teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of engineering education, 95(2), 123-138.[11] Ryan, A. M., Gheen, M. H., & Midgley, C. (1998). Why do some students avoid asking for help? An examination of the interplay among students' academic efficacy, teachers' social– emotional role, and the classroom goal structure. Journal of educational psychology, 90(3), 528.[12] Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of engineering education, 94(1), 87-101.
, Assessment, & Data Adminis- tration in the College of Engineering & Computer Science at the University of Central Florida. She is Co-PI of 2 NSF-funded S-STEM programs and program evaluator for 2 NSF-funded REU programs. Her research interests include factors that impact student persistence, identity formation, and career develop- ment in the STEM fields.Salih Safa Bacanli, University of Central Florida Salih Safa Bacanli is PhD student at Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida (UCF). He received his MS degree in Computer Science from UCF and BS degree in Computer Engi- neering from Bilkent University, Turkey. His research interests include opportunistic networking routing, wireless
, 2006, 2006.[3] (4/20). The VIP Model. Available: http://consortium.vip.gatech.edu/content/vip-model[4] S. P. Borgatti, Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C., J. Seaman, Ed. Analyzing social networks. London: SAGE Publications Limited, 2013.[5] J. Melkers et al., "The Social Web of Engineering Education: Knowledge Exchange in Integrated Project Teams," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX, 2012. Available: http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/8/papers/5300/view[6] J. Ludlum, "Georgia Tech Exit Survey Research Brief: VIP Program Comparisons," Georgia Institute of Technology2015.[7] Analytic Technologies. (2017, April 8). QAP-Correlation [Webpage]. Available: http
faculty by 12 since 2012.Table 2. School of Engineering Faculty Research Proposal/Funding Production 2011-20168 Proposals Requested Funding Submitted Funding Expended 2011 0 0 2012 2 $197,070* 2013 3 $361,081* 2014 6 $240,097* 2015 8 $3.64m $161,077* 2016 11 $7.906m $225,424*These funds are primarily from a NSF S-STEM grant submitted in 2010 and
projects that the participant would like to conduct in the 1-3, 3-5, and beyond five-yearrange.The “Motivation/Background of Research” peer review was added to help participates begin todraft the introductory portion of their research statement. Participants would receive constructivefeedback to help hone in on what research problem(s) they identified and would seek to addressin their future research.We have added both a peer review and panel session for “Outlining Specific Aims”. The goal ofthese sessions is to help participants begin to begin to identify the broad research themes in theirstatements. We have scheduled the peer review before the panel session so that participantscould receive constructive feedback and guidance from faculty after
://scholarworks.rit.edu/other/6477 Berkey, Rick. Call about Michigan Tech Enterprise Program Jered Dean and Kristina Csavina. November 2016. Telephone.8 Gregory, Gayle H., and Carolyn Chapman. Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn't fit all. Corwin press, 2012.9 Michelle Chamberlin, Robert Powers; The promise of differentiated instruction for enhancing the mathematical understandings of college students. Teaching Mathematics Applications 2010; 29 (3): 113-139. doi: 10.1093/teamat/hrq00610 G. S. Mason, T. R. Shuman and K. E. Cook, "Comparing the Effectiveness of an Inverted Classroom to a Traditional Classroom in an Upper-Division Engineering Course," in IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 430
place students into courses. TheAssessment and LEarning in Knowledge Spaces (ALEKS) is an assessment tool created byMcGraw-Hill with a mathematics placement module. Similarly, CollegeBoard’s ScholasticAptitude Tests (SAT) and ACT Inc.’s ACT Assessment college entrance exams are used as abasis for admissions into higher education. Since 2012, data has been collected for Engineeringand Technology programs to determine if these exams used for admissions and placementactually serve as a predictor for success. This study compares the ALEKS and ACT scorespredict success in a comparison to grades achieved in Engineering and Technology classes.Similar studies compared the high school grade point average (GPA) with the ACT as predictorsof college
EAC GeneralCriteria.* Thus, while UCSD offers the twelve courses specified in the NCSEA curriculum, theprogram is not subject to any explicit accreditation standards for its structural engineeringcontent.* The relevant ABET policy is stated in paragraph I.C.4.c.(2) of the ABET Policy and Procedure Manual, as follows:“If a program name implies specialization(s) for which Program Criteria have been developed, the program mustsatisfy all applicable Program Criteria.“11Given the inability of most baccalaureate civil engineering programs to provide all requiredcoursework for structural engineering practice, structural engineering firms with more than tenemployees now hire primarily at the master’s level. For this reason, in our definition
." 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, June 2015. doi:10.18260/p.24004.3. Dr. Johnson, Suzette S. "Agile Systems Engineering: What is it and What Have We Learned?" Software Process Improvement Network. March 22, 2012. Accessed February 11, 2017. http://www.uces.csulb.edu/spin/media/pdf/INCOSE_LA_SPIN_AgileEngineering_Johnson.p df.4. Dr. Valasek, John. Introduction to Systems Engineering. PDF. College Station: Vehicle Systems & Control Laboratory, September 4, 2016.
