advisor for new and freshman students campus wide.Susan Murray, Missouri University of Science and Technology Susan L. Murray is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Management and Systems Engineering Department at the Missouri University of Science and Technology. Dr. Murray received her B.S. and Ph.D. in industrial engineering from Texas A&M University. Her M.S. is also in industrial engineering from the University of Texas-Arlington. She is a professional engineer in Texas. Her research and teaching interests include human systems integration, productivity improvement, human performance, ergonomics, and engineering education. Prior to her academic position, she spent seven years working
-based design philosophy that are hallmarks of thecivil engineering program at Rose-Hulman there were to be no changes to the current curriculumto accommodate the development of the BOK compliant tract. To maintain the integrity of thecivil engineering program, all engineering courses within the current curriculum must be taken atRose-Hulman. Additional courses included in the BOK compliant tract to achieve specializationmay not necessarily be limited to courses offered at Rose-Hulman. Our intent is not to modifythe current curriculum but to offer an alternate tract within the current curriculum that wouldallow for students with sufficient off-curriculum hours to take the additional courses required forspecialization. In addition, we prefer to
electronic evidence collection and analysis of student learning outcomes incourses. The discussion will include sample results of this tool and its utility in preparing a self-study for an ABET site visit. Finally, future goals in relation to continuous improvementpractices will be highlighted.Background As previously mentioned, the accreditation organization, ABET inc., includes continuousimprovement in its list of general criteria for evaluation. Furthermore, the ABET general criteriaof student outcomes, program educational objectives, and curriculum are synergistically relatedthrough the continuous improvement process. Student outcomes are descriptions of skills that astudent should be able to perform prior to graduation1. Currently, ABET
SE discipline fills this critical educational need to handle theincreasing demands for systems efficiency, effectiveness, and integration in engineering andbusiness operations. SE education is critical for the companies in the U.S. to remain competitiveand for U.S. engineering graduates to be able to participate in global engineering operations.This paper demonstrates some activities in designing a Bachelor of Science in SystemsEngineering (BSSE) curriculum. The activities include benchmarking other similar programs,performing an industry needs analysis, and fulfilling the needs from other engineeringdepartments and the institution’s B.S. requirements. A list of required skills in industry in the SErelated fields is used to map to the demand
Degree Programs in Software Engineering, Integrated Software & Systems Engineering Curriculum Project, Stevens Institute of Technology, September 30, 2009. www.gswe2009.org2. Ardis, M., Bourque, P., Hilburn, T. Lasfer, K. Lucero, S., McDonald, J., Pyster, A. and Shaw, M., Advancing Software Engineering Professional Education, IEEE Software, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 58-63, July/August 2011.3. Pyster, A., Lasfer, K., Turner, R., Bernstein, L., and Henry, D., Master‘s Degrees in Software Engineering: An Analysis of 28 University Programs, IEEE Software, vol. 26 , no. 5, pp. 94-10, September/October 2009.4. Abran, A., Moore, J.W., P. Bourque, P. and Dupuis, R. (Eds), Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK), IEEE
traditional lecture. For manystudents, the combination of difficulties with the level of mathematics and passivitywithin the traditional lecture style has an overwhelmingly negative impact on their abilityto learn and understand the subject matter. In recent years, scientific visualization hasemerged as an important tool in helping us understand many complex physicalphenomena. However, the problem of translating standard mathematical notation into thetraditional high-level computer languages has made it difficult to use programming andcomputers in the undergraduate classroom.To overcome these problems, state-of-the-art software for mathematical computing isbeing integrated into the teaching process to facilitate and foster an active
University at Indianapolis (IUPUI). The school offersundergraduate degree programs in: Mechanical Engineering Technology, Electrical EngineeringTechnology, Biomedical Electronics Technology, Electronics Manufacturing Technology,Computer Integrated Manufacturing Technology, Technical Graphics, Computer Technology,Civil Engineering Technology, Architectural Technology, Construction Technology, andOrganization Leadership and Supervision. The school also offers undergraduate and graduatedegree programs in Mechanical, Electrical, and Biomedical Engineering. The school has anenrollment of more than 2000 full and part-time students. The IUPUI campus has an enrollmentof 27,000 students in 18 schools and is the third largest university in Indiana
