thatfocused on students’ preferences for Blackboard or Canvas as part of theundergraduate research effort, which resulted in 137 responses. In addition, a usabilitystudy was conducted to gain qualitative usability data. Among other questions, thestudent preference survey asked students to rank the two systems for the followingtasks: 1. Finding course documents 2. Finding grades 3. Having accurate and updated grades 4. Ease of navigation 5. Intuitiveness 6. Communicating with professorsVolunteers were recruited from the 2016 online survey for a usability study. Duringthe study, students performed a set of five tasks in both Blackboard and Canvas. Eachtask was timed and the number of clicks to complete each task was recorded. Thetasks
consultation area which has a stationwith a 42 inch screen, seats five to six people and has a wireless keyboard and mouse, seeFigure 1. The students are encouraged to use their electronic devices to follow along or takenotes.Figure 1: Teams Consultation DeskThe team meeting includes showing the class guide, demonstrating each relevantdatabase/source, and explaining which library services to use for the project. Typically the first20 minutes cover the class guide, Figure 2, project scope, Knovel or Engnetbase, and Compendex. For example, if the topic is lubrication and the team had only narrowed down the topic to any type of synthetic lubricant, then the first step would be for the librarian to ask about which brand or formulation was being considered
mainpremise of the TAP theoretical framework is that the validity of an argument depends on itslogical structure, and the process for constructing these arguments is argumentation23. The TAPmodel is a general model that can be applied to many disciplines, including philosophy, law, andmathematics, among others. Per Toulmin’s definition, a rational argument contains some, thoughnot necessarily all, of six main elements: claim, data, warrant, backing, modal qualifiers, andrebuttals (See Figure 1). More complex arguments will include more elements. For the purposesof this research, we chose to define an instance of EBR using a limited version of Toulmin’s sixelements in order to explore a greater variety of EBR. This simpler version of “instance of EBR
and High School Students in Summer Robotics Program (Fundamental Research)IntroductionRobotics provides an opportunity to engage more students in STEM. Veltman, et al. [1] andChubin, et al. [2] observe that robotics is particularly effective in attracting male student interest.Many current robotics programs are mission-based. That is, students build robots that are strongor fast to carry out a mission in competition with other robots. Several researchers have shownthat female students are often less motivated by competitive, mission based approaches [3-5]. Inour own rural area, females are less likely (1 girl:10 boys) to participate in robotics programs,which mirrors national trends [6]. Female students are more likely to be
underdevelopment (1). The current focus of this development is CAPTIVATE, a serious game to assiststudent veterans in mastering the calculus and physics skills that are necessary prerequisites tothe main engineering curriculum. Building on the development and lessons learned fromMAVEN, a game developed previously to help student veterans master precalculus skills, thedesign and initial implementation for CAPTIVATE involves careful consideration regardinggame and instructional design. Many of the positive aspects from the design of MAVEN havebeen implemented in CAPTIVATE. First, the overall framework developed for MAVEN hasbeen reused. This modular framework involves both a model and process that combine game,instructional, and software design in a way
. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two- strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Jill Marshall, University of Texas, Austin Jill A. Marshall is an associate professor of STEM Education. She studies how people come to understand and engineer the physical world and how teachers can facilitate that process, as well as equity issues in STEM
exposure in STEMactivities through their high school tenure [1-4]. While successful for approximately 7% ofstudents who entered 9th grade in 2001, this system has filtered out 93% of the population,including many students who might have had interest and potential to pursue STEM careers [3].Importantly, this pernicious systemic problem impacts students of color (African American,Hispanic American, American Indian and Alaska Native students) disproportionately. Forexample, in 2010 studentsof color represented 31.3%of the nation’s population[5], but earned 17.8% of theengineering and sciencedegrees [6]. Lookingforward we see that by2020, almost half of thenation’s k-12 schoolpopulation will berepresented by students of Figure 1. In 2001, more
section and which semester they were created in, and then assigned a number from one to41. Using the rubric described above, two researchers first independently evaluated just 4infographics, met to discuss any differences in their application of the rubric, and then negotiated1 This was because one of the assignments from the Fall 2015 sample did not actually include afull readable infographic. We discarded that group’s work from this study. 5to a consensus (e.g. to scores for each category that were no more than 1 point apart).Researchers then evaluated four more infographics, and again negotiated any differences. Againindependently, each researcher then evaluated the remaining 32 infographics. Of
