-engineering major” .More students were confident in their Calculus abilities (76% “Confident” or “Veryconfident”) versus Physics (52%), Computer Skills (45%), or Chemistry (36%).Eighty-nine percent of the respondents thought they had strong problem-solving skills,75% felt confident in their ability to succeed in engineering and 70% thought theyneeded to spend more time studying. Over half planned to join a student engineeringorganization. Interestingly, 42% did not feel they knew what an engineer does and 62%tend to procrastinate, putting off the things they need to do.Overall students gave very positive feedback to the DEE program and to the teachingassistants. Nearly all respondents (98% “Agree” or “Strongly agree”) would recommendDEE to other
, which is authentic reflection on the process. Some of the groups that we looked atdid very thoughtfully reflect on points such as how this assignment and course altered theirperceptions of engineering practice, and how their team carried out the design process to accountfor CSR. However, most team reflections were superficial and vague, at best, a result we havealso seen in past work incorporating reflection into engineering courses [12]. We plan to providebetter guidance to the students moving forward on what high-quality reflections look like. Wealso will work to weave CSR more completely throughout the semester. A few students observedon the end-of-semester course evaluations that it was a focus at the beginning and end of thecourse, but was
sessionsconnected research to practice. First, the leadership team determined the topics for eachworkshop. Then the project leadership created a time management schedule. The projectleadership team then selected readings, websites, videos, or other content for each session. Thisinformation was then utilized to develop PowerPoints presentations.A cohesive “workshop” plan was developed for each session, which then went through athorough review process. Each workshop consisted of an introduction, brief discussion ofhomework results, a mini-lecture covering the main topic for that session, then one or twofacilitated activities (ie. breakout discussions, think-pair-share, active learning activities), andconcluded with a report back from group work or a
andstatistical analyses plans to test their chosen specification. When possible, the teams areencouraged to present the preliminary results or simulations. This project is assigned at thebeginning of the quarter, and the teams are encouraged to work on it throughout the quarter inparallel with their design process. The project results are then presented in class in place of thefinal exam.AssessmentIn the current academic year, the Biomedical Device Evaluation course was taught for the firsttime (N = 45 students). In May 2019, a survey will be administered to assess the students’perceived knowledge of the regulatory and device evaluation topics, their level of confidence inthat knowledge relative to other professional BME topics, and its applicability
coordinator for the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. She teaches at the graduate and undergraduate level, using both face-to-face and blended online learning instruction. She is an Adjunct Faculty for the Transportation Systems and, the City & Regional Planning programs at MSU. Her research interests include engineering education, student success, online engineering pedagogy and program assessment solutions, transportation planning, transportation impact on quality of life issues, bicycle access, and ethics in engineering. She has several published works in engineering education and online learning. Dr. Petronella James earned her Doctor of Engineering (Transportation) and Masters of City &
used.The ability to practice GD&T in student engineering drawings, as well as machining assemblieswith GD&T specifications makes a more competent mechanical engineer, who knows how toreduce the total time and budget required to complete a satisfactory design project.IntroductionIn the Fall and Spring semester of their Senior year, the Mechanical Engineering students arerequired to design and fabricate a machine for their capstone projects. A popular machine for theSeniors to design and manufacture is a Stirling Engine. In the Fall semester, each design group isrequired, among others, to create their designs using a Computer Aided Design software andproduce engineering drawings for all of the parts they plan to manufacture. Prior to this
problems in engineering, from quantitative tocognitive reasoning (i.e., step-by-step, engineering design, rule- and similarity-based).Solving analytical problems in engineering may require the use of the widely accepted processdeveloped by Polya [31]that consists of the following steps: (1) Represent the Problem, (2) GoalSetting and Planning, (3) Execute the Plan, and (4) Evaluate the Solution. In the first step, thestudent reads the problem statement and identifies the objective. This step depends of thestudents’ ability to determine the structure of the problem and identify the concepts and formulasnecessary to solve it. During the second step, students must develop a path to reach the solution.The Execution step is where the student carries out
