the research area, (2) overall scope of your research, (3) thescope of the problem talk, (4) scope of the solution talk, (5) key limitation(s) of the research, (6)information that a reference source will provide, and (7) credibility of that source. Because thelist of messages is long and the student is allowed only two assertion-evidence slides,remembering all seven messages is a challenge. Shown in the upper left is an entry point statistic(message 1) from National Geographic—namely, that the average number of acres in thewestern United States has recently increased from 4-5 million acres to 9 million acres. The imageto the right shows the talk’s first slide with message 2 as the headline. The box to the right of theslide provides notes for
://www.networkworld.com/article/2287582/lan-wan/frame-relay-vs--atm.html2. U. Black, MPLS and Label Switching etworks, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall PTR, 2002.3. L.D. Ghein, MPLS Fundamentals, Indianapolis, IN, Cisco Press, 2007.4. E. Osborne and A. Simha, Traffic Engineering with MPLS, Indianapolis, IN, Cisco Press, 2003.5. S. Bradner and J. McQuaid. (1999, Mar.). Benchmarking Methodology for etwork Interconnect Devices (IETF RFC 2544) [Online]. Available: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2544.txt6. A. Akhter, R. Asati, and C. Pignataro. (2009, Nov.) MPLS Forwarding Benchmarking Methodology for IP Page 26.1164.15 Flows (IETF RFC
Multi-State Collaborative to Advance LearningOutcomes Assessment. [accessed 2015 Mar 11]. http://www.sheeo.org/projects/msc-multi-state-collaborative-advance-learning-outcomes-assessment17. Zahner D. Reliability & Validity - CLA+. Council for Aid to Education; 2013.http://cae.org/images/uploads/pdf/Reliability_and_Validity_of_CLA_Plus.pdf18. Klein S, Liu O, Sconing J. Test Validity Study (TVS) Report. Council for Aid to Education; 2009.19. Pintrich PR, Smith DAF, Garcia T, Mckeachie WJ. Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategiesfor Learning Questionnaire (Mslq). Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1993 [accessed 2013 Jan15];53(3):801–813.20. Council for Aid to Education (CAE). CLA+ Sample Report. http://cae.org
Systems Conference, IEEE Society, 2011, pp. 367-370.8. F. Squires, etal, “Investigating an Innovative Approach for Developing Systems Engineering Curriculum: The Systems Engineering Experience Accelerator”, ASEE Annual Conference, 2011.9. M.C. Brannon, T.A. Mazzuchi, “Introducing the Fundamentals of Systems Engineering to Freshman through Various Interactive Group Activities”, ASEE Annual Conference, 2014.10. S. G. Teng, “Embedding Systems Engineering Practices into Systems Engineering Classes”, ASEE Annual Conference, 2014.11. C.S. Wasson, “Systems Engineering Competency: The missing course in engineering education”, ASEE Annual Conference, 2012.12. M.D. Wilson, etal, “Entrepreneurship Education: Engineering a Pracademic
Course for Computer Scientists and Engineers. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine. pp. 85 - 89.3. Burke, J., Murphy, R. R., & Kidd, C. (2007). Young Researchers in HRI Workshop 2006: Contemplating the future of human–robot interaction. Interaction Studies, 8(2), 343-358.4. Sabanovic, S. I400/590: Human-Robot Interaction. Indiana University Bloomington. Retrieved January 1, 2015, from http://homes.soic.indiana.edu/selmas/teaching.html.5. Thomaz, A. (2012). Human-Robot Interaction. Georgia Institute of Technology. Retrieved January 1, 2015, from http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~athomaz/classes/CS7633-HRI/index.html.6. Yanco, H. Human-Robot Interaction. University of Massachusetts Lowell. Retrieved January 1, 2015, from
2014 from: http://www.scieng.ed.ac.uk/ltstrategy/resources/Clicker_feedback_v0_7_incl_exec_summary.pdf 3. T. Pelton and all, “Clicker Lessons: Assessing and Addressing Student Response to Audience Response Systems”, CELT – Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, Vol. 1, 2008, pg. 85- 92. Retrieved November 2014 from http://celt.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/CELT/article/view/3184 4. W. Kappers and S. Cutler, “Polleverywhere! Even in the Classroom: An investigation into the impact of using Polleverywhere in a large-lecture classroom”, 2014 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN 5. Kay, R. H., & LeSage, A. (2009). “Examining the benefits and challenges of using
