Committee for International Conference on ReConFigurable Computing and FPGAs in 2013 and IEEE Journal of Transactions on VLSI Systems in 2016.Ana Cristina Cadavid,Dr. Vicki A. Pedone, California State University Northridge c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 AnInterdisciplinaryTeamBasedResearchInitiativeThroughActiveLearningtoIncreaseUndergraduateStudents’Motivation,Engagement, andRetention Shahnam Mirzaei1, Ph.D., Ana C. Cadavid2, Ph.D., Vicki A. Pedone3, Ph.D. California State University, Northridge CA 91330, USA 1 smirzaei@csun.edu, 2ana.cadavid@csun.edu, 3vicki.pedone@csun.edu
problem, a relatively small set of designrequirements and constraints, and a budget of $100 per team. An exhibition was hosted at the endof the semester at which the students' projects were presented to the public. This work describesthe logistical, pedagogical, and social challenges encountered by the instructors and facilitatorsin creating and implementing this interdisciplinary and multi-institutional design assignment.IntroductionSuccessful engineers must be able to work effectively on interdisciplinary projects and asmembers of multidisciplinary teams [1]-[3]. This is also true for many creative arts professionals,especially those who work in fields driven by technological innovation [4]. Several collaborativeprojects involving both
utilizing SDR at the undergraduate level are now available [1]-[3].A survey of recent publications in the engineering education literature shows many instances inwhich SDR is leveraged in electrical and computer engineering curricula. Common uses of SDRin the classroom include advanced elective-level coursework [4]-[6], courses focusing onteaching SDR technology itself [7][8], senior capstone [9] or other research projects, and SDR-based demonstrations used within existing courses [10] [11].This paper presents an introductory communications systems course with an integratedMATLAB/Simulink-based SDR laboratory. The course covers introductory physical-layeranalog and digital communication systems. The laboratory modules were designed to
https://solarnexus.epscorspo.nevada.edu/kits Contact information: Dr. Erica Marti (erica.marti@unlv.edu) and Jenny Valdez (valdejm@nv.ccsd.net) Materials Example Criteria Matrix List Evaluation or Decision Matrix Analysis Questions 1. Describe how the solar thermal water heater works. 2. Distinguish between the role of the
mentality that is no longer met by traditional passive teaching approