ofstudy requiring a minimum of 124 semester hours of credit. Out of this, a minimum of 43credits is required from the university General Education studies. In addition to that, allComputer Engineering Technology majors are required to complete 27 credits of corerequirements (Table 1) in the area of Computer Science, General EngineeringTechnology, and Math/Technical Writing skills, and 36 credits of Computer EngineeringTechnology Specialization courses (Table 2), 15 credits of directed electives, and 3 hoursof free electives.Table 1: Core Courses Course number BS Computer Engineering Technology Credits Core Requirements ET 150 Intro to Engineering Technology
Page 12.1588.3visibility at each clock cycle.Single-bus ArchitectureAddressing mode and microprogrammed control exercises are based on a single-bus architecturefrom the course text, shown in Figure 1. Processor registers and memory are defined along withcontrol signals and the datapath to create the resulting architecture is shown in Figure 2. Figure 1. Single-bus architecture from text. Page 12.1588.4 Figure 2. Single-bus architecture for homework.Addressing ModesFor the addressing mode homework exercise, a simple instruction format was created based onclassroom and text examples. The instruction format
metric, or metrics, in mind for measuring the level of success orfailure, such as examination or homework questions, or project requirements. Course Objectivesand Outcomes should then be included in the course syllabus distributed to each student on thefirst day of class (Figure 1).At the completion of the course, each instructor completes an assessment report for each BMEcourse they taught. The report includes the following sections; Heading, Catalog Description,Grade Distribution, Modifications Made to Course, Course Outcomes Assessment, StudentFeedback, Reflection, Proposed Actions for Course Improvement. Other sections may beincluded as each instructor or the Department wishes. These extra sections may be used toassess the “soft” skills
pedagogy, academicquality, communication skills, educational culture, academic progress of graduate students, andeducational needs of undergraduates and undergraduate programs. The approach includes acombination of short courses, seminars, regular coursework, language proficiency evaluation,and faculty developed policy in cooperation with academic administration. The programs arecontinually reviewed for quality and potential improvements. Details of the program and theachievement of best practices are described.IntroductionThe growth of graduate and doctoral programs (Ref. 1) at New Jersey Institute of Technologyhas provided an opportunity for research-involved faculty to handle their teaching duties andcontinue to perform their research at a high
students. The 2006-2007 Almanac issue of the Chronicle of Higher Educationdated August 25, 2006 shows a table "Number of Colleges by Enrollment, Fall 2003". ForNJIT's enrollment (5,000-9,999) and status (public), 377 institutions are indicated with not onebeing in the Doctoral Extensive Carnegie Classification. (Ref. 1)The Doctoral Extensive category requires an institution to award 50 or more PhDs per year over15 or more disciplines. The next category, Doctoral Intensive, requires the award of 20 or morePhDs overall. While, the Carnegie Classification System has been recently revamped, the tablesuggests that NJIT has achieved the status of being the top producer of PhDs for its enrollmentsize and type among the 377 institutions. Among all 4,140
AC 2007-386: EXPECTING THE UNEXPECTED AS AN EXPECTING FACULTYMEMBER: A QUALITATIVE STUDYAdrienne Minerick, Mississippi State UniversityMara Wasburn, Purdue UniversityValarie young, Ohio University Page 12.709.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Expecting the Unexpected as an Expecting Faculty Member: A Qualitative Study Adrienne R. Minerick1, Mara H. Wasburn2, Valerie L. Young3 1 Dave C. Swalm School of Chemical Engineering Mississippi State University Mississippi State, MS 39672
units: 1. Overview of nanotechnology, applications and manufacturing processes. 2. Sources of nanoparticles and occupational exposure. 3. Human health effect of nanomaterials and environmental risk assessment. 4. Nanoparticle pollution controls and regulations.Each unit includes learning objectives, overview, suggested study topics and list of readingmaterials. This module is intended to be integrated to an existing sophomore/junior levelenvironmental engineering course.Unit I: Application of Nanotechnology and Manufacturing ProcessesLearning Objective:Upon completion of this unit students will be able to do the following: 1. Understand the new frontier of nanotechnology and engineered nanomaterials. 2. Identify the various
andfactors influencing career choice of minority students. Finally, some suggestions are made forstrategies which may increase the attraction and retention of minority students to the discipline.Diversity within Environmental EngineeringData from the American Society for engineering Education (ASEE) and the EngineeringWorkforce Commission (EWC) regarding enrollment and degrees awarded to women andminorities by engineering discipline for 2003 was compared and complied for a paper at the2006 ASEE conference1. Figure 1 shows the percentage of bachelors degrees awarded to womenand minorities for environmental engineering and engineering overall. It can be seen that the