Urbana-Champaign, 1978. URL http://books.google.com/books?id=JNHUjwEACAAJ.[4] Thomas Angelo and K. Kross. Classroom Assessment Techniques - A Handbook for College Teachers. Jossey-Bass, 2003.[5] M. Ruiz-Primo, R. Shavelson, and S. Schultz. On the validity of concept-map-based assessment interpretations: An experimental testing the assumption of hierarchical concept maps in science. Technical report, University of California, 1997. URL http://research.cse.ucla.edu/Reports/TECH455.PDF.[6] H. E. Herl, H. F. O’Neil, G. K. W. K. Chung, and J. Schacter. Reliability and validity of a computer-based knowledge mapping system to measure content understanding. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(3-4): 315–333, May 1999. URL http://dx.doi.org
the interactivity of the software and the ability of the learner to impacthis/her environment, which should facilitate different modes of learning. Future work willinclude testing the iHASOB prototype in an educational environment to test the validity of theconcept and how it compares to traditional eBook.AcknowledgementThis work was partially supported by NSF grant DUE 1022934 and Office of Research and Graduate Studies at Texas A&M University-‐Kingsville. References1. S. Canfield, Sheikh G. and M. Abdelrahman, “Enhancing the Programming Experience for First-Year Engineering Students through Hands-On Integrated Computer Experiences,” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, Volume 13 • Issue 4 • July
not so obvious. References1. Colby, A. and W.M. Sullivan, Ethics Teaching in Undergraduate Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 2008. 97(3): p. 327-338.2. Holsapple, M.A., et al., Framing Faculty and Student Discrepancies in Engineering Ethics Education Delivery. Journal of Engineering Education, 2012. 101(2): p. 169-186.3. Drake, M.J., et al., Engineering Ethical Curricula: Assessment and Comparison of Two Approaches. Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. 94(2): p. 223-231.4. Yadav, A., G.M. Shaver, and P. Meckl, Lessons Learned: Implementing the Case Teaching Method in a Mechanical Engineering Course. Journal of Engineering Education, 2010. 99(1): p. 55-69.5. Freyne, S
Characteristics – Color Detect, Grab and Drop Red Ball Parameter Uncompensated Compensated (before tuning) 33.55Plant & Compensator 16.27 1062 16.27 1062Dominant Poles -8.07 ± 8.454j -16.02 ± 16.78jk 4.2377 19.252kp ∞ ∞e(∞) 0 0 0.6905 0.6905n (rad/s) 11.69 23.20% OS
Online StaticsTextbook Hibbeler, R.C., “Engineering Same textbook and website Mechanics Statics”, plus use of the publisher’s website “Mastering Engineering”Theory sessions 3 times weekly for 50 minutes Videos posted on website each, covering theory/examples covering same theory/examplesDiscussion Lab sessions Once weekly for 50 minutes, No Discussion Lab max. class size of 24 studentsTeaching Assistant(s) One TA per 24 students One TA for every 25
our experience, we believe that the online learning paradigm is conduciveto the 21st-centry education where creativity, critical thinking, communication and collaborationare encouraged.References1. S. Patrick, “E-Learning: A Federal Perspective”, U.S. Department of Education, (www.nutn.org/susan_patrick.pdf).2. J. Bourne, D. Harris, F. Mayadas, “Online Engineering Education: Learning Anywhere, Anytime”, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 9(1), pp. 15-41 (2005).3. A. F. Mayadas, “What is ALN?” (http://www.aln.org.alnweb.aln.htm).4. L. Palma, R. F. Morrison, P. N. Enjeti, J W. Howze ,“Use of Web-Based Materials to Teach Electric Circuit Theory,, IEEE Transactions on Education, 48 (4) November 2006.5
