feedback surveys are utilized asmetrics to evaluate the impact of the pilot program’s changes for each of these courses.Description of Program The pilot program utilizes experiential learning tools in the form of hands-on projects,classroom