Electrical (Due to B 1 3 Emergency Escape Escape Dome Cover Protection for Vehicle Fail Open Escape Delay/Impossible HIGH Redundancy Fires or Other) Inadequate Life 4a Escape Vehicle Leaving the Moon Base Poor Planning Potential Death MED Redundancy
is honored with Geoffrey G. Eichholz Faculty Teaching Award in 2015 and Undergraduate Educator Award in 2012 from the Center for Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL), Georgia Tech.Dr. Tristan T Utschig, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Tris Utschig is Assistant Director for the Office of Assessment at Georgia Tech. Formerly, he was Assistant Director for Scholarship and Assessment of Teaching and Learning in the Center for the En- hancement of Teaching and Learning. He has extensive experience consulting with faculty for research, planning, implementation, and assessment of educational innovations and programs. Formerly, he was Associate Professor of Engineering Physics at Lewis-Clark State College. Dr
the machine would be tested and a video recorded.Although a Build Day was specified, student teams were encouraged to work with the adjacentteams prior to that so that they could test and modify their segments.As the Build Day approached, we decided to require a few test runs, for several reasons: - Although student teams were strongly encouraged to build and test, it was evident they were not doing this. Requiring a test run meant that students would have to build and test their designs prior to the official run day, giving them extra time to make changes to their design, if needed. - We were interested in documenting this project and planned on recording the machine in action during the official run day
their knowledge of patterns to complete weavings in pairs. Students will also use the properties of paper to make decisions about which papers to use as they plan for their basket design.• Lesson 5 – In the final lesson, students read about construction engineering as they are practicing the blending of three phonemes words presented in the story. S tudents are given the chance to build and test their basket designs when wet and when dry, before a cycle of sharing, redesign and retesting. F inally, students use what they learned during designing and testing to write letters to Max and Lola in
University Mark E. Yerger is the Chief Technology Officer at Bucknell University where he has been a member of the merged Library and Information Technology (L&IT) division since 2009. He oversees the systems and processes that support the seamless flow of information across Bucknell including enterprise technol- ogy operations, application development, business intelligence, systems integration, telecommunications, and networking. In addition, he is also responsible for planning, assessment, project management, and budgeting across L&IT. Mr. Yerger holds an MBA and a Project Management Professional (PMP) certifi- cation and was privileged to join in the acceptance of a 2015 CIO Impact award on behalf of his team
and how project-based learning (PBL)takes the center stage in this strategy. We assert that building a camp or even a lesson plan fromlearning blocks creates a totally immersive and engaging environment for the learner and makes itmuch more plug-and-play for the designer/instructor.Our paper will also focus on implementing these learning blocks in a K-12 mixed environment (allgrade levels, male and female participants) versus a much more homogenous cohort (all highschool, all female) type of camp. A showcase of student products (from reflective pieces to actualcreations) will be discussed along with how “check-ins” are built into the learning blockchallenges; the latter as a means to embed assessment into the project workflows dynamically
more complex AI, such as neural networks, can be trained.After completing that activity, the students were introduced to the final project: building an AIfor an autonomous Mars rover. The concept was first shown to them as a game, where theywere challenged to get the highest score possible. This required planning ahead to find the bestpath and learning how the rover operates. These activities drew on many areas of CT, includingmodeling and simulation, abstraction, and data representation. On the fourth day, the rover was re-introduced as a game, but this time the rover couldonly see the squares immediately adjacent to it. This required students to “sense” theirsurroundings and act based on limited information, just as the rover would
plan:(1) Instructor will ask students to modify the frequency tank circuit after the initial success to generate three specific frequencies (95MHz, 100MHz and 105MHz) that a customer can switch from one frequency to another.(2) Students who are unable to complete the project design and demonstration within four weeks, will be given an opportunity to complete the project with two weeks extension for 10% reduced points on their own time.ConclusionThis project in Electronic Communications II creates criticalthinking by introducing a design component in the critical part ofthe project which is the high frequency oscillator circuit togenerate the required carrier frequency for modulation. Whenstudents understand modulation process
