from the University of Maryland; and is a certified STEAM integration specialist. Dr. Shirey is passionate about helping teachers and students grapple with complex problems in novel ways, such as using science and math content with art practices and awareness to approach real-world engineering challenges.Dr. Stacy S. Klein-Gardner, Vanderbilt University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #38035Dr. Stacy Klein-Gardner serves as an Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Vanderbilt Univer-sity. She is the co-PI and co-Director of the NSF-funded Engineering For Us All (e4usa) project
. Her research interests center on interdisciplinary learning and teaching, technology-integrated STEM teaching practices, and assessment development and validation in STEM education.Dr. Daniel S. Puperi, The University of Texas at Austin Daniel is an assistant professor of instruction in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the Uni- versity of Texas at Austin. Dan received a BS in aerospace engineering from Purdue University and then worked at NASA Johnson Space Center for 15 years before pursuing a PhD in Bioengineering from Rice University. In 2016, Dan graduated from Rice and began teaching four design/laboratory courses required for all undergraduate BME students at UT Austin.Thomas E. Lindsay, The University
Paper ID #40633Workshop: Democratizing and Demystifying Engineering for All - Aworkshop to help you bring e4usa to your campusMr. Kevin Calabro, University of Maryland, College Park Kevin Calabro is Keystone Instructor and Director in the Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland and the Credit and Placement Lead for Engineering for US All (e4usa).Dr. Stacy S Klein-Gardner, Vanderbilt University Dr. Stacy Klein-Gardner serves as an Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Vanderbilt Univer- sity. She is the co-PI and co-Director of the NSF-funded Engineering For Us All (e4usa) project. She is also
Paper ID #36529On the Use of Video in Support of a Maritime Robotics STEM OutreachProgramDr. Leigh S McCue, George Mason University Leigh McCue is an Associate Professor and Chair of George Mason University’s Department of Mechan- ical Engineering.Stacey Rathbun, George Mason University Television Stacey is a Senior Producer/Director at George Mason University Television.Dr. Ali Khalid Raz, George Mason University Dr. Ali Raz is an Assistant Professor at George Mason University Systems Engineering and Operations Research department and an Assistant Director of Intelligent Systems and Integration at the C4I and Cyber
Innovation and Design Collaboration (IDC), he leads joint teachDr. Julie S Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Julie S. Linsey is a Professor in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technological. Dr. Linsey received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas. Her research area isDr. Tracy Anne Hammond, Texas A&M University Dr. Hammond is Director of the Texas A&M University Institute for Engineering Education & Innovation and also the chair of the Engineering Education Faculty. She is also Director of the Sketch Recognition Lab and Professor in the Department of Computer Science & Engineering. She is a member of the Center for
), American Educational Research Association (AERA) and Tau Beta Pi. She earned a B.S. in Bioengineering (1978) from the University of Vermont, and M.S. (1986) and Ph.D. (2002) in Bioengineering from Clemson University.Dr. David A. Delaine, The Ohio State University Dr. David A. Delaine is an Assistant Professor at The Ohio State University Department of Engineering Education. Within this newly formed department he strives to creatively impact engineering education and society through investigating community-based leDr. Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University SHAWN JORDAN, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of En- gineering at Arizona State University. He teaches context-centered
, Texas A&M University Blaine is currently a graduate student earning his Ph.D. in Educational Psychology with an emphasis in Research, Measurement, and Statistics at Texas A&M. His research is primarily focused on issues of equity in STEM education.Camille S. Burnett, Prairie View A&M University Camille S. Burnett, Ph.D., ACUE, is Assistant Professor of Mathematics Education and Director of the SMaRTS (Science, Mathematics, Reading, Technology, and Social Studies) Curriculum Resource Lab in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at Prairie View A&M University. She has almost 20 years of combined experience in the K-12 and higher education settings. She is also the principal investigator for
named in his honor.Mr. Boz N Bell, HP Inc.Mrs. Tiffany Grant King, HP Inc. Mechanical engineer with both academic research experience and industry experience in the areas of automotive, pharmaceutical, paper manufacturing, consumer products/goods, and technology engaged in the challenges in STEM education, talent acquisition, and global business systems. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023DIVERSIFYINGSTEM PATHW AYS:MATH CIRCLES OFCHICAGO Doug O’ Roark Boz BellA Ne wJ o u rn e y 1. The Need 2. A Solution 3. Outcomes 4. Shared Vision 5. Reflecting on the JourneyIn t ro d u c t io n s Doug O’ Roark
