Engineering at NC State Universitychanged from offering a Biological and Agricultural Engineering (BAE) degree withconcentrations in Biological, Environmental/Soil and Water, Food, and Power and Machinery,which was ABET-accredited under the guidelines for agricultural engineering programs, to adegree in Biological Engineering (BE) that followed the ABET guidelines for biologicalengineering. The revised curriculum offered students a choice of four concentration areas:Agricultural, Biomedical, Bioprocess, and Environmental Engineering. The revised degreeprogram reflected the facultyÀs vision that biological engineering will play an important role inengineering activities in the 21 st century and was also a response to declining enrollments thatbegan in
. This presentation, however, focuses on the novelcontributions of the authors as they have adapted and transformed the core material offered at their own institutions,and also describes the authors’ attempts to modularize structural art content so that it can be offered at institutionswithout a dedicated course.Key themes of the authors’ work have been to: (1) introduce contemporary examples of structural art and structuralartists to curriculum; (2) enrich the course with in-class demonstrations and lab exercises related to structural formfinding; (3) develop the idea of environmental loading as a force to be responded to by the designer, therebyintroducing sustainability into the idea of structural art; (4) integrate computerized structural
ExpectationsAbstractThis work-in-progress paper presents an ongoing evidence-based practice implementingintegrative professional communication activities derived from an investigation of professionalcommunication expectations of industry co-curricular partners. Contemporary pedagogicalapproaches, such as problem-based learning and entrepreneurially minded learning, have as acentral focus the desire to expose students to authentic experiences which integrate technicalknowledge with workplace skills connected to professionalism, communication, collaboration,and leadership. This approach can conflict with traditional engineering curricula where theinstruction of technical skills are frequently separated or deemed more important than “softskills” instruction in
liberal arts classes • reorganization of schools and department including integration across 3 campuses • created interdisciplinary graduate degree programs or majors while maintaining discipline based degree program majors and department structure • classes were numbered based upon dept. curriculum, major and year in the program (100, 200, 300 1st , 2nd, 3rd year undergraduate courses, 400-500 master courses, 600 doctoral coursework)11. This major reorganization allowed an opportunity for launching of new interdisciplinary graduate curriculums in design science and engineering, human centered science and biomedical engineering, artificial intelligence, nuclear engineering, urban design and built environment
interconnections of mechatronic engineeringinto consideration. The necessary background to the demands of each semester was not provided,and so there was merely an interdisciplinary bias to the projects developed at this stage.Examples included a mini sailing boat and a lyophilization machine. Despite promotingteamwork, planning and construction, these new projects did not add conceptual componentsrelated to mechatronics.In 2005 the original team resumed the project, seeking to return to the guidelines used at thebeginning of the course, but in a new situation: the curriculum had been changed and a disciplinenamed “interdisciplinary work” had been introduced. This was an attempt to insert the concept ofinterdisciplinarity into a disciplinary model, i.e
among engineering educators on how to measure and documentperformance in this area. Though not a panacea, institutional design portfolios are proposed as a tool to helpassess and communicate the design content of an institution’s curriculum. The design portfolio can be a usefulmechanism for a program to articulate its design philosophy, document how student design experiences haveput that philosophy into practice, reflect on successful design exercises and evaluate the students’ completedesign experience. Creating and using a design portfolio highlights design as a developmental skill within theengineering curriculum and allows the faculty to focus on design as an integrated component of engineeringeducation. Because of this focused attention
of the ways discussed in Section II. The notes for the two slides are given in Table 3. Fig. 3: Two slides from module on reverse engineeringV. EthicsEngineering ethics is typically covered at various points throughout an engineering curriculum;however, because it is often a central issue in design, ethics should be emphasized in a capstonedesign project. The intent in this module is not to give a complete coverage of all the topicsassociated with engineering ethics but to give a review of some of the issues involved. The moduleuses information from a variety of sources, but the principal source of material is the NationalSociety of Professional Engineers' (NSPE) web page2,3