Interpretations.” Research in Higher Education, Vol. 7, pp. 67-78, 197713 Scherr, F. C., Scherr, S., Journal of Education for Business, v65 n8 pp. 356-58, 1990 11
keep girls in the science pipeline: Outcome differences by ethnic status. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (4), 393–414 (2).3. Lyon, G. H., Jafri, J., & St. Louis, K. (2012). Beyond the pipeline: STEM pathways for youth development. Afterschool Matters, 16, 48–57.4. Watt, H. M. G., Eccles, J. S., & Durik, A. M. (2006). The leaky mathematics pipeline for girls. Equal Opportunities International, 25 (8), 642–659.5. U.S. Census Bureau (2000). http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-02.pdf Accessed April 1, 2016.6. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. 2015. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2015. Special Report NSF
Education 100, 604–623 (2011).10. Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. (Sage Publications, Inc, 2007).11. Marton, F. & Booth, S. A. Learning and awareness. (Psychology Press, 1997).12. Marton, F. & Pong, W. Y. On the unit of description in phenomenography. Higher Education Research & Development 24, 335–348 (2005).13. Salzman, N. A phenomenographic study of students’ experiences with transition from pre- college engineering programs to first-year engineering. (Purdue University, 2014).14. Salzman, N., Ohland, M. W. & Cardella, M. E. Measuring the Effects of Precollege Engineering Education. in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual
recognition of the material(s) tested and, thus,they can examine the validity of theoretical concepts as well as uncertainties resulted from alaboratory process. Students working with the team members were finally required to write apaper on the laboratory exercise after the completion of the lab experiment. We have reported theresults and findings in the development of POGIL based-materials and manufacturing curriculumin the ASEE conferences, the Materials Symposia, and other professional meetings.21-26 2) Results of the Student Survey in POGIL-based Materials Laboratory Course This new laboratory module in 3D printing, as a term project, emphasizes the needs togive students proper preparation in additive manufacturing (AM), so that
. Alabama Department of Labor: http://www2.labor.alabama.gov/OES/Wage/wagesbygrouparea.aspx2. Bureau of Labor Statistics in the US Department of Labor: http://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and- engineering/electrical-and-electronics-engineers.htm3. Cheshier, S. R. , A Modest Proposal Regarding the Future of Engineering Technology Education in America, Engineering Education, pp. 706-712, May 1985.4. Dudeck, K., and Grebski, W. (2008, June), A New Vision For Engineering Technology Programs To Strengthen Recruitment And Retention Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. https://peer.asee.org/32555. Gray, K. C. and Herr, E. L., Workforce Education: The Basics, Boston
.Marikunte, S., F. Harackiewicz, J. Nicklow, and L. Chevalier, “Benefits and Challenges ofTraining Teaching Assistants,” Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Chicago, Illinois, June 2006. https://peer.asee.org/798.Marra, R., K.A. Rogers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “A multi-year, multi- institution study ofwomen engineering student self-efficacy,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, I 1, p 27 –38, January 2009.Packard, B., Successful STEM Mentoring Initiatives for Underrepresented Students. StylusPublishing, 2015.Roberts, S.C., K.A. Hollar, and V.M. Carlson, “Looking Back: Lessons Learned from Ten Yearsof Training Teaching Assistants,” Proceedings of the 1997 ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, June
industrial and organizational psychology applied to engineering student project teams—A review. Journal of Engineering Education, 102, 472-512. doi:10.1002/-jee.20023.[5] Treem, J.W. (2012). Communicating expertise: Knowledge performances in professional-service firms. Communication Monographs, 79, 23-47. doi:10.1080/03637751.2011.646487.[6] Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.[7] Whitbred, R., Fonti, F., Steglich, C., & Contractor, N. (2011). From microactions to macro-structure and back: A structurational approach to the evolution of organizational networks. Human Communication Research 37, 404-433. doi:10.1111/j
