Professional Development Center for Educators, College of Education and HumanDevelopment, University of Delaware, Newark, DE4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CAIntroduction Over the past twenty five years, the government and industry have called for heavyinvestment in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education anddeveloped an impressive array of classroom and extracurricular programming designed toencourage young people to pursue STEM careers [1,2]. Despite these efforts, the vast majority ofcollege-bound high school students continue to pursue majors outside of engineering and otherSTEM fields [3]. Furthermore, there are high attrition rates – some approaching 50
Paper ID #19645A Systematized Literature Review: Defining and Developing EngineeringCompetenciesMr. Hossein Ebrahiminejad, Purdue University Hossein Ebrahiminejad is a graduate research assistant at SPHERE(Social Policy and Higher Education Research in Engineering), and a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He com- pleted his M.S. in Biomedical Engineering at New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT), and his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in Iran. His research interests include student pathways, educational policy, and relationships between education and professional practice
of Electrical and Computer Engineering of Old Dominion University. He is also affiliated with Virginia Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation Center (VMASC). Dr. Shen is a Senior Member of IEEE.Dr. Anthony W. Dean, Old Dominion University Dr. Anthony W. Dean has had several roles in academia. He is currently Assistant Dean for Research, Batten College of Engineering and Technology (BCET) at ODU. His previous appointments include As- sociate Professor of Engineering Technology and as Associate Director of the Institute for Ship Repair, Maintenance, and Operations at Old Dominion University (ODU).His research has focused mostly on control systems (integration and testing) and the reliability and maintainability of
Development in the school of engineering and associate professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Dayton. She teaches undergraduate and graduate materials related courses including Introduction to Ma- terials, Materials Laboratory, Engineering Innovation, Biomaterials and Engineering Design and Appro- priate Technology (ETHOS). She was director of the (Engineers in Technical Humanitarian Opportunities of Service-Learning) for approximately ten years. She has incorporated service-learning projects into her classes and laboratories since she started teaching in 2000. Her research interests include community engaged learning and pedagogy, K-12 outreach, biomaterials and materials
whether students could demonstrate competency in four subjectareas. These subjects are Mathematics, English/Language Arts, History and Social Studies, andScience & Technology/Engineering. Consequently, a single integrated test called the ‘MCAS’ orthe Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System was introduced to drive the students andteachers to improve upon the quality of education and student learning. This test is nowadministered at the elementary, middle and high school level, with 25% of the 5th and 8th gradelevel science test addressing technology/engineering learning standards.With the set of state wide tests in place, and a lack of teacher expertise in implementing thetechnology/engineering standards, there arose a need to assist the
AC 2007-350: THE USE OF ELLUMINATE DISTANCE-LEARNING SOFTWAREIN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONJohn Crofton, Murray State University Dr. Crofton earned his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Physics and his B.E.E. in Electrical Engineering from Auburn University. Before coming to Murray State University in 1994, Dr. Crofton was a Senior Engineer at the Westinghouse Science and Technology Center in Pittsburgh. Dr. Crofton’s research work has focused on ohmic and Schottky contacts to compound semiconductors such as SiC and GaN. Additionally, Dr. Crofton is interested in applications of solid state UV sources for water purification.James Rogers, Murray State University Jamie Rogers is an assistant professor in the
awarded by President Obama the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) in 2011. Her award citation read ”for outstanding research into how early experiences can lead children to pursue engineering later in life and for working with teach- ers from diverse schools to develop new teaching materials and methods that can help students become innovative and more technologically literate.” The PECASE is ”the highest honor bestowed by the US Government on Science and Engineering professionals in the early stages of their independent research career.” Dr Evangelou’s research group is actively involved in research into early childhood antecedents of engineering thinking, developmental factors in
