Collection

2023 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

Ben Weihrauch

persistenceand graduation outcomes (Dewsbury, et al., 2019). In addition to socioeconomic factors, FGSalso choose engineering for the ability to make a societal impact (Thompson, 2021).STEM FGS Academic DeterminantsFGS are enrolled in STEM programs at a lower rate than CGS (Chen & Carroll, 2005) and havelower persistence and graduate rates (Chen & Soldner, 2013). Studies show STEM FGS are lessacademically prepared for college as (determined by college prep courses and standardized testscores), and have lower math and science self-efficacy than CGS (Green & Sanderson, 2017).Despite these precollege academic readiness deficiencies, FGS still enter college with high levelsof interest in engineering programs (Robinson et al., 2018).Performing

Conference Session

Innovative Course Structures and Learning Environments

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian P. Helmke, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, The University of Michigan, 1986.11. R. Schwarzer and M. Jerusalem, M, “Generalized Self-Efficacy scale,” in J. Weinman, S. Wright, and M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON, pp. 35-37, 1995.12. B. J. Zimmerman, “Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 25, pp. 3-17, 1990.13. B. P. Helmke, “Barriers to learning in a large flipped biotransport course,” ASEE Annual Conference, June 25-28, 2017, Columbus, OH. Paper ID #18299.14. J. J. Endo and R. L. Harpel, “The effect of student-faculty interaction on students

Conference Session

Student Assessments and Tests

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Viyon Dansu, Florida International University; Yashin Brijmohan, University of Nebraska Lincoln; Nathaniel Hunsu, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

learning goals in a bid to improve their learning [8]. Also, by self-assessingtheir learning, students are brought into the learning process thereby making them active and notpassive contributors to their own learning [6]. On the other hand, instructors also find self-assessments to be valuable as they take advantage of it to improve students' self-efficacy therebymaking the students commit to learning outside of the classroom [6], [7], [10]. It was found in anengineering course that final grades were higher for students who took self-assessmentscompared to those that didn’t [11]. As a result, Baisley [11] argued that self-assessment eitherimproves the performance of students or that high-performing students are more likely to takeself

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Madhurima Das, NuVu Studio

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

accomplish much on their own,stating that it is because the girls aren’t present to lead the group or assign tasks.Student Assessments and Self-Efficacy ScoresAt the end of each session, students spend a whole day on reflection. This reflection includesproviding feedback to their peers and analyzing their own experiences during the session. Thestudents discuss personal reflections and complete a self-assessment of their learning during thesession. The students fill out a survey which asks them to score their skill levels on specific skillsthat were used during the session such as “Brainstorming,” “Sketching,” “Prototyping,” and“2D-Design: Illustrator.” For each skill, they rate their level on a 3-point Likert scale withanswer choices “Lacking

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Branimir Pejcinovic, Portland State University; Phillip Wong, Portland State University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

components: a) assessing student self-efficacy, i.e., their perception of theirown ability to perform certain tasks, and b) perceived effectiveness of instructional techniquesused in the class. Survey questions include: A) Self-efficacy (“I am confident that …”) Scale: Strongly disagree (1), Disagree (2), Neutral (3), Agree (4), Strongly Agree (5) 1. I can program and use MATLAB to solve problems 2. I can use MATLAB to control LabJack 3. I can solve DC electric circuits problems 4. I can solve general engineering problems 5. I can write good quality reports B) Effectiveness of instructional techniques Scale: Complete waste of time (1), Not helpful (2), Neutral (3), Somewhat helpful (4), Very

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lynn Mayo P.E., RePicture Engineering, PBC; Carolyn Voter, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Expectancy-Value Theory, developed by JacquelineEccles, to understand the factors influencing students’ persistence in engineering. AsMatusovich et al. explains [6], Expectancy-Value Theory suggests that a student’s decision topersist is shaped by: 1) their expectancy or belief that they can succeed in engineering (i.e., “CanI do this?”) and 2) the value or importance they put on engineering (i.e., “Do I want to do this?”).Expectancy beliefs can include: - Engineering self-efficacy (i.e., confidence in one’s ability) - Expectations for success in engineeringValue beliefs can include: - Intrinsic interest (enjoyment of engineering activities or interest in engineering) - Attainment (importance of doing well in engineering in terms of one’s