Paper ID #43952Head, Heart, Hands: A Rubric for Creating Inclusive STEM Learning EnvironmentsDr. Meagan C Pollock, Engineer Inclusion As an engineer turned educator, through her company, Engineer Inclusion, Dr. Meagan Pollock focuses on helping others intentionally engineer inclusion® in education and the workforce.Lara Hebert, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Serves as the Outreach and Public Engagement Coordinator for The Grainger College of Engineering. She brings to this position and this initiative expertise in teacher education and curriculum design.Dr. Lynford Goddard, University of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignDr. Luisa
, 101(3), 539–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00061.xCorcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform. Philadelphia, PA: Center on Continuous Instructional Improvement.Custer, R. L., & Erekson, T. L. (2008). Engineering and technology education. Woodland Hills, CA: Council on Technology Teacher Education.Duncan, R. G., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2009). Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 606–609.Grubbs, M. E., & Strimel, G. (2015). Engineering design: The great integrator. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 50(1), 77-90.Helmer, O
of Civil Engineering at Lawrence Technological Universitydecided to adopt the BOK2 in spring 2008 as part of the annual program objectives/outcomesreview process. There was extensive debate on the prudence of adopting a new standard just twoyears before the ABET accreditation visit in 2010. The department’s commitment to continuousimprovement, however, was the eventual impetus for adoption of the BOK2. This paperprovides an overview of the challenges faced and the various approaches taken by thedepartment in its mission to integrate the BOK2 into the civil engineering program. Similar tobattling the mythical Hydra, every time it appeared that a question was satisfactorily addressed,two additional questions arose in its place. It became clear
pieces are most effective in influencing,inspiring, and/or guiding our students into their particular pathways of engineering.At NU, the first-year engineering curriculum is fundamentally common for all majors andstudents take an Engineering Design course and a Problem Solving and Computation course in atwo-semester sequence. There is pressure for these two introductory engineering courses toaccomplish a myriad of things alongside content delivery, such as prepare students for thedemands of college, expose them to the engineering majors, provide relevant hands-on and real-world projects, develop algorithmic and critical thinking skills, and get them excited about theirengineering career path. There are a number and variety of projects
SpaceAdministration (NASA) offer a joint program for faculty and research development. This programknown as ASEE/NASA Faculty Fellowship program offers opportunities for professional developmentfor Engineering Technology faculty. This paper discusses one such experience involving applied researchat NASA Langley Research Center, which resulted in professional development of the faculty memberwhile enhancing the undergraduate curriculum in Engineering Technology.I Introduction Success in an Engineering Technology programs has been traditionally evaluated based uponthree factors namely, Teaching, Research and Service. While the relative ranking of these factors isarguable 1,2, it is the research (and the associated requirement of publication), which
at Reynolds Community College in Richmond, Virginia in 2009 and moved to VCU in August 2016. Debra has served on the advisory board for Lighthouse for Computer Science (LH4CS). The goal of the Lighthouse project is to improve computer science diversity through faculty professional development. In addition, she is a member of the Advisory Council for the Deep Run High School’s Center for Informa- tion Technology in Glen Allen, Virginia, where she provides program support and assists in curriculum development for their technology-based preparatory program for future computer scientists.Dr. Mandayam Thirunarayanan, Florida International University Mandayam Osuri Thirunarayanan is an associate professor in the School of
Processing for Teaching: Transforming a Scientific Research Tool Into an EducationalTechnology”, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1998, 149-60.“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”[4] Shultz, R. R., “Experience in the Integration of Digital Signal and Image Processing Research into theUndergraduate Electrical Engineering Curriculum”, Proceedings of the XXXX American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference & Exposition, Session 2632.[5] Jankowski, M., “New Courseware Modules and Software for Digital Image Processing”, Proceedings of the2001
specificallyto assess student achievement in these topics. In terms of the ABET criterion, the facultyidentified this course as addressing outcomes c, e and k.The senior courses, MET 460/461, form the two semester capstone experience for the students.The capstone experience is a cornerstone of the curriculum, forming the transition betweenacademic study and the practice of engineering, and is designed to integrate the knowledgeacquired throughout the curriculum. This is accomplished by working in a team environment tocomplete an engineering project of interest to industry. The experience involves technical designand evaluation as well as project management, scheduling, written and oral presentations, andmarketing of the products. Consequently, the