likely to be intense?4. How should engineering research be enriched to integrate these socio-political aspects with the purely technical engineering research subjects? Bibliography & ResourcesBaillie, C., Pawley, A. and Riley, D.M., eds. (2012). Engineering and Social Justice: In the university and beyond. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Banfield, J. & Tripathi, S. (2006). Conflict-sensitive business practices: Engineering contractors and their clients. Page 26.1216.8 London, UK: International Alert. Retrieved from http://www.international- alert.org/resources/publications/csbp-engineering
most impact onidentity development.References1. Banerjee, A. (2015, January). Databytes: Retention Range. ASEE Prism, 16-17. Page 26.1274.92. Matusovich, H. M., Streveler, R. A., & Miller, R. L. (2010). Why do students choose engineering? A qualitative, longitudinal investigation of students' motivational values. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 289-303.3. Nicholls, G. M., Wolfe, H., Besterfield-Sacre, M., Shuman, L. J., & Larpkiattaworn, S. (2007). A method for identifying variables for predicting stem enrollment. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(1), 33-44.4. Beam, T., Pierrakos, O., Constantz, J., Johri, A
. Page 26.1339.11References1. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2014, 92, 470-471.2. O' Riordan, T. (1981). Environmentalism. London: Pion Books.3. Stein, J. (2007, August 7). Arrogance is Good: In Defense of Silicon Valley. Bloomsburg Businessweek.Retrieved January 5, 2015.4. Papert, S. (1990). A Critique of Technocentrism in Thinking About the School of the Future. M.I.T. Media LabEpistemology and Learning Memo, 2.5. Passino, K. (2009). Educating The Humanitarian Engineer. Science and Engineering Ethics, 577-600.6. Reinvent the Toilet. (n.d.). Retrieved February 3, 2015, from http://www.gatesfoundation.org/What-We-Do/Global-Development/Reinvent-the-Toilet-Challenge7. Romell, R. (2014). Kohler helps Caltech in quest to reinvent toilet
abroad program. Advances in Engineering Education, 4(1), 1-31.9. Olds, B. M., & Miller, R. L. (2008). Using formative assessment for program improvement. In J. E. Spurlin, S. A. Rajala & J. P. Lavelle (Eds.), Designing better engineering education through assessment: a practical resource for faculty and department chairs on using assessment and ABET criteria to improve student learning. Sterling, Va: Stylus Pub.10. Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson Education. (p. 348)11. Green, J., Willis, K., Hughes, E., Small, R., Welch, N., Gibbs, L., & Daly, J. (2007). Generating best
chemistry. We begin by discussing the historical origins of quantumtheory, why it was such a radical departure from classical physics, why it became necessary toaccept such a totally different approach to understand the world, and why the “quantum picture”continues to be anti-intuitive and difficult to accept. Next, we examine the postulates ofquantum mechanics and how we can “shut up and calculate” everything that is determinable forquantum systems, including tunneling, and low-dimensional quantum systems, such as 1D and2D quantum wells. We then extend the quantum analysis to real systems from quantum dots tothe hydrogen atom and touch on the chemistry of the “s-p-d-f” quantum states and hybridizedouter orbitals. Finally, we look at electrons in
." Energy 36.8 (2011): 5154-5161. [7] Mekhilef, S., R. Saidur, and M. Kamalisarvestani. "Effect of dust, humidity and air velocity on efficiency of photovoltaic cells." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16.5 (2012): 2920-2925. [8] Mani, Monto, and Rohit Pillai. "Impact of dust on solar photovoltaic (PV) performance: research status, challenges and recommendations." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14.9 (2010): 3124-3131. [9] IDEM - Indiana Department of Environmental Management. Air Quality in Indiana [Online]. Retrieved from: http://www.in.gov/idem/airquality/index.htm. [10] Jiang, Hai, Lin Lu, and Ke Sun. "Experimental investigation of the impact of airborne dust deposition on the performance of