and Research, 2013. 14(1): p. 56. 5. Lee, V.S. and S. Ash, Unifying the undergraduate curriculum through inquiry‐guided learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2010. 2010(121): p. 35-‐46. 6. Justice, C., et al., Inquiry-‐based learning in higher education: administrators’ perspectives on integrating inquiry pedagogy into the curriculum. Higher Education, 2009. 58(6): p. 841. 7. King, N., et al., A Scoping Study Investigating Student Perceptions towards Inquiry Based Learning in the Laboratory. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2016. 4(3): p. 305-‐314. 8. Flora, J.R. and A.T
. R., Jennings, P., Renewable energy education in sustainable architecture: lessons from developed and developing countries. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B-Social and Educational Studies, 2010. 2(3-4): p. 111-131.8. Poboroniuc, M.-S., et al. SALEIE: An EU project aiming to propose new EIE curricula oriented to key global technical challenges. in 2014 International Conference and Exposition on Electrical and Power Engineering (EPE 2014). Iasi, Romania: IEEE.9. Kandpal, T.C. and L. Broman, Renewable energy education: A global status review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014. 34: p. Pages 300–324.10. Bachmann, C., et al. Engineering For Non-Engineering Schools: A Hands-On
. Quinn. "Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT– S)." Journal of personality assessment 91.2 (2009): 166-174.24. Digman, John M. "Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model." Annual review of psychology 41.1 (1990): 417-440.25. Sexual Minority Research Team. "Best practices for asking questions about sexual orientation on surveys." (2008).26. R Core Team. (2016). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/27. Ruxton, Graeme D. "The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student's t-test and the Mann– Whitney U test." Behavioral Ecology 17.4 (2006): 688-690.28. Cohen, Jacob. "A power primer
education and accreditation 3. A shift to emphasizing engineering design 4. A shift to applying education, learning and social-behavioral sciences research 5. A shift to integrating information, computational, and communications technology in educationIn the 50’s, industry demands for engineers required a change in the process of training andeducation of engineers. Engineering curricula and other phases of college programs were modifiedto provide an alignment between colleges and industry [4]. This evolution of the discipline movedacademic institutions to have a more dynamic and adaptive curriculum. During the last twodecades, technology has been one of the most important supports for engineering development,requiring engineers from many
select oneanswer for these and any remaining questions), numbers have been assigned here on a 0 to 4scale for reference where 0 indicates that the student did not agree at all with the given statementwhile 4 indicates that s/he agreed to an extremely large extent. Using this scale, the mean andstandard deviations of each set of responses is also shown in Table 3. 50% 45% 40% 35% Not At All (0) 30% Very Small Extent (1) 25% Moderate Extent (2) 20% Large Extent (3
. Felder, R.M., R. Brent, and M.J. Prince, Engineering instructional development: Programs, best practices, and recommendations. Journal of Engineering Education, 2011. 100(1): p. 89.4. Fink, L.D., S. Ambrose, and D. Wheeler, Becoming a professional engineering educator: A new role for a new era. Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. 94(1): p. 185.5. Brent, R., S.A. Rajala, and R.M. Felder, Preparing new faculty members to be successful: A no-brainer and yet a radical concept. 2006.6. Camblin, L.D. and J.A. Steger, Rethinking faculty development. Higher Education, 2000. 39(1): p. 1-18.7. Hubbard, G.T. and S.S. Atkins, The professor as a person: The role of faculty well-being in faculty development
$3,640,000.00 $161,077.00*2016 11 $7,906,850.00 $225,424.00 *These funds are primarily from a $600k NSF S-STEM grant submitted in 2010 and the internal grants for research ($3000) noted above.This growth founded on requiring professional development plans that match tenure andpromotion goals have led to greater research proposal submission and funding, scholarship,and growth in student enrollment which has ultimately led to new faculty lines. The actualavailability of these funds ten years ago did not generate the faculty development envisioned.The fact that the resources are now limited, the college is moving to a 60-20-20 facultyworkload model, and an
