Intellectual Property Advisory Committee (IPAC) (Patent in progress).7. Technical Date Sheet for 1002300 Twist-Release Polymagnet Pair – 90 degree with Detent, available from http://catalog.polymagnet.com/media/pdf/1002300%20datasheet.pdf on October 24, 2016.8. A.B. Nellippallil, J.K. Allen, F. Mistree, R. Vignesh, B.P. Gautham, and A.K. Singh, (2017). A Goal-Oriented, Inverse Decision-Based Design Method to Achieve the Vertical and Horizontal Integration of Models in a HotRod Rolling Process Chain, ASME Design Automation Conference. Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Under Review.9. C.-H. Goh, S. Ahmed, A.P. Dachowicz, J.K. Allen, and F. Mistree, Integrated Multi-scale Robust Design to Consider Microstructure Evolution and Material Properties in the
. 3 See Robert Cialdini, Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: Morrow,1993; Douglas Stone, Bruce Patton, and Sheila Heen, Difficult Conversations: How toDiscuss What Matters Most (New York: Penguin, 1999); and Roger Fisher and DanielShapiro, Beyond Reason: Using Emotions as You Negotiate (New York: Penguin, 2005).4 Eight Hours for What We Will: Workers and Leisure in an Industrial City, 1870-1920.Cambridge University Press, 1983.5 Engel’s autobiography, like those of his seven co-conspirators, was originally publishedserially in 1886 in the Chicago Knights of Labor. They were reissued in a single volume,edited by Philip S. Foner in 1969. Engel’s short autobiography is available online:https
,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, Jan. 2005.2. M. Hoit and M. Ohland, “The Impact of a Discipline-Based Introduction to EngineeringCourse on Improving Retention,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, no. 1, Jan. 1998.3. P. A. Johnson, “Problem-Based, Cooperative Learning in the Engineering Classroom,”Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 125, no. 1, Jan. 1999.4. L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate EngineeringEducation,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, Jan. 2005.5. M. Meyer and S. Marx, “Engineering Dropouts: A Qualitative Examination of WhyUndergraduates Leave Engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 4, Oct
Strategies for Engineering Education and Practice,” Proceedings of the 1st World Engineering Education Flash Week, Lisbon, Portugal, pp.205-212, 2011.24 John Heywood, “Engineering Education Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction,” Hoboken, N.J. : Wiley-Interscience: IEEE Press, pp.402-415, 2005.25 Larry J. McKenzie, Michael S. Trevisan, Denny C. Davis, & Steven W. Beyerlein, “Capstone Design Courses and Assessment of ABET EC 2000: A National Survey,” Proceedings of 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition: Engineering Education Reaches New Heights, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, pp.20-23, June 2004.26 Leah H. Jamieson, William C. Oakes, & Edward J. Coyle, “EPICS: Documenting Service-Learning to
education, faculty in your department who have been more vocal about pedagogyand associated research, and members of the ASEE collegiate chapter.Involvement with Engineering Education ResearchThere are a few approaches to get involved with engineering education research if it is not theprimary focus of your doctoral work.Express an interest to learn and collaborate with an engineering education faculty mentor(s) thatyou have sought out, who may be faculty outside of your department. Investigate if they have on-going research projects that you could assist with on a voluntary (unpaid) basis, but that wouldultimately allow you to co-author papers and/or participate in poster or presentations at on-campus symposia, regional or national conferences. A
and stakeholder relationships. Organization studies, 29(8-9), 1227-1254.Lester, J., & Kezar, A. (2012). Faculty grassroots leadership: Making the invisible visible. The Journal of the Professoriate, 6(2), 98-129.Lozano, R. (2006). Incorporation and institutionalization of SD into universities: breaking through barriers to change. Journal of cleaner production, 14(9), 787-796.Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of organizational behavior, 23(6), 695-706.Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: developing an individual differences measure. Journal of applied psychology, 88(4), 680.Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional Change in Toque Ville
. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8:255- 284.[16 Isaacs, B. (2001). Mystery of the missing women engineers: A Solution. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 127(2):85-91.[17] Tuan, H., Vhin, C., and Shich, S. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation toward science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6): 639-654.[18] Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, Instrument: Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.[19] APPLES (Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey), created by the CAEE (Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education) project and available
biomedical engineering curricula", Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual: IEEE, 2001, pp. F3E-16-21 vol. 12.[16] Linsenmeier, R.A., T. Harris, and S. Olds, "The VaNTH bioengineering curriculum project", Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 2002. 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society EMBS/BMES Conference, 2002. Proceedings of the Second Joint: IEEE, 2002, pp. 2644-2645.[17] Linsenmeier, R.A., and D.W. Gatchell, "Core elements of an undergraduate biomedical engineering curriculum–State of the art and recommendations", 9th International Conference on Engineering Education, 2006.[18] Martin, T., S.D. Rivale, and K.R. Diller