ASCE’s prescribed Body ofKnowledge (BOK)1 learning outcomes. However, with a full third of the BOK’s prescribed learningoutcomes based on professional practice and communication skills, Civil Engineeringadministrators have begun to consider the interdisciplinary2 characteristics of the BOK.Among ten more technically-focused learning outcomes, the BOK entails that graduatesdemonstrate “(6) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility, (7) an ability tocommunicate effectively, (8) the broad education necessary to understand the impact ofengineering solutions in a global and societal context, (9) a recognition of the need for, and anability to engage in, life-long learning,…[and] (15) an understanding of the role of the leader
experience with MATLAB®. At the start of the semester 80% of thestudents responding to a pre-course survey intended to major in civil engineering, 16% inbioengineering, and 5% in environmental engineering (N=44). In the same anonymous survey,students overall responded to the question “Given your current choice for major, on a 1-5 scale,how certain are you of your choice? (1 is least certain, 5 is most certain)” with an averagecertainty of 4.2 (standard deviation = 0.8).Course ContentThe primary learning outcomes for the course are that by the end of the semester, working in andoutside of class, students will: • Know the basic steps and strategies involved in approaching solutions to a problem • Have a basic understanding of the engineering
program. Repeated measures analysis of variance techniques were usedto examine students’ responses and test for 1) significant increases in students’ attitudes towardscience, mathematics and engineering and their knowledge about careers in engineering from thebeginning to the end of the program, 2) significant differences in attitude and knowledgebetween boys and girls, and 3) significant difference between the girls in the single-genderFEMME programs and the girls who attended the other mixed-gender programs.IntroductionCurrent trends in the supply of and need for engineers in the workforce portend a significantshortfall of qualified engineering practitioners in the not too distant future. Although demand forengineers is expected to increase
(draft) Seismic Design of Piersand Wharfs. The layout of the marina has been established since the structure is an actual marina(not in a high seismic zone) designed by the lead author. Figure 1 shows a plan view of themarina. Figure 2 shows a section through a typical finger pier. Only schematic drawings will begiven to the students and the students will be required to design for all loads including: • Dead • Live • Earthquake Page 12.1261.3 • Wind • Current • ImpactAll environmental loading other than seismic will be determined using MOTEMS4. Detailing ofthe structure will be in accordance with ACI 3186 and AASHTO LRFD
problems and that the problem may be a direct result of the presentationformat used by the course instructor (traditional lectures with long problems only) and thesimilar presentation format used by the course textbook. A hypothesis was developed in 2005that student performance may improve if the course material is presented in more of a “conceptoriented” format with short (1 to 2 line) example problems that illustrate this material. Hence, in2006 the author elected to modify the conclusion of each chapter’s material presentation bypresenting short concept only problems to improve student understanding of the key subjectmaterial. No other changes to the course material or presentation format were made in 2006.The objective exams show a marked
Centers and Technical Curricula: A Proposal for StudyAbstractThis paper proposes to study how activities of technology-intensive visualization centers have orhave not been integrated into technical undergraduate curricula. The study focuses onvisualization centers applied to urban planning, engineering, construction, medicine, and science.The study is delimited and a set of preliminary research questions are proposed.IntroductionData visualization has become an important tool in science, engineering, and technologyeducation and practice.1 Technologies for interacting with complex multi-dimensional data havebecome economically feasible and functionally practicable as witnessed by the establishment of“Visualization
Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) that is includedwith the standard package of Microsoft Office1.This paper outlines one method to include scaled graphs into a spreadsheet; this graphpresentation completes the engineering calculations and helps in the final decision to accept ormodify a design. These graphs are also useful in the drafting process, because the graphs can becopy-pasted into any computer assisted drafting (CAD) program. Several actual class examplesare included.Prior to running the VBA program, the drawing data is listed and organized on the spreadsheet.VBA can then be accessed using a command button. The program follows a routine, consisting
AC 2007-398: HUMAN BEHAVIOR SKILLS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONRose Mary Cordova-Wentling, University of Illinois-Urbana ChampaignRaymond Price, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign Page 12.814.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 1 Human Behavior Skills in Engineering Education AbstractThis past decade has been characterized by a series of changes in engineering education,beginning with the recognition of the need to incorporate human behavior skills in engineeringeducation. Now, it is important
. Regardless, even with one student group, it is possible to gather, record, reviewand report assessments. These seniors may reflect on their educational objectives andmay be able to provide constructive feedback to the department and the university as awhole. The department and faculty may be able revise and remodel their curriculumstructure. A partial list of possible assessment areas is given below: 1. Assessment of oral project presentation. 2. Assessment of written project report. 3. Assessment of written communication skills 4. Assessment of the principles of Miami Plan for Liberal Education. 5. Assessment of reflective essay. 6. Assessment of instructor or project mentor. 7. Assessment of the
approvalof the Texas State University Board of Regents. The Chair of the Department of CivilEngineering was authorized to determine the courses that were to be offered and develop adegree plan for the curriculum. Unfortunately, the Chair is a theoretical structural engineer and isnot familiar with construction engineering.Texas State University Board of Regents Certification For a program to be approved by the Commissioner for Academic Affairs and Research,the Board of Regents must certify that the new program meets eight criteria.4,5 The criteriastipulate that the program shall: (1) Be within the institution’s current Table of Programs
more than a student would pay fortuition, room and board for the semester in Boston.Participant DemographicsAlthough we now have programs at three sites, we report below on the experiences of the 124students who have participated in Dresden, Germany since spring 2001. Participants included105 BU students and 19 from other institutions (Tulane, Brown, Cornell, Vanderbilt, Villanova Page 12.283.4and the University of Washington); 77 men and 47 women. The participants’ majors at the timeof the study abroad experience are shown in 50Figure 1. We have accounted for the 40 42undergraduate majors available at
increasingly important. Education and research are of equal value andshould be viewed as complementary parts of any STEM education system3. Incorporating a research problem into a graduate level course4 presents challenges, and toincorporate a problem into an undergraduate level is even more challenging. These challengesinclude 1. the research problem may not address most of the topics of the course to justify the use of class time, 2. specific skills may be needed that are too time consuming to teach, 3. the problem may be out of scope for the education level of the students. In the Numerical Methods course, we were either able to meet or not have to face thesechallenges. In the next sections, the description
ancillary equipment. Specific hardware requirements include aFaraday Cage manufactured by LBA, Greenville, NC, two Axis Copper to Fiber Converters, AT-MC13, a remote portal computer, andPhysical Connectivity of Lab Devices relies on different OSI Layer 1 mediums. Shown in Figure1, equipment is arranged in a Pod, enclosed inside a Faraday Cage, and accessible to studentsthrough a fiber hole. Figure 1. Topology for the various lab components.Students control four computers and a Wireless Access Point (WAP). Computers are labeledWKSta1, WKSta2, Attacker, and WAP Controller. WAP Controller is used to directly connect tothe WAP for configuration. Four computers are the maximum number required by any labmodule. Each computer is
AC 2007-407: AN INTEGRAL ANALYTICAL-NUMERICAL-EXPERIMENTALPEDAGOGY FOR A SYSTEM DYNAMICS AND CONTROL COURSEBenjamin Liaw, City College of the City University of New York Professor Liaw received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Washington in 1983. After a year of post-doctoral research study at University of Washington, he joined the faculty of the City College of the City University of New York (CCNY) in 1984, where he is a Full Professor at Department of Mechanical Engineering. During 2000-2002 he was also appointed Acting Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies, School of Engineering. His interests include (1) the design, analysis, manufacturing and testing of composites and smart
(Applicationand Use), Accelerometer (Vibration Measurements), and (8) Thermocouple(Construction and Use).Students are given a handout that lists the experiments in the order they areperformed, as well as a statement of essence of each lab. The entire handout of allthe lab instructions and data sheets is 70 pages long. A detailed write-up of eachexperiment is available from the author.Lab 1: Statistical Analysis: The students measure two dimensions of the nut orbolt with a digital calipers and measure the resistance of the resistors with amultimeter. They then have to determine how many tests should be run to have acertain accuracy and confidence level.Lab 2: Electric Motor Performance: Each student team measures voltage,current, force, length of moment
University, Northwestern University, University ofTexas and HST) Biomedical Engineering Education Research Center (Fig. 1). We present thefundamental concepts and the clinical case for the students to consider using both graphics and text, andthroughout the module they are prompted to answer questions on which they receive immediate feedback.The feedback is customized to address common patterns of incorrect responses. A second form offeedback occurs during the lecture. The lecturer uses data from student responses collected during thefirst online exercise to inform the focus of the lecture. The computer simulation is used during the lectureto demonstrate examples and probe student reasoning (Fig. 2). Manipulation of the input variables usingthe
supersaturated.(Increasing concentrations are illustrated by the increasing density of the dots in the diagrams.The dots represent the dissolved sugar molecules. The undissolved sugar in beaker B is shown asa darkened area at the bottom of the beaker.) (Correct answers are in bold)In the questions below, please circle the correct answer and then give an explanation.I.1. Solution A is (saturated, unsaturated, supersaturated). PLEASE EXPLAIN!I.2. Solution B is (saturated, unsaturated, supersaturated).PLEASE EXPLAIN!I.3. Solution C is (saturated, unsaturated, supersaturated).PLEASE EXPLAIN! Page 12.540.6The second question shown below is from the MCI and
Operations 1 course and electives in polymer rheology. She is author of the textbook Understanding Rheology.Julia King, Michigan Technological University Julia King is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Michigan Technological University. She recieved her PhD from the University of Wyoming in 1989. Julie teaches the required Transport / Unit Operations 1 and Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering 1 courses. Page 12.746.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Finite Element Modules for Enhancing Undergraduate Transport Courses: Application to Fuel Cell FundamentalsAbstractThe
Page 12.1468.3 Figure 1: Preliminary Design of Science Roverinspect the lower stage of the LEM (Lunar Excursion Module) and perform ananalysis of the aging the materials of the LEM had experienced. The class createda preliminary design of a rover to travel from the SLS landing site a short distanceto an Apollo landing site and perform a materials survey. (see Figure 1).The only Apollo site that was formally with regards to materials and surface finishis Apollo 17. For those reasons, Apollo 17 is the primary site for the SLS explo-ration. This selection had the additional advantage that Lunakhod 2 is less than150km almost due North of this site. The class decided that a secondary sprintrover (see Figure 2) should be created to
increase studentinvolvement through three distinct but overlapping developmental thrusts. 1. Social Development 2. Typological Models 3. Intellectual DevelopmentThus, a conceptual framework for student development adopted by Industrial Engineering isshown below in Figure 1. Cognitive Development Figure 1. Conceptual Framework for Student DevelopmentIn this model, we interpret typological development to mean student awareness of, and anappreciation for, alternative learning styles and thinking preferences both for the individualstudent and for others. This approach to student development is not new and is similar to thenotion of diversity proposed by Felder and Brent11.Identity/Social
help students better understand the solutions thatthey, their instructor or the textbook may have generated.There has been considerable work done to exploit the use of computer graphics to clarifyphysical problems governed by partial differential equations. An early paper used MATLABTMto illustrate solutions to hyperbolic differential equations.1 Several papers at about the same timeused computer animation to illustrate solutions for elastic wave propagation and beamvibration.2,3 The concept of using MATLABTM for the animation of lumped parameter dynamicsystems was demonstrated by Watkins et al.4 Recently there have been a number of papersdescribing the graphical interpretation of partial differential equations. The transport ofpollutants in
-plans were formalized intoa one-page written document submitted to the instructor at the beginning of theconstruction session. Page 12.1000.4 The replica is shown in Figure 1 and consists of 10 components: 2 abutments, 2towers, 4 cable and hanger assemblies, 2 bascule spans. Each component is assembledseparately and then connected to complete the project. Figure 1: K’NEX Replica of the Tower Bridge14 Each group was provided instructions for constructing the bridge. Theinstructions were gray-scale photocopies of the color instructions provided in the K’NEXkit. As a result, the students were required to focus on the