gain a better understanding of their desired career/work exploration by employing these Lean tools to evaluate processes and responsibilities integral to those roles in a virtual setting. Imagine a virtual reality nursing station, for example. Learners can actively observe and assess how they might use the Lean methodology to increase safety, efficiency, teamwork and encourage employee empowerment to provide an overall improved experience for the nurses, staff, and patients, as well. Educators For educators, the Lean curriculum offers a straightforward concept that demands minimal computation, much to the delight of some learners. The modules come equipped with project- based and problem-based activities, which align with the learning outcomes
the 2001-02 school year MUSCLE placed 12 undergraduate Engineering Teaching Fellowsfrom the Pratt School of Engineering in Lakewood Elementary School and Rogers Herr MiddleSchool. These schools were selected as partnership schools since one of the goals of this projectwas to have a specific focus on fostering an interest in math for underrepresented minoritystudents and each school has a predominantly African-American population. The majority ofteaching fellows were also African-American. Fellows assisted teachers in developing andcarrying out hands-on learning projects that integrated math into all areas of the curriculum butwith a particular emphasis on life sciences. The fellows taught in ways that were fun andexciting to the students and
intermediate algebra or precalculus math level. Thelearning community, titled “Engineering in Context” spans two academic quarters and includessix different courses which integrate place-based learning. The curriculum includes a new two-quarter precalculus for engineering sequence, contextualized English composition, and PacificNorthwest history. Specific sections of these four courses along with our existing first-yearengineering sequence (ENGR 101: Introduction to Engineering and ENGR 151: IntroductoryDesign and Computing) create the two-quarter learning community. Introductory engineeringcontent includes an orientation to the engineering profession, academic skill development,introductory physics, problem-solving, computer programming, and team
Project Management Institute (PMI). Dr. Parris is actively involved in curriculum design, introduction of innovative pedagogies of engagement and the practice of engineering education through teaching several courses across the department. He is integrally involved in the design and delivery of the Pre-Freshman and Cooperative Education Program and others of that ilk at OSU, as a part of his specific interest in soft skill development, diversity, recruitment and retention initiatives.Dr. Krista M Kecskemety, Ohio State University Krista Kecskemety is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. Krista received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio
data science activities.7. A major project that 1) incorporates an application domain area and 2) requires integration and application of knowledge and skills acquired in earlier course work.5.2 Data Science Curriculum in An Applied and Natural Science ProgramANSAC (Applied and Natural Science Accreditation Commission) is still in process of define Data Science program criteria. AmericanStatistical Association is the leading society to define the Data Science criteria under ANSAC. It is expected the curriculum will be verysimilar to the curriculum criteria under CAC.6 Review Two Data Science ProgramsWe review two mentioned two programs’ curricula and discuss whether a program should apply for CAC or ANSAC accreditation
newlycreated concentration in bioprocess engineering provides an excellent opportunity to developand implement a novel curriculum based upon proven pedagogical approaches designed toengage the students and improve their mastery of concepts. There are four main objectives ofthis NSF funded (DUE-0737198) Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement project:utilize proven techniques to develop nine instructional modules for three bioprocess engineeringcourses (three modules per course); develop common themes to integrate subsets of thesemodules between two or more courses, while ensuring portability to other programs; assess theeffectiveness of the instructional modules; and disseminate the results so other programs canincorporate the modules into
engineering curriculum. Page 15.1264.72. Students motivated to pursue engineering but lacking the analytical foundation required are provided a rich opportunity to strengthen their math training PRIOR to the calculus sequence.Page 15.1264.8Alex Chediak. An introduction for the major course under development and taught by the deanwas a pilot for the whole University and integrates and incorporates hands on designopportunities, a Christian worldview and utilizes Dr. Ray Landis’ outstanding text “StudyingEngineering: A Roadmap to Success”. In addition there is a service learning requirement and anadditional engineering design course the first year. In