century is described asthe “era of sustainability”. Engineering education needs to foster this concept and impartknowledge about dealing with it to future engineers by conducting innovative teachingapproaches like the EWB Challenge, for instance.AcknowledgmentThis work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research withinthe project ELLI (Excellent Teaching and Learning in Engineering Sciences). The authorswould also like to thank Mr. Steffen Rolke of Engineers Without Borders, Germany(Ingenieure ohne Grenzen e.V.).ReferencesAllen, Deborah E., Richard S. Donham, and Stephen A. Bernhardt. 2011. “Problem-Based Learning.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning (128): 21–29.Belu, R., R. Chiou, Ciocal L., and B. Tseng. 2016
stored by the software. Programs are listed in alphabetical order; two programs with thesame name will be displayed in an arbitrary order. Figure 3 (left) shows an example of a programnavigation view.By pressing Enter while a given program is selected, the user will be taken to the instruction navi-gation menu, where the selected program’s instruction list will be displayed. The user can then editexisting instruction parameters by moving their cursor over an instruction subfield and pressing theappropriate FUNCTION button(s). Users can also quickly create basic movement instructions bytoggling the pendant’s Shift button to on and pressing F1, which will add a new motion instructionFigure 2: The simulated teach pendant showing tabs at the top, a
& Sons.9. Lee J.J., Hammer J. (2011). Gamification in Education: What, How, Why Bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, vol. 15(2), 1-510. Gee, J.P. (2016). Games as Well-Designed Teaching and Learning. http://www.p21.org/news- events/p21blog/1511-gee-games-as-well-designed-teaching-and-learning. Accessed on July 14, 2016.11. Akpolat, B.S. and Slany, W. (2014). Enhancing software engineering student team engagement in a high intensity extreme programming course using gamification. IEEE 27th Conference on Softwar Engineering Education and Training, CSEE and T2014 Proceedings, April 23-25, 2014. Klagenfurt, Austria. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2014.681679212. Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge J.A., Goncalves, D
, S.G., 2001. Identifying determinants of academic selfconfidence among science, math, engineering, and technology students. Journal of women and minorities in science and engineering, 7(4).5. Gibbons, J.D., and S. Chakraborti. 2011. Nonparametric statistical inference. Chapman & Hall/Taylor & Francis.6. Hollander, M., D.A. Wolfe, and E. Chicken. "Nonparametric statistical methods.7. Wheatley, B. B., Catton, K., and Donahue, T. H. (2017), An Active Learning Environment to Improve First-Year Mechanical Engineering Retention Rates and Software Skills. ©2017 American Society for Engineering Education. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, June 25th – 28th, Columbus, Ohio – in review8. Grow, G.O., 1991
, and to what extent are they interested in impact-driven work?2.2 Impact-Driven Interest as a Career ChoiceThere are many capacities in which one may address societal challenges, e.g. as a volunteer,employee, and/or founder. To narrow the scope, the current study explores how engineeringundergraduates consider addressing societal challenges as a career choice.In the early 1990’s Robert Lent proposed a model of career choice called Social CognitiveCareer Theory (SCCT, see Figure 1) that provides a framework for understanding, explaining,and predicting the processes through which people develop occupational choice (Lent & Brown,2006; Lent, Brown, & Hackett, 1994). The SCCT model has been shown to be useful inpredicting career choice
the most significant limitation of the analytic rubrics: they didn’t effectivelyrepresent for the students the way(s) in which design deliverables are evaluated in anon-academic context, and therefore writing in response to those rubrics wasn’t providing the“authentic,” real-world design project experience that is one of the goals of our course. Asupervisor or potential client wouldn’t decide how they felt about a design report by tallying up aseries of points awarded for discrete categories, nor would they be likely to evaluate an oralprogress report by considering the technical content separate from the way in which that contentis delivered; audiences react and respond to written and oral communication much moreholistically--even those
the Net Generation, D.G. Oblinger and J.L. Obliner, Editors. 2005, EDUCAUSE.6. Technology and Student Achievement: The Indelible Link. 2008, International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).7. Lai, K.-W. and K.-S. Hong, Technology use and learning characteristics of students in higher education: Do generational differences exist? British Journal of Educational Technology, 2015. 46(4): p. 725-738.8. Thompson, P., The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education, 2013. 65: p. 12-33.9. Kirkwood, A., Teaching and learning with technology in higher education: blended and distance education needs ‘joined-up thinking’ rather than
Technology Education (SIGITE '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA,Gartner, Inc. (November 2015). Gartner Says 6.4 Billion Connected "Things" Will Be in Use in2016, Up 30 Percent From 2015. Retrieved from on February 10, 2017.NXP. I2C-bus specification and user manual. Retrieved from on February 10, 2017.Smith, M., Jones, F., Gilbert, S., & Wieman, C. (2013). The Classroom Observation Protocol forUndergraduate STEM (COPUS): A New Instrument to Characterize University STEMClassroom Practices. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 618-627.Simblee. Retrieved from on February 10, 2017.Texas Instrucments. TMP102 Datsheet. Retrieved from on February 10, 2017.
effect group of ideas; and once all the cards have been placed under an appropriate affinity category, borders can be drawn around each affinity group to complete the diagram. Table 1. Define Tools 2. MeasureKASH Box A KASH box is a tool, similar to a SWOT where K is Successful:Analysis knowledge, A is attitude, S is Skill, and H is habits. visual, Management uses KASH Boxes to help identify areas qualitative where sustainable change can be done. This sustainable data, hands- change is necessary in most cases for a
teach this course onmultiple occasions. This allowed for a steady improvement in examples being used in class tofortify concepts for students. The author thanks ASEE reviewers and the chair for comments,suggestions and recommendations provided during various stages of preparing this paper. Thisinput allowed for an improvement in the structure of this paper.References [1] William Jolly Duncan. Galerkin’s method in mechanics and differential equations. Technical report, DTIC Document, 1937. [2] Junuthula Narasimha Reddy. An introduction to the finite element method, volume 2. McGraw-Hill New York, 1993. [3] Singiresu S Rao. The finite element method in engineering. Elsevier, 2010. [4] Daryl L Logan. A first course in the finite element
action will reduce programquality. The analytical tools we present in this paper have proved useful in guiding discussionsaround curriculum change on our campus, as they provide a tool for comparing the complexities ofsimilar programs at different institutions, including those that are highly rated, and for consideringthe possible improvements in graduation rates that could be obtained through particular curricularreforms.References 1 C. Abdallah, G. Heileman, and T. Babbitt. The university is a system. The EvoLLLution, Jan. 29, 2016. 2 C. Alexander, S. Ishikawa, and M. Silverstein. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, New York, 1977. 3 K. Beck and W. Cunningham. Using pattern languages for
development of the student, for the benefit of society andfor the quality of the work itself in bringing considerations of social impact into ethics trainingfor all science and engineering students.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no.1338652 (SRR) and grant no. 1449469 (EL-STEM). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.1 Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics inengineering. Herkert, J. R. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 2005, 373-385.2 On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct of
Paper ID #19700A Consulting Engineering Model for the EE Capstone ExperienceProf. Arnold Stanley Berger PhD, University of Washington, Bothell Arnold S. Berger is an Associate Professor and former Chair of the Division of Engineering and Math- ematics in the School of STEM at the University of Washington Bothell where he teaches classes in embedded systems, computer system design, digital and analog circuitry. He is also the program admin- istrator for the UWB Capstone program. Dr. Berger is the author of two books on the subjects of computer architecture and embedded systems. Before coming to UWB he was an engineer and
. The Journal of Higher Education, 3(8):411, November 1932. [3] Lene Arnett Jensen, Jeffrey Jensen Arnett, S. Shirley Feldman, and Elizabeth Cauffman. It’s Wrong, But Everybody Does It: Academic Dishonesty among High School and College Students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2):209–228, April 2002. [4] Michael Kerwin. Cheating epidemic? Denver Post, June 2013. [5] Emily Hendricks, Adena Young-Jones, and James Foutch. To Cheat or Not to Cheat: Academic Dishonesty in the College Classroom. LOGOS: A Journal of Undergraduate Research, 4:68–75, 2011. [6] E. Mavis Hetherington and Solomon E. Feldman. College cheating as a function of subject and situational variables. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(4):212, 1964. [7
Telescope. Retrieved from Modeling Community Blog: https://blog.nomagic.com/thirty-meter-telescope-sysml-model/Pearce, P., & Friedenthal, S. (2013). A Practical Approach for Modelling Submarine Subsystem Architecture in SysML. Proceedings from the 2nd Submarine Institute of Australia (SIA) Submarine Science, Technology and Engineering Conference.Systems Architecture Guild. (n.d.). Retrieved from YouTube: http://tinyurl.com/showmethewowUniversity of Detroit Mercy. (2017, February 12). Master of Science in Product Development. Retrieved from Graduate Catalog: http://www.udmercy.edu/catalog/graduate2016- 2017/programs/eng-sci/product-development/index.htmUniversity of Detroit Mercy. (2017, February 12). MPD