Conference Session

Faculty and Student Perspective on Instructional Strategies

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Roxana Maria Carbonell, University of Texas at Austin; Audrey Boklage, University of Texas at Austin; Patricia Clayton, University of Texas at Austin; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

questions that examine the following factors: affect towards design, technology self-efficacy, innovation orientation, design self-efficacy, and a sense of belonging to themakerspace. As these surveys continue, this research team plans on conducting further analysisto explore the student experience in these courses. In addition to these quantitative measures,future research should conduct in-depth interviews with students and TAs about theirexperiences. Finally, a comparative case study amongst faculty members would be useful inexamining different approaches to iteration and pedagogy to further establish best practices.ReferencesAmerican Society for Engineering Education. (2016). Envisioning the future of the maker movement: Summit Report

Conference Session

NSF Grantees' Poster Session

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan W. Klingbeil, Wright State University; Karen A. High, Oklahoma State University; Michael W. Keller, University of Tulsa; Ian M. White, University of Maryland; Bradley J. Brummel, University of Tulsa; Jeremy S. Daily P.E., University of Tulsa; R. Alan Cheville, Oklahoma State University; Jennifer Wolk, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

(NSWCCD). The partnership between University of Maryland andNSWCCD allowed for project mentorship by volunteers from NSWCCD, Lockheed Martin, andby the instructor. Within the scope of the project, students must use mathematical fundamentalsto conduct an engineering design. Examples include calculations for carrying capacity andairfoil selection based on experimentally measured principles of aerodynamics, such askinematic equations of motion, lift, drag, and thrust (Figure UM-1).The inclusion of the design project is motivated by the potential to increase the mathematical andengineering self-efficacy that students receive from the course. It is believed that employing themathematical fundamentals acquired in the course to solve real-world

Conference Session

MECH - Technical Session 1: Foundations of Engineering Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware; Amy Trauth, American Institutes for Research; Alexander John De Rosa, University of Delaware

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

. Otherengineering educators have presented projects of similar complexity, including a fast-returnactuator [8], compressed air engine [9], and ceiling hoist [10]. These projects are typicallyimplemented in standalone lab settings [7] or embedded within junior year machine designcourses [3, 10] and students work in groups to manufacture their prototype from a common,instructor-specified design. Implementation of machining projects has been linked to improvedcourse evaluations [3, 11] and enhanced understanding of theory-based course material [10];however, prior studies do not present evidence of improvement in students’ self-efficacy withregards to specific machining skills nor do these prior studies adequately demonstrate thetransferability of machining

Conference Session

Transfer Issues Between 2-Year Colleges and 4-Year Engineering and Engineering Technology Programs 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Yowell, University of Colorado Boulder; Heidi G. Loshbaugh; Nick A. Stites, University of Colorado Boulder; Chris Anderson, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College Division (TYCD)

academic/personal growth and understanding of engineering careers.Participants reported increased interest in and understanding of research practices and futurecareers. One “Learned so much more about the field I am going into and the different types ofwork I can expect in my future.” Another described growth in research interest, career potential,and opportunities for future study: “Ultimately, it [the internship] opened my interests and eyes to a different type of engineering that I did not expect. Also, with seeing how helpful this opportunity was I have become more excited to transfer and get more involved with this project or other projects.”Emerging self-efficacy [19]-[23] as an engineer is evident in the

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine Allison Gray, Northern Arizona University; Robin G. Tuchscherer, Northern Arizona University; Ron Gray, Northern Arizona University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

“weed out” course. In the larger project of which thisstudy is a part, we utilize the constructs of engineering identity and self-efficacy as proxies toexamine future attrition. In this study, we focus on fine-tuning our instructional interventions toincrease students’ sense of community. Results from this initial iteration reveal usefuldifferences in the role instructors and students play in the course as well as the impact thosechanges have on students’ sense of community. Over time, we believe an increase in a sense ofcommunity among the students will have a positive impact on both their engineering identity andself-efficacy, and thus their continuation as engineering majors, as they continue in theirprograms.References[1] Blickenstaff

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

for the reader.]1There is a growing national concern over decreases in science achievement in middle and highschool. Paired with it are challenges associated with workforce declines in STEM-relatedcareers. In response, in a recent PCAST report,2 recommendations for recruitment of science andengineering students and corresponding recommendations for increased attention to strategicSTEM-related instruction and teacher professional development have emerged. A significantchallenge facing urban science and math teachers is a low sense of self-efficacy in teachingSTEM content.3 Additionally, a recent large-scale study of teachers revealed that secondaryteachers indicated a strong need for help in the area teaching in science, and that a weakness

