introduce these tools into a curriculum that is alreadycrowded. As engineering programs struggle to find accommodations, many studentsreach their senior year before realizing an opportunity to apply these sophisticated analy-sis methods- frequently with little or no training. A recurring example is that of students’a priori construction of a system component followed by a perfunctory stress analysis us-ing a commercial computer code. Often the analysis performed is irrelevant or incom-plete. The notion of analysis being an essential element in the design process can be lostin the minds of many students. Therefore, the ME department faculty at SDSM&T to-gether with campus partners are integrating into the traditional junior-level core curricu
AC 2007-878: A METHODOLOGY FOR DIRECT ASSESSMENT OF STUDENTATTAINMENT OF PROGRAM OUTCOMESScott Danielson, Arizona State UniversityBradley Rogers, Arizona State University Page 12.63.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 A Methodology for Direct Assessment of Student Attainment of Program OutcomesAbstractWhile not directly required in Criterion 3 of the ABET accreditation criteria for engineeringtechnology programs, some form of direct assessment of student attainment of programoutcomes is generally expected. Unfortunately, direct assessment can be overlooked by programfaculty, often leading to an over reliance on indirect
AC 2007-2941: THE EFFECTS OF THEORY "X" AND THEORY "Y" ONNETWORK ENGINEERSLahoud Hilmi, East Carolina UniversityBatts David, East Carolina University Page 12.1419.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007The Effects of Theory “X” and Theory “Y” on Network EngineersAbstractNetwork engineering is a dynamic profession that consists of designing,implementing, and maintaining different aspects of network connectivity in asecure manner. As Information Technology (IT) changes and new security threatsstrike enterprise networks, network engineers strive to provide solutions to defendtheir networks from such threats. In addition to the demanding job responsibilitiesand challenges
AC 2007-3044: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY GRADUATE PROGRAM INTECHNOLOGY-BASED LEARNING WITH DISABILITYForouzan Golshani, Wright State University Forouzan Golshani is the NCR Distinguished Professor and the Chairman of Computer Science and Engineering Department at Wright State University. Previously, he was Co-Director of Arts Media Engineering and Professor of CSE at Arizona State University. His research interests include multimedia systems, assistive technologies, and information mining.Michele Wheatly, Wright State University Michele Wheatly is the Dean of the College of Science and Mathematics and Professor of Biological Sciences at Wright State University. Previously she was Professor of Zoology at
organization called the Institute for Affordable Transportation which leverages the creative abilities of collegiate minds in the creation of Basic Utility Vehicles (BUV’s) – www.drivebuv.orgLingma Acheson, Indiana University-Purdue University-Indianapolis Lingma Acheson is the Database Administrator and Webmaster in the Computer Network Center of the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, Indianapolis. She received her Masters Degree in Computer Science from School of Science, Purdue University, Indianapolis. Her research interests include database design and implementation, knowledge base and data integration, object-oriented systems design and server-client communications. She is also an
andacting as a mentor in the writing process.Bibliography1. Schleter W and Bennett R. Using Web-Based Homework in an Introductory Engineering Physics Course. Proc.ASEE, Chicago, IL, 2006.2. Penick, J.E. Creativity and the Value of Questions in STS. Science/ Technology/Society As Reform In ScienceEducation. Robert E. Yager, (ed), University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 1996.3. Wankat PC and Oreovicz FS. Teaching Engineering, https://engineering.purdue.edu/ChE/News_and_Events/Publications/teaching_engineering/index.html4. Armstrong B. The Imperfect Solutions Homework Format, IEEE Transactions on Education. 38 (3) 258-260.1995.5. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, eds.. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School.Expanded edition
AC 2007-2190: ANALYTICAL SYNTHESIS AND ANALYSIS OF MECHANISMSUSING MATLAB AND SIMULINKAli Mohammadzadeh, Grand Valley State University ALI R. MOHAMMADZADEH is currently assistant professor of engineering at Padnos School of Engineering at Grand Valley State University. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Sharif University of Technology And his M.S. and Ph.D. both in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor. His research area of interest is fluid-structure interaction. Page 12.242.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Analytical
AC 2007-208: UTILIZING PROCESS VALUE MAPPING IN LIEU OF VALUESTREAM MAPPING FOR ELIMINATION OF WASTE IN BUSINESS ANDINFORMATION PROCESSESMerwan Mehta, East Carolina UniversityAndrew Jackson, East Carolina University Page 12.1578.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Utilizing Process Value Mapping in Lieu of Value Stream Mapping for Elimination of Waste in Business and Information ProcessesAbstract:An ex-Toyota internal consultant has expressed an opinion that companies are achieving only10% of their potential for process improvement. In the consultant’s words, “most manufacturingseems to be focused on