Portugal have teamed with researchers at the University of Western Australiafunded by the Portuguese FCT to study engineers in the workplace.In Ireland, Dr. Kevin Kelly of Trinity College Dublin collaborated on a European-wideproject that looked at engineering recruitment, retention, and progression. In the fall of 2013,Dublin Institute of Technology established a research group specifically aimed at promotingEER across the college of Engineering and the Built Environment; leaders plan to convertthis research group into an established center on campus in the near future. Several Irishfaculty have also developed strong collaborations across the European Union for conductingEER work; however, there have been few instances of national collaboration
: physics, mathematics, and science (general). These items were combined(following earlier quantitative work in this domain14) to form nine composites, which are proxiesfor these identity measures. Several questions also probed students' beliefs about the nature ofscience and engineering and the ability of science & technology to impact the world. Using Page 23.438.5exploratory factor analysis, some of these items were combined into a pair of measures ofagency: global science agency (beliefs in the ability of science & engineering to change theworld in a global sense) and personal science agency (beliefs in science & engineering to
when she became an Assistant Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. In 1999, she accepted a position in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Virginia Tech where she was promoted to Professor in 2003. She was appointed as the Department Head in July 2006 at Penn State. Dr. Thole’s areas of expertise are heat transfer and fluid mechanics special- izing in turbulent boundary layers, convective heat transfer, and high freestream turbulence effects. Dr. Thole has been responsible for attracting funding from such agencies at the US Department of Energy, US Air Force, United Technologies Corporation - Pratt & Whitney, Solar Turbines, Modine Manufacturing, and Siemens-Westinghouse. She has co-authored
Page 23.509.4materials. For their effort they receive a design challenge specific magnet. Catching the Wind: Designing Windmills, an example of the formal classroom curriculum In contrast, the formal classroom curriculum is mostly constrained by teachers’ need to meet state and national content standards. As engineering is not yet a part of most states’ elementary school standards, teachers will not be motivated to teach engineering in the classroom unless it reinforces skills in science, English language arts or mathematics. The EiE curriculum is designed to integrate engineering and technology concepts and skills with elementary science topics in grades 1-5.1 The EiE curriculum consists of 20 engineering units; each
is done by a skilled librarian who has extensive experience with the topic. Studentsin Biomedical Engineering may also gain additional knowledge for their design projects.Assignments Involving Library MaterialsShort assignments involving patents may start with newspaper articles, directories, journalarticles, and conference papers. Newspaper articles and selected publications may discussspecific new medical devices. Rob Stein9 has written a recent newspaper article titled; “PatientsFind Technology Easy to Swallow” in the Washington Post described a new device. Hedescribes the technology as a “M2A disposable diagnostic capsule. Also called the "gut cam,"the device is the first of its kind -- a self-contained, miniature, disposable color video
left in the capable hands of educational researchers—the focus of this paper is onpedagogic applications of the ARS in engineering education. An emphasis is placed onleveraging the inherent advantages of the ARS to overcome obstacles faced in particular by newengineering educators. Four applications of the ARS are discussed. These applications are usingthe ARS to: survey students to determine their preferences on course administration; solicitingstudents for formative feedback on teaching; assessing students’ mastery of subject matter; andincreasing interaction in teaching new subject matter.This paper is arranged as follows. In Section 2 an overview of state-of-the-art ARS technology isprovided. In Section 3 through Section 6, four
University’s Middle States Accreditation Self-Study Taskforce in 1999, has led a number of research and intervention initiatives to attract and retain African American students in the STEM disciplines (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) and im- prove the quality of engineering education for Howard undergraduates. Dr. Fleming is the founder and director of the HUSEM (Howard University Science, Engineering, and Mathematics) program, and serves as the principal investigator and director of the National Science Foundation- funded Global Education, Awareness, and Research Undergraduate Program (GEAR-UP), which provides STEM undergraduates with research opportunities abroad as well as exposure to engineering
plausibleclaim to being the first national professional engineering body in the world to have accreditedfour-year undergraduate software engineering degrees as professional qualifications.Traditionally, undergraduate computer courses in Australia have fallen under one of threeheadings: Computer Science, Information Systems (or Information Technology) and ComputerSystems Engineering. Software engineering, it is well known, fits none of these categories.Furthermore, it is long recognised that the education of practitioners in the emerging field ofsoftware engineering would require a different approach to that traditionally applied to computerscience. Juggling the concurrent requirements of duration and content has required a reshapingof curricula. It is