. Garcia, M., Numers, Stephanie von, and Twamley, Erin (2014, May 8). Educated and Equipped: Energy & Manufacturing Training. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved January 23, 2015 5. Tseng, Tzu-Liang Bill, Chiou, Richard, Mandal, Paras, Smith, Eric.D, Belu, Radian G and Salcedo, Oscar H. "Fusing Green Energy into Manufacturing Engineering Education to Cultivate Technical Success." 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.6. Smith, R. T., and S. A. Melnyk. "Green Manufacturing: Integrating the Concerns of Environmental Responsibility with Manufacturing Design and Execution." Dearborn, MI: Society for Manufacturing Engineering (1996).7
-education-in-the-u-s-doesn-t-add- up/ 2. Booth, J.L. and Koedinger, K.R. (2008). “Key Misconceptions in Algebraic Problem Solving.” Proceedings of the 30th Annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Pp. (64-70). 3. Epp, S.S. (2003). “The Role of Logic in Teaching Proof.” The Mathematical Association of America. 4. Goetting, M.M. (1995). “The College Student’s Understanding of Mathematical Proof.” University of Maryland. 5. Green, E. (2014). “Why do Americans stink at Math?” The New York Times Magazine. 6. Harel, G. and Sowder, L. (1998). “Students’ Proof Schemes: Results from Exploratory Studies.” Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education III. American Mathematical Society. Pp
consumables? How did the program assess its success? Were some willing to share specifics about building their kits, including potential copyright issues?At North Dakota’s Grand Forks Public Library (GFPL), grant monies from IEEE and the NDState Library allowed for the purchase of materials for their STEM kits. Worth noting is thattheir STEM library activities are made possible through cooperation with the Dakota ScienceCenter (module developers) and the University of North Dakota College of Engineering and1 Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., Rogers, C.; Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms; Journal ofEngineering Education, 2008.2 Committee on Standards for K-12 Engineering Education; Standards for K-12 Engineering
example project portfolio that each judge could go through. Maybe once we submitour findings have some sort of way to compare with others. Feedback is priceless for judges too!”). Although the EDPPSR was new to the vast majority of KC judges, when asked how this most recentexperience using the EDPPSR compared to any earlier experience(s), one of the three experiencedusers of the rubric who responded to the survey simply said, Excellent.” The last survey questioninvited additional feedback and elicited a range of comments, including: • I generally like the approach and believe it offers an opportunity for fair evaluation for each participant. • Based on rubric criteria and examples I feel I harshly graded students/ I hope
Of Project BasedService Learning". 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas3. Engineers Without Borders (link). Last accessed 2/10/174. EPICS @ Purdue (link). Last accessed 2/10/175. John Duffy, Linda Barrington, and Manuel Heredia. "Recruitment, Retention, And ServiceLearning In Engineering". 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas, 20096. Malinda S. Zarske, Derek T Reamon, Angela R. Bielefeldt, and Daniel W. Knight. "Service-based First-year Engineering Projects: Do They Make a Difference? ". 2012 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, 20127. Jacqulyn Baughman, Gretchen A. Mosher, Ann M Gansemer
planning.” “I want to learn about current sustainable transportation systems, and what is being done in transportation that will help or is hurting our environment.” “[I want to learn about s]ustainable transportation and highway transportation.” “I want to learn about challenges in sustainable transportation projects.” “[I want to learn more about t]he current technologies and methods used to best deal with [t]he population and transportation needs of our society.”In the initial class meeting session, all group members appeared to have had a thoroughdiscussion of their interests, as is evident from the very detailed list of potential topics that theyhanded in to the instructor (as part of the GIA). They mentioned