AC 2007-212: A SIX-YEAR REVIEW OF NEW COURSE DEVELOPMENT INELECTRICAL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY AT NORTHEASTERNUNIVERSITY IN THE AREA OF INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEMS REVEALSSUCCESSES AND FAILURES ? A CASE HISTORYJerome Tapper, Northeastern University Professor Tapper is an Associate Academic Specialist in EET at Northeastern University in Boston, Massachusetts. He holds a BSEE and an MSIS both from Northeastern University. Jerry is a Registered Professional Engineer in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts with over twenty-five years of industrial experience. He is also the author of a tool-kit based text for electrical engineering technology students, Electtonics for Engineering Technology and has authored
experimentalvehicles to compete in nationally recognized intercollegiate design competitions. Until recentlythis was limited to a solar bike and a moonbuggy. This has expanded to include two solar bikes,two moonbuggies, two Baja off-road vehicles, a solar boat, and a formula style race car. Whenlimited to a couple projects the task of supervising the student teams was relatively manageable.However, the explosion in the number of student projects has exposed an area of concern: safety.Safety is generally not at the forefront of an energetic engineering student’s mind for all theusual reasons: “it will only take a second,” “it will never happen to me,” and an inherent sense ofinvulnerability common in youth. With limited space, project areas overlap. One team
AC 2007-983: INTEGRATING THE DEVELOPMENT OF TEAMWORK,DIVERSITY, LEADERSHIP, AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS INTO ACAPSTONE DESIGN COURSEJoseph Hanus, University of Wisconsin-MadisonJeffrey S. Russell, University of Wisconsin-Madison Page 12.929.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Integrating the Development of Teamwork, Diversity, Leadership, and Communication Skills into a Capstone Design CourseAbstractThe development of teamwork, diversity, leadership, and communications (TDLC) skills in ourprofessional domain is critical to our engineering education program and profession. We solveproblems in teams which are
AC 2007-2525: THE BLENDED CLASSROOM: THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS?Sophia Scott, Southeast Missouri State University Dr. Sophia Scott is an Assistant Professor at Southeast Missouri State University in the Department of Industrial and Engineering Technology. She teaches both undergraduate and graduate courses. She is currently interested in using face to face, blended, and online course formats to increase student learning, problem solving, project management and teaming. Page 12.1391.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 The Blended Classroom: The Best of Both Worlds?AbstractMost
AC 2007-2641: ENHANCING THE LEARNING OF ENGINEERING ECONOMYWITH INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY AND TEACHINGKailash Bafna, Western Michigan University KAILASH M. BAFNA is Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Western Michigan University. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Industrial Engineers and a registered Professional Engineer. He teaches Engineering Economics, Facilities Design and Materials Handling, and Quality Control. His current research interests are in the areas of incorporating technology in education and developing methodology to enhance web-based learning.Betsy Aller, Western Michigan University Betsy M. Aller is Assistant Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing
AC 2007-1399: A FRAMEWORK FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ONLINEENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY COURSES: A CASE STUDYHarpal Dhillon, Excelsior College Dr. Harpal Dhillon is currently the Dean of the School of Business and Technology at Excelsior College. In the past he has taught undergraduate and graduate Courses in Information Systems, Software Engineering, and Project Management at University of Maryland, Southwestern Oklahoma State University, and George Washington University. Dr. Dhillon worked as owner/senior executive in three systems engineering companies over a period of 20 years. His research interests are in the areas of Human-Computer Interaction, Quality Assurance, and Applications of IT in
AC 2007-1413: SENIOR PROJECT COURSE ENHANCEMENTJohn Irwin, Michigan Tech University Page 12.1271.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Senior Project Course Sequence EnhancementAbstractCurriculum changes implemented to enhance the Mechanical Engineering Technology(MET) BS degree curriculum have brought about distinct differences in the methodologyof teaching the Senior Design Project course sequence. The previous course sequencerequired a senior project course that spanned two semesters for the undergraduatestudent. The students sought out an advisor who offers a choice of senior projectproblem statements that most often require a team of 3 or 4 students to