of students (“Face-to-Face” and “Distance”) attended the same blended style coursethat offered those two types of interactions. The instructor teaches students in the classroom whilethe lesson is recorded and uploaded to the learning management system for the distance studentsto view later. Lastly, students who received instruction from prerecorded videos in which theinstructor addresses the students directly in a virtual one-on-one teaching style outside theclassroom will be recognized as “Online” students. Table 1 summarizes the types of students andthe corresponding course modality. Table 1: Student Types Course Modality Type of Students Traditional
, studieshave shown that it has some significant educational disadvantages. Over the past severaldecades, physics education research has shown that students were not learning the conceptsand/or were not engaged by the methods used in “traditional” physics education.1-4 Those andother studies have motivated a significant amount of research on physics education and muchprogress has been made. A significant body of physics education research has focused ondeveloping and incorporating classroom techniques that reduce or eliminate lecture and replace itwith active learning methods.5,6 Often the focus of the active learning strategies has been tomove away from methods that lead to students memorizing facts and mimicking solutions andtoward developing
, dougong, intelligent system, graphical simulation, virtual realityI. Introduction The dougong is a well-known and unique characteristic of ancient Chinese architecture, theterm referring to the components located at the intersections of pillars comprising the roofsupport system of ancient Chinese buildings. In Chinese, the word “dougong” consists of twoparts, “dou” and “gong,” denoting the two basic elements of the dougong structure. Specifically,the word “dou” denotes the inverted cap for support, and the word “gong” denotes the bow-likeblock for supporting the load. Fig. 1 shows these two components in a 3-D model of a typicaldougong structure made in Autodesk 3DS MAX. In the structure of ancient buildings, dougongare constructed on
Entering the Engineering Pathway: Student Veterans’ Decision to Major in EngineeringAbstractAs the engineering community seeks to widen the pathways toward engineering education,hundreds of thousands of military veterans are initiating their college studies at universitiesacross the U.S. Given this trend, it is essential to better understand the factors that lead studentveterans to choose to major in engineering.We are conducting a comparative case study at four institutions enrolling undergraduate studentveterans in engineering (SVEs). In this paper, we draw upon in-depth interviews conducted withSVEs at two of these institutions to: (1) better understand the factors that shape SVEs’decisions to major in engineering and, (2
seeking career advice from both faculty and undergraduatestudents.This summer program attracts many high school students from rural areas who have limited, ifany, exposure to STEM careers and strives to introduce students to STEM disciplines and careersthrough classes and guest speakers from industry. The main goals of this program are to (1)introduce students to a wide variety of STEM fields, (2) increase student’s engineering andscience knowledge, and (3) help students learn what fields they are interested in pursuing (ornot). During the summer of 2016, students were surveyed both pre- and post-camp experienceon their attitudes towards the STEM fields and their knowledge of the types of careers availableto engineers and scientists. At the end
second semester. These metrics will be used to compare the effectiveness of the MLMs on both an individual and department wide basis.KeywordsMultimediaLearningModules,Prelectures,PhysicsEducation,PhysicsPedagogy.IntroductoryPhysics,EngineeringPhysics.1. Introduction Over the last twenty years, numerous advances in physics education research(PER) as well as the development of non-traditional learning tools have changed thelandscape of STEM education [1]. A short time ago, the most widely accepted approachto physics education was the traditional lecture, supported by a hands-on laboratorycomponent, with typical homework exercises. Demonstrations and group work added anactive component to these techniques, but the overall learning
Tech University. She is currently Associate Director of the STEM Center for Outreach Research and Education and serves as Assistant Director for the Center for Leadership in Education. Her research includes STEM education, the assess- ment and instruction of culturally and linguistically diverse students, bilingual/ESL teacher education; and academic literacy development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 1 Inquiry, Talk, and Text: Promising Tools that Bridge STEM Learning for Young English Language Learners (Fundamental