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Maja J. Mataric, University of Southern California; Shaobo Huang, University of Southern California; Svetlana Levonisova, University of Southern California

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

careers. Inresponse, in a recent PCAST report1 recommendations for recruitment of science and Page 24.1042.3engineering students and corresponding recommendations for increased attention to strategicSTEM-related instruction and teacher professional development have emerged. A significantchallenge facing urban science teachers is a low sense of self-efficacy in teaching STEMcontent.2 Additionally, a recent large-scale study of teachers revealed that secondary teachersindicated a strong need for help in the areas of English Language Development (ELD) andcontent teaching in science, and that a weakness of existing professional development was in

Conference Session

Spatial Visualization Within Engineering Design Graphics

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wilhelm Alex Friess, University of Maine; Eric L. Martin, University of Maine; Ivan E. Esparragoza, Pennsylvania State University, Media; Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

building blocks for the development of self-efficacy 44.Further indication of this effect is the subsequent formation of a 3D printing club by anumber of the students in the class, in order to continue their design activities in anextracurricular fashion.No specific assessment of self-efficacy (in particular in relation to the reported genderdifferences) was conducted, as the survey instrument of this work in progress wasdesigned to only probe for student preferences. Future work however will considerexpanding the analysis to include these assessments.Conclusion and future workThe intention of this work-in-progress was to qualify changes in SV caused by thegeometric design projects and the 3D printing interventions, and the student survey

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Demos and Interactives

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan Ngo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Emily Welsh, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Benita Comeau, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Nicholas Fang, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; John Liu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Kachina Studer

is preferencefor AR) 4.2 1.30 5.4 1.525. Conclusion and Future WorkWe created an AR app to open up the “black box” of the SEM and allow students to investigatethe different components and functions of the machine. The app was piloted to a small group ofstudents in Spring of 2021. Students were given pre- and post- assessments to measure changesin their self-efficacy, willingness to re-engage with the content, and fear of making mistakes aswell as their conceptual understanding of the SEM. We found that students who used the AR appdid exhibit a statistically significant increase in willingness to re-engage with the SEM after thecourse. Learner feedback indicates

Collection

2011 North Midwest Section

Authors

Kristine Guzak; Kurt Paterson

how well the participant might work with someone who has a different worldview, culture, and life experiences; while this is important for forecasting possible project partnership successes and challenges (and can inform preparation), it is also s ggesti e of the frame ork s pporting a st dent s motivations for participation.C. Sustainable Engineering Assessment This assessment addresses how well prepared students are to work with global engineering problems. It is comprised of two components: (1) an open-ended case study based question to measure the understanding of sustainable engineering, Proceedings of the 2011 North Midwest Section Conference and (2) an online survey in which the motivations, self

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University; Brock Alexander Hays, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

the entrepreneurial mindset across the curriculum,” unpublished. 4. S. Purzer, N. Fila, and K. Nataraja, “Evaluation of Current Assessment Methods in Engineering Entrepreneurship Education,” Advances in Engineering Education, Winter 2016 issue, Feb. 2016. 5. Shartrand, P. Weilerstein, M. Besterfield-Sacre, and B. M. Olds, “Assessing student learning in technology entrepreneurship,” 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008. 6. J. E. Mcgee, M. Peterson, S. L. Mueller, and J. M. Sequeira, “Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy: Refining the Measure,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 965–988, 2009. 7. M. Schar, S. Gilmartin, A. Harris, B. Rieken, and S. Sheppard, “Innovation Self

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Luster-Teasley, North Carolina A&T State University; Sirena C. Hargrove-Leak, Elon University; Cindy Waters, North Carolina A&T State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

ofdeveloping student writing skills. The students were administered pre and post surveys. The firstsurvey consisted of twelve questions used to measure student preferences for instructionalpedagogy or student preferences for teaching methods and resources used to help teach classes.This survey used a Likert scale using the rankings of Strongly disagree (1), Disagree (2), Neutral(3), Agree (4), and Strongly Agree (5). PRISM statistical software was used to perform thestatistical analysis of survey data to calculate significance in compared data using a two-tailed t-test. The ABET survey consisted of eleven questions to measure student self-efficacy for theircompetencies in the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) criteria areas

