Paper ID #35578Supporting lecturers by building community, promoting agency, andincreasing leadership opportunitiesDr. Pauline Khan, University of Michigan Pauline Bary Khan has been serving as the Director of Lecturer Development since 2020 where she has led efforts to support teaching faculty at the College of Engineering. This work includes advising, mentoring, professional career coaching, and facilitating workshops to serve the teaching faculty population. Her research interests include the topics of teaching faculty development, organizational culture, educational leadership, and workplace communication. Prior to
University in NJ. Data on studentadvising was collected via email inquiries over these four semesters specifically for theMechanical Engineering department. Themes were identified into queries related to courseenrollment, course grades, majors and minors, certificate programs, retention/attrition, courseadd-drop, attendance, hardships experienced, transition to newer learning platform and technicaldifficulties associated with it, graduation requirements/criteria, career/internships, ProfessionalSocieties, personal issues, health/mental issues, and Waivers. By studying the above data, theauthors hope to identify how advising changed pre-Covid and during Covid phases. Themotivation was to provide insights into which areas to focus and strengthen if
amelioration; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development for nontraditional data. Her NSF CAREER award studies master’s-level departure from the engineering doctorate as a mechanism of attrition. Catherine earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from Purdue University, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Monique S. Ross (Assistant Professor) Assistant Professor, Knight Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences and STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International University, research interests include broadening participation in computing through the exploration of: 1) race, gender
contributes to women’s recruit- ment, retention, and graduation within the TCE. Thompson has mentored student leaders throughout her career, most recently with women-centric organizations in the college. She has served as a Chancel- lor appointed member of UT’s Commission for Women and a board member with NASPA’s Center for Women. Thompson has received numerous recognitions and honors, including the 2017 NAMEPA Out- reach Program Award, 2017 NAMEPA Wings to Succeed Award, 2014 Outstanding New Professional, 2014 NACADA Region III Excellence in Advising – New Advisor (NC), and 2012 Gold Winner-Student Health, Wellness, Counseling and Related-Excellence Award. Thompson earned a Master’s degree in business administration
engineers are responsible. Educating engineers for their career responsibilities hasalways been a priority of teaching institutions, but ethics education in engineering has not alwaysbeen a significant part of the curriculum. The importance of ethics training for students in otherfields such as medicine and psychology is more prevalent than that in the field of science andengineering. While the need for making ethical decisions for professionals in medicine andpsychology is apparent, it may not be so for engineers. Engineers make countless decisions thataffect the welfare of their corporations, their communities, and their professions. For instance, achemical engineer may have to choose between safety of those living near a plant and cost
-efficacy have been related to improved academic and career outcomes [3],especially for women in non-traditional fields such as engineering. The goal of the study is todetermine simple yet effective strategies that can be implemented in engineering classrooms toimprove self-efficacy.Seven engineering faculty members participated in a faculty learning community (FLC), asemester long program to learn about teaching strategies in each of the four areas of self-efficacy; mastery experiences (e.g., active learning, scaffolding), vicarious learning (e.g., guestlectures, peer mentors, group work), social persuasion (e.g., constructive feedback, positive self-talk), and emotional arousal (e.g., test anxiety, building rapport). The faculty then chose
the outcome-based educational framework. She has also incorporated the Content, Assessment, Pedagogy (CAP) model to the development and redesign of courses, laboratories, and educational experiences implemented successfully in the course offerings at UPRM. Another research area includes the incorporation of Responsible well-being in faculty and students (undergraduate and graduate). Through an innovative research-based assessment plan, they determined the levels of moral development achieved by participants. In the past two years, Santiago has incorporated theories on social cognitive career choices and student attrition mitigation to investigate the effectiveness of institutional interventions in increasing the
living-learning community, expansion of university tutoringinitiatives to allow access for community college students, and promoting a new peer mentoringinitiative. The program emphasizes career opportunities including promoting on-campus careerfairs, promoting internship and co-op opportunities, and bringing in guest speakers from variousindustry partners. A goal of the program was to allow community college students to buildrelationships with university students and faculty so they can more easily assimilate into thestudent body at the university upon transfer. This paper presents the challenges presented to theproject in the first year and the pivoting that occurred due the pandemic. Data is presentedregarding recruitment of scholars in both
courses.Students also discussed support related to academic learning such as tutoring, specificallyin engineering. When asked, “What else could we do to help you to transfer or continuemoving towards your career as an engineer? Students indicated ‘more information’ and‘access to engagement opportunities’ as two strategies the institution could offer tosupport their career goals in engineering. A student said, “Information on what it means tobe a female student at a 4-year school” can be offered to assist them with the transferprocess from a two-year engineering program to a bachelor’s program or into theworkplace as an engineer. Another student said, “Support outside of the classroom wouldbe key to success” in engineering.Students were also asked, “What
throughcollege and into careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) andcareer and technical education (CTE), with the focus of this project on information technology(IT). The project gathers data about current and former students who started in the same cohort,includes institutional research data (e.g., grades, demographics, course-taking) and merges thesedata with employment data from surveys and lived experiences obtained from interviews. Thesedata are analyzed to identify potential pathways and critical junctions that may lead to studentsuccess or other outcomes. The research team is led by a doctoral granting institution and acommunity college, and includes four additional community colleges that collectively serve ruraland
Graduate Administrative Assistant for the Bioengineering Department and assists with advising students throughout their academic careers. Her primary research focuses on women and minorities in multiple engineering disciplines. She earned her BS from North Carolina State University, Raleigh, and her MS from Clemson University, Clemson, both in Mechanical Engineering.Marisa K. Orr (Associate Professor) Marisa K. Orr is an Associate Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the
developedcollaboratively between university and industry partners to address gaps in terms of bothevolving skillset requirements for graduates and students’ lack of awareness of the diverse rangeof career opportunities. Highlights of the collaborative program design along with outcomes andlessons learned from the first year of implementation are presented.IntroductionThe demand for engineering graduates has increased in recent years but the pipeline of talent hasnot similarly expanded. Universities face challenges in both attracting students to engineeringand retaining those who do choose engineering majors. Further, women and students of color arestill grossly underrepresented in many engineering disciplines. To further complicate the talentshortage, industry is
important ideas.* Pre PostIncrease in Likelihood to Pursue a Science Career- SETSParticipants were asked to indicate their level of agreement (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree) onadditional items in the Self-Efficacy in Technology and Science (SETS) instrument related to theirintended future careers. On three items, participants showed statistically significant change in theirreported intentions to pursue a science career. Specific questions and amount of growth are shown in thechart below
(Fundamental, Diversity)Abstract Pre-college engineering education still struggles to implement curricula that engage adiverse range of students. Engineering for US All (e4usa) aims to fill this gap through a coursethat demystifies engineering while catering to a broad range of students. This paper examines theinfluence of the e4usa course on students’ engagement with engineering design, and theirunderstanding of engineering as a potential future educational and career pathway. Focus groupsessions were conducted with students from 12 participating schools during the 2020-21 schoolyear to examine how their interests and understanding of engineering were influenced by thecourse. There were four main question categories for the focus groups
classroom, decision process, and future plans. In this particular study,the focus is on a subset of questions dealing with student advising. Survey respondents wereasked a number of questions on advising. These questions included the following:Is it required in your program for you to have an academic adviser? (Yes/No/I don’t know)Do you have an academic adviser? (Yes/No)What do you need from your academic adviser? Frequent meetings Course scheduling Personal supportiveness Ease of arranging a meeting Assistance with academic difficulties Career advice Advice on future academic plans Advice on suitable academic courses Other needsHow well does your adviser meet your needs? (five-point Likert scale