makedecisions regarding classroom instruction on a more individualized basis. The assessment willcomprise multiple components in different virtual environments as shown in Figure 1. Defining the problem Create virtual prototype Developing possible Test and evaluate Introduction to solutions (Redesign) prototype the problem Selecting the most Redesign, test, and Online delivery promising solution evaluate with teacher Virtual collaborative Interactive
studies, students from STEM disciplines consistently report lower usage of librariesthan students from the humanities and social sciences, and Tenopir suggests that engineers whodo use libraries are reluctant to ask for assistance when looking for information.1-6 While Changand Eskridge suggest that engineers during their undergraduate and graduate training areinducted into a culture of non-library use by their instructors and faculty mentors,7 even amongengineers that make use of the libraries, physical visits and direct interaction with librarians havedwindled since the ascension of easy to use full-text search engines.8 Hemminger et al. foundthat as early as 2007, the wide availability of electronic resources had transformed theinformation
feature may have been used where more bricks were used for the outerlayer and less rubble for the inner core at every other section of the base (see Figure 1 for thesection view of the wall). Evidence of the key-in feature was found in eastern Jinshanlingwhere pure rammed earth was used for the inner core.Figure 1: Section view of the wallModeling of the Studied Towers and the WallFor the authors’ earlier research (J. Yang, A. Tan, F. Tan, Parke, & F. Yang, 2016; Yang,Hadipriono Tan, & Tan, 2017), the modeling of the wall and towers was created usingSOLIDWORKS, shown in Figures 2, 3 and 4. SOLIDWORKS modeling can show theconstruction sequence using static images and animation (Figure 4). The animation wascreated using the hide/show
ObservationAbstractContinuous improvement process can be applied to different areas of higher education,specifically improvement of faculty teaching. Anand, et al.1, defined continuous improvement as“a systematic effort to seek out and apply new ways of doing work, which is actively andrepeatedly making process improvements.” In this light, the lead author has used a triangulationmethod to improve their teaching effectiveness by being observed in the classroom at the sametime by the department head and a peer observer, over several semesters. The paper will framethe current literature on teaching evaluation for growth and development, examine the facultymember’s, the peer’s, and the administrative observer’s perspectives, and discuss how thisprocess has led to
AllieMolinelli. The authors would also like to thank Bill Palmer for editing this paper.Bibliography 1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (2017). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2017-2018. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2017-2018/. 2. Binghamton University Systems Science and Industrial Engineering Department. (2017). Undergraduate Program Curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.binghamton.edu/ssie/under-grad/undergraduate-curriculum.html. 3. Binghamton University Systems Science and Industrial Engineering Department. (2017). Objectives/Outcomes/Data. Retrieved from http://www.binghamton.edu
classroom.Furthermore, while much NGSS reform has focused on pedagogy and curriculum, there has beenless resources readily available for assessments aligned to NGSS. One place teachers and schoolscan look for example assessments are in the integrated STEM curricula units commerciallyavailable. By examining current STEM assessments with two frameworks, this study aims toanswer the following research questions: (1) What aspects of engineering are being assessed incommon engineering or integrated STEM curricular units? (2) What level of cognitive demand isbeing referenced by these assessments? (3) What level of cognitive demand is assessed for eachaspect of engineering design? Using a purposeful sampling strategy, the authors reviewed nineengineering curricula
2015. Asanother tremendous improvement compared with 2015, 25% of the participants are AfricanAmerican students in 2016. During the academy, the participating female students learnedabout fundamental knowledge of science and engineering, were exposed to cutting-edgetechnologies, and conducted multiple mini-projects. The photo in Figure 1 was taken at theacademy with all the academy participants. Figure 1: Participants of the STEM Summer Academy for Girls held in July 2016.As last year, we embraced femininity while using hands-on activities to explore STEM. Somecontents of the 2016 STEM Summer Academy was particularly tailored for girl participants.For example, the participating girls applied biomechanics of the human foot to design
EngineeringTechnology, STEM Education and Professional Studies, and Modeling, Simulation, andVisualization Engineering. The primary objectives for the workshop are: 1) focusing on the skillsdevelopment related to the workshop concepts (additive manufacturing – AM, computer aideddesign – CAD, reverse engineering – RE); 2) fostering of sailors’ STEM knowledge andprofessional development, 3) introducing skills needed for opportunities in advancedmanufacturing, and 4) empowering active duty military personnel to solve problems through acreative design approach. A long-term goal for the project is for active duty personnel to obtainsuch skills, so once the 3D printers are deployed to their naval vessels they will have the necessaryskills for efficient on-board