21 9.50 15.12 23.06 0.50 4.179 2 Su 21 12.00 21.03 22.75 0.50 4.467 3 F 21 12.00 20.00 23.00 0.50 4.194 4 S 22 12.00 21.70 22.60 0.50 4.579 5 S 22 13.00 21.80 23.00 0.50 4.322 6 S 22 13.40 20.70 23.00 0.50 3.981 7 S 22 12.00 20.20 22.90 0.50 4.319 8 S 22 11.50 20.50 23.00 0.50 4.594 9 S 22 12.50 19.60 23.00 0.51 3.883 10 S 22 9.00 14.90 22.50 0.51 3.979 11 S 22 10.00 15.80 22.80 0.50 4.037 12 S 22 9.00 15.80 22.90 0.50 4.469 13 S 22 13.00
Division; Senior Fellow CASEE, National Academy of Engineering, 2008-2010; Program Officer, NatDr. Maura Borrego, University of Texas, Austin Maura Borrego is Director of the Center for Engineering Education and Professor of Mechanical Engi- neering and STEM Education at the University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Borrego is Senior Associaate Editor for Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and E ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Lessons Learned from a Capacity-Building Workshop for Two-Year Colleges seeking U.S. National Science Foundation FundingAbstractThe Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM) program,managed by the U.S
bachelor’s degrees may be eager to enter the engineering workforce. However,in many engineering disciplines, individuals have more earning potential and career trajectoryoptions with a master’s degree. In this paper, we identify several categories of barriers and lessonslearned to launching an S-STEM focused on graduate students at a large R1 public institution thatmay be useful to other such programs. These include discussions on recruitment of this specializedpopulation of students into graduate school, especially those from other institutions, can bedifficult because i) there are structural and legal barriers to accessing financial information aboutstudents to identify low-income students and ii) smaller institutions may not have the
, and geosciences mobilized bonding and bridgingsocial capital to access academic and professional pathways. Specifically, this case studyinvestigated women in master’s programs participating in a National Science Foundation (NSF)S-STEM program and interdisciplinary community of practice, focused on a wicked problem ofunderstanding and balancing biogeochemical cycles in natural and engineered systems,incorporating a variety of strategies (e.g., mentoring, research opportunities, communityengagement, coursework) to ease transitions into and through master’s programs.Literature ReviewLimited research exists on graduate women in the STEM disciplines. Within the extant literature,we found that women were less likely to apply to graduate school than
North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2023, American Society for Engineering Education2.1 Data Generation: Using MATLAB (MathWorks, 1984), a code is written to generate a sinusoidal plot overa sixty second time period for trials 1-9 and a twenty second time period for trials 10-12. Thechange in time period for trials 10-12 is due to the number of waves present when graphed whichmakes differentiating between the calculated and recorded waves very difficult. A time interval of0.0305 seconds is used to obtain all data points. This step is done to match the values generated tothe values collected with the polling rate of the Arduino sensor (19200 baud or 45 points/s Twelveindividual data sets (path trials) are
Blocks(i) We will utilize the code blocks editor for listening to an Arduino input pin. Next, the analogvalue or digital state will be print out in the SerialM onitor window. To open the code panel, astudent needs to click the “Code” button.(ii) Next, s/he is asked to click on the SerialM onitor which is located at the bottom of the codepanel.(iii) To run the Arduino code, s/he should click “Start Simulation”, and observe the numbers inthe Serial Monitor during the interaction with the potentiometer. As the potentiometer input valuechanges by moving the pointer on the dial, the serial output value will change accordingly. Sincethe circuit includes two independent Arduinos, students can click back and forth between the twoArduinos while the
). For overthree decades, many researchers conducted various conceptualization studies on PCK (Grossman1990; Cochran et al., 1993; Loughran et al., 2012; Van Driel et al., 1998; Gess-Newsome 1999;Magnusson et al., 1999; Hashweh, 2005; Abell, 2008; Park and Oliver, 2008; Kind, 2009). Amongthese models, Magnusson et al. (1999)’s PCK model has been widely used in pre-service and in-service teacher education. In these prior efforts, most of the studies have argued for threeknowledge domains: content (subject) knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and contextualknowledge were the basic domains affected by teachers’ PCK (Abell, 2008; Cochran et al., 1993;Gess-Newsome, 1999; Grossman, 1990). In our approach, we identified four knowledge domains by