studied using the implementation in a variety ofengineering schools.Acknowledgements: Support for this work is provided by the National Science Foundation Award No. DUE 1504692 and1504696. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are thoseof the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References:[1] Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D.R., and Edström, K., "Historical accounts of engineering education", Rethinking engineering education: Springer, 2014, pp. 231-255.[2] Froyd, J.E., Wankat, P.C., and Smith, K.A.," Five major shifts in 100 years of engineering education", Proceedings of the IEEE Vol. 100, No. Special
), 370 - 392.4. Dubinsky, E. and McDonald M. A. (2002). APOS: A Constructivist Theory of Learning in Undergraduate Mathematics Education Research, The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level, 7 (3), 275-282.5. Piaget, J., and Garcia, R. (1989). Psychogenesis and the history of science (H. Feider, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published in 1983).6. Piaget, J., J.-B. Grize, A., Szeminska, and V. Bang (1977). Epistemology and psychology of functions (J. Castellano`s and V. Anderson: Trans.)7. Thompson, P. W. (1994). Students, functions, and the undergraduate curriculum, Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences Issues in Mathematics Education, 4, 21-44.8. Tokgöz
analysis. The students generallyperformed well in the overall class and the group project (e.g., the majority of the class obtaineda 70% grade or higher in the course). Future versions of this course could improve students’understanding of LCA software by introducing software earlier in the curriculum or including alaboratory component to the class. Lastly, this class provides skills that could be applied to asenior capstone course, which could enhance the student design experience in future semesters.References 1. Hallegatte, S.; Green, C.; Nicholls, R. J.; Corfee-Morlot, J. 2013. Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 802−806. 2. State of California. 2017. Retrieved from: http://climatechange.ca.gov/ 3
leader and has lead and contribute to Peer Evaluation leading the project successfully? Commitment to deadlines (20%): did the team member attended all the meetings? Was s/he committed to deadlines? Workload (40%): did the team member contributed to the project satisfactorily and performed all the tasks required from him/her successfully?5. ConclusionsThe collective experience of the authors with this one-semester industry project that wasincorporated into the undergraduate manufacturing systems course has shown that the projectwas beneficial to both students and industry. Data collected from student survey has shown thatthe industry project helps
teaching delivery in manufacturing engineering education." UICEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education, Australia. 2003. 6. Frost, G. S., & Foster, J. A., & Irish, R., & Sheridan, P. K. (2012, June), The Development of a DfX Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/22042
initial chapter(s) of the Hybrid Electric Vehicle textbook.2. Perform basic calculations involving electrical current, voltage, and power as well and speed, torque, and efficiency. Discuss and perform basic calculation for hybrid topics such as speed coupling and torque coupling of multiple motor systems. Student Self Assessment: (Subjective) ……………..…. 89% Faculty Grades of Student Work: (Quantitative) ….….. 85% Student Comments From other classes Review a little from EGEE210 Described well in class Motors in the lab and in class. Completed homework Because of other classes Faculty Comments There was a very wide background of the students even though they
beenimplemented, c) implementation of the new search request web form and desktop short-cut to theform, d) exploration of the faculty perspective holistically to encourage changes in behavior andperceptions. For example, question 6 in the survey could be expanded as follows: What are thefundamental barriers to the current library system? What is the faculty level of satisfaction withtheir current process? What are their beliefs about their skill level and research time? What werefaculty’s reasons for answering in the negative to question 6? e) to interview those faculty whoused the services to find out more about their experiences, and f) to determine the productivity ofa reference librarian in performing literature searches.References1. Kumar, B. T. S