system. Successive steps have been followed for the testing of Robot Control System. The fundamental architecture for the overall testing procedure for Robot Control System is depicted in Fig 8. Fig 8: System testing procedure © American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 2016 ASEE Southeast Section ConferenceTherefore, the entire test procedure is carried out based on the planning, designing,implementation and evaluation.i. Test Case GenerationAn apprize
• S-N diagrams • Miner’s rule • Paris lawAppendix B: Survey questionsThe following survey is administered as part of an effort to improve the aerospace structurescurriculum. Participation in the survey is voluntary. If you do not wish to participate, simplycheck this box and return the empty form. Survey results are anonymous and will not factorinto your grades. Please do not use cell phones or computers.1. What is your status regarding MAE 4281, Design of Aerospace Structures Already Completed: Year taken _____________ Currently Enrolled Plan to Take in the Future No plan to take
race in urban education, community development, and housing.His work investigates the significance of race in the quality of schools located incommunities that are changing both racially and economically. From a practical andtheoretical perspective, his research draws from Critical Race Theory, educational policyanalysis, sociology, urban planning, political science, community organizing, and youthculture.Facilitators: Dr. Ebony O. McGee, Assistant Professor of Diversity and STEM Education, Department of Teaching and Learning, Vanderbilt University Dr. William H. Robinson, Associate Dean, School of Engineering, and Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt UniversityMcGee and Robinson have collaborated on
ME-Practice classes replacing all traditionallab classes as part of a curriculum revision.The real course content planning started in summer 2013 with the finalization of the detaileddefinition of learning goals and identification of possible practice session experiments (not labs)that accomplish the learning goals in a particular sequence (scaffolding knowledge). Softwarepackages were chosen and coordinated for use in the curriculum to minimize the students havingto learn more software packages than needed. For the two-credit class, 13 weeks of materialswere created that cover safety training and writing instruction, data acquisition, reverseengineering of a consumer product and manufacturing techniques, tension and bending testing
learning13. It is consequentlyimportant to give students the opportunity to study outside of the typical classroom setting whiletackling real-world problems. It becomes the student’s responsibility to conduct research,develop a plan of action, and collaborate within a team. This approach helps discover naturaltalent, applies and expands on classroom knowledge, and may help launch a career in aerospaceor engineering based on that discovery.MethodsStudents were initially surveyed solely to gauge project interest based on academic major andpersonal preference. The group was initially comprised of 16 students willing to devote three tofive hours of work per week, with four students dropping out during the first half of the projectdue to personal
reducing the cost of solar in the Development of Solar Photovoltaic energy occur at the state Power,” Climate Policy Initiative, May 31, level instead of the national 2011.6 level, given that this energy source is likely to be more economic in some parts of the country, such as the southwestern United States, than others?Fusion Does the nation need an Holland, Andrew and N. Cunningham, “FusionEnergy “Apollo program” (as Power: A Ten-Year Plan for American Energy proposed by one advocacy Security,” 2014, American Security Project.7 group) that would
. The first ofthree phases is the problem recognition. Here, the student will understand the problem and createa plan to solve. The student will use verbal and mathematical representations for that purpose.On a second phase called problem framing, the students execute the plan creating computationalrepresentations of the phenomenon (i.e., the implementation of the model). Finally, on theproblem synthesis phase, the students will complete the plan by evaluating the solution. They Page 26.744.3will use computational, visual, mathematical, and verbal representations to ensure the solution iscorrect. The Methods section contains a detailed
presentations and written reports.Multidisciplinary Module: Structure, Lesson Plan, AssignmentStructure of the Multidisciplinary ModuleThe framework implemented in the multidisciplinary module is illustrated in Figure 1. Themodule was divided into three distinct phases. In Phase I, the two instructors taught fundamentaldisciplinary principles to students in their respective courses, as elaborated in the coursedescriptions above. For example, the civil engineering instructor taught the principles of staticequilibrium, structural design, and environmental impact of construction materials to the civilengineering students. The nuclear engineering instructor taught the principles of reactor physics,nuclear waste, and containment to the nuclear engineering