Scholarship ProgramIntroductionThere is a lack of low-income community college students who successfully transfer to four-year-institutions, graduate with an engineering baccalaureate degree, and enter the STEMworkforce/graduate school [1,2,3]. To remedy this situation, the current project, funded throughan NSF S-STEM grant, developed the “UC Irvine Pathways to Engineering Collaborative” tohelp low-income students from diverse backgrounds to successfully transfer to and persist in theengineering program of a four-year university. The designed program targets the population ofstudents who have the ambition to pursue engineering degrees, but often lack the resources orexposure to engineering opportunities. The aim of the project is to a) increase the
Electrical Engineering (ICITEE). https://doi.org/10.1109/icitee49829.2020.9271781Sense of Belonging References: [2] Walton, G. M., & Wilson, T. D. (2018). Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems. Psychological Review, 125(5), 617–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000115 [3] Walton, G. M., & Brady, S. T. (2017). The many questions of belonging. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (pp. 272–293). The Guilford Press. [4] Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 82–96. https
pedagogical content knowledge for undergraduate engineering and technology programs: Accelerating graduates’ preparedness for the 4IR geospatial industryAbstract:Surveying engineering technology (SET) and Geomatics (S/G) programs have significantly beenimpacted by advances of three-dimensional (3D) geospatial data acquisition technologiescoupled with innovation in computational infrastructure over the past decade. Today, large-volume 3D data in the form of point clouds, meshes, or other representations, are frequentlycollected by sensors such as Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and depth cameras for bothindustrial purposes and scientific investigations. Traditional surveying techniques are more oftenintegrated with the
Drexel. Since joining Penn State in 2004, has taught a variety of courses on RF and mi- crowave, electromagnetics, antennas, and communication systems to Electrical Engineering and Electri- cal Engineering Technology students. Dr. Tofighi’s main research interest for about 25 years has been on medical/biological applications of RF and microwave including wireless implants, microwave radiometry and imaging, biomedical antennas, interaction of microwave with tissues, and permittivity measurement using time and frequency domain methods. Dr. Tofighi’s main professional affiliation is with the IEEE Microwave Theory and Techniques Society (MTT-S). For many years, he has served the IEEE MTT-S in various capacities such as
Program Chair for the ASEE Faculty Development Division, and the Vice Chair for the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN). He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS) from the National Experimental University of T´achira, Master of Business Administration (MBA) from Temple University, and Engineering Education (PhD) from Virginia Tech.Dr. Jennifer Lyn Benning, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Jennifer Benning is an Instructor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Tech.Donna Westfall-Rudd ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 P R E S E NT A T I ON B Y Q U A L L A J O K E T CH U MWALKING BETWEENTWO WORLDSCreating a Framework for
students’ learning. The students were also encouraged to ask questions and interactwith their peers.InstrumentsThis study comprised multiple data sources: an open-ended questionnaire, classroomobservation, and an S-STEM survey. The open-ended questionnaire consisted of five questionsdesigned to probe students to share their experiences of the problem-based learning environment.The students were provided the opportunity to address their likes and dislikes regardingengineering learning through PBL and describe the strategies they used to solve each problemscenario [10]; [34].Classroom observations were conducted throughout the duration of the study. The commentsentailed the teacher and the students. The implementation of the lessons, pedagogy, and
). School engagement: Potential ofthe concept, state of the evidence. Source: Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3516061[2] Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitiveand psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal ofSchool Psychology, 44, 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002[3] Kashefi, H., Ismail, Z., & Yusof, Y. M. (2012). Supporting engineering students’ thinkingand creative problem solving through blended learning. Procedia - Social and BehavioralSciences, 56, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.638[4] Ohland, M. W., Sheppard, S. D., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., Chachra
, he completed his MSc Degree in Construction Management from Istanbul Technical University in 2019. For his MSc thesis, he focused on the integration of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in facilities management. Before joining MSU, he worked as a research & teaching assistant at ITU from 2017 to 2021.Andreana Louise RoxasDr. Kristen Sara Cetin P.E., Michigan State University Dr. Kristen S Cetin is an Associate Professor at Michigan State University in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.Dr. Annick AnctilGeorge Berghorn, Michigan State UniversityRyan Patrick Gallagher ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Developing and Evaluating a Virtual Training
