Asee peer logo
Displaying results 121 - 150 of 345 in total
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Melissa M. Bilec, University of Pittsburgh; Daniel Mosse, University of Pittsburgh; Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh; Jennifer L Cartier, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Tagged Divisions
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
undergraduateSTEM majors at the University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) to interact with young adolescents in formaland informal learning contexts and to engage with peers and faculty members around issuespertaining to K-12 education; (2) develop a state-approved, one-year Masters of Arts in Teaching(MAT) program to prepare middle grades (4-8) teachers who will specialize in mathematicsand/or science; (3) integrate issues related to sustainability across the undergraduate and teacherpreparation programs; and (4) expand our capacity for faculty in the Schools of Education, Arts& Sciences, and Engineering to collaborate on program and course design. We expectSUSTAINS will help address the need for middle grades math and science teachers bydeveloping a program to
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
S. Gary Teng, University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
leadership and collaborations is emphasized during their project work. In additionto the technical part of project tasks, students also need to work on their skills for leadership,project management, communications, and collaborations.The project requirement calls for all students to present at least once or twice among threerequired team presentations. Students evaluate other team’s presentations, and perform peerevaluations on their own teammates’ contribution to their project. Peer reviews done at proposaland progress report milestones include providing each team member’s percentage of contributionto the project work to date. Peer review at the final report milestone includes a seven categorycomprehensive evaluation of all project team members
Conference Session
FPD 3: Retention
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Claudia Elena Vergara, Michigan State University; Theodore Demetrius Caldwell M.Ed., Diversity Programs Office/College of Engineering/Michigan State University; Jon Sticklen, Michigan State University; Subashini Nagendran Sivakumar, Michigan State University; Kyle P. Foster, Michigan State University College of Engineering; Tonisha Brandy Lane, Michigan State University; Rickey Alfred Caldwell Jr.; Lisa R. Henry, Michigan State University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
duringtheir transition from high school into university life: • Mandatory participation in the Engineering and Science Summer Academy (ESSA). ESSA is a six-week, pre-freshmen summer bridge program that provides information about support units and systems across campus. It also exposes participants to successful academic skills to deal with courses that are critical to the success of all college students but, in particular, students in STEM majors: o Mathematics o Chemistry/Biology o Writing • Mandatory schedule building by DPO staff during their first full academic year and approval of schedule during the second academic year. Due to the amount of time spent
Conference Session
Potpourri
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Emily Dringenberg, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Mel Chua, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
a project on faculty workshops. In other words, we werepresented both as outside researchers and as "junior members" of their line of work, and studyparticipants related to us as such when discussing their experiences.Data collection: focusing on written attendee reflections Page 24.1366.4Within the existing workshop activities, written reflections were the data source that mostdirectly addressed our research questions about faculty motivations and workshop perceptions.All attendees were given time to hand-write brief thoughts on their hopes, worries, etc. for theweek at the start (Monday) and mid-point (Wednesday) of the workshop. This
Conference Session
SD Technical Session: Tricks of the Trade
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Martha E. Grady, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Ryan Christopher Reuer Gergely, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Divisions
Student
research interests include active learning techniques, peer to peer learning, and participation of underrepresented groups in engineering.Mr. Ryan Christopher Reuer Gergely, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Ryan Gergely is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign where he is pursuing a degree in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. He received his B.S. (2006) and M.S. (2010) in Mechanical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He plans to finish his studies at UIUC in 2015 Page 24.1372.1
Conference Session
New Teaching Methods in Mechanics
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University; Edward J. Berger, University of Virginia
Tagged Divisions
Mechanics
address topical areas as part of an NSF-funded project. One of these focused on Statics and Dynamics; 24 instructors from research-based, community colleges, and MS granting institutions participated in the Mechanics VCP.The VCP was centered on aligning the classroom around teaching objectives, classroomactivities, and assessment and utilized the How Learning Works framework for discussions.Topics included Bloom’s taxonomy and writing learning objectives, active learning strategies,collaborative learning, conceptual understanding, hands-on activities, and flipping the classroom.An initial 8 week period introduced these topics and helped the instructors formulate their plansfor the upcoming term, and a follow-on period is currently underway to