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 5: Identity & Belonging

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Sparks, Miami University; Katherine M. Ehlert, Miami University; Karen C. Davis, Miami University; Justin Michael Saul, Miami University; Brian P. Kirkmeyer, Miami University; David Joseph Fox, Miami University; Thao Nguyen, Miami University; Michael Hughes, Miami University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

the competitive climate experienced in STEM classes, increased reports of loss of confidenceincluding among high-performing female students who switch out of STEM, and problemsfinancing college. Seymour also notes that students with socio-economic disadvantages are atrisk of leaving their institution following just one DFWI grade in a severe STEM gateway courseeven when their grades in other courses place them in good academic standing [4]. This body ofliterature suggests that for many students, particularly women, minoritized individuals, andstudents from disadvantaged backgrounds, issues related to competitive/individualistic climate,lack of fit, lack of interest, and loss of self-efficacy can be significant drivers of attrition

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Carolyn Nichol, Rice University; Christina Anlynette Crawford, Rice University; Christopher Barr, Rice University; Isaias Cerda, Rice University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

]. Acquiring studentinformation that addresses student willingness to pursue STEM as a career preference was difficultdue to teacher error in reporting long-term student information or students not responding to specifiedquestions [10].Addressing the GapAt the time of this study, RET program evaluation measures tend to focus on the growth anddevelopment of teacher self-efficacy, engineering content knowledge gains, or classroomimplementation of developed curriculum materials and students' attitudes toward STEM. To provide abetter understanding of RET programs' impact on students, data are needed to show the long-termimpact of PjBL RETs on student graduation rates and STEM undergraduate major selection rates. Thestudy sought to inform RET program

Conference Session

Engineering Design: Implementation and Evaluation

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Layer, University of Evansville; Chris Gwaltney, University of Evansville

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

internationalcapstone design experience.Service learning appears as a manifest variable measuring Humanitarian Attributes. Despite thefact that there has been evidence provided that our society is turning from a value system basedon self-sacrifice and duty, to more of a value system based on self-attention11 and self-servingbehaviors, service learning remains an important factor in facilitating student engagement anddeveloping student motivation12. This experiential service learning component enhances studentlearning while facilitating the development of self-efficacy. Service learning opportunitiesprovide immediate feedback concerning the student’s contribution in addressing a particularsocietal need, thereby greatly bolstering the student’s self-view of

Conference Session

Track: Pre-college - Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Authors

Whitney Gaskins, University of Cincinnati; Darryl Dickerson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Virginia Lynn Booth-Womack, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Delano White, The Gaskins Foundation

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Pre-College

to entering college generally experience greater success in the first year of an engineering program.  Our AB7G cohort model begins in the third grade. Students are registered as a class and begin a supplemental course that enhances and measures their success against state-recognized goals.  Ab7G Objectives:  •Increase self efficacy in students from historically underrepresented groups through mentorship and engagement  •Provide ethnicity and gender-matched mentors to historically underrepresented students through engaging Purdue engineering and STEM students  •Engage parents in fun activities to increase their involvement in student learning activities  The AB7G program meets on the 2​nd​ and 4​th​ Saturday of each month. There is no cost

Conference Session

Assessment

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mieke Schuurman, Pennsylvania State University; Laura L. Pauley, Pennsylvania State University; Dennis Gouran, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

#0206630 (PI McGourty): http://nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward.do?AwardNumber=02066305. Mickelson, S.K., Hanneman, L. F., Guardiola, R. & Brumm, T.J. (2001). Development of Workplace Competencies Sufficient to Measure ABET Outcomes. Conference Proceedings of Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition. June 2001, Albuquerque, New Mexico.6. Bandura (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Page 13.238.87. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.8. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 4

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kimberly Lechasseur, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Kristin Wobbe, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Sarah E. Stanlick, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

].The second possibility for expanding access offers depth over breadth. Stacking multiple high-impact practices has been demonstrated to hold potential as a multiplier effect [13,4,14-15].Where experiencing a single high-impact practice is good, experiencing more than one can beeven better. In this study we ask, To what extent does stacking additional high-impact practiceson top of course-based PBL provide additional benefits for students? We examine this potentialvalue in terms of the range of benefits previously associated with PBL: developing professionalskills and mindsets, as well as building content mastery; improving self-efficacy and ownershipover learning; and career preparedness. We then extend these well-established impacts of PBLby