mechanical engineering students to enhance their academic success and transition them into a career in STEM.Subha Kumpaty Dr. Subha Kumpaty is a professor of mechanical engineering and program director of master of science in engineering at the Milwaukee School of engineering. Besides teaching a variety of engineering courses in both undergraduate and graduate programs, he leads the research experiences for undergraduates program sponsored by the National Science Foundation. He has led Engineering Education track of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress for more than a decade. He currently co-leads the S-STEM grant with Dr. Fertig which provides scholarships and activities to 20 diverse mechanical
years of occupational experience, with her most recent experience being in teaching, research, and service. Dr. Ofori-Boadu is a dedicated instructor, advisor, mentor, and role model who has served over 1,500 undergraduate and graduate students. Andrea has received almost $2M from funding agencies to include the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Engineering Information Foundation (EIF), the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), the National Housing Endowment (NHE), and East Coast Construction Services (ECCS). In 2019, she received her prestigious NSF CAREER grant to construct substantive theories that explain professional identity development processes in undergraduate architecture, engineering, and
A. Henderson (”Dr. J”) is an Assistant Professor in the William A. Brookshire Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Houston. He has dedicated his career to increasing the number of students who are in the pipeline to pursue STEM careers. He believes that exposing students to STEM early will have a lasting impact upon their lives and academic pursuits. He is a co-founder of the St. Elmo Brady STEM Academy (SEBA). SEBA is an educational intervention aimed at exposing underrepresented fourth and fifth grade students to hands-on, inquiry based STEM experiments and activities. Henderson is also the Director of the Program for Mastery in Engineering Studies (PROMES), a program
well as temporally influenced.Additionally, the concept of future self has been developed specifically in the context of theworkplace as the future work self: this type of future self is “explicitly future focused, positive,and specific to work” [16]. Because it is framed from a positive perspective, a future work selfcan begin a feedback loop of career exploration and adaptation leading to positive reinforcementof the future work self [16], [17]. A salient future work self grows from realism and vividness[16], like the more general future self. The concept of future work selves was initially researchedwithin the workplace, and it was found that observation of role models can help strengthen thesalience of a future work self [16], but the
Psychology from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and conducts research evaluating education and community intervention programs and investigating social issues, such as career choices related to STEM fields, social-psychological aspects of health behavior and outcomes, and safety and well-being of children and youth. She has contributed to numerous NSF-funded programs, including REU, S- STEM, SFS, LSAMP, and IRES through evaluation and social science research activities.Erika Machan Steele (Research Associate) Erika Steele earned a Ph.D. in Science Education in 2013 from the University of Alabama (UA). She currently works as a research associate at the Institute of Social Science Research at UA
Paper ID #38230Building Effective Community College Engineering andInformation Technology InternshipsLois Joy (Research Director)Nia Yisrael © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Building Effective Community College Engineering and Information Technology InternshipsAbstractDespite their potential to support and enhance technology education and career goals, little isknown about what makes community college technology internships effective for studentparticipation, learning, degree completion, and the transition to technology employment
Paper ID #36237Addressing the Needs of Students with Disabilities during the COVIDPandemicDr. Paul J Marchese, City University of New York, Queensborough Community CollegeDr. Deborah Hecht, Center for Advanced Studyin Education As Director of the Center for Advanced Study in Education, at the CUNY Graduate Center I am involved in a wide range of educational evaluations of funded and local projects. I also mentor graduate students interested in careers in evaluation. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Addressing the Needs
courses that include students with a wide range of prior exposure toengineering. The design projects engage students with a tentative interest in engineering and limited priorhands-on experience, while also challenging the skills and creativity of those students already committedto an engineering career. This workshop will allow participants to learn about and carry out some of thesehands-on projects for themselves. At the workshop, participants will be provided with materials that theycan take with them back to their home institutions.The efforts to increase diversity in engineering have resulted in a challenge for introduction toengineering classes of supporting students with a wide range of prior exposure and degree of interest inengineering