21st Century Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future. 2008. p E001.17. Lowman J. Mastering the techniques of teaching. 1995.18. Conley CH, Ressler SJ, Lenox TA, Samples JW. Teaching teachers to teach engineering—T4E. Journal of Engineering Education 2000;89(1):31-38.19. Estes A, Ressler S. ExCEEd teaching workshop: Fulfilling a critical need. 2001.20. Dennis N. ExCEEd Teaching Workshop: Taking It on the Road. 2001. Page 26.1411.12Appendix A: Student and TA Survey Page 26.1411.13Course: _____________________________ Day:______________________________ I. An Effective Teaching
learning inhigher education," 1998 World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia & World Conference on2 Gibbons, M. T., “The Year in Numbers,” 2007 Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges,Washington, DC: The American Society for Engineering Education, 2008.3 Brown C., Johnson M., Lax J., “Educational Classroom Technology: What Works Best in the Engineering Context”,2007, 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Session S4J.4 Grady, H., and Codone, S., " From chalkboard to PowerPoint to the web: A continuum of technology," 2004International Professional Communication Conference, pp. 217-222.5 B. Flores, "CAMPUS DIVERSITY FACTS”, http://research.utep.edu/Default.aspx?tabid=44271, 1995-2007,(accessed
solution manuals in the teaching of higher mathematics,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics at the Undergraduate Level, Crete, Greece, July 2002.8. Ginsberg E., Panasuk R., George S., “ Survey of Physics Instructor Attitudes on Student Access to Problem Solutions,” Electronic Journal of Science Education, v2 n3 Mar 1998AppendixStudent comments“Solution manuals are not helpful at all if students just copy the answers. I have used solutions manuals and it has helped me outa lot. I use them to double check my answers as well as the way that I get to my answer. It helps to reinforce ideas as well asdouble check for simple mistakes. It is also helpful if you are stuck on a problem and just need
Exposition, Indianapolis, IN. 5. Smith, K., Sheppard, S., Johnson, D., and Johnson, R. (2005) “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom- Based Practices.” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 87-101. 6. Smith, K. (2011) “Cooperative Learning: Lessons and Insights from Thirty Years of Championing a Research-Based Innovative Practice.” Proceedings of the 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, SD. 7. Prince, M. (2004) “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research.” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 223-331. 8. Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., and Bunting, C. F. (2011) “Problem-based Learning: Influence on Students’ Learning in an Electrical
, J., Giles, D. E., Jr., Stenson, C. M., & Gray, C. J. (2001). At a glance: What we know about theeffects of service-learning on college students, faculty, institutions and communities, 1993-2000 (3rd ed.).Nashville, TN:Vanderbilt University. Jacoby and Associates (1996). Securing the Future of Service-Learning in Higher Education: A Mandatefor Action.” 317-35 in s. Service-Learning in Higher Education: Concepts and Practices. San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass, 1996.Oakes, William C. (2004), Service-Learning in Engineering: A Resource Guidebook, Campus Compact,download at http://www.compact.org/publications/detail2.php?id=19Oakes, W., Leone, L., Gunn, C., Dilworth, J., Young, M., Diefes, H., Flori, R, Potter, M., Engineering:Your Future, 3rd
teacher education using knowledge creating heutagogies. British Journal of Educational Technology 2006;37(6):825 -840.9. Bhoyrub J, Hurley J, Neilson GR, Ramsay M, Smith M. Heutag ogy: An alternative practice based learning approach. Nurse education in practice 2010;10(6):322-326.10. De Jong T, Linn MC, Zacharia ZC. Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science 2013;340(6130):305-308.11. Bonwell C, Eison J. Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom AEHE-ERIC higher education reports. 1991.12. Chiang VC, Leung SS, Chui CY, Leung AY, Mak Y. Building life-long learning capacity in undergraduate nursing freshmen within an integrative and s mall group learning
