evaluation of the projectssuccess, psychometric survey-based measures of these social psychological outcomes will alsobe operationalized as dependent variables, thus providing both quantitative and qualitativeassessments. A vital first phase of this RED project then involves the development of thepsychometric scales (i.e., testing of the tests), that will be used. Although researchers have developed a number of survey-based measures of socialpsychological aspects of the learning process, and recent efforts have been made to assess causal 2models of the multiple social psychological influences on educational and career outcomeswithin the area of engineering [cf. 4, 2, 5]. Importantly, the
art facilities.One of the more effective ways to increase knowledge about science, technology, engineering,and math (STEM) careers is to increase the knowledge of teachers. As part of a National ScienceFoundation Advanced Technological Education project, a group of high school teachers wasoffered the opportunity to work in advanced manufacturing labs with engineering faculty. Theseprojects included additive manufacturing (AM) of ceramics, surface characterization of AMmetal parts, and surface alteration. The teachers were tasked with developing lesson plans whichincorporated the advanced manufacturing concepts that they had learned.As part of the assessment of the program, teachers were given pre- and post- research experiencesurveys
Moderate level of interest Highest level of interest Figure 1 – Participant Thread ChoiceThe pre-assessment survey also asked questions about STEM faculty development issues, facultyexpectations from the workshop, and information they would like to share with the workshopattendees. Following the workshop, the project team and external evaluator administered a post-assessment to all workshop participants. The post-assessment asked participants to rate workshoplogistics such as ease of travel, transitions throughout each day, and accommodations. In addition, thepost-assessment asked participants to describe how the workshop changed their views on holistic STEMfaculty development and how they might go
outreach, educational and support systems that have the potential to form ”resource-rich” networks in which students receive in- formation and resources in routine exchanges. Dr. Martin’s current projects evolve her prior research on social and cultural capital away from a normative state that requires students to conform to the main- stream institution of engineering education in an effort to promote experiences and systems that affirm/are inclusive of people from diverse backgrounds. In addition to research, she is deeply interested in STEM education policy, and held a Science and Technology Policy Fellowship with the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2012-2013. Dr. Martin has held a
free the industrial partners to develop realistic problems without beingconstrained by educational parameters. Once the AEPs were developed, they were reviewed bythe course instructor to ensure that the scope of the project was reasonable for the course. Eachindustrial partner presented their AEP to students using their own words, without modificationsfrom faculty members, in order to preserve the authenticity. After the industrial partner’spresentation of the problem, students worked in three-person teams to solve the AEP. During atwo-week period, the instructor facilitated a discussion among students and guided them todetermine the knowledge they must gain and information they must gather to solve each AEP. Atthe end of the two-week period
@temple.edu.Dr. Saroj K Biswas, Temple University Saroj Biswas is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Temple University specializing in electrical machines and power systems, multimedia tutoring, and control and optimization of dynamic systems. He has been the principle investigator of a project for the development of an intelligent tutoring shell that allows instructors create their own web-based tutoring system. His current research focuses on security of cyber-physical systems based on multiagent framework with applications to the power grid, and the integration of an intelligent virtual laboratory environment in curriculum. He is an associate editor of Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete and Impulsive
. Page 24.1359.6Week 5: Teams and Scaffolding. Given that many engineering curricula have substantial team-based instruction (e.g., laboratory sessions, group projects), we explored the potential benefitsand challenges of incorporating team-based activities into circuits courses. Before the session,each participant completed a team-maker survey and read one of two assigned articles6,7 oneffective student teams. An initial presentation discussed challenges associated with formingteams, turning groups of students into interacting teams, assessing students individually whenthey work in teams, and dealing with social and intellectual differences among students. Via apoll and break-out group activity, participants shared their prior experiences with
Paper ID #11775Does Motivation Matter for Conceptual Change: Developing Effective Qual-itative Research ApproachesDr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research