63% between Fall 2007 and Fall2011.References1. Gibbons, Michael T. (2006) “Engineering by the Numbers,” 2005 Edition Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges, American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, D.C.2. Gibbons, Michael T. (2007) “Engineering by the Numbers,” 2006 Edition Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges, American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, D.C.3. Gibbons, Michael T. (2008) “Engineering by the Numbers,” 2007 Edition Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges, American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, D.C.4. Gibbons, Michael T. (2009) “Engineering by the Numbers,” 2008 Edition Profiles of Engineering and
AC 2012-3120: AT-RISK VISUAL PERFORMANCE AND MOTIVATIONIN INTRODUCTORY ENGINEERING DESIGN GRAPHICSDr. Jeremy V. Ernst, Virginia Tech Jeremy V. Ernst is an Assistant Professor in the Integrative STEM Education program of the Department of Teaching and Learning at Virginia Tech. He currently teaches graduate courses in STEM education foundations and contemporary issues in integrative STEM education. Ernst specializes in research focused on dynamic intervention means for STEM education students categorized as at-risk of dropping out of school. He also has curriculum research and development experiences in technology, engineering, and design education.Dr. Aaron C. Clark, North Carolina State University Aaron C
undergraduate science and mathematicscourse framework, examples of successful course models, and a mentoring support system forfaculty wishing to implement new courses or modify existing courses at their universities. Theframework uses interactive learning and integrates science, mathematics and technology as ameans of developing a new paradigm for educating pre-service teachers.In the spirit of NOVA’s mission, the authors developed this course with three specific goals inmind:• To improve the science and engineering problem-solving skills of pre-service teachers• To model effective teaching methods to the students• To provide opportunities for the students to create their own problem-solving strategies and modules and practice communicating them to
Longitudinal Study of Intellectual Development ofEngineering Students: What Really Counts In Our Curriculum”, presented at Frontiers in Education Conference(FIE), Kansas City, MO, 2000.3. Perry, William G., Forms of intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years, Holt, Rinehart andWinston, Inc., New York, 1970.4. Accredidation Board for Engineering and Technology, “Engineering Criteria 2000: Criteria for AccreditingPrograms in Engineering in the United States”, ASEE Prism. Vol.6, No. 7, 1997, pp. 41-42. 5. Woods, D.R., Hrymak, A.N., Marshall, R.R., Wood, P.E., Crowe, C.M., Hoffman, T.W., Wright, J.D., Taylor,P.A., Woodhouse, K.A., and Bouchard, C.G.K., “Developing Problem Solving Skills: The McMaster ProblemSolving Program”, Journal of
curriculum and recommended changes to the goals and curriculum. Therevised Academic Program Goals of USMA are reflected in the following statement: Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 6.54.2 Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Education We expect graduates to “anticipate and respond effectively to the uncertainties of a changing technological, social, political, and economic world.” Graduates must have experience and competence in the following areas: 1) Moral Awareness 2) Communications 3
a new engineering course in industrial ecology with an industrialengineering focus. The course introduces students to analysis of environmental metrics and labels,life cycle assessment, design for environment, material selection, production planning withenvironmental considerations, reverse logistics, service industry impacts, disassembly planning,recycling technologies, and environmental cost accounting. The course is designed as a sequenceof modules. Each module may be integrated individually into other courses or the entire set ofmodules may be taught as an industrial ecology course.Most of the modules contain active learning exercises that require students to participate indiscussion and analyze environmental implications of product and
to increase excitement and promote diversity of the engineeringworkforce.IntroductionThe United States has experienced a decline in the number of technology and engineeringcollege graduates, largely due to fewer students choosing to enter an engineering education andprofession (Crawford et al, 1994). Furthermore, the performance of K-12 students in the Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields has decreased in overall achievementas reported by Weiss et al (2003) and others. Rightly so, government agencies and educationresearchers have made the link between a decreasing number of engineering college graduates,relative to demand, and the declining performance of K-12 students compared to other nations onSTEM assessment