and Similarly Named Programs; therefore, this paper alsoprovides an overview of the new commentary.Current and Proposed Civil Engineering Program CriteriaThe ABET/EAC accreditation criteria for baccalaureate-level civil engineering programsincludes both general criteria and program-specific criteria. Requirements stipulated in theprogram-specific criteria are limited to two areas: (1) curriculum topics and (2) facultyqualifications. The focus of this paper is on civil engineering curriculum topics, noting that thefaculty qualifications area has not changed in many years nor have any changes to the facultyqualifications been proposed. The current (2015/2016) civil engineering program curriculumcriterion6 is provided here: The program must
Session 2213 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY AND BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING WITH A CHEMICAL ENGINEERING FOUNDATION Melanie McNeil, Art Diaz, Michael Jennings, and Claire Komives Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, San Jose State UniversityABSTRACT: Chemical Engineering principles are utilized in a variety of industries such assemiconductor processing, environmental engineering and biotechnology. One main characteristicof these fields is their multidisciplinary nature. Thus, parts of the chemical engineering curriculumcan be an integrated into the training of engineers desiring to work in these fields. We willdescribe
the bridge between the engineering and management disciplines.6 The engineering manager possesses both the ability to apply engineering principles and a skill in organizing and directing people and projects.3EM programs are distinguished from systems engineering (SE) programs primarily by themanagement aspect. SE focuses on the development life-cycle from an operational andmathematical perspective with heavy emphasis on decision analysis, structured problem solvingapproaches, and the interaction/integration of systems. In contrast, an EM program focuses onmanaging SE efforts and engineering relationships with the rest of the organization. Along thespectrum of programs labeled as EM, those that rely heavily on industrial
results in a bloated and disjoint curriculum. The need for additionalbackground in biological sciences is an exemplar. The entire core program has been reviewed,recommendations for improvement developed and acted on, and assessment conducted to Page 15.337.6determine the effect of implemented curricular changes.The second area of content concern lies in the current specialization options of the AES program.Because 95% of students select the supply chain management program, AES is effectively amore technically grounded variation on the Michigan State University supply chain major. AESgraduates are increasingly finding excellent professional
interface through molecular dynamics.Naser Haghbin, Fairfield University Dr. Naser Haghbin is an Assistant Professor and Director of the Innovation Annex at Fairfield Univer- sity’s School of Engineering and Computing. With a distinguished career in Mechanical Engineering, he focuses on advancing industrial automation, robotics, and smart manufacturing. Driven by an inter- disciplinary approach, he seamlessly integrates traditional and advanced manufacturing processes with CNC machining, contributing significantly to academia and industry. Moreover, he excels in operating two fully automated robotic paint shops, showcasing his expertise in manufacturing processes, practical automation, and robotics in large-scale
systems.SummaryStudents in engineering and technology programs need laboratory experience with moderninstrumentation to prepare them to use this equipment in industry. This paper has outlinedefforts at Lake Superior State University to build students’ competence and confidence with thistechnology by integrating the use of this equipment throughout the curriculum in bothfundamentals and advanced laboratory courses.AcknowledgmentLake Superior State University acknowledges and appreciates an Instrumentation and LaboratoryImprovement (ILI) grant from the National Science Foundation, “Improving the LaboratoryExperience in Engineering Technology with Modern Computer-Based Instrumentation,” DUE9452284, and grants from the Society of Manufacturing Engineers Education
throughout the curriculum, from the first to the last year. Page 5.42.3The philosophy of the workshopsIn our program, design is seen as an essential element of the curriculum. The design workshopsprovide for a continuous integration of knowledge and designing skills. These workshops arearranged in a sequence which assumes that design is a skill acquired with experience and basedon a methodological process, tools and techniques (see Figure 2). In the course of the first threeworkshops, students learn the methodology and the tools needed to design mechanical
, pp. 190-197.[11] Al-Holou, N., N. M. Bilgutay, C. Corleto, J. T. Demel, R. Felder, K. Frair, J. E. Froyd, M. Hoit, J. Morgan and D. L. Wells, "First-year integrated curricula across engineering education coalitions," Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference, 1998, pp. 177-197.[12] Tonkay, G. L., R. Sause, L. A. Martin-Vega and H. G. Stenger, "Integrating design into freshman engineering: a Lehigh experience," Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference, 1997, pp. 1115-1119.[13] Nelson, J. and S. Napper, "Ramping up an integrated engineering curriculum to full implementation," Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference, 1999, pp. 13C12/12-13C12/17.[14] Morgan, J. R. and R. W. Bolton, "An