participation andidentity in relation to situativity. This framework will specifically guide the development of theresearch instruments – interview and observation protocols for the qualitative portion of thestudy and their subsequent use for designing the survey. Informal learning can be understood as asituated activity that takes place in a specific setting, a setting different than a formal classroom,and often involves students becoming a part of a community of practice over time. The situatedperspective also helps shed light on the different identities that students take on as they work ondifferent projects, for instance, as part of collaborative teams. Therefore, although we believethat the debates and frameworks around informal learning are
, and educational psychology, as well as a co-PI, an external evaluator or advisory board member on several NSF-funded projects (CA- REER, iCorps, REU, RIEF, etc.). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Impact of a Research Experience Program in Aerospace Engineering on Undergraduate Students: Year TwoAbstractThis work-in-progress study is to report results from the second-year implementation of researchexperiences for undergraduates (REU) program funded by the National Science Foundation(NSF) in aerospace engineering at a Southwestern public research university. A total of 25students, who are citizens or permanent residents selected across the United States
exploring challenges and identifying at- risk characteristics among students in first-year writing courses. I also worked on an initiative focused on writing in the disciplines as part of our university’s Higher Learning Commission 10-year re-accreditation cycle. As Borderlands Writing Project Director, I have worked with K-16 teachers to strengthen quality in using writing in their courses to help students learn, regardless of discipline.Mr. Germain Degardin, Southwest Outreach Academic Research (SOAR) Center Germain graduated from New Mexico State University with a Bachelor in Economics, a Master in Busi- ness and Administration, a Master in Curriculum and Instruction, and a secondary education teaching license
efficiency, lower energy usage, reduce capital costs, reduce wasteemissions and process hazards, or encompass several of these benefits. Improving processes byprocess intensification requires engineers to integrate many fundamental concepts and go beyondtraditional unit operations. Through activities focused on process intensification, global learningand the ability of our students to synthesize knowledge from different courses are strengthened.Four core chemical engineering courses are targeted: fluid flow operations; heat transferoperations; mass transfer operations; and chemical reactor design. Over the course of thiscurriculum improvement project, activities/modules have been developed and incorporated intoeach course. Each activity/module
haveearned an MBA or have gone on to graduate school part-time. This program builds on12prior/current National Science Foundation (NSF) CSEMS/S-STEM/S-STEP projects ($6.715M)addressing lower-division, upper-division, and CC transfer needs.The CIRC/METS (C/M) Program has had a profound impact upon its scholarship students.Nationally, “transfer GPA shock” is a drop in GPA of a half to a full grade point upon transfer to Page 25.899.7a university from a CC. Since students start their University GPA from scratch, this drop can bedevastating. After Fall 2010, a study was done with the 16 new upper division transferscholarship students compared with the 183
of Beams B3A and B3Bmust be coped to meet the top-of-steel-elevation requirement, often specified in design. Thisspecific refers to the necessity to have the top face of the beams and the top face of the girders onthe same elevation so that roof deck and floor decks can be placed on them. From the authors’teaching experience, the coping detail in particular, is difficult for students to comprehend from2-D sketches.One way to remedy this problem is to take students to actual construction sites. Although this is agood approach, it is a major challenge to find construction projects that are nearby and installingconnections that coincides with the topic being taught at the time. Additionally, liability issuesmay also arise and prevent the
investigates students’ math reasoning. She designs tasks to help students to expand their math reasoning, and she studies how instructors and departments transform practices to grow students’ math reasoning.Marie E. Evans, University of Colorado Denver Marie Evans draws her experience from working across different sectors, from domestic and international nonprofit work to education and technology. She partners with teams by facilitating and implementing creative processes and collaborates on initiatives and research projects with social good emphasis. She’s worked with cities, non-profits, medical professional teams, K-12 groups, and more. She supports the research process with extensive experience engaging diverse
