shouldalso encourage students to participate in co-ops, internships, and research opportunities thatprovide both mastery and vicarious experiences. Exposure to engineers and what engineers dohelps students to envision and realize their capabilities as future engineers. Recognizing theinfluence of social messages, instructors could be more mindful in providing feedback and/orcomments regarding students’ work and abilities. Further examination of the sources ofengineering self-efficacy is recommended to understand how students’ perceptions of their Page 26.1386.14experiences relate to their achievement and retention in engineering
to build things.”These descriptions extend the previous fall 2014 focus group discussion by e+ students (notnecessarily + teaching), adding that they feel themselves to be “different” from their non-e+engineering peers and possess a shared experience of the difficulty of self-identifying as part of anew, unconventional engineering degree program.11 The CU Teach Engineering students notonly navigate the new Engineering Plus degree pathway, but also negotiate both the engineeringand education environments during their undergraduate years—campus entities that arephysically and culturally different from each other.Continuing to delve into the minds of engineering majors who are concurrently seeking STEMteacher licensure, the survey asked, “Do
student uses an understanding of constantsupplied power to the heater system to assume constant energy transfer into the process fluid.The student reasons through the physical system in his/her mind, a useful tool for practicingengineers. Engineering world codes tended to persist longer in the broader dialogue as it callsupon a deep understanding of processes. The school world example stands in contrast to thisphysical system reasoning. Representativeness resulted in students forming an idea of what thesolution should look like early in the problem-solving process. The example in Table 1 mentionsΔT log mean, a common solution to undergraduate heat transfer problems. School world codestended to be short and require less dialogue. Hybrid world
AC 2011-2497: INTEGRATING EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES WITH EN-GINEERING DESIGN COURSESCaleb DeValve, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Caleb DeValve is a Ph.D. student in Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. He is currently a GAANN (Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need) Fellow sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education. His research interests focus on composite materials; specifically nanocomposites and flow processes during composite fabrication, relevant to technologies such as heli- copter rotor and wind turbine blade fabrication and material enhancement.Richard M. Goff, Virginia Tech Richard M. Goff is an Associate Professor and Assistant
AC 2011-1837: EVOLVING IDENTITIES: UNDERGRADUATE WOMENPURSUING THE ENGINEERING PROFESSORIATESarah Hug, University of Colorado, Boulder Dr. Sarah Hug is Research Associate at the Alliance for Technology, Learning, and Society (ATLAS) Institute, University of Colorado at Boulder. Dr. Hug earned her PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Her research and evaluation efforts focus on learning science, tech- nology, engineering, and mathematics, with a special interest in communities of practice, creativity, and experiences of underrepresented groups in these fields across multiple contexts.A. Susan Jurow, University of Colorado at Boulder A. Susan Jurow is an Assistant Professor and Co
Assessing Critical Thinking in Mechanics in Engineering Education Chris Papadopoulos1, Adeeb Rahman2, and Josh Bostwick3 Typically, mechanics education in engineering schools focuses on communicating explicit content to students, but deemphasizes the critical thought that underlies the discipline of mechanics. We give examples of the failure of students to apply basic principles of mechanics in solving problems. We develop assessment tools to measure critical thinking in student work, and how well mechanics textbooks engage students in critical analysis. Both tools focus on the treatment of three criteria that we judge to be fundamental, but which are commonly overlooked or
education for students to fulfill this call?In 1981, Andrei Sakharov – recipient of the 1975 Nobel Peace Prize – published a thought-provoking piece in the journal Nature. He reflected on the worldwide community of scientistsand engineers and how they possess a unique ability to comprehend the potential benefits andrisks of scientific progress [2, p. 1]. Sakharov envisioned that, because of their education andtraining, scientists and engineers would be mindful of societal issues and ethical questions.Ideally, through their professional formation, they should develop an awareness of societal issuesand ethical questions that lead them to ponder the positive and negative directions of progressand its possible consequences. Fast forward to today, and
critically minded engineering educators. Next, we build on this literatureby inserting a question into the discussion: What do engineers need to know about the enactmentand resistance of violence in engineering? Here we pay specific attention to defining theintersections of interpersonal violence (intentional violence between people) and structuralviolence (the violence of social structures and institutions). Finally, we use interview data fromengineering undergraduates enrolled in Programs in Design and Innovation at the RensselaerPolytechnic Institute to make suggestions for curricular reform.Literature ReviewIn 2016, social scientists Diego Gambetta and Steffen Hertog published the controversial book,Engineers of Jihad: The Curious Connection
%).This was the same change observed for the Architecture students who thought the same aboutconstruction engineers, and all changed their mind (50% to 0%). This illustrates the idea that thecollaborative work environment reinforced in the project between different disciplines representsan attempt to reach common goals (class deliverables). Architecture students also changed theirperception, reporting an increase regarding Construction Engineers needing Civil Engineers'assistance during construction from 12% to 31%. This also shows that Architecture students areincreasing their knowledge and awareness of the advantages of the involvement of Civil Engineersin the construction process.In terms of comparing the various disciplines, Architecture and
shedesigned advertisements for a local art school, edited a magazine to present scientific research topublic audience in more interactive styles, and co-founded the aeronautics club at Smith. Someof her classmates chose to expand their horizon by travelling to different parts of the world. P1spent a semester in an exchange program studying architecture in Denmark; she also made afield trip to Nepal with her teammates, gathering information for their Design Clinic project. P4pursued a minor in Portuguese. While she was studying in an exchange program in Brazil, anindependent study course attracted her to social sciences, after which she made her mind toswitch to engineering arts.When H4 first came to HMC, he didn’t have a good understanding of what a
Paper ID #44464Encountering Axiology: Engineering Graduate Students’ Experiences withValues in an Engineering Research CenterMr. Herman Ronald Clements III, Purdue University H. Ronald Clements is an engineering graduate student at Purdue University.Alexander V Struck Jannini, Purdue University Alex is a Ph.D. Candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He is interested in furthering the use of motivational theory in engineering education research, and investigating how departmental culture can affect students’ persistence. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Encountering
few interview questions focused on familiarity with ABET professional skills and theimportance of each skill. The subsequent questions were about other professional skills neededfor engineering graduates and, lastly, if any 21st-century skills came to mind that would beuseful for engineering graduates. The interview participants preferred “soft skills” rather thanprofessional skills. The researcher prepared Table II, which indicates how faculty memberswould classify each skill. TABLE II ENGINEERING FACULTY DEFINITIONS OF PROFESSIONAL SKILLS 21st- ABET Soft Skills century
AC 2010-623: SUMMER ENGINEERING EXPERIENCE FOR GIRLS (SEE): ANEVOLVING HANDS-ON ROLE FOR THE ENGINEERING LIBRARIANDonna Beck, Carnegie Mellon University Donna Beck is the Engineering librarian at the Engineering and Science Library of Carnegie Mellon University. She received her MLIS from the University of Pittsburgh. In 2009, she served as President of the SLA Pittsburgh Chapter. She was the winner of the 2007 IEEE Continuing Education Stipend, administered by the SLA Engineering Division.G. Berard, Carnegie Mellon University G. Lynn Berard is Principal Librarian at the Engineering & Science Library at Carnegie Mellon University, where she managed the science libraries for 20+ years. She
444 CIBRED: Engineering Education on Cyberinfrastructure with a Multidisciplinary Approach for Non-Engineering Students 1,2,* 1,3 4 4 4 Arun K. Datta, Jacqueline Caesar, Daphne Rainey, Stephen Cammer, Julie Schuman , 4 Oswald Crasta1 2 National University of Community Research
.” 3. Thinking about your experience in the Engineering Management & Leadership course, in what ways was the description achieved? 4. What did you learn during the course that made the most meaningful difference in the quality and performance of your Design or other Project team? Why? How? 5. Please state the first concepts, tools, or activities that come to mind, if any, when you think about how you used or applied the learning from this course while you were working on your senior design or other university project this fall. 6. Looking at the handout we’ve shared with learning outcomes, please share any (short) stories you have of times you have used each or ways in which you expect to use each