it.References 1. Engineering College Profiles, 2009, ASEE. 2. Susan A. Ambrose, Cristina H. Amon, “Design of a First-Year Mechanical Engineering Course at Carnegie Mellon University, Journal of Engineering Education, April 1997, pp 173-181. 3. B.J. Savilonis, D. Spanagel, K. Wobbe. Engaging Students with Great Problems. Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference, Louisville, KY (June, 2010). 4. Mary R. Anderson-Rowland, “A First Year Engineering Student Survey to Assist Recruitment and Retention,” Proceedings of FIE 1996, Salt Lake City, pp 372-376.Appendix A, Guest LecturesFollowing are the topics of the guest lectures: Technology and Economics of photovoltaic power, Electronics design for the
Session 3522 Online Review and Practice Tests for the Fundamentals of Engineering Exam Adrian Ng, Kurt Gramoll University of OklahomaAbstractWithin the past few years, the World Wide Web has proven to be a tool of great potentialboth as an instrument for education as well as for technology application. This is evidentwith the increase in distance learning sites available on the Internet. This paper focusesusing the Internet by students to prepare for the Fundamentals in Engineering ReviewProject. This project implements the computer-based, distance learning
illustrate additional concepts. Faculty provide notes andproblems. Students purchase a reference manual published by Professional Publications, Inc.The next year Civil and Electrical Engineering Review Courses were added, and the PE courses werestandardized at thirteen weeks. Lastly, Chemical, Industrial, and Fire Protection Engineering wereadded. The later two were offered once a year to coincide with exam offerings in Massachusetts.This paper presents details of the courses and the Seminar series. The paper concludes with the futureof the program relative to the impact of changing technology, increased competition, and formatchanges at the national level.The Courses OfferedFE Review courses run two times a year at three locations for 12 weeks
faculty member at the University Georgia, Bio & Ag Engineering Department, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Tifton Campus. He is a licensed Professional Engineer and holds B.S. and M.E. degrees in Agricultural Engineering from LSU and a Ph.D. from Purdue University. Page 15.718.1Paige Davis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge Paige Davis is an Instructor in the College of Engineering at Louisiana State University. She has 20 years experience teaching Engineering Graphics and Computer Graphics courses. She received her baccalaureate degree in Engineering Technology
annually in courses organized to ensure student success through rigorous academics in a team-based environment. His responsibilities in- clude operations, faculty recruiting, curriculum management, student retention, and program assessment. Dr. Merrill received his Ph.D. in Instructional Design and Technology from The Ohio State University in 1985, and has an extensive background in public education, corporate training, and contract research. He has made frequent presentations at conferences held by the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and its affiliate conference, Frontiers in Education (FIE). He is part of the research team that was recently awarded an NSF grant to study strategies for maximizing
students to advancedlaboratory equipment and a range of engineering concepts. Select details of the course content,new learning materials, and a summary of the assessment tools and mid-project evaluations areprovided in this paper.IntroductionRecent and emergent developments in technology, together with changes in the social andprofessional context of engineering, generate continuing challenges for engineering practitionersand consequently for engineering education as well. Engineering education must be realigned toprovide adequate knowledge for the students and prepare them to enter the engineeringprofession1. Considering the often weak linkage between engineering education and practice,effort needs to be placed in creating courses that better
digital media technologies (the engineers) are not trained in thecreation of content. Similarly the creators of content (the artists) are not trained in thecreation and exploration of digital technologies and do not have a fundamentalunderstanding of the computational models driving these technologies.AME was formed to address this problem. AME was created by the engineering, arts and Page 10.189.2science disciplines at Arizona State University. These programs contribute to the AMEgraduate education and research program. The education component of this programconsists of formalized graduate concentrations within existing degrees that allow facultyand
critical for future success. If millennials value “parallel career” educators will need to promote engineering and science parallel career opportunities. Educators will need to demonstrate the value of engineering and science careers as careers that will require lifelong learning and training. 2. Educators must be willing to present information and design education so to appeal to millennial learning styles. Communicating cross-generationally means packaging the message in several ways so that every hearer understands [7]. Technology must be employed in the classroom and utilized to offer courses differently. If millennials do not see state-of-the-art technology in the classroom and