engineeringcurriculum. The six-week program consisted of four stages, introduction to Roboticsengineering, hardware design, robotics programming, and project development. The applicationof this courseware proved to be an effective way for students to realize their academiccapabilities and engage themselves in group projects. The course was held at Vaughn College ofAeronautics and Technology in Queens, New York. Based on the planned course layout the courseware has been developed as follows: (1)Introduction to Robotics engineering, such as engineering design steps and industrialapplications. The robot design implemented by college students who won the World Roboticscompetition has been utilized as an example in the class lecture; (2) Hardware design with
the applications of an electrical field. Piezoelectric energyharvesting uses the direct effect and kp, k33, d33, d31, g33 are the characterizations of thepiezoelectric material properties. The k factor, referred to as a piezoelectric coupling factor, istypical way to conveniently and directly measure the overall strength of the electromechanicaleffect [1-4].Piezoelectric energy harvesting is a method that translates mechanical energy into electricalenergy by straining a piezoelectric material [5]. Strain or deformation of a piezoelectric materialcauses charge separation across the device, producing an electric field and resulting in a voltagedrop proportional to the stress applied. The oscillating system is typically a cantilever
/quizzes include the slow response rate for students and the tediousness for instructors.Summative assessments in the form of tests and exams are not sufficient measures of students’understanding and application of knowledge 1-2. Students need continuous formative assessmentsto monitor their learning by actively evaluating their level of understanding. Additionally, thereis the present need to satisfy the dynamic technology-based demands of current engineeringstudents.In an attempt to address these challenges, a web-based audience response system was employedin an introductory engineering course at a large, land-grant university in the mid-Atlantic region.This introductory course is offered in multiple sections in the first-year engineering
outlines a comprehensive first year engineering program that incorporates innovationand entrepreneurship over a two semester span. Innovation and Entrepreneurship skills aredelivered to students using Problem Based Learning (PBL), Entrepreneurial Minded Learning(EML) and Active and Collaborative learning (ACL). Students perceived mastery of innovationand entrepreneurial skills were assessed using a set of pre and post-program surveys.Entrepreneurship expertise was further assessed through an independent judging of open endeddesign projects on such criteria as novelty of opportunity and assessment of market.Course StructureThe first year engineering program course structure is outlined in Figure 1. The primary courseoutcomes are listed for each
currently professor and academic Coordinator of College Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Paper ID #13289courses 1-DeVry Brazil Education Group. Has experience in the field of chemistry and Petrochemistry,and Mechanical Processes for the industry. Experience and knowledge in the area of transformationprocesses and information technology. Developed consulting for large companies in the area of controland technological innovation. Know the transformation processes of thermoplastics, with emphasis intechnology
National Science Board, the Association of American Universities, andother professional organizations issued the views of higher education leaders, highlighting theincreasing production of Ph.Ds., the shrinking academic job market, and difficulties transitioninginto the academic workforce [1]. More pertinently, these organizations also noted that theemphasis on research training leaves future faculty unprepared to perform other faculty roles,and the need to improve teaching to improve undergraduate education [1]. However, these reports were based on the views of organizational leaders about doctoralstudents’ needs; “none took the point of view of students” [1]. When doctoral students in the artsand sciences were surveyed, findings
remote tutoring, a format the cousins foundparticularly helpful, as they could watch, replay and pause the explanations at their own pace.However, the availability on YouTube quickly made the videos a popular resource amongthousands of other students searching for online mathematics resources.1 This was thebeginning of Khan Academy, a free online learning resource comprising short videos on awide range of academic subjects, now ranging from mathematics to economics and history. In2010, KA received funding from private benefactors, Google and the Bill & Melinda GatesFoundation to form a non-profit organisation with a mission to provide "a free, world-classeducation for anyone, anywhere."2The mathematics module of KA is particularly well