AC 2008-1198: SEVERAL WAYS OF PREPARING EXPORT ENGINEERINGSTUDENTS FOR INTERNATIONAL PRACTICEKnud Holm Hansen, Copenhagen University College of Engineering Page 13.1077.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Several Ways of Preparing Export Engineering Students for International PracticeAbstractExport engineers work in many different kinds of Danish and foreign companies where theymarket projects and products with substantial contents of engineering knowledge – in a highlyinternational environment.Besides giving an overview of the study program, including objectives and structure, this paperdescribes the different ways to
65 8 115 EGGN 450 (MEL III) 2 22 3 41 Total 13 233 18 3302 Sequential Integration of Knowledge Across Multiple Disciplines2.1 ImplementationMEL teaches problem solving skills. Therefore, instructors must balance between a “hands-offapproach and a traditional explain–all-the-steps approach. An instructor and a teaching assistant(TA) are present in every MEL section to provide mentoring and coaching support to students Page 6.96.3who are struggling to discover the operation of instruments and develop
as an option and instead sold some capital items and then invested all the earnings on one financial stock. This raised the stock value from $15 to $30 per share and saved the 11company. This type of thinking was described as integrative thinking and was used to solve a complex problem. Cognitive misfit of problemsolving style at work: A facet of personorganization fit and Creativity and the finding and solving of realworld problems gave 6 14further insight in current use of problemsolving in the industrial setting. Recent developments in applied creativity approaches techniques that can be used to solve complex problems
expressway and move onto their career pathway and focus on the specifics of the career. Traveling on the STEM Career Expressway, students change lanes as their interests change and they explore the variety of careers open to them in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Simultaneously, their core academic knowledge and skills are enhanced and applied through a highly integrated curriculum. The development, definition, dissemination, and adoption of the STEM Career Expressway is the single most important strategy of this project because of its ability to position Technology Education as an integral component of public education for preparing our state’s workforce and its ability to integrate and support the core academic
analysis. In Design II, students: construct and test a prototype usingmodular components as appropriate, conduct system integration and testing, assemble finalproduct and field-test the device, write a final project report and an operator manual, and presentan oral report.III. Team WorkGraduates entering the real- world find that just about every project is tackled by a team ofengineers, scientists, marketing experts, technicians and other personnel. Yet, team-basedprojects tend to be difficult for a student without the basic team-building skills in his or herbackground.3 Student learning styles differ within teams and are best described by fieldindependent and field dependent learners. Field independent learners tend to be excellentproblem
can also be displayed in theclassrooms and in the department areas. All of these activities can be embedded into coursesand many programs may just need to take credit for what they already probably do.Professional & Ethical ResponsibilityAnother professional outcome that can be integrated throughout the curriculum is professionaland ethical responsibility. At USMA, our cadets are required to take over 70 hours ofeducation in professional and military ethics where they discuss honor and integrity issues,leadership and officership. To focus on the civil engineering professional standards and ethics,each civil engineering major in our program takes a mandatory one-credit hour senior seminarcourse taught by an endowed chair with years of
presenters and community partners to discussobjectives, techniques, problems, solutions with improving the S-L projects in our courses.Other goals of the SLICE program with regard to faculty are to:• study the art and science of service-learning and form a community of practice ,• create a formal program to connect faculty to community groups (local and international) ,• develop appropriate projects/experiments for integration of S-L into at least forty core courses in the undergraduate engineering curriculum at UML ,• develop assessment tools to gauge the impact of this integration on students, faculty, institution, and community ,• become an engaged college—engaged with the students, each other as faculty across departments, and with the
andprescriptive guidelines. Updating some of these codes has included developing a methodologyfor an integrated quantitative risk analysis. Initially, the main objective is to establish a risk-based decision tool, which specifies important safety requirements of road tunnels (e.g.ventilation systems). Although insightful studies have been performed which analyze theforemost discussion of tunnel specific risks (fires in tunnels), the analysis methods are not verywell developed yet. In addition, risk analyses of other events remain almost intact.SummaryIt is believed that to improve living conditions and minimize environmental impacts,infrastructures can be placed under the ground. In addition, our investigation reveals that currentstatus of tunneling