engineering andComputer science at LSU. The project, Preparing Resilient Individuals to Succeed in Engineering(PRISE), creates a scholarship to meet the financial needs of underprepared, low SES students forsuccess in an engineering program (e.g., not calculus ready and low Advanced Placementcoursework). This project works to fill the gap between a student’s high school academicpreparation and those skills needed to be a successful engineering student. Currently, many XXstate high school students are not receiving sufficient academic preparation in mathematics andstudy skills to be successful in engineering, particularly in “high need” / low SES regions of thestate. This paper provides an overview of the program and results through the first two
academic programs and the needs ofthe graduates and industry. The academic programs are heavily oriented towards control theory,board-level electronics, interfacing and microprocessors supplemented with laboratoryequipment, such as the inverted pendulum, and projects, such as Lego robots5-7. But industrialapplications require mechanical engineers to design machines with multiple axes that executecomplex, high speed, high precision coordinated motion using sophisticated motion controllers.In this paper, we present overview of a new course and its laboratory developed in partnershipwith industry. The course aims to teach “the fundamentals” while focusing on industrial motioncontrol technology and multi-axis machines. The course was offered for the
backgrounds.Workforce studies have shown that the number of students being educated in STEM (science,technology, engineering, and math) cannot meet projected demands [1]. Also, the currentenrollments in engineering are not diverse, especially among women, blacks, and Hispanics [2].On a related issue, a recent survey of engineers in industry indicates a compelling need forengineers to have strong communication skills [3]. To address these challenges, Pennsylvania State University created the EngineeringAmbassador Program: a professional development program for undergraduate engineeringstudents with an outreach mission to middle and high schools. The development mission is toenrich the communication and leadership skills of engineering undergraduates
allocated a budget with which they can acquire allthe necessary parts. The project was divided into three segments. First, the students constructedcustom powertrains that can be housed in a gearbox. Then, a steering made up of a servo and a 1parallelogram linkage mechanism was designed and assembled. Finally, students manufactured acustom chassis to accommodate and support the weight of all the electronics (including sensors),the gearbox, and the steering mechanism. Towards the end of the course, the RC Cars designedand built by these groups are evaluated through testing on indoor tracks that requires the cars tomaintain structural integrity during the
microfossil assemblages allowstudents to apply their identification skills and have an insight into various applications ofmicropaleontology in research and industry. FossilSketch environment allows students to practiceand receive feedback in real-time with little to no instructor supervision.Study Goals and Research QuestionsThe main research goal of this project was to develop and evaluate the effectiveness ofFossilSketch and its impact on student learning experiences and knowledge retention.The following research questions were assessed: • RQ1: To what extent does student comprehension and retention of micropaleontology knowledge increase (or decrease) after using FossilSketch? • RQ2: To what extent does students’ interest in and
in2YCs [1]. The "Capacity Building Workshops for Competitive S-STEM Proposals from Two-Year Colleges in the Western U.S." goal has been to support preparation and submission ofproposals to the NSF S-STEM program from two-year colleges (2YCs).The workshop has been offered during the summers of 2019 (in person), 2020 and 2021 (virtual)and focused on several aspects of proposal preparation, including addressing the NSF MeritReview Criteria, developing, and justifying proposed budgets, incorporating appropriate andmeaningful evidence-based strategies, and evaluation and dissemination plans. A completedescription and evaluation analysis of this project is currently being submitted for publication[2]. The workshop facilitators who were carefully
strengthen the sustainability of our project, in 2022 our teamexpanded the reach of the RDI by training leaders form five institutions across the US, namelyPenn State, UC Irvine, University of Florida, Iowa State and North Carolina A&T, who pilotedthe RDI in their institutions as part of their rounds of incoming student orientations. With thehelp of our team, each one of the collaborating institutions committed two leaders who oversawthe adaption and implementation of the RDI model to better meet their students’ needs, whileaiding their institutions’ efforts to support diversity, equity, and inclusion. When adjusting themodel, some leaders followed the 2-3 day-long workshop model of the original RDI, whileothers implemented it throughout the
perceived appropriateness? 4. What are teachers’ rationales for (a) integrating or (b) not integrating specific digital technologies? Literature ReviewEngineering, Technology, and Science: Natural Integration Opportunities for PositiveOutcomesFor decades, educational researchers have espoused integrated science instruction as a means toincrease student engagement, interest in science, and achievement (e.g., Roth, 2001). As a result,many different commercial curricula (e.g., Engineering is Elementary, Project Lead the Way,Lego Robotics) and open-source software (e.g., WISEngineering) exist to facilitate integratedinstruction. Further, design-based, project-based, and problem-based learning can