), working on initiatives to protect the watershed by bringing value to waste up-stream and transparency to the state of water quality. ● Twain High School, partnering for the participation of pregnant and parenting teens in a USD interdisciplinary course, Creative Minds, that combines ways of thinking from theatre, mathematics and engineering, to create tools or manipulatives that can be used by young children to facilitate mathematical learning. ● Viejas Band of the Kumeyaay Nation, enabling USD engineering students and Kumeyaay children to exchange ideas, collaborate, and share cultural knowledge in their Science Technology Engineering Art and Math (STEAM) lab. ● Waste for Life, supporting communities to develop
inengineering education focusing on women in engineering. We considered the context ofinclusive curriculum and showed the importance of a sense of belonging in developingengineering identity. Sense of belonging is a salient factor that enhances in-group feelingsthat confirm group membership and help develop stronger identity with the group [19]. Whileplanning and designing an intervention for empowering women in engineering classrooms, itshould be kept in mind whether the intervention is able to foster a sense of belonging in away that women feel they are a part of the engineering community. Strengthening groupdynamics can help minimize climate effects. So, interventions should be designed aroundincreasing women students’ belongingness in an
., Carnes, M. T., & Ohland, M. Returning students in engineering education: Making a case for “experience capital.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education. Vancouver, BC: American Society for Engineering Education, 2011.10. Schilling, W. Issues Effecting Doctoral Students Returning to Engineering Education Following Extensive Industrial Experience. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education. Pittsburgh, PA: American Society for Engineering Education, 2008.11. National Academies Press (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC.12. Dreyfus, H. & Dreyfus, S. (1986). Mind over Machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the age
interactions to ultimately preparethemselves to become productive citizens. The challenge for Jamerson’s Elementary engineeringfocused curriculum is to use engineering design and engineering science elements to facilitateaccomplishing the school’s primary mission as dictated by the benchmarks embedded within theFlorida’s Sunshine State Standards.As we set out to design curriculum, we chose to use the Backwards Design Model2 as our modelfor our unit design plan. This model asks teachers to begin with the end in mind. Teachersdevelop their essential understandings and create the ending assessments before planningactivities to reach their goals. Once this was accomplished, then the teachers could begin todesign lessons that would support the outcomes
AC 2008-850: ME350 REMOTE EDUCATION: EXPERIENCES IN TEACHINGENGINEERING TO NON-ENGINEERING MAJORS STUDYING ABROADBrian Novoselich, United States Military Academy Brian Novoselich is a Major in the United States Army and an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He holds a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering.Bobby Crawford, United States Military Academy Bobby Crawford is a Colonel in the United States Army and the Director of the Aero-Thermo Group in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He holds a M.S. and a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering and
forimprovement. The students dissect several staplers on the market and then use design methodsto suggest a new stapler to satisfy a potential market. The module follows the case of Accentra,Inc. who has seen considerable market success through the launch of their PaperPro line ofergonomic staplers. The laboratory exercises are supplemented with instructional video podcaststhat asynchronously guide the students through the product dissections.IntroductionProduct dissection has been used in a variety of ways to successfully engage engineeringstudents in their learning. Intellectual and physical activities such as dissection help to anchorknowledge and practice of engineering in the minds of students6,7 (Sheppard, 1992 a,b) and hasbeen successfully used
for informationand publicity purposes. If you do not mind being contacted, please provide your email address.Use the back of this paper for sufficient space to write your comments.Scale: 1 = Outstanding 2 = Pretty Good 3 = Average 4 = Could Improve 5 = Need practice 4. How do you currently rate your presentation skills? ___________ Have you learned anything in this class that has helped you? If so, what?_____________________________________________________________________________ In your opinion, should the classes on presentation skills be modified? If so, how?______________________________________________________________________________ 5. How do you currently rate your written skills for engineering