industry after graduation andtherefore would benefit from the experience and lessons learned from those who have reallyencountered the problems while functioning as a full time practicing engineer. The theory is thesame but the practical execution and frame of mind are different than that of the researcher.Today’s students need both perspectives if they going to be able to compete in the highlycompetitive global economy. The student of today needs to be more job ready and know morethen just theories if they are to compete for the jobs of tomorrow. Exactly how this uniqueperspective has helped to shape the curriculum at Eastern Washington University’s (EWU)Engineering Technology Programs will be described. Engineers who return to the classroom
Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No. 4, October 2001.3. Seat, E., J. R. Parsons, and W. A. Poppen, “Enabling Engineering Performance Skills: A Program to Teach Communication, Leadership, and Teamwork,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 90, No. 1, January 2001.4. Shuman, L, J., M. Besterfield-Sacre, and J. McGourty, “The ABET “Professional Skills” – Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No.1 , January 2005.5. Bransford, J. D., A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking (Eds.), How People Learn: Brian, Mind, Experience, and School, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1999.6. Purdue University Course Catalog, available on-line, http://www.courses.purdue.edu/cgi- bin/relay.exe/query?qid
accreditation).3. The reportage and the participation of corporate personnel in an industrial project can be useful in university evaluation.1 Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind,Experience, and School; The National Academies Press.2 Ferguson, C.; Ball, A.; Stone, W.; & McCrary, P. (2005). Engagement in Industry: Preparing UndergraduateEngineering Technology Students For Graduate Study; ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006.3 Ferguson, C.; Ball, A.; Stone, W.; & McCrary, P. (2005). Engaging Industry in Graduate Engineering TechnologyEducation; ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2005.4 Aller, B.; Alamgir; C.; Kamman, J.; Rodriguez, J.; Elsamawal, M.; Desjardins, M
AC 2007-1233: CIVIL ENGINEERING IN 2025: THE VISION AND HOW IT WASDEVELOPEDStuart Walesh, S. G. Walesh ConsultingMichael Chajes, University of DelawareDavid Mongan, Whitney, Bailey, Cox & Magnani Page 12.360.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Civil Engineering in 2025: The Vision and How It Was DevelopedAbstractIn June 2006, a diverse group of civil engineering and other leaders, including internationalparticipants, gathered to articulate an aspirational global vision for the future of civilengineering. Summit participants saw a very different world for civil engineers in 2025. An ever-increasing
AssociatesThe first success measure is that we have so many projects involved. It is obvious that ourengineers value the industry/university relationship in many areas. This is not a small measure.It takes time to oversee effort like this from a development standpoint and university perspective.Our combined teams feel so strongly of the value of Senior Projects, CO-OPs and joint learningopportunity that all are placed at high value. In an environment where competition andtechnology leadership are on everyone’s minds, the ABET requirements of the colleges ofengineering make a case of long term benefits of great value to all parties.Just about all our engineering departments want more projects submitted to the MEDITECprogram. That is the test of value
AC 2007-1936: FACILITATING MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMS IN ASERVICE-LEARNING ENVIRONMENTGregory Bucks, Purdue University GREGORY W. BUCKS is a PhD student in the department of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received his BSEE from the Pennsylvania State University and his MSECE from Purdue University. He is currently the head teaching assistant for the EPICS Program at Purdue University.William Oakes, Purdue University WILLIAM C. OAKES is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Purdue University and the Interim-Director of the EPICS Program. He is a co-recipient of the 2005 National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard M. Gordon Prize and the 2004 NSPE
-LCoordinator, for help making community contacts; and graduate students Manuel Herediaand Eric Morgan for assistance with data collection and analysis.References1. Jacoby, B., and Assoc. (1996). Service learning in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.2. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology [ABET] (2005). Criteria for accreditingengineering programs – Effective for evaluations during the 2005-2006 accreditation cycle. RetrievedJanuary 17, 2006, from: http://www.abet.org3. Brandenberger, J.W. (1998). Developmental psychology and service-learning: A theoretical framework(p. 68). In R. Bringle and D. Duffy (Eds.), With service in mind: Concepts and models for service-learningin psychology. Washington, DC: American Association of