Electrical Systems, was chosen and includedthese broad topics as well as plumbing. The faculty know it as the MEP course, and studentsnickname it the Mechanical course since that is the first area in the course they study. Forconstruction engineering students, this course broadens their curriculum and allows them tointeract with faculty and students in other departments. Mechanical engineering students can takethis course as an elective to apply many theoretical concepts from previous courses into anarrower field. Since its inception, the course has been taught by a mechanical engineeringfaculty member.The ASME Vision 2030 [1] states that the problems that mechanical engineers work on ofteninclude elements of other engineering disciplines, require
beginners in the fall of 2017. Immediately behind isa new major called Transdisciplinary Studies in Engineering Technology slated to beginaccepting students in the fall of 2018. The unique features of the program and are 1) studentscreate their own plan of study with the help of an advisor and faculty mentor, 2) the student’sjourney is highly faculty mentored, and 3) the program is competency-based. To progress andgraduate, students must demonstrate their developmental proficiency of approximately 30competencies spread across 8 broad competency families. This presentation will motivate anddescribe novel integrative learning experiences created to enhance competency development.The presentation will also demonstrate the early developmental work of
a professor and head of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Colorado State University. He is a fellow of IEEE. A complete vita is available at: http://www.engr.colostate.edu/ ˜aam.Ms. Andrea M. Leland, Colorado State University With nearly twenty years combined experience in higher education and private industry, Andrea Leland has distinguished herself as a dynamic communicator and tireless ambassador of engineering education and research. For the past twelve years she has worked in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Colorado State University to advance its mission through well-planned communication strategies and relationship building. Leland has played an integral role
.Bieniawski, Z. T., “Curriculum Design by Engineering Design Principles”, Proceedings, 1995 Annual Conference,ASEE, 1995, pp. 1780-1784.Byrd, J. S. and J. L. Hudgins, “Teaming in the Design Laboratory”, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 59, no.10, 1995, pp. 335-341.Carr, R., H. Thomas, T. S. Venkataraman, A. L. Smith, M. A. Gealt, R. Quinn, and M. Tanyel, “Mathematical and Page 2.345.10Scientific Foundations for an Integrative Engineering Curriculum”, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 59, no.10, 1995, pp. 137-146.Frank, A. A. “SAE Design Competitions: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly for the Super Mileage Competition
, "Developing recruitment and retention strategies through 'Design4Practice' curriculum enhancements," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, Georgia, Oct. 2004.[30] S. Green, M. Auzenne, C. Burnham and R. Jacquez, "Building a foundation for pre-calculus engineering freshman through an integrated learning community," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon, June 2005.[31] N. A. Pendergrass, R. E. Kowalczyk, J. P. Dowd, R. N. Laoulache, W. Nelles, J. A. Golen and E. Fowler, "Improving first-year engineering education," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico, Aug. 2002.[32] H. Alnajjar, "Getting freshmen to make the connection between courses through integrative learning
Adjunct Professor, Department of Curriculum and Instruction. Lisa's extension and research projects have included work with public schools in the areas of instructional technology and science, including numerous in-service workshops for teachers.Patricia Dixon, Florida State University Dr. Dixon is Director of the Center for Integrating Research and Learning at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, conducting educational programs for students, teachers, and the general public. She has administered REU and RET programs since 1999, participates in a national RET Network, and has published and presented research on RET programs. Dr. Dixon is currently directing a study to
, although specific expectations for majors willoften exceed expectations for non-majors. A graduate of an engineering technology orengineering degree program would have knowledge and capabilities required for practice in theirfield that would go far beyond expectations for a non-major. These aspects are directly related tothe curriculum in any degree program. Aspects related to broader questions and concerns, suchas the impact of technology on society, are not closely linked to the traditional elements of thecurriculum. These aspects of technological literacy are, however, at least as important to ourgraduates as they mature and move into positions of leadership as they are to non-majors.Accreditation Criteria – Program OutcomesThe need to prepare