Conference Session
Biomedical Division Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Catherine Langman, Illinois Institute of Technology; Eric M. Brey, Illinois Institute of Technology; Judith S. Zawojewski, Illinois Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
Teaching in the Middle School. She has published in numerous teaching and research journals, and written books and book chapters for both mathematics and engineering educators. In addition, Dr. Zawojewski has long been active in writing curriculum related to problem solving, mathematical modeling, and performance assessment. In particular, Dr. Zawojewski is interested in the role of modeling and problem solving in developing mathematical capabilities, and in enhancing mathematics education for all students. Page 24.376.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014
Conference Session
Enhancing Success/Peristence at Two-Year Colleges
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kenan Baltaci, University of Wisconsin, Stout; Melissa Thompson P.E. P.E., BridgeValley Community and Technical College; Bekir Zihni Yuksek, University of Northern Iowa
Tagged Divisions
Two Year College Division
Scholars who become employed in theirfield or continue their education. This paper shares the insights gained about retention andenrollment in engineering technology programs using student demographics, baseline data, and asurvey conducted learn about impact of financial and academic barriers on student enrollmentand retention during the grant-writing process. Demographics and baseline data shows that thecommunities served are disadvantaged, come from low-income families in West Virginia,require financial assistance, and require developmental courses upon enrollment. The surveyconducted shows that 84% of students receive financial aid, 55% stated that a lack of fundingdelayed progress toward a college education, and 88% expressed concern over
Conference Session
Classroom Management
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Juan C. Morales, Universidad del Turabo; Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
to theclassroom; an overview of Massive Open Online Course (MOOCs) and their potential use for“flipping the classroom”. Faculty were also requested to perform the following: create apanoramic outline (divide each course into 30 class sessions) prior to starting the SFIP in June;write granular learning outcomes for each and every class session during the SFIP; and prepare areview sheet for students per exam that is based on the learning outcomes created during theSFIP. Partial results of the SFIP are also provided.Introduction The Summer Faculty Immersion Program (SFIP) strives to ignite and sustain innovativeclassroom practices in engineering and physics courses in a manner that will promote lastingchange in the faculty. In essence
Conference Session
Computer Hardware
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Wayne W. Walter, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Timothy G. Southerton, RIT Mechanical Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
,the course gets started with three one hour lectures, with examples, on the basics ofArduino programming. These three lectures can be broken down as follows:1.) Getting Started with Arduino - Outlines basics of Arduino hardware, software, and robotics programming2.) Arduino Programming Language - Details sketch structure, programming syntax notes, and pin functionality3.) Starting Arduino Examples - Demonstrates integrated analog and digital writing and reading examplesTeams of two are formed, which stay together for both the lab exercises and the project.These can be self-formed by the students or assigned as they would be in industry.Beginning week 2, each week of classes for the next 8 weeks consists of two one
Conference Session
Computers in Education General Technical Session 2
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Huiru Shih P.E., Jackson State University; Jacqueline M Jackson, Jackson State University ; Cassandra L Hawkins Wilson, Jackson State University; Pao-Chiang Yuan, Jackson State University
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
Engineering) from Ok- lahoma State University in 1986. He has published 60+ abstracts and articles in journals and contributed chapters to four books. Dr. Yuan continues to serve as peer reviewer for state, private grant programs and different professional journals and magazines. He is the board member of USEPA Monitoring Group, Gulf of Mexico Program. He is also council member of Mississippi Citizen Crops, Mississippi Office of Homeland Security. Dr. Yuan is the recipient, 2002 Outstanding Mentor of the Year, The Alliance for Graduate Education in Mississippi. 2004 recipient of Recycler of the year, presented by Mississippi Recycling Coalition. Professor Yuan is the JSU/Hinds County/MDEQ Computer Recycling Program di
Conference Session
Design Across the Curriculum
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer Buelin-Biesecker, North Carolina State University; Cameron Denson, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
researcher’s judgment that a rater possesses bothknowledge of the domain and “familiarity with the kinds of creative products typically producedby the kinds of subjects in the study” 16. In recent years researchers have looked at comparisonsof novice and expert judgments. At least three categories of raters stand to provide valuableassessment data for engineering design education: self-evaluations conducted by students; peer-evaluations conducted by students enrolled in the same or similar courses; and adult ratingsconducted by raters with experience in the domain 17, 18. Across a range of domains, preliminarybut significant correlations have been seen between peer evaluations or otherwise non-expert, butsomewhat experienced, raters and those made by