AC 2007-2697: EFFECTIVELY IMPLEMENTING THE INTERDISCIPLINARYSENIOR DESIGN EXPERIENCE: A CASE STUDY AND CONCLUSIONSMatthew Green, LeTourneau University Dr. Matthew G. Green is an assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering at LeTourneau University, Longview. His objective is to practice and promote engineering as a serving profession, with special recognition of opportunities to improve the quality of life in developing countries. Topics include the design of affordable transportation, training engineers to design for marginalized populations, needs assessment in frontier design environments, assistive devices for persons with disabilities, and remote power generation. Contact: MatthewGreen
AC 2007-2761: BEYOND THE BACHELOR OF SCIENCETerrance Boult, University of Colorado-Colorado Springs Dr. Boult is the El Pomar Endowed Professor of Innovation and Security at U.Colorado at Colorado Springs. Before joining UCCS in 2003, he was an endowed professor and founding chairman of Lehigh University's Computer Science and Engineering Department. He received his BS in Applied Math (1983) MS in CS (1984) and Ph.D. in Computer CS (1986) all from Columbia University. He then spent 8 years on Faculty of the Columbia CS Department. Dr. Boult is the driving force behind UCCS's new Bachelor of Innovation™ family of degrees. He as won multiple teaching, IEEE service, research and
AC 2007-1417: WEAVING THE CAPSTONE TAPESTRYJames Everly, University of Cincinnati James O. Everly is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at the University of Cincinnati. He received a BSEE and MSEE from The Ohio State University in 1969 and 1970, respectively. He is a Senior Member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and a registered professional engineer in the state of Ohio. He is currently Chair of the IEEE Cincinnati Section, and in 1997 he received the IEEE Professional Achievement Award. He has held several research and management positions in industry working for such companies as Battelle's Columbus Laboratories
Materials Processing (ChE 444/544) was first introduced into the ChE curriculum inFall 1994 and has been taught in every following school year. This course is well developed, butis similar to many nanotechnology–specific courses.19,20 Enrollment has varied between 22 to 36senior undergraduate and graduate students enrolled from chemical engineering, chemistry,physics, and material science. The focus of this course is the application of core chemicalengineering sciences (transport, kinetics, thermodynamics and reactor design) to thin filmprocesses, one important example of which is integrated circuit technology. This approachcreates a mind set in the process engineer to apply engineering skills in problem solving. It isparticularly suited for the
AC 2007-830: LESSONS LEARNED IN ADOPTING A CFD PACKAGEDavid Blekhman, California State University Los Angeles David Blekhman is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering at Grand Valley State University. He holds M.S. in Thermal Physics from St. Petersburg State Technical University, Russia and a Ph. D. in Mechanical Engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo. Since joining GVSU, he has taught courses in the Mechanics and Thermal-Fluids sequences. He has also focused on developing courses in Combustion and Alternative Energy. Page 12.1017.1© American Society for
“rewarded” with a week-long trip each year at spring break. Half of the faculty advocates accompany the second year students on the domestic trip and the other half of the faculty advocates accompany the third year students on the international trip. The value of the camaraderie that develops from these trips cannot be overstated. The faculty members, all from different departments within the college, get to know one another extraordinarily well. Interconnections between the various disciplines become much clearer in everyone’s minds and the nucleus for future collaborations between disciplines materializes.‚ On each trip, the faculty advocates are exposed to engineering managers, innovators and leaders, and learn first
) Leaving Engineering: Lessons from Rowan University’s College ofEngineering, Journal of Engineering Education, January7. Felder, R.M., Brent, R., Understanding Student Differences, Journal of Engineering Education, January,p.57-72, 2005.8. Kroll, B.M., Teaching Hearts and Minds: College Students Reflect on the Vietnam War in Literature,Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press, 1972.9. Astin, A.W., What Matters in College?: Four Critical Years Revisited, Jossey-Bass Publishers, SanFrancisco, 1993, Chapter 11.10. Marton, F., and Säljö, R., “Approaches to Learning,” in Marton et al. [11]11. Marton, F., Hounsell, D., and Entwistle, N., eds., The Experience of Learning, 2nd ed., Edinburgh:Scottish Academic Press, 1997.12. Heckel, Richard W
the curriculum and course suggestions, respondents suggested adding courses typicallyfound in industrial engineering and management curriculums. They suggested more coursesrelated to lean manufacturing, logistics and material handling, project management and financialanalysis, leadership and management, and communications. With regards to the balance ofengineering and management courses, five felt that it was adequate, one wanted moremanagement courses, and one wanted more engineering courses.The conclusion that might be drawn from the survey is that our local employers have a cleardistinction in their minds between engineering students and management (business) students.This clear distinction might make it difficult for engineering