to be accessible via a computer, tablet, or smartphone. The currentlyworking prototype was developed using HTML5 with Javascript. While the prototype wasdesigned for multiple platforms, it was primarily implemented and tested for iPads for the studyreported in this paper.Appendix A presents a series of screenshots from the working prototype on a tablet, whichillustrates the steps in one of the activities. In the beginning, the user is presented with a briefscenario or context for the activities (Fig. A-1). Immediately following, the user is presentedwith the initial screen that introduces the technical communication problem (Fig. A-2) and thenasked to (1) identify a problematic segment of a text (Fig. A-3), and (2) select an
critical industries of thiscentury: consumer electronics, food, solar & wind power, and advanced battery manufacturing toname just a few.” 1 Educational efforts presented in this paper are closely tied to the latest trendsspecified in "Investing in Next-Generation Robotics" platform by President Obama (June 24,2011) 2. The President has launched the Advanced Manufacturing Partnership (AMP), a nationaleffort bringing together industry, universities, and the federal government to invest in the Page 26.1250.2emerging technologies that will create high quality manufacturing jobs and enhance our globalcompetitiveness. One of the key steps being
the level of IPv6 readiness ofinternational universities is largely unknown. Secondly, the quality or “effectiveness” ofuniversities that have IPv6 web services enabled is also unknown. This study addresses thesetwo challenges by providing the first known published assessment of the IPv6 enablement ofuniversities within a global scope.Though the need to become ready for IPv6 implementation may not be on the forefront of auniversity’s list of priorities, the effects of not becoming IPv6 ready can have negativeimplementations much sooner than administrators may anticipate. A university’s adoption ofIPv6 can affect the institution’s teaching, research, innovation, and budget.1 Partneringinstitutions and research facilities that are already IPv6
programs fail to engage 21st century learners, ignoring the plethora of resourcesand techniques made available by advanced technology.1 GalvanizeU offers programs that are industry relevant. Developed in partnership with theUniversity of New Haven (UNH), GalvanizeU’s data science program is based in Silicon Valley,California (San Francisco). GalvanizeU/UNH will infuse a new breed of diverse, creative andinterdisciplinary talent into the field of data science. This paper describes the innovative way in which GalvanizeU/UNH’s curriculum isdesigned to address the needs of students, educators, employers, and stakeholders, combininglearner-centered pedagogy, industry partnerships, and a commitment to continuous improvement.The first program
finiteelement method. One could make the case that this is part of the natural evolution of any newtool (as one no longer needs to be a mechanic to drive a car). On the other hand, users absolutelyneed to know enough to understand the consequences of their own modeling choices (e.g. howboundary conditions are applied, element selection, meshes size, etc.). Thus, the proliferation ofFEA software in industry (1) necessitates treatment of these tools at the undergraduate level and(2) suggests a balance be struck between the software and theory in these courses.This paper details the authors’ experience with a first course in finite element analysis within anundergraduate only engineering curriculum. In particular, the struggle to find the best
curriculum and resources developed.1. IntroductionThe 2012 President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) report, “Engageto Excel” indicates that the United States needs to produce one million additional STEMprofessionals in the next decade in order to retain its historical preeminence in science andtechnology. To meet this need, the number of undergraduate STEM degrees will have to increaseby about 34 percent annually over the current rates. The PCAST report proposes that addressingthe retention problem in the first two years of college is the most promising and cost-effectivestrategy to address this need.1 The California Community College System, with its 112community colleges and 71-off campus centers enrolling approximately
& Business Development Professionals to Create Globally Competent Engineers via On- and Off-Campus ActivitiesAbstractEfforts to scale curricular and co-curricular experiences designed to foster globally competentengineers sit at an important crossroads. Education for global competency, along with thedevelopment of other “professional” or “soft” skills, is an important part of the formation of 21stcentury engineers. There is broad agreement that, “US engineers [of 2020] will face totallydifferent problems from the ones we face today” and “will have to be open to different religions,different ways of thinking, and different social values.”1 However, consensus does not existregarding how to cultivate globally
postdoctoral research at the Harvard Medical School. He has 7 years of industrial research experience in environmental consulting and is dedicated to training young professionals. Page 26.1243.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Preliminary Evaluation of a Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) Program: A Methodology for Examining Student OutcomesAbstractThe current study presented an initial evaluation, following Year 1, of a National ScienceFoundation (NSF) sponsored Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) program inchemical