, L., & Zembal-Saul,C. (2002). Making the case for the use of web-based portfolios in support of learning to teach. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1 (2) 1-19.Barrett, H. C. (2005). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement. The Reflect Initiative; Researching Electronic Portfolios: Learning, Engagement, Collaboration, through Technology. Retrieved from http://ww.w.electronicportfolios.org/reflect/whitepaper.pdfBartholomew, S. R. (2017). Assessing open-ended design problems, Technology and Engineering Education Teacher, 76(6), pp. 13-17Bartholomew, S. R., Reeve, E., Veon, R., Goodridge, W., Stewardson, G., Lee, V., Nadelson, L. (2017). Mobile devices, self-directed learning
student’s thoughts on his experiencewith the project. The last two sections describe parts of the project that are yet to come, the radiofrequency amplifier and antenna, along with some lessons learned.BackgroundThe course that led to this project is Military RF Electronic Applications. It consists of anintroduction to antennas and radio frequency (RF) wave propagation, an overview of militaryand civilian systems that use wireless communication techniques with a particular focus on radar,and a study of some techniques for emitter location and identification [1]. The basis of the courseis what the military calls electronic warfare (EW), which can be defined as “the art and scienceof preserving the use of the electromagnetic spectrum for friendly use
P Okoye, Connecticut Department of Transportation Sharon Okoye is a senior engineer with professional experience in transit asset plan management, federal- aid program development and implementation, major corridor feasibility studies and roadway intersection design. Sharon is also Director of Connecticut’s Transportation and Civil Engineering (TRAC) program, and is currently working with state universities and the Department’s Office of Equal Opportunity & Di- versity to provide a 1-week summer program to introduce underrepresented high school students to college level transportation courses, as well as transportation careers, through the FHWA’s National Transporta- tion Summer Institute grant program
details about the data after a periodof time has passed. There are three types of metadata or documentation: descriptive metadata(often connected with a specific subject schema), structural metadata (expressing relationships toother files), and administrative metadata (including rights and environmental information). Thesemetadata elements are particularly important for data deposited in institutional or disciplinaryrepositories.STORAGE AND BACKUPOur instruction focuses on recommendations regarding number and locations of data copies;schedules for backup; and the robustness and efficacy of storage solutions. We demonstrate the3-2-1 rule which prescribes: 3 copies of the data; 2 kinds of media; and placing 1 copy in aremote location. Also
Paper ID #20358Analysis of reasoning paths of engineering studentsProf. Genaro Zavala, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico & Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago,Chile Genaro Zavala is Full Professor of Physics and Director of Educational Innovation in the School of Engi- neering and Sciences at Tecnologico de Monterrey. Also, he is currently collaborating with the School of Engineering of the University Andres Bello at Santiago, Chile. Professor Zavala is National Researcher Level 1 of the National System of Researchers of Mexico and leads the Physics Education Research and Innovation Group. He works with the
States military offer twenty-two career fields which, in turn, contain hundreds ofoccupational specialties that require specific training (Ford & Ford, 2015). The career fields are: 1. Accounting, Budget & Finance 2. Arts, Communications, Media & Design 3. Aviation 4. Business Administration & Operations 5. Combat Operations 6. Communications Equipment Technologists & Technicians 7. Construction, Building & Extraction 8. Counseling, Social Work & Human Services 9. Engineering & Scientific Research 10. Environmental Health & Safety 11. Health Care Practitioners 12. Human Resources Management & Services 13. Information Technology, Computer Science & Mathematics 14
, pedagogically advantageous, and an efficient use of student time.With appropriate modifications, it may even supply some of the advantages that the communicationcourse offered, namely explicit communication frameworks and peer feedback.1 Importance of communication skills for engineersThe core emphasis of most degree programs in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) is to develop “hard technical skills,” often at the neglect of “soft skills” that are alsoessential.This division is misaligned with the reality that engineering graduates report spending roughly64 % of their time on communication-intensive tasks [1]. Accreditation agencies recognize thisimportance, and both British [2] and US (Accreditation Board for Engineering and