on students’ choice of pursuing aSTEM career (Chan et al., 2020; Kong et al., 2014; Maltese & Tai, 2010); however, our studyfound that Latinx students were not engaged in out-of-school activities during middle school. In-and-out of class learning experiences during middle school and high school have also been foundto impact students’ decision to pursue a STEM major [17]–[24]. Yet, studies have found that Latinx students are less likely than other groups to participatein out-of-school activities or school-based extracurricular activities [25]–[29]. Chan et al.’s [28]study, which used the High School Longitudinal Study: 2009 dataset, reported that Latinx studentsfrom high and low socioeconomic status were less likely than their
engineering or civil engineering with anenvironmental focus do not assess directly into one of the jobs listed in Table 2. For many, theopportunity to transition into a job coded as an environmental engineer comes later in theirmilitary career. For example, at West Point only 1 or 2 cadets per year matriculate into theMedical Service Corps with the intent of becoming an Environmental Science & EngineeringOfficer. The more common pathway for West Point cadets is to enter the Engineer Branch andwork towards serving in a position that does environmental engineering work. It is also commonfor environmental engineering majors to serve in positions that leverage their leadership skillsand an engineering mindset, such as the Infantry, Armor, or Aviation
fieldthrough emerging technology pathways. The goal of the focus group interviews was to identifythe reasons for their career and/or educational breaks, barriers they faced and/or are currentlyfacing in their studies and/or employment, and suggested strategies and actions to mitigate thesebarriers.In this paper, we present the details of the focus group findings summarized based on thequalitative study. The proposed mitigations voiced by the participants can be used as a baselineto build or increase the pipeline in the computing field by providing a suitable and flexiblelearning environment for returning and adult women.IntroductionAs technology continues to advance, and computers and robotics are increasingly utilized toautomate tasks, demand has
-Disciplinary Data Science (MDaS) S-STEM Scholarship ProgramAbstractThis paper provides an overview of the MDaS S-STEM scholarship program. With the growingneed for professionals with technology and critical thinking skills related to data analysis, theMDaS program employs established recruitment and retention activities for undergraduates inSTEM fields, to encourage consideration of careers in data science related fields. The purpose ofthe program is to provide financial and professional support to low-income and underrepresentedSTEM students to improve their chances of completing degrees related to data science. Thispaper presents the motivation for the program, its goals, structure, research questions, and thedesign and
developed several sets of instructional modules for elementary and middle school learners that employ engineering and literacy contexts to integrate STEM and computational thinking content in meaningful and significant ways. In 2012, she received a U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) for her work with urban youth. In 2016, she received Purdue University’s Faculty Engagement Scholarship Award for working with teachers and students across the United States on teaching and learning engineering.Maeve Drummond Oakes (Assistant Director for Education) Maeve Drummond Oakes is the Associate Director of Education for the NSF Engineering Research Center, CISTAR. She has extensive experience in
process andtheir reflection of the experience. Evidence of the design process included observation notes, flowcharts,and design sketches. Students were provided the following prompts to guide their reflection: What did you learn from the module? How does this relate to the course learning goals? How does the module affect how you will conduct clinical observations in the future? What was your biggest accomplishment during the module? What would you do differently? Is there anything you wish that the module covered that we did not discuss? How does the module relate to your career and professional goals? How does the module relate to your civic and community engagement?Teams documented their design process using
Development in Homogeneous Women GroupsBackgroundGender diversity in management within engineering companies not only yields positiveperformance outcomes but also improves corporate social responsibility [1]. For women’s careeradvancement to upper leadership positions in engineering firms, they must be prepared with keyleadership competencies. In many engineering organizations, success in leadership andmanagement roles is described in masculine terms and associated with stereotypical malecharacteristics [2]. Engineering leadership and one’s engineering leadership identity are oftenportrayed as a masculine practice so that success in leadership in an engineering career oftenmeans that women should learn to lead through a socialized masculine