andcollaborative industry/university partnerships or alliances should have as their primary focus thedevelopment of those graduates.Clearly, new paradigms for educational quality excellence are needed to break the traditionalbarriers and move toward an integrated educational vision of the 21st Century. However "what"needs to be done is more clear than “how” to do it. Let’s look at an example of “how” it can bedone.EMP Partnership ModelOne Industry/University Partnership model that enables the collaborative actions and develops“industry ready” graduates is summarized next. (Also see [4], [5].) Cal Poly initiated aninnovative MS / MBA Engineering Management Program (EMP) in 1990 and the EMPPartnership in 1992 to integrate the graduate curriculum with the
computer sciencecurriculum or a circuit theory curriculum. In the last few years, however, we’ve beenfocusing on in integrating both hardware and software engineering into EECS PBL at thesecondary level. We have been carrying out this work with classes of rising high schoolseniors in a number of summer enrichment programs run through the Office ofEngineering Outreach Programs (OEOP) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Inthe last two years we have particularly been exploring ways of deploying single-boardcomputer platforms including the BeagleBone Black and Raspberry Pi as means ofproviding a flexible, enriching, and open-ended project-based learning experiences thatprovides significant exposure to both hardware and software development
, Computer Science, and Technology, CSU- Kaibab LA, Student Development: An Alternative to Sink or Swim9:15 – 10:15 Concurrent Session Presentations Kaibab Applications of Technologies I Integrating Contemporary Issues II San Moderator: John Tester Moderator: Dieter Otte Francisco • Elizabeth Brauer, WeBWorK • Peg Pankowski, Assessment for Development in Electric Circuits Accreditation and Beyond • Bruno Osorno, Online Teaching of • William R. Peterson, Academe and Electrical
Computer laboratoriesUH continues to assist in integrating laboratory experience with theoretical and textbook learningthroughout the curriculum. However, an ongoing obstacle is that the current lab space, althoughaesthetically pleasing, is not well-designed for conducting labs. For example, it is extremelydifficult to conduct the soil laboratory in the space provided, and the marble floor in the concretelab are not up to the wear and tear this lab entails.Computer Laboratory and IT Resources: As of June 2008 furniture has been purchased and isbeing installed in the third-floor computer lab and second-floor library of the HU engineeringbuilding. Originally it was proposed that each engineering classroom contain a smart board andrelated computer
responsibility • the broad education necessary to understand the impact of an engineering solution in a global and societal context • proficiency in a minimum of four recognized major civil engineering areas • an ability to perform civil engineering design by means of design experiences integrated throughout the professional component of the curriculum Engineering tools • an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice Laboratory experience
, and computer administeredquizzes. The term paper is done in two stages. Each student writes an individual paper, due at midterm, onan agreed upon theme. The students are organized into groups according to themes. Then they revise theirpapers and integrate them into a group report, with an accompanying oral presentation. Page 1.15.1 1996 ASEE Annual Conference ProceedingsCourse Content and Goals The course is divided into four parts, focusing on X-ray (including computed tomography (CT)), nuclearmedicine, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The course content is selected
comparing programs to assess program effectiveness and efficiency.Effectiveness measures the achievement level of Program Outcomes and Program Objectives,while efficiency measures the portion of the curriculum devoted to each Program Outcome andProgram Objective. In order to perform benchmarking, programs with similar programobjectives, program outcomes, and corresponding curriculum emphasis must be identified andthe curriculum must be measurable. This paper presents an approach to defining curriculummetrics that can be used for benchmarking programs as well as assessing curriculum efficiency.IntroductionIn earlier versions of the ABET criteria, needs of program constituents were addressed in thecontext of accredited program requirements. The
an Art Education masters/licensure program. The other four have done very well;three will teach in spring 2005, while the fourth has taken a leave this academic year. Becausethe demand for licensed Technology teachers is so remarkable, each of these graduates will havean endless number of teaching positions/opportunities from which to select. Virginia’s teachingreciprocity with 48 states means this “seller’s market” is a nationwide phenomenon.Contemporary framework for undergraduate engineering pedagogy Page 10.649.4BEEVT investigators launched a number of data collection activities with objectives to analyzechanges in GE curriculum and