Paper ID #12963Female Millennial Perceptions of Engineering’s ’Brand’Ms. Lynsey Mitchell Kissane, Ryerson University Lynsey Kissane currently manages strategic planning for Ryerson University’s Faculty of Engineering and Architectural Science. In this role she is responsible for academic planning, finance and strategic initiatives including increasing female enrollment and supporting technology-entrepreneurs. Her previous role at George Brown College involved forging partnerships that resulted in equitable educational access and community and economic development. Before moving into higher education, Lynsey contributed
, the CIT-E community had a deeper understanding of flipping.We understood that flipping is not simply a matter of recording some screencasts for students to watchout of class. Rather, the design of the flipped classroom exercises must be intentional. The SecondAnnual Infrastructure Education Workshop is planned in May 2015 to answer the following questions,and the answers will be reported on the companion poster to this paper. What material in the current course(s) can readily be adapted to out-of-class screencasts? The answer to this question will provide an estimate of how much class time is now freed up for active learning exercises. What are the characteristics of an effective in-class question for the flipped
?” Page 26.789.4Observation process A pre-observation meeting “establishes a collegial tone for the entire process and is useful for gathering strategic information about the teacher’s pedagogical habits and practices along with any problematic issues or areas of concerns that he or she is experiencing in the classroom” (Buskit et al., p. 35). It also allows the observers to find out what the instructor’s plans are for the class to be observed. During this meeting, the observers explain the observation sequence, reassure the Collins Scholar of confidentiality, and provide him or her with the self-reflection instrument. During the class visit, the observers sit toward the back of the room and videotape the class. They take field notes guided by a
courses on student learning and student attitudes. We evaluate the quality anddepth to which faculty apply diverse teaching strategies for statics courses. It is our goal toincrease the adoption of research-based instructional strategies in statics courses, which willincrease the success of students in earning engineering degrees. We plan to motivate this changeby providing information on the effectiveness of innovative teaching methods in statics courses,data on effective methods and environments that facilitate faculty adopting these methods andapplying them effectively, and by providing data on the importance of statics instruction tostudents’ satisfaction and knowledge of statics. This information can then be leveraged toencourage instructor
Im1 Helped me to understand problem solving better Im2 Led me to a better understanding of my own career goals Im3 Increased my interests in studying engineering in college Im4 Increased my interests in studying a technical degree in college Im5 Made me think more about what I will do after graduating from high school Im6 Made me decide to work harder in school Made me decide to take different classes in school (including college) than I had Im7 planned to Im8 Made me more confident in my ability to succeed in engineering or a technical field Increased my confidence in my ability to participate in engineering projects or Im9 activitiesAfter all students took the electronic pre-survey, the
future plans for the course. Our assessment includesdetailed feedback from students and teaching assistants who completed the course in the initialtwo years.IntroductionAs a land grant institution with Research I status, The Ohio State University (OSU) has a longtradition of engineering education. In 2012, after over three years of preparation, the universityswitched from a longstanding quarter-based schedule to a semester schedule. The Department ofMechanical Engineering at OSU utilized this transition to review and improve their curriculumin order to better prepare their graduating engineers for entrance to the profession in anincreasingly competitive, global economy. Extensive input from alumni of the prior 20 years wasutilized with
, energy production studies, and strategic planning. He spent nearly 30 years as a consulting engineer and also worked for the Corps of Engineers. He also served as adjunct faculty at Seattle University where he taught water resources engineering and fluid mechanics. Mr. Killgore received both a Bachelors of Civil Engineering degree and Bachelor of Arts degree in Spanish from Seattle University (1978) and a Master of Science in Civil Engineering degree specializing in water resources and environmental engineering from the University of Washington (1984). He holds the Diplomate, Water Resources Engineer (D. WRE) specialty certification from the American Academy of Water Resources Engineers and is a licensed Professional