Conference Session
Engineering Leadership Development Constituent Committee Division Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bruce DeRuntz, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; Rhonda K. Kowalchuk, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; John W. Nicklow, Southern Illinois University Carbondale
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Leadership Development Division
in 2007 (i.e., theprogram was conceived in 2006, and the first cohort began in 2007). The students represent across-section of two technology and five engineering majors. Participants choose a studentorganization in the College of Engineering (e.g., Society of Women in Engineering) in whichthey would like to lead. A student then has their peers assess their leadership effectivenessthrough the results of the organization’s projects. This information is then recorded in the LDP’sX-matrix.The LDP has used the X-matrix over the past three years and the results illustrate a progressiveimprovement in the overall efficacy of the program each year. The quantitative resultsdemonstrate that students are improving their engineering leadership skills as
Conference Session
Best of NEE
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Thomas Shepard, University of St. Thomas; Alison B. Hoxie, University of Minnesota Duluth; Matt Anderson, Milwaukee School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
assignment where students write problems and use some in future semestersObscure the source of the exercise and/or solution by:  taking problems from other textbooks Page 24.681.5  rewording questions making them harder to find with a text search  changing the names of people/organizations in problems  never distributing solutions with problem statements and not including the semester/year on problem/answer sheetsUse newer pedagogies which promote learning through an avenue other than homework  Problem-Based Learning (PBL)  Team-Based Learning (TBL)  Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning (POGIL)  Peer-Led Team
Conference Session
K-12 Engineering Resources: Best Practices in Curriculum Design, Part 1 of 2
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sara Hahler, Louisiana Tech University; Krystal S. Corbett, Cyber Innovation Center
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
which includes writing assignments, classroom debates, and student presentations.Beyond concrete skills, the curriculum also aims for students to improve upon soft skills andhigher order thinking as well as creativity; this aspect of the curriculum meshes well with thestandards for mathematical practice that should occur at every grade level. For example, theopening project of the AMES curriculum that introduces the Cartesian coordinate systeminvolves students guiding a peer to a certain spot in the class using only verbal instructions.Unless the student giving directions is very specific, the student following the instructions mayend up in a completely different position than the directing student intended. The resulting affecton the students
Conference Session
NSF Grantees’ Poster Session
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Spencer S. Kim, Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT); Sunday O. Faseyitan, Butler County Community College
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Tagged Divisions
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
, the current approachto teaching materials science does not appeal to students studying new manufacturing processesand systems for green plastics manufacturing technology (GPMT).6-9The higher education community has strived for reforming the undergraduate STEM educationso that traditional lecture-based instructions and laboratory exercises are transferred to morestudent-centered learning formats. Innovative approaches, such as student-centered, activelearning, peer-led team learning, process-oriented-guided-inquiry-learning (POGIL), project-based learning (PBL), and other educational approaches have received increased attention withinthe educational communities.10-15Process-Oriented-Guided Inquiry-Learning (POGIL) adapts guided inquiry
Conference Session
Aerospace Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Steve Gorrell, Brigham Young University; C. Greg Jensen, Brigham Young University; Brett Stone, Brigham Young University; Edward Red, Brigham Young University; Michael Richey, The Boeing Company; Fabian Zender, The Boeing Company; Michael Wright; David E. French, The Boeing Company; Shigeo Hayashibara, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott; Carl Johnson, Georgia Institute of Technology; John P. Sullivan, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
investigated how amulti-disciplinary team could coordinate tasks using a novel Computer Aided Design (CAD) toolthat enables multiple users to simultaneously access and modify a model [10]. The projectdemonstrated that students from three institutions in three time zones could effectivelycollaborate on the design of an aircraft wing assembly. The 2012 – 2013 project successfullyimplemented a “multi-site, cloud-based capstone design project” within a cross-cultural, peer-to-peer design-build-test environment [11]. Within this environment students were exposed to theindustrial principles of collaborative digital design and manufacturing, targeting complex cyber-mechanical systems. These previous projects were evaluated in order to develop a betterprogram
Conference Session
Focus on African-American and Hispanic Engineering Students’ Professional and Academic Development
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kalynda Chivon Smith, Howard University; Lorraine N. Fleming, Howard University; Inez N. Moore, Howard University; Silas E. Burris, Howard University; Fabiana Bornmann
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