AC 2009-764: USING ENGINEERING DESIGN AS A RETENTION TOOL FORFIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING STUDENTSAmber Kemppainen, Michigan Technological University Amber Kemppainen is a Lecturer in the Engineering Fundamentals Department at Michigan Technological University where she teaches first year engineering courses. Her research interests include online learning, ethanol production and sustainability.Amy Hamlin, Michigan Technological University Amy J. Hamlin is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Technological University where she teaches first year engineering courses and an introductory spatial visualization course. Additionally, she advises General Engineering and
EngineeringSimilar to theatre practitioners that use different techniques and tools to approach different theatreproduction, engineers perform a similar analysis to figure out the best practice for each system.This is also closely tied to the importance of keeping the main stakeholder in mind whendeveloping a system. In theatre it is seen when the director and everyone else involved in theproduction work towards doing justice to the playwright’s vision. In engineering it is seen whenengineers work towards trying to please the stakeholder’s vision.This course aimed at teaching the students multidisciplinary teamwork and leadership skills.Theatre practitioners, as do engineers, work closely with individuals that come from differentbackgrounds, that speak
Paper ID #22414From ’Empathic Design’ to ’Empathic Engineering’: Toward a Genealogy ofEmpathy in Engineering EducationDr. Xiaofeng Tang, Ohio State University Xiaofeng Tang is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University. He worked as a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 From “Empathic Design” to “Empathic Engineering”: Toward a Genealogy of
study of nonlinear enhancement of polymers embedded with nano-materials such as quantum dots and carbon nano-tubes. He has given numerous technical lectures and seminars at professional meetings and universities and has published a number of journal and conference papers in the areas of nonlinear effects in polymers, solids and semiconductors. Dr. Walser has served as the divisional chair of the Minorities in Engineering Division (MIND) of the American Association of Engineering Education (ASEE) from 2000 to 2006. He is the recipient of many awards for teaching, including the Faculty of The Year award from the engineering honor society Eta Kappa Knu and the faculty award of the National Society of Black Engineers.Mr
tied her identity to problem solving when she said, I solve problems, and so that's one way I identify myself as an engineer. First, [….] what are the possible ways of solving the problem? I think that I have an understanding of the way a lot of different things work, and how they interact with each other. I have a big picture view, that's one thing about engineering, is having the whole in mind, even as you work on just the part. That's the second way I think I'd identify myself as an engineer. I'm fearless, I feel like I can solve any problem, or even if I can't solve it, I can understand what I don't understand. Even if I can't put the puzzle together, I can understand what it is I'm missing
words, “carefully consider,” imply that the engineer is debating in his mind whetherhe wants to consider safety, health, and welfare before he makes a decision. If an engineer holdsthe safety, health, and welfare of the public as paramount then he doesn’t need to “carefullyconsider” this. It is questions like this one that likely cause students with the correct way ofthinking about professional ethics to still mark a test question incorrectly.It also raised the question that students with limited experience working in a professionalenvironment may not have the background to fully understand the different aspects of how ethicsinteracts with day-to-day work activities.It is also suspected that asking instructors to include ethics topics in
engineering to participate.Likewise, for students from grades 4-8 who attended the 1-day mechanical engineeringoutreach also showed an increase in interest in considering engineering as a career asreported by Fleischer, Wemhoff, O’Brien, Ural & LeRoy9. Ultimately, Deckard andQuarfoot10 summed it up in their paper:“single-day event can be effective in reshaping attitudes, exposing young minds to theworld of engineering.”The above studies demonstrate the short-term effect (immediately after the completion ofthe outreach program) of engineering outreach to both middle and high school students.However, very few studies have followed the same group of participants to determine thelong-term impact of early outreach program on the students’ decision to
Paper ID #12114Connections between Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Problem SolvingStrategies and Perceptions of Engineering ProblemsCatherine D. McGough, Clemson University Catherine McGough is currently a graduate research assistant in Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. She obtained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Clemson University in 2014. Her research interests are in undergraduate engineering student motivations and undergraduate engineer- ing problem solving skill development and strategies.Adam Kirn, Univeristy of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering