their third year of undergraduatestudy. During these introductory courses, students report the study of fluid mechanics as abstract,relying on difficult mathematical concepts, and presenting only uninteresting problems that lackconnection to real-world engineering challenges and applications [1]. Notably, researchers havereported that students’ experiences in introductory fluid mechanics courses relate to a negativeperspective shift in their perceptions toward the field [2]. Taken together, these observationssuggest that there is a need to involve students in fluid mechanics activities earlier, and withauthentic and interesting curricula for the purpose of garnering interest and intuition in the topicof fluid mechanics. Flow
greatsource of information, a critical realization to support positive engineering design experiences inK-12 and higher education.1.0 IntroductionConceptual modeling has been described as the most important step in engineering design [1],[2]. Developing and using conceptual models involves creating representations of how a systemworks, which help people know, understand, or simulate a subject the model represents [3]–[6].These representations include underlying structures, relationships, and processes which aid inunderstanding underlying systems of the engineering design problem [3], [4], [7]. Research onprofessional engineering design practices indicates the importance of conceptual modeling as aninteroperable representation to generate and
deeply in graduate education,interdisciplinary learning has not been highly reflected or cultivated in engineering educationcurricula [1]. This lack of acknowledgment may be attributed to the historical exclusion ofinterdisciplinary ways of being and thinking across the disciplines, which also limits how studentssee themselves as engineers. Historical perspectives within engineering education include thosethat “institutionalize cultural and epistemic injustice” by excluding views that deviate from thedominant ways of thinking in engineering [2, p. 4]. Riley and Lambrinidou [2] expressed how thisapproach to educating engineers may result in engineers who do not feel they fit into the mold ofa stereotypical engineer, which emphasizes technical
by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET),which, in its most recent manifestation, cunningly integrates societal context and professionalskills throughout its technical objectives. The new ABET Student Outcomes 1-7 renderengineering programs unable to decouple technical skills from what are commonly (and oftendisdainfully) referred to as “soft skills.” Our program, and specifically the course discussed inthis study, embrace the integration of the liberal arts into engineering and purposefully frametechnical engineering content by its broader social context, as well as take a humanisticapproach to engineering by orienting the core of our program around social justice [1, 2].Much of the literature tying engineering
improve its sustainability as a lab course modality.Introduction and Purpose In many universities, graduate students have been recruited as economical and valuableadditions to the teaching staff. They serve as a cost-effective solution to increasing face-to-faceinteraction with students while reducing the teaching and/or grading burden on senior staff andinstructors through service as a graduate teaching assistant (GTAs). There are both benefits anddrawbacks to the graduate assistant position [1], but one prevalent theme in existing literature isthe murky and ill-defined nature of a GTA’s practical role in academia, as it sits firmly in thegrey area between teacher and student that often comes with unclear expectations [2], [3
doctoral programs, the numbers are staggering,especially for engineering disciplines. According to the Council of Graduate Schools, attritionfrom engineering doctoral programs ranges from 35% for men to 44% for women, with higherrates reported for students in minority groups [1], [2]. Despite such staggering statistics,researchers have just begun to focus on education at the graduate level in response to a call fromthe National Academies for educational change, particularly in science, technology, engineering,and mathematics [3]. Ameliorating attrition at the graduate level is vital because each Ph.D.student who leaves their program represents an investment of both time and money by thestudents themselves and universities, departments, and
ethics and ethical frameworks. With the knowledge gainedfrom this research, first-year engineering programs can better explore how incoming students viewdecision-making and design more effective instructional practices. BackgroundIntroductionEthics is the “standards of conduct that apply to everyone” [1]. It is the difference between rightand wrong. People use ethics to determine how to act when confronted with any situation; askingquestions such as “who will this benefit?”, “who will this harm?”, and “what are theconsequences?”. However, engineering ethics is different from everyday ethics. Engineeringethics are a set of professional ethics, or “those special morally permissible standards of conductthat
engineering education does not encourage or cultivate socially relevant thoughtsgiven the evidence of a lack of meaningful interpersonal relationships within the field (Seymourand Hewitt, 1977). Furthermore, the concerns of a culture of disengagement from social andpolitical issues is prevalent in engineering trajectories (Cech, 2014). Public-inspired science can include elements of 1) science as a “public good,” 2) citizenscience to empower people, 3) service learning, and 4) social justice and investigative science(Edwards, 2016). Allowing engineers to pursue public-inspired work can potentially be anopportunity for engineering to remain socially relevant. Public-inspired science has a premisethat scientists and engineers can enter into a
culture, equity in engineering education and increasing diversity in STEM through transformation of traditional teaching methods.Dr. Randy Yerrick, Fresno State University Randy Yerrick is Dean of the Kremen School for Education and Human Development at Fresno State University. He has also served as Professor of Science Education at SUNY Buffalo where he Associate Dean and Science Education Professor for the Graduate School of Education. Dr. Yerrick maintains an active research agenda focusing on two central questions: 1) How do scientific norms of discourse get enacted in classrooms and 2) To what extend can historical barriers to STEM learning be traversed for underrepresented students through expert teaching
with properly selected NGOs they might be ready todeliver. Moving beyond the dangers and perils of trips to "save the poor," the HumanitarianEngineering (HE) program at Colorado School of Mines (Mines) is developing newinteractions with socially responsible and accountable NGOs to ensure that communities areempowered through engineering projects for sustainable community development. To ensurethat these projects can better serve and empower communities, this paper shows 1) howengineers can map their partnerships with NGOs; 2) how to develop engineering designcourses where students learn human-centred problem definition and explore designchallenges with NGO partners; and 3) how to develop relationships with NGOs so studentscan have community
to obtain a job. Many faced personal/discriminatory interviewquestions, biases, and assumptions about what they could or could not do, in addition to beingsubjected to explicit discouragement and gender discrimination. The paper offersrecommendations for addressing these issues as well as further areas of research to pursue. Bybringing to light the issues surrounding females entering engineering professions in Qatar, thisstudy offers a contribution to women’s role and empowerment in the region.IntroductionWhile attracting women to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) fieldshas been a steady concern in Western countries, female students across the Arab world aredominating most STEM educational programs [1-2]. Engineering
identified collaboration and communication as core aspects ofengineering work. Discussions of other social aspects of engineering, such as engaging withstakeholders, collaborating with users, or considering the societal implications of engineeringwork, were relatively limited. Understanding engineering students’ beliefs about the socialaspects of engineering work based on their previous experiences can help us better alignengineering curricula to promote more holistic and inclusive views of engineering.1. IntroductionEngineering is an inherently social discipline. The social aspects of engineering work include thevarious ways that engineers, within the context of their professional roles, impact, interact with,and relate to both broader society and
Paper ID #32392#LaHoraSTEAM (The STEAM Hour) – An Initiative to Promote STEM-STEAMLearning in Quarantine Times (Work in Progress)Mr. Marcelo Caplan, Columbia College Marcelo Caplan - Associate Professor, Department of Science and Mathematics, Columbia College Chicago. In addition to my teaching responsibilities, I am involved in the outreach programs and activities of the department. I am the coordinator of three outreach programs 1) the NSF-ISE project ”Scientists for To- morrow” which goal is to promote Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) learning in community centers in the Chicago area, 2) the Junior
-12 teachers. Teachers took pre-and post- concept inventories to assess their learning of content throughout the workshop and theresults indicated improvement of 58%. These assessments focused on vulnerabilities and specifictypes of attacks, system security, data transmission and encryption, permutations andcombinatorics, and binary numbers.1. IntroductionThere is an exponential growth in the number of cyber-attack incidents in the recent yearsresulting in significant financial loss and national security concerns. Secure cyberspace has beendesignated as one of the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) Grand Challenges inengineering. Broadly, the security threats are targeted on software programs, operating systemand network with the intention
persistence in the discipline [1], increasingstudent interest in graduate school [2], and developing a student’s identity as a researcher [1].The U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) is a large supporter of such experiences through itsResearch Experience for Undergraduates (REU) Site and Supplements Program. Almost 150REU Site Programs are currently funded in Engineering.Most REU Sites are based at a single institution. This traditional model for REU Sites typicallyinvolves 8-12 participants per summer, housed in close proximity on campus, engaged inresearch projects united by a common theme. Having a unifying theme and developing strongcamaraderie are two aspects deemed critical to a successful REU program [3].A small but growing number of summer
provision of choice and control has a more prominentimpact on female students’ motivation than on male students. The perceived need satisfaction ofcompetence may play a role in shaping students’ motivational responses.IntroductionHands-on team-based open-ended design projects in freshman engineering courses have beenshown to significantly improve student retention due to the benefits of active hands-on learning,self-directed acquisition of knowledge, development of skills and confidence necessary tosucceed in engineering and a growing sense of community [1, 2]. These open-ended designprojects range from highly structured [3] to theme-based [1, 2] to free choice [4, 5]. Combiningentrepreneurial thinking and maker technology, student-driven free
the degree program, and ifthe relevance of the intervention was clear to students’ personal and academic interests. Thisresearch provides suggestions for educators designing ESI instruction and considerations of thecontext in which the instruction is embedded.IntroductionCalls to improve engineering ethics education have reverberated through industry andgovernment with increasing intensity over the past few decades (e.g., [1], [2]). Engineeringprograms have responded to the growing recognition of the need to foster students’ ethicaldevelopment and awareness of societal impacts in a variety of ways [3]-[5]. Without consensuson how engineering ethics should be taught or which outcomes the instruction should aim toachieve, different approaches
change. “We are currently preparing students for jobs that don't yet exist,using technologies that haven't been invented, in order to solve problems, we don't even know areproblems yet.” Most of us have come across this famous insight from former Secretary ofEducation, Richard Riley. Here are some key pointers from a recent publication (Walsh). - 65% of children entering elementary school this year will work in a job that hasn’t been invented yet - 49% of current jobs have the potential for machine replacement, with 60% having at least 1/3 of their activities automated - 80% of the skills trained for in the last 50 years can now be outperformed by machines - At a global level, technically automatable activities touch the equivalent of 1.1
—somethingunexpected—thus showing the potential allure of an Engineers’ Conductorless Orchestra toexternal audiences. Specifically, this student conductorless orchestra brought a New Yorkaudience to its feet. Though it was not OCO’s best 2017 concert, the performance connectedviscerally and crossed the footlights. As has repeatedly been observed, students talented in math, science, and engineering areoften talented in music, suggesting that a viable musical presence within an engineeringcurriculum makes sense. A first approach towards introducing the conductorless orchestramodel to other schools will occur at the 2019 ASEE Zone 1 International Conference in Niagara 3Falls, New York. The photo below captures
c Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Multi-Instructor Study of Assessment Techniques in Engineering Mechanics Courses1. IntroductionThe authors have conducted a three-year study to explore the effects of a new assessment modelon student outcomes in a sophomore level Mechanics of Materials course. Preliminary resultsfrom the first two years were discussed previously [1]. The most recent set of results andconclusions are presented here, along with further discussion and lessons learned regarding itsimplementation. A key component of the latest phase of the study is the transition of the controlinstructor to the new method. For this instructor this paper includes a control
2018, UTA added Supplemental Instruction (SI) tothe class, giving the students more academic assistance outside the classroom.Underprepared students and underrepresented minoritiesThe educational gap between the expectations placed on college students and the knowledgelevels of underprepared students are not at all encouraging. These students are more likely to domore poorly in their courses and have lower graduation rates than other students. In looking forways to meet the needs of these underprepared college students, one-to-one tutoring has becomea service that is most often provided to them. Tutoring has sometimes been called the goldstandard to supplement effective instruction [1]. Many universities have also adoptedSupplemental
critical formational period and yet often neglected in student successinitiatives [1-3]. The sophomore year is a defining moment in the college career, and also a timethat is filled with uncertainty and a sense of losing support students had in their freshmen year [2,4-6]. We recognized the need for students to strengthen their motivation, resolve, and capabilityto persevere through the challenges that tend to hit them particularly hard when they reach theirfirst engineering courses, typically in their sophomore year. We hypothesized that servicelearning projects during the students’ freshman-to-sophomore transition would address theseneeds and thus build engineering identity and improve their academic performance in theirsophomore year
support cross-cutting technologies across three coredisciplines: 1) computer and engineering science research specifically in a form of machinelearning and high performance computing (HPC), 2) advanced manufacturing, and 3) nucleardetection technologies. For outreach and development, ETI hosted the first of three summerschools from August 24-28, 2020 with the theme of “Data Science and Engineering”. Theschool was hosted in an on-line format and had over 200 participants. The recorded content isavailable on-line as a resource for students. This describes the hurtles and methods utilized toovercome obstacles limiting in-person workshops in 2020.The summer school had four modules: 1) Fundamentals of data Applications, 2) ComputationalMachine
popular textbooks, these concepts are oftendisconnected from the study of statics proper, and instead students are told, "you'll need this nextsemester, too," as the instructor launches into math-intensive theoretical lectures. Though allstatics textbooks draw connections between center of gravity and area centroids, they rarely doso using the previously-established language of equivalent load systems [1], [2]. These divisionsin the textbooks and lectures can cause the effort of calculating an area centroid to becomedivorced from the source concepts of center of gravity and equivalent systems resulting in weakmental models and underdeveloped understanding of the connections between these importantconcepts. However, centroids should be related
dynamics), a required course for students majoring inbioengineering, civil engineering and environmental engineering at FGCU. Success in this courseis critical to success in follow-up mechanics courses and upper-level engineering courses. Datahas been collected on students’ performance on homework, quizzes and exams, and on thestudents’ thoughts on learning and course delivery. Thus far, it has been concluded that the use oftraditional hand-written homework, frequent assessment via quizzes [1], or the Pearson MasteringEngineering [2] software for formative assessment did not have a significant impact on students’performance on exams. It was also observed that neither traditional nor online homework scorescorrelated well with exam scores; however
biomicrofluidics. More recently, her interests have emphasized mentorship of women and underrepresented students in order to promote persistence and success in engineering. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Book Club Model to Promote Personal and Professional Development Activities for Female Engineering and Computer Science StudentsIntroduction and MotivationProfessional and leadership development is one recommended strategy to support and retainfemale engineers and computer scientists in their professional careers in industry or academia[1], [2], [3], [4]. For women in engineering and computer science, personal
limited IT support/or lack of support. Instructors having to createlabs is a problematic option since it is a very time-consuming overhead added to the regularactivities involved in teaching a curriculum. COVID-19 has recently compounded this problemdue to universities having to restrict access to labs.Creating virtual labs for cybersecurity classes has been given attention in the last few years, andASEE has published papers on the topic [1- 4]. Some universities are creating labs, while othersare using the NSF-funded SEED Labs Project. [5-7]. The authors are proposing an opensourceproject initiative that allows universities, students, and others to contribute their lab work to apublic repository hosted by an entity like GitHub. The work can be
facultyadvisors. This team started their capstone as usual. However, in the middle of the first semesterof the capstone (Spring 2020), the team has experienced imposed restrictions due to COVID-19.Restrictions due to COVID-19 were still active in the second semester (Fall 2020). The teamcould complete the capstone project in Fall 2020 during COVID-19 pandemic. In this paper, thepowder compaction system is introduced. The details of the block diagrams and fabricatedprototype device are presented. Testing and verifications are shown, and the capstone evaluationis presented.I. Introduction A powder compaction system can be useful to various manufacturing technologies, such aspowder metallurgy [1] and additive manufacturing [2-5]. In powder metallurgy, a
competitors from the global market catching up withits standing as the international leader in science and technology [1]. This challenge from the globalcommunity has led to the United States government issuing a call for reform-based science teachingwith an aim of strengthening the science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) workforce[2]. With this call comes the associated need to train competent teachers prepared to handle thechallenges accompanying the demand to increase the STEM workforce. To help provide a capableSTEM workforce, many institutions, groups, and committees have created and promoted STEMeducational interventions aimed at i) increasing the number of students pursuing STEM majors and ii) improving student
Associate Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021A Characterization of Engineering and Computer Science Undergraduate Participation in High Impact Educational Practices at Two Western Land Grant Institutions IntroductionTo maintain its technological competitiveness and innovation leadership into the 21st century,the United States requires a robust engineering and computer science (E/CS) workforce withsubstantial diversity across gender and underrepresented racial and ethnic minority groups [1][2]. However, there are growing concerns about the ability of U.S. educational