Paper ID #10767African American Undergraduate Success in Engineering: ”Proving themDr. Kalynda Chivon Smith, Howard University Dr. Smith earned a Ph.D. and an M.S. in Social Psychology from Howard University in Washington, D.C., and her B.A. in Psychology and English from Truman State University in Kirksville, MO. Dr. Smith has managed a three year longitudinal NSF-funded research project across four campuses, which has included collecting, analyzing/interpreting and reporting data through article writing and conference presentation. She has also taught various psychology courses.Dr. Lorraine N. Fleming P.E., Howard
Conference Session
Improving Introductory Experiences in Chemical Engineering
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Richard L. Zollars, Washington State University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
discussion and feedback. Third, students’ peers critique their solutions andprovide comments. Finally, students are given the opportunity to respond to these comments and Page 24.1135.2criticisms, and to modify their solutions appropriately. Note that SBL, as defined above, differs from a variety of other instructional techniques that also use the terminology “studio”. Among the more notable is the Scale-Up4 program introduced at North single or individual or
Conference Session
Integrating Engineering & Liberal Education
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Pete Hylton, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Wendy Otoupal-Hylton, IUPUI
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
not likely to result in newengineering courses examining the collected works of Shakespeare, writing poetry, or teachingverse in iambic-parameter. On the other hand, anything is possible. We engineers need not be seen as bland. Nor must we fear to reach out to our peers, Who teach of things we do not understand. Let us reach out and overcome our fears. Then shall we strive to find a common ground, And train a grad whose skills are found well round.References[1] Snow, C. (1956). “The Two Cultures.” New Statesman, 6 October 1956.[2] Snow, C. (1959). “The Rede Lecture.” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.[3
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Programs and Courses Session 5
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yan Xu, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Hua Li, Texas A&M University, Kingsville; Kai Jin, Texas A&M University, Kingsville
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
Introduction to the engineering design process Form teamsWeek 1: Problem Laboratory LEGO MindStorm NXT (project hardware)Definition LEGO NXT/Robot C (project software) Entrepreneurial Teamwork Thinking Deliverables The problem definition Study controllers, sensors, motors, chassis and Lecture other physical structures of robots Write an engineering design specificationWeek 2: Hands-on labs for
Conference Session
Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Capstone Design Projects
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University (Tech.); Irina Nicoleta Ciobanescu Husanu, Drexel University (Tech.); Richard Chiou, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.); Joshua Konstantinos
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing
sequence aims totrain the students in identifying projects of relevance to the society, in planning and scheduling asolution, and in entrepreneurial activities that may result from the project. The course is worththree credit hours per quarter offering. The course is also intended to cover an industrial projectstarting from the proposal writing and conceptual design to final prototype building and conceptrealization steps. The course is focused on proposal and project progress report writing,prototype fabrication as well as design improvement and optimization. Each quarter, studentteams must submit a progress report and demonstrate a physical working prototype at the end ofacademic year. During fall and spring quarters, they conduct an oral
Conference Session
Capstone and Online Courses in Construction Education
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Carol L. Considine, Old Dominion University; Michael W. Seek, Old Dominion University; Jon Lester, Old Dominion University
Tagged Divisions
Construction
be open-minded about sharing their life, work andeducational experiences. Visual barriers that hinder some students are eliminated, and studentshave time to reflect in preparation of written responses. Since most course correspondence is bywriting, students must be able to communicate clearly through writing. Students need to be self-motivated and self-disciplined to stay on schedule with the course materials and assignments.When they have problems with the course content or assignments, they need to speak up.Instructors are not able to recognize student problems from visual interactions and cannot help ifthey are not notified of problems. Students need to recognize that they are responsible for theirlearning and need to be proactive. On
Conference Session
FPD 10: Teamwork
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Oguz Hanoglu, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Aladar Horvath, Ivy Tech Community College; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
, in mathematical modeling activities, the kind of detail infeedback that offers a better learning experience is still not well understood16. The prerequisitefor understanding the nature of effective feedback is to understand how students perceive andrespond to various types of feedback they are provided. The feedback TAs and peers provide andthe way students respond to it when revising their solutions capture important data aboutstudents’ thinking processes. In the literature, these thinking processes have been revealedmostly through an analysis of documented works, such as written feedback and studentsolutions15,17. However, such approaches do not reveal the whole story of students’ interactionswith feedback. The purpose of this study is to