and their association with career interest in STEM,” International Journal of Science Education, Part B, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 63–79, 2012.[5] Y. S. George, D. S. Neale, V. Van Horne, and S. M. Malcom, “In pursuit of a diverse science, technology, engineering, and mathematics workforce: Recommended research priorities to enhance participation by underrepresented minorities,” American association for the advancement of science, 2001.[6] N. Gonzalez, L. C. Moll, and C. Amanti, Eds., Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing Practices in Households, Communities, and Classrooms. New York: Routledge, 2005. doi: 10.4324/9781410613462.[7] P. Bell, L. Bricker, S. Reeve, H. T. Zimmerman, and C. Tzou, “Discovering and Supporting
this lack of representation in higher education engineeringprograms, the University of Lowell S-STEM program, funded by the NSF Scholarships inScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Program (S-STEM), has the goal torecruit three cohorts of low-income, high-achieving students who wish to pursue a career inhigher education. The UML S-STEM program supports engineering scholars for four years,their last two years of undergraduate school and their first two years of graduate school. Thegoal of the program is to attract and retain diverse engineering S-STEM scholars and preparethem to enter the competitive pool of future faculty candidates. We present our successes and challenges in recruiting the first two cohorts of low-income
. A., & Hensel, R. A., & Raisa, S. A., & Atadero, R. A., & Casper, A. A., & DeLyser, R. R., & Griffin, C. D., & Leutenegger, S. T., & Morris, M. L., & Paguyo, C., & Paul, J., & Park, S., & Rambo- Hernandez, K. E., & Roszelle, B. N. (2021, July), “Leveraging Changes in Engineering and Computer Science Curricula to Engender Inclusive Professional Identities in Students” Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/37454[3] C. Finelli, and M. Kendall-Brown, “Using an interactive theater sketch to improve students’ perceptions about and ability to function on diverse teams,” in American Society for Engineering
. It'snecessary in phase diagrams to prevent clutter and confusion, but students can benefit by seeingdatapoints on S/N fatigue curves and in graphs of Charpy impact energy vs. temperature. In suchgraphs, data points help students understand the degree of scatter that is normally found in thesemechanical tests.Some limitations of graphing software can be overcome by changing default settings on fonts,standard symbols, line thicknesses, hard-to-read vertically-oriented text, or a legend that fails tolist symbols in the same order as they appear on the graph. Other limitations are best overcomeby converting a graph to artwork.This paper demonstrates ways to improve the quality of engineering graphs used in materialseducation by comparing many examples of
thickness). They quantifiedcharring using an automated pixel counting method adapted from work on air void detection inconcrete [9]. The control factors responsible for the specimens in Figure 1’s Row A exhibitedthe most charring and highest variation as measured by signal to noise ratio (S/N). Row Bexhibited the least.For the individual projects one student chose to investigate laser settings that minimizeengraving time. Another student explored the effects on the surface quality of parts printed withthe Stratasys F170. He measured differences in surface height to ±0.0005 in to quantify surfacequality. This student went beyond the means and signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios required in TMdata analysis, conducting a one-factor ANOVA using R-Studio
, University of Missouri, Kansas City Dr. Michelle Maher explores student research, teaching, and disciplinary writing skill development and higher education access and equity issues. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Reaching Consensus: Using Group Concept Mapping in an S-STEM Research TeamAbstractThis study was done to explore Group Concept Mapping (GCM) as a method to reach consensusfor data collection using document analysis in an S-STEM research team. The team wascomprised of five members and the GCM approach was made up of six steps: (1) Preparation,(2) Generation, (3) Structuring, (4) Analysis, (5) Interpretation, and (6) Usage. The members ofthe
is to prepare the2023 Fall semester implementation. This will include a more detailed implementation frameworkfor 1101 Intro and UNIV 1301 sections. Further, the objective is to expand the interventions toinclude other departments in CECS and possibly to other colleges such as the College of Scienceor College of Business. Our vision is to have a sequence of interventions that continue thisFreshman Year experience with Sophomore, Junior, and Senior Year Innovator Experiences,with an increasing portfolio of skills each year. . T E S M ESS S ESS . T S . S E M T T