) of the Department of Engineering Technology at Miami University of Ohio. Thetrainer is composed of 4 different stages, namely: flavor selection, filling, capping and labeling.Two automated conveyor belts and a turntable are used to transport bottle(s) between the stages.The process starts with selection of a flavor from the three available flavors (Cola, Dew andRed).Once a flavor is selected, an empty coke bottle proceeds to the filling station and waits forthe filling valve to be activated. The bottle is then filled with the selected flavor and it proceedsto the capping station. It then travels to on to the labeling and exits the system once it is labeled.The stages are deployed in a distributed fashion in order to demonstrate the
experience.We were excited to see how many of the teams were embracing the conflict and tension thatemerged during their preparatory work and initial outreach to their communities. Team membersrecognized what the literature on culture change has long described: that dissonance motivateschange (as in Festinger 1962). Team members often described culture change as their goal; in thesame sentence, they would indicate that they welcomed uncomfortable conversations becausethese conversations, when approached with openness and listening ears, drew out the best ideasand created a supportive team environment. On a larger scale, we see these discussions as beingconsistent with Bowe et al.’s (2003) recommendations relating to identifying contradictions
project ideas butnot knowing how to fulfill them. Therefore, we experimented including in this course theconcept of closed-loop control system with variety of sensors and actuators.II. Arduino UnoArduino Uno is the most popular Arduino platform in the family of the Arduino product line.The following table (Figure No. 1) compares the basic features of the various Arduinos andArduino Compatibles platforms presently available. The user has a choice among the manyArduino platforms with regard to 1) Processor and its speed, 2) Physical footprint, 3) Number ofI/O s, 4) Memory size, 5) Compatibility with the daughter boards (Shield in Arduinoterminology), etc. A very important consideration to note is that the user has a large list ofdaughter boards to
for Teaching and Learning, 1991(47), 63–69.https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219914708Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior:Perspectives in social psychology. New York: Plenum.Herrick, R. J., Buikema, S. C., & Runshe, D. D. (2016). A collaborative approach to courseredesign with student-centered learning just one click away. Presentation for OLC Innovate, NewOrleans, LA.IMPACT Management Team and IMPACT Assessment Team. (2015). Annual IMPACT report2015: A report by the IMPACT Data Collection and Analysis Team, parts 1 and 2. IMPACTReports, Paper 6. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/impactreps/6IMPACT Management Team and IMPACT Assessment Team. (2015). Annual IMPACT report2015: A
: What module are you QUESTION 4: Because of using the module, evaluating? I now have a significantly better o Density understanding of the engineering principles o Piston/Cylinder that are demonstrated in the module. o Iso-lines o Strongly Agree o Other o Agree o Neither Agree nor Disagree QUESTION 2: Describe the fundamental o Disagree engineering principle(s) that is/are being
Pathways. Committee on Barriers and Opportunities in Completing 2-Year and 4- Year STEM Degrees. S. Malcom and M. Feder, Editors. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Board on Higher Education and the Workforce, Policy and Global Affairs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21739.
Commons [EngineeringLibrary], Garage Physics, and Discovery Building), and University of Illinois – Urbana-Champaign (Undergraduate Library and Granger Engineering Library) for meeting to share yourexperiences and ideas.ReferencesAdobe Systems Incorporated. (2017). “Adobe KickBox.” Retrieved from: https://kickbox.adobe.com/.Bieraugel, M. & Stern, N. (2017). “Ascending Bloom’s Pyramid: Fostering Student Creativity and Innovation in Academic Library Spaces.” College & Research Libraries, 78(1), 35- 53.Forest, C. R., Moore, R. A., Jariwala, A. S., Fasse, B. B., Linsey, J., Newstetter, W., …. Quintero, C. (2014). “The Invention Studio: A University Maker Space and Culture.” Advances in Engineering Education, 4(2
DESIGN PROJECTS TO AID PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES Edited By." (2005). 8. Ulwick, Anthony W. What customers want: Using outcome-driven innovation to create breakthrough products and services. Vol. 71408673. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005. 9. Battarbee, K., J. Fulton Suri, and S. Gibbs Howard. "Empathy on the Edge: Scaling and sustaining a human-centered approach in the evolving practice of Design." IDEO. http://www. ideo. com/images/uploads/news/pdfs/Empathy_on_the_Edge. pdf (2014). 10. Zimmerman Low Vision Simulation Kit, http://www.lowvisionsimulationkit.com. Accessed 27 Jan. 2017 11. Adcock, Bev, and Michael L. Remus. "Disability Awareness Activity Packet." Activities and Resources for Teaching Students About
and I remember. Involve me and I learn.” This quote illustrates quite succinctly Mark Jupina’s pedagogy in teaching courses to undergrads. Since the 1990’s, Dr. Jupina has employed ”active learning” techniques both inside and outside of the classroom using various modalities, including the flipped-lab approach dur- ing the last five years. More recently, Dr. Jupina has also incorporated Entrepreneurial Minded Learning (EML) exercises into his sophomore and junior-level courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 “FLIPPED LAB” APPROACH IN ELECTRONICS DESIGN TO ENHANCE STUDENT LEARNING EXPERIENCE Department of Electrical & Computer
now, then it is going to be very difficult when each stateattempts to satisfy the energy needs through 100% natural renewable energy sources such assolar, wind and water.Interpretation of ResultsThe E3’s findings can offer some insight into the usefulness of rooftop PV in Pennsylvania.Assuming that Pennsylvania has a greater average sunlight than many other states, we canconclude that the results only encourage the use of rooftop PV in Pennsylvania. The small scaleinstallation threshold of 5000 KWh for California could be applied to small scale Pennsylvaniainstallations because of their comparable sun exposure. However, when considering the FederalITCs, both the contended conditions approach cost-effectiveness.ConclusionIt is undeniable that
orthoses using rapid prototyping. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.8(1), 1-11.doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-1[2] New 3D printing technology helps enable customized, in-office-printed orthotics (2015). Los Angeles: AnthemMedia Group. Retrieved fromhttps://reddog.rmu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1718199313?accountid=28365[3] Zug, S., Penzlin, F., Dietrich, A., Nguyen, T. T., & Sven, A. (2012). Are laser scanners replaceable by Kinectsensors in robotic applications? Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Retrieved fromhttps://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/00a7/bb020b5f1eea7311439289f8c15f79c62429.pdf[4] Innovations and novel manufacturing techniques to hold the future for orthotic devices. (2015, Jan 06
; Watton, A. (2006, June), Teaching Improved Methods Of Tuning And Adjusting Hvac Control Systems. Paper presented at 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. https://peer.asee.org/784.7. Field, B., & Ellert, D. (2010, June), Project Based Curriculum For Thermal Science Courses. Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. https://peer.asee.org/16734.8. Ross, S., & Giordano, P., & Blanck, J., & Johnson, D., & Jansson, P. (2004, June), Undergraduate Research On Sustainability: Campus Energy Analysis And Building Lighting Audits. Paper presented at 2004 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/13316.
build a professional network with the possibility of future employment. A potential long‐term benefit of this experience could be an increased number of off‐site internships. After past interns see the benefit of the program, they may offer similar opportunities to future interns, thus continuing to influence future curriculum, mentorship and ultimately ensuring an industry‐ready student pipeline. Acknowledgement This work is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers DUE‐1407160. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. References
environment. Eur J Eng Educ. 2006;31(1):35-42. doi:10.1080/03043790500430185.7. Meyers KL, Ohland MW, Pawley AL, Silliman SE, Smith KA. Factors relating to engineering identity. Glob J Eng Educ. 2012;14(1):119-131.8. Chachra D, Kilgore D, Loshbaugh H, McCain J, Chen H. Being and becoming: gender and identity formation of engineering students. In: American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.; 2008.9. Varelas M (Ed. . Identity Construction and Science Education Research: Learning, Teaching, and Being in Multiple Contexts. (Varelas M, ed.). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2012.10. Johnston S, Lee A, McGregor H. Engineering as captive discourse. Techn{é} Res Philos Technol
, engineering firms and companies around theworld. In short, they began to see themselves as practicing professional engineers. This isprobably one of the most valuable outcomes of this course. Given the right opportunity, I wouldteach this course again, or another course using a similar format. What it lacked in structure, itmore than made up for in its breadth and depth of industrial-type experience.Bibliography1. Swartwout, M. A., & Jayaram, S. (2012, June), Spacecraft Integration and Test: AnUndergraduate Course in Systems Engineering Practice Paper presented at 2012 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/219272. Guerra, L., & Murphy, G. A., & May, L. D. (2013, June), Applying Systems
, C., Mathews, S.,Murphy, C., and Pijawka, D., 2008, “Benchmarking Sustainable Engineering Education: FinalReport,” EPA Grant Number: X3-83235101-0American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2004. Sustainable Engineering Practice: AnIntroduction. 127 pp.American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2011. Journal of Professional Issues inEngineering Education and Practice, Vol. 137 (2).American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2015. Journal of Professional Issues inEngineering Education and Practice, Vol. 141 (2).Barbier, E.B. 1987. The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development. EnvironmentalConservation, 14(02):101 – 110.Bielefeldt, A.R. 2013. Pedagogies to Achieve Sustainability Learning Outcomes in Civil andEnvironmental Engineering
, Vancouver, BC, Canada.12. Ferguson, C.W., Yanik, P.M., Chang, A. and Kaul, S. (2015). “Scholarship Program Initiative via Recruitment, Innovation, and Transformation.” Proc. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA.
Journal of Educational Thought 29, 2 (1995).5. M. Borrego and L.K. Newswander, The Review of Higher Education 34, 61 (2010).6. P. Stock and R.J. Burton, Sustainability 3, 1090 (2011).7. National Science Foundation, Introduction to the IGERT Program, WWW Document, (https://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/igert/intro.jsp).8. V.B. Mansilla, E.D. Duraisingh, C.R. Wolfe, and C. Haynes, The Journal of Higher Education 80, 334 (2009).9. V.B. Mansilla and E.D. Duraisingh, The Journal of Higher Education 78, 215 (2007).10. L.R. Lattuca, D. Knight, and I. Bergom. International Journal of Engineering Education 29, 3 (2013).11. D. Fowler, R. Arroyave, J. Ross, R. Malak, and S. Banerjee. Looking Outwards from the “Central Science”: An Interdisciplinary
is that we had more content than we couldreasonably address within time available for the course, so focusing on objectives and outcomeshelped us pare the material down to its most important components.A revised version of Bloom’s Taxonomy [3] was used to write learning outcomes and objectivesin measurable terms. As a result of an iterative process between SME and curriculum designers,course level learning objectives were aligned with the learning outcomes; likewise, module-levellearning objectives were aligned to course-level learning objectives to ensure that each learningmodule could help learners to achieve intended learning outcomes. To exemplify this point, thetable below lists learning outcomes, course-level objectives, and Module 1’s
the targeted SO. 1 ~ the assignment is not related to the targeted SO.If the score assigned is lower than 4, the reviewer(s) should provide suggestions as to how toimprove the assignment to better foster student attainment of the targeted Student Outcome.Examples of the Results of the Work Review Assessment The initial implementation of the Work Review process was in the spring 2013 semester.The table and discussion below show how the results of that SO attainment were reported in theself-study. The courses involved in the table are: ASE 324L – Aerospace Materials Laboratory ASE 333T – Engineering Communication ASE 366K – Spacecraft Dynamics ASE 367K – Flight Dynamics ASE 370L – Flight Control
Paper ID #19077Engineering Pathways Fellows: Four Years of Successful Retention Initia-tives, Including International CollaborationDr. Amy L. Freeman, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Amy L. Freeman holds a Master of Science degree in Engineering and a Ph.D. in Workforce Edu- cation. She has a been a practitioner of retention programming for over two decades and is a member of several organizations and networks that support her research interest: access and inclusion to STEM education. She is the primary PI for the NSF sponsored S-STEM award, ”Engineering Pathways: An Undergraduate Scholars Program.” Dr
learning.Out of a total of 40 students in the course, 33 consented to provide their information for the studyand also completed both the pre- and post-course surveys (an 82.5% completion rate). Changesin the self-efficacy scores were evaluated relative to student gender, ethnicity, and ACTcomposite score. These data were obtained with student consent from the office of the Registrar.A total of 17 female and 16 male students were surveyed. Ethnicities were divided into threesub-categories: (1) White (any students with White as their only race, N = 21), (2) Asian (anystudents with Asian or Asian and White listed as their race(s), N = 7), and (3) UnderrepresentedMinorities (URM, any students listed as Hispanic, Native American, Black, or Pacific Islander
, http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=40, . (accessed: 4/1/2015). 4. Reeve Hamilton, “At UTEP, Success Is Not All About Graduation Rates”, March 2, 2012, http://www. nytimes .com/2012/03/02/us/utep-calls-for- success-criteria-other-than-graduation rates.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 5. Steve Bossart, Senior Energy Analyst, DOE “Smart Grids & Microgrids for Government & Military Symposium” October 24-25, 2013, Arlington, VA. 6. X. Fang, S. Misra, G. Xue, D. Yang. Smart grid – the new and improved power grid: a survey. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials (2011). 7. B. Flores, "CAMPUS DIVERSITY FACTS”, http://research.utep.edu/ Default .aspx?tabid=44271, 1995-2007, (accessed 4/1/2015). 8
comparing theprinting results of both machines. Support material removal and cleaning time on average for thelarger parts such as base, femur, and tibia-fibula was between 20 to 30 min where as for thesmaller parts it was between 10 to 15 minutes. Table 2: Results of 3D printed parts14 Printer Settings Weight Extruder Platform Print Layer Printing Weight Decrease Part Name Temp. Temp. Speed Infill (%) Height Time (g) (PLA (oC) (oC) (mm/s) (mm
-Share, Thinktrix, Thinklinks, and weird facts: An interactive system for cooperative learning. In N. Davidson & T. Worsham (Eds.), Enhancing Thinking Through Cooperative Learning (pp. 169–181). New York: Teachers College Press. 10. McKeachie, W. J., & Svinicki, M. (2006). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. 11. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Publishing. 12. Angelo, T. A., & Cross, P. K. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd Ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 13. Stacy S
John in that he retrospectively reflectson how reading journal articles in the past helped him approach reading journals in the present.He states: “When I started reading paper[s], I used to go through it very fast. My idea was just grasp the results and that's all… I didn't follow the whole idea of the [paper]... [My advisor] wanted me to see that all these things are not very difficult. All the [big] equations we see are actually very small, simple equations… Now when I see some very difficult equation, I know that it's not difficult. Inherently it's very simple. This is the learning I had because this helps me a lot now.” - UmarEven though Umar knows he learned how to approach reading journal papers with
sketch of any new equipment, an estimatedprice, and the potential market. In addition, each group delivered an “elevator pitch” for theirproduct(s) (< 2 minutes). The class then voted for the best product.This assignment addresses the 3Cs by requiring students to identify opportunities and brainstormideas (curiosity), investigate the market and perform research (connections); and identifycustomers and develop a value proposition (creating value). The KEEN outcomes for thisactivity are for students to explore a contrarian view of an accepted solution, integrateinformation, identify opportunities, apply creative thinking, investigate the market, evaluatevalue and feasibility, and convey a solution.This assignment has been used to assess a