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fethiye Ozis P.E., Northern Arizona University; Sahar Razavi, Northern Arizona University; Nihal Sarikaya, Northern Arizona University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

this case provided by the NASA Space Grant.The student is living minority status in three dimensions (3D) as being a woman, a first-generation college student, and a Native American studying engineering.It is fascinating to analyze how one’s environment and experiences influence their resiliency.Data will be collected on her readiness for an academic career along measures including but notlimited to understanding of the research process, skills in academic writing, self-efficacy, andcompetence in oral presentation. The case study will explore her story. What experiences shapedher determination and brought her to this level, and what benefit did she gain from NASA Spacegrant? The goal is that sharing her story will encourage others to believe

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT) Technical Session 4

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tobias Rossmann, Lafayette College; Martin Johnson

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

-curricular training fellowship offers the skill-building, cohort-based peer-support, 8+ semesters of time, and life experiences to help address this challenge.The rise in entrepreneurship education at the university level is rooted in student and faculty desireto teach abstract and applied STEM knowledge in a deeper way that delivers value for real-worldstakeholders. Students learn dynamism and adaptability while simultaneously obtaining thefundamentals [1]. While entrepreneurship education typically rose out of business school roots,engineering programs increasingly look to integrate those activities in their curricula due to naturalsynergies around the design process [2], customer/product fit, student demand for purpose-drivenwork, self-efficacy

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Maja J. Mataric, University of Southern California

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

theirteachers’ participation in the RET programs. Students gained science and engineeringknowledge, increased their science interest and motivation, and demonstrated gains in scienceliteracy as well. Introduction and program needThere is a growing national concern over decreases in science achievement in middle and highschool. Paired with it are challenges associated with workforce declines in STEM-relatedcareers. In response, in a recent PCAST report1 recommendations for recruitment of scienceand engineering students and corresponding recommendations for increased attention to strategicSTEM-related instruction and teacher professional development have emerged. A significantchallenge facing urban science teachers is a low sense of self-efficacy in

Conference Session

Exemplary Outreach Programs in Engineering Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Joseph Cocozza, University of Southern California

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

program is in year 3 of implementation with few participants (N=8 teachersand 16 students), multiyear comparisons and multivariate analyses are not yet possible and willnot be presented as the sample size is still relatively small and not all data sets have beencollected. Accordingly, descriptive statistics and qualitative analyses associated with theavailable data sets are illustrated and described.Teacher Related ResultsScience Teaching EfficacyThe Science Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Instrument (STEBI) is an instrument based on Bandura’sdefinition of self-efficacy as a situation-specific construct. The instrument was developed byRiggs and Enochs 7 to measure efficacy of teaching science. The STEBI consists of 23statements which are divided to

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacquelynn Ann Horsey; Mostafa Elsaadany, University of Arkansas; Timothy J. Muldoon, University of Arkansas

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

programs- reporting the efficacyof such courses within the context of such available resources is of broad interest to theengineering community. This study sought to measure the effectiveness of a clinical observationscourse designed for a major land-grant, public university without proximity to a medical school.We compared IP generation and pre- and post-class surveys were used to quantify students’ self-efficacy, motivations, and ability to make connections to real-world problems. The total numberof IP applications increased more than two-fold following the adoption of the course, and surveyresults indicated students’ collective improving understanding of the design process. Ongoingwork will continue to examine the long-term impacts of the

Collection

2023 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

John Annor; Francois Jacobs

Education,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 169–175, May 2000, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:3(169).[3] J. Biggs, “The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching andlearning,” http://lst-iiep.iiep-unesco.org/cgi-bin/wwwi32.exe/[in=epidoc1.in]/?t2000=016712/(100), vol. 41, Apr. 2001, doi:10.1023/A:1004181331049.[4] M. A. Cavanaugh, G. Milkovich, and J. Tang, “The Effective Use of MultimediaDistance Learning Technology: The Role of Technology Self-Efficacy, Attitudes, Reliability,Use and Distance in a Global Multimedia Distance Learning Classroom,” undefined, 2000,Accessed: May 13, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Effective-Use-of