a two-year, project-based program that allows students with two-yearcollege degrees to complete a bachelor’s degree in engineering. The program is a partnershipbetween a community college and a state university, separated geographically by severalhundred miles. The program takes place at the community college, targeting students in that partof the state and responding to the needs of local industries. Because of the complex nature of theinstitutional partnership, as well as the project-based, team-focused emphasis, the program servesas an innovative model for engineering education.IntroductionThe engineering profession is becoming steadily more global in nature,1 creating the need forengineering education to develop a graduate who is
degreein mechanical engineering while the other had worked in the construction field. Although neitherhad experience in engineering education methods, faculty members from a nearby engineeringcollege provided guidance. Before designing individual courses, the teachers generated twodocuments intended to form the foundation of all ensuring coursework. The first of thesedocuments, entitled the Academic Standards, focused on five key areas for student development:1) STEM career exploration, 2) collaborative teamwork skills, 3) STEM skills and knowledge, 4)open-ended hands-on design, and 5) communication skills. The second, called the Grade LevelExpectations, broadly outlined the learning outcomes for each of the program’s four years. Theseexpectations
pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and understanding.Dr. Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford UniversityDr. Helen L. Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is a research scientist in the Designing Education Lab in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of ePortfolio Initiatives in the Office of the Registrar at Stanford University. She is also a member of the research team in the National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter). Helen earned her undergraduate degree from UCLA and her PhD in Communication with a minor in Psychology from Stanford University in 1998. Her current research interests include: 1) engineering and entrepreneurship education; 2) the pedagogy of
computerskills that make it difficult to put them into the same classroom (page 29)”. For makerspaces tomake significant contributions to enhancing the participation of women and multiculturalstudents in STEM fields, we must make them attractive environments for these constituencies. Inthe paragraphs below we illustrate how the various elements of our programs try to achieve this.DiscussionOne way in which we have tried to attract a variety of audiences is by providing multiple formatsfor participation: (1) a long-term after school program, (2) periodic “Maker Meetup” workshopsin our space, and (3) introductory outreach events. The 21st Century afterschool programprovides an opportunity to work with the same group of middle school students over the
mathematical constructs in the question? Ifmath literacy is poor, how can students be effectively taught engineering concepts or berationally evaluated?Unfortunately, many engineering students are not highly-skilled in math literacy[1, 2]. Perhaps,this is because this skill is in the overlap between English and mathematics[3] and, as a result, isnot addressed as fully as is could be. Whatever the reason, the weakness is evident in the resultsof the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) assessments. The tests, scored ona 1000-point scale, assess 15-year-old students’ abilities. They have been held every three yearssince 2000, with the latest being in 2012. The 2012 test included over 500,000 students in 65countries or economies[4]. As
to selectan appropriate case study that: 1. Directly applies to the content of the course, 2. Is clear as to what the students will be doing (what are the case activities?), 3. Provides a sufficient challenge at an appropriate skill-level for the students, and 4. Instills interest and engagement.One method of increasing interest in the case itself is to select one that is related to the careerinterests of the students1, 4, 13. Choosing a case study in their field can highlight the type ofexperience they hope to gain after graduation, which is appealing to students4. These cases are asimulation of “on-the-job” learning2.A large group of students can make this selection difficult because their areas of interest will bemore
typical situation for mostprograms. We have received NSF funding to explore the sources of difficulty in such courses anddetermine effective methods of helping students to learn the material. A major outcome of thisproject is to produce a workshop that communicates pedagogical research results, gathersdifferent perspectives from other schools through focused discussion, and develops a broadercommunity of interested pedagogical researchers. By June 2015, the workshop will have beenoffered five times, each time over a different duration from 1.5 hours to 3 days and with avarying audience [1-4]. This paper describes the contents of the workshop, the experiences of theattendees, and the results of interacting with the various attendees.Regardless of