Conference Session
International Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hamid R. Parsaei PE, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Nimir Elbashir, Texas A&M University at Qatar
Tagged Divisions
International
Paper ID #8503A New Vision for Enginering EducationDr. Hamid R. Parsaei PE, Texas A&M University at Qatar Hamid R. Parsaei is Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Texas A&M University (College Station) and also Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Associate Dean for Academic Affairs at Texas A&M University at Qatar. He is a registered professional engineer (PE) in Texas and a Fellow of the Institute of Industrial Engineers (IIE). He has published more than 200 articles in peer-refereed archival journals and conference proceedings. He also served as editor for three international academic
Conference Session
FPD 6: Course Content and Educational Strategies
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brian M. Frank P.Eng., Queen's University; Behnam Behinaein Hamgini, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Queen's University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
by computerizedscoring of student work 3 and computer-supported peer review 4, and considerable success hasbeen found by enhancing lecture time using an interactive classroom format and frequent in-classassessment.5,6 When combined with small group work in approaches like peer instruction,regular-in class feedback has been shown to yield significant learning gains as measured byconcept inventories.5Audience response systems have been widely used to provide feedback to the instructor aboutand their impact on engagement and learning has been presented widely. These include handhelddedicated transmitters, often known as clickers 7,8, and web-based response systems that allowstudents to use their laptops, tablets, smartphones, and SMS to
Conference Session
Track 3 - Session 1
Collection
2014 ASEE International Forum
Authors
Kaitlin Litchfield, University of Colorado, Boulder; Amy Javernick-Will, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Topics
Student Development
organization was similar to EWB-USA,participants were directly asked if they were involved with an organization or program similar toEWB-USA and if so, to write in the name of the program or organization. The authors readthrough individuals’ responses, and those who listed humanitarian engineering serviceorganizations or educational programs with a humanitarian engineering focus (e.g. Engineers fora Sustainable World, Bridges to Prosperity) were added to the EWB-like group.In order to check whether or not increased learning gains were due to active participation in aprofessional engineering organization rather than humanitarian engineering participation, we rantwo additional tests of comparison. The first test compared only EWB-like respondents
Conference Session
Track 3 - Session 2
Collection
2014 ASEE International Forum
Authors
Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, Pune Innovation Centre; Gautam Akiwate, University of California, San Diego; Ayano OHSAKI P.E., nnovation Center for Engineering Education, Tottori University
Tagged Topics
Student Development
, process consulting and verification and validation. He has headed the corporate product and technology innovations and quality and delivery innovation departments. Pradeep was on the apex senior management group before proceeding on to pursue his academic, research and social interests. Before Patni, he has worked at IIT Delhi, IIT Bombay, SGGS College of Engineering and Crompton Greaves R & D Electronics in different research and academic positions. Pradeep Waychal has also published papers in peer reviewed journals, presented keynote / invited talks in many high profile international conferences and I involved in a few copyrights / patents. His teams have won a range of awards in Six Sigma and Knowledge
Conference Session
International Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Audra N. Morse, Texas Tech University
Tagged Divisions
International
global workforce, which includes theability to travel to other countries, respect other cultures and understand engineering through theeyes of other cultures. Additionally, the WCOE believes this requirement will improverecruitment of top freshman and transfer students from peer institutions and other high qualityprograms.Historically, the WCOE has had approximately 100 students per year participate in faculty-led oralso referred to as faculty-directed programs. Less than 20 students per year have participated inreciprocal or affiliate programs.The WCOE demographics are as follows. The WCOE has eight different departments providing10 different undergraduate degree programs including chemical engineering, civil engineering,computer engineering
Conference Session
WIED: Curricular Undergraduate Student Programs
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alistar Erickson-Ludwig, Drexel University (Eng.); Alisa Morss Clyne, Drexel University (Eng.)
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
summer bridgeprograms; however, a few studies do show improved retention for summer bridge participants. Page 24.1140.3A study of 617 students who participated in the Georgia Tech summer bridge between 1990 and2000 found that underrepresented minority students who participated in the program were 19%more likely to graduate than their underrepresented minority peers who did not participate in theprogram  5. African American, Hispanic, and Native American student who participated inPurdue’s Academic Boot Camp showed higher retention rates and first semester grade pointaverages14.Institution Overview and Program ObjectiveThe College of Engineering