underserved elementary schools to promote STEM literacy, and provided in school STEM training for both teachers and students. She began her career at Rice in 2010 as a post-doctoral research fellow and then project manager in the Colvin labs. She joined the office of STEM engagement at the beginning of 2015 as Director of Programs and Operations. In her role Carolina is responsible for overseeing the program operations and the research efforts for the RSTEM group. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Nanotechnology Research Experience for Teachers Enhancing STEM EducationAbstractTeachers serve a vital role in improving the nation’s STEM education and
research, relate thisknowledge to each teacher’s independent project, and translate this knowledge and experienceinto a new lesson plan for their high school classroom. These lesson plans were disseminatedbroadly through the web (http://agpa.uakron.edu/p16/ret.php), workshops to local K-12educators, and national conference symposia.The targeted participants were high school science teachers (e.g. chemistry, physics, biology) inthe Akron hub of the Ohio STEM Learning Network within a one hour drive of the University ofAkron.1 This encompasses Summit county and four surrounding counties (Portage, Stark,Wayne, and Medina counties).The intellectual focus of this site was polymeric films and interfaces, but branched out after itsinception to encompass
Korolev, University of FloridaProf. Philip J. Brucat, University of Florida ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 General Chemistry Laboratory as Situated Engineering DesignIntroductionChANgE Chem Labs is an NSF-funded Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE)project that involves curriculum reform for improving the experience of freshman engineeringstudents taking general chemistry. Our current work builds upon prior success with recitationreform [1], [2] to include engineering Design Challenges (DCs) as laboratory activities that arebased upon the NAE Grand Challenges for EngineeringTM.The laboratory has long been viewed as an important component of a chemistry course [3],offering a unique
at Lipscomb University in Nashville, TN. Prior to Lipscomb, Dr. Myrick was the Director of the Health Systems Research Center in the School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technol- ogy. He also was a former faculty member at the University of Central Florida and a project engineer at Sikorsky Aircraft in Stratford, CT. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Enhancing Engineering Talent in Tennessee NSF S-STEM Grant 1458735AbstractA summary of work in progress regarding the Enhancing Engineering Talent in Tennessee, NationalScience Foundation S-STEM Grant #1458735 sponsored by the Directorate for
growth. Therefore, this project aligns well with calls to study the designof STEM learning experiences and whether those experiences improve valued outcomes.References[1] E. Towle, J. Mann, B. Kinsey, E. J. O. Brien, C. F. Bauer, and R. Champoux, "Assessing the self efficacy and spatial ability of engineering students from multiple disciplines," in Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference, 2005, pp. S2C-15.[2] N. Veurink and A. Hamlin, "Spatial Visualization Skills: Impact on Confidence and Success in an Engineering Curriculum," presented at the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, 2011. Available: https://peer.asee.org/18591[3] M.-T. Wang and J. Degol, "Motivational Pathways to
with theparticipation of undergraduate computer science students in the last year of their studies to validatethe effectiveness of the CT assessment framework.(c) Computational thinking assessment in formal undergraduate coursesLibeskind-Hadas and Bush [32], assessed student success by scoring the student solutions on theirfinal projects from a Biocomp course at Harvey Mudd College for correct functionality, quality ofdesign, ability to communicate their computational approach in writing, and ability to use theirprogram for scientific exploration as assessed however the framework followed for assessmentwas not clearly described. Mishra and Iyer [33], used a grounded theory-based assessmentframework in an AI course to assess the quality of
Knaphus-Soran, University of Washington Emily Knaphus-Soran is a Research Associate at the Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (CERSE) at the University of Washington. She works on the evaluation of several projects aimed at improving diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM fields. She also conducts research on the social- psychological and institutional forces that contribute to the persistence of race and class inequalities in the United States. Emily earned a PhD and MA in Sociology from the University of Washington, and a BA in Sociology from Smith College.Dr. Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University Donna Crystal Llewellyn received her BA (major in Mathematics and minor in Economics) with High