with disabilities in all Page 26.141.2areas of public life. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act protects individuals from 1 discrimination based on disability status and applies to organizations receiving federalfunds. States receiving funds through the Assistive Technology Act of 1998vi are requiredto comply with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act and ensure that electronic andinformation technology is accessible to individuals with disabilities. Since all statesreceive this funding, state entities like public universities must comply with the
to develop global competencies has become apressing necessity for engineering programs given the highly global nature of engineering workthat requires the ability to work productively with other cultures. Study abroad programs, virtualglobal courses, and courses and modules focused on engineering for a global society, are allpedagogical approaches to improving engineering students’ global competencies. Although theseformal education approaches can be highly effective, they are not always accessible to a widepopulation of students and largely engage students for only a single and short portion ofstudents’ academic experiences.1 Increasingly, extracurricular activities, such as EWB, haveemerged as another an alternative that offer students an
energy has been marked by four broad trends: (1) risingconsumption and a transition from traditional sources of energy (e.g., wood, dung, agriculturalresidues) to commercial forms of energy (e.g., electricity, fossil fuels); (2) steady improvementin the power and efficiency of energy technologies; and (3) a tendency (at least for most of the20th century) toward fuel diversification and de-carbonization, especially for electricityproduction; and (4) reducing pollution emissions1-16. These trends have largely been positive.However, the rate of technology improvement has not been sufficient to keep pace with thenegative consequences of rapid growth in energy demand. The task, then, is not so much tochange course as it is to accelerate progress
be noted that the department level makes up thefoundational structure of a college because it is to the individual department that collegeprofessors will be tenured.Table 1. Industrial to Academic Structure Comparison Industrial Structure Academic Equivalent Comments Corporation University The entire organization Divisions Colleges Related product groups Manufacturing Plant Department Specialized groups Production Departments Degree Programs Individual products3. Organizational Hierarchy ComparisonThe key to a successful transition from industry to academia requires
concluded that a sample of 53 engineering innovators provided asufficient population for our qualitative analysis of engineering innovativenesscharacteristics (Mason, 2010). The experience levels and recognitions received by asample of ten of the engineering innovator interviewees is shown in Table 1. Allinterviewee names are represented by a pseudonym to keep their identities andremarks confidential. Page 26.1650.5 Table 1: Engineering Innovator Interview Study Sample Pseu- *Type Gen- Years of ***Formal **Types of donym of der Innovation Education Innovation
Foundation (NSF) began requiring researchers to include a data 1management plan (DMP) as a part of their submitted proposals for funding. As defined by the NSF, a DMP should include: ● a description of the data being developed, ● the standards that will be employed in formatting and developing the content of the data and metadata produced, ● policies for accessing and sharing the data with others, ● statements on how the data may be reused, redistributed or used to produce derivatives, and Page 26.215.2
findings show that the current Page 26.343.2methodology can be expanded to other classes throughout the curriculum.1 IntroductionThe main goal of an educator is to provide knowledge and experience to the students throughdifferent teaching techniques. Developing and improving these techniques is an area that has beenstudied for many decades and will continue evolving for many years to come. As an educator, onehas to find teaching methods which best fit the subject matter and provide a learning experiencethat eventually will improve the professional practice 1 . In recent years, studies have shown thatfor engineering, mathematics and science there
show proficiency in abstractconceptual understanding in mathematics. 1 Diagnostic tests administered at the beginning ofengineering programs at a mid-sized Swedish University have shown declining results during thelast decade, a trend shared with other western countries. This substantially lowers the pass ratesand overall grades in mathematical courses and creates problems in the subsequent courses inscience and technology. Furthermore, it causes attrition and considerably delays graduation formany students with consequences for the individual and society at large. Page 26.401.2Students may be unprepared for abstract thinking in mathematics for