Figure 4: Chua’s breadboard layout using Fritzing. Figure 5: Fully constructed Chua’s circuit. Page 26.348.8USB Soundcard ScopeIn order to visualize the chaotic attractor one would typically use an oscilloscope (see Figure 6),however such devices are frequently out of the price range for hobbyists and students to makea simple demonstration. Moreover, the measurement of analog signals using a Line-In port of adesktop soundcard is no longer a relevant solution to replace an oscilloscope. The 1990’s desktopscame commonly equipped with a soundcard which included a Line-In port. The current computermarket is split between desktop and laptop computers
. Twombly, Mark H. Salisbury, Shannon D. Tumanut, and Paul Klute Study Abroad in a New Global Century: Renewing the Promise, Refining the Purpose Wiley Periodicals (2012).10. Mark E. Mendenhall, Joyce S. Osland, Allan Bird, Gary R. Oddou, Martha L. Maznevski, Michael J. Stevens, and Gűnter K Stahl Global Leadership: Research, Practice, and Development 2nd Edition; Routledge (2013).11. Ross Lewin, ed., The Handbook of Practice and Research in Study Abroad Routledge, (2009). Page 26.372.13
technical support.We’d also like to thank Tim Stelzer for conversations that helped lead to and helped shape thiseffort.References [1] J. L. Azorlosa and C. H. Renner. The effect of announced quizzes on exam performance. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33:278–83, 2006. [2] B. S. Bloom and D. R. Krathwohl. Taxonomy of educational objectives book 1: Cognitive domain. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, 1984. [3] F. M. Kika, T. F. McLaughlin, and J. Dixon. Effects of frequent testing of secondary algebra students. Journal of Educational Research, 85:159–62, 1992. [4] T. Kuo and A. Simon. How many tests do we really need? College Teaching, 57:156–160, 2009. [5] C. E. Nelson. Student diversity requires different approaches to college
response(s) is(are) most important. Figure 1: Predicted Responses for the Hanging Bar of Homogeneous Specific Weight, γPresenting a force (flexibility) method in the opening example helps students connect FEA to ear-lier coursework. Course lectures and assignments subsequently transition to the direct stiffnessmethod. Students solve spring and bar problems, then use coordinate system transformation matri-ces to analyze trusses. One dimensional heat transfer round out coverage of second order methods.The theory phase of the course completes with elastic beam analysis. For the second course of-fering (2014), this included activities to build upon laboratory exercises students had previouslyconducted in Strengths of Materials and Vibrations
. Individual Differences in Solving Physics Problems. 1978:325–348 3. Eccles JS, Wigfield A. Motivational Beliefs , Values , and Goals. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002. 4. National Academy of Engineering. Advance Personalized Learning. NAE Gd Challenges Eng. 2012. 5. McGough C, Benson L, Kirn A. Relationships between Engineering Students’ Future Time Perspectives and Their Problem Solving Processes. In: NARST Conference.; 2015. 6. Kirn AN. The Influences of Engineering Student Motivations on Short-Term Tasks and Long-Term Goals. Dissertation. 2014. 7. Nickerson RS. Thinking and Problem Solving. 2nd ed. (Carterette E, Friedman M, Sternberg R, eds.). Academic Press; 1994:425–430. 8. Grigg S, Benson LC. A coding scheme
, 1968.20- Guo, E., Gilbert, S., Jackman, J., Starns, G., Hagge, M., Faidley, L., & Amin-Naseri, M. (2014). Statics Tutor: Free Body Diagram Tutor for Problem Framing. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 448-455). Springer International Publishing.21- Corbett, A. T. and Anderson, J. R.: Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(4), 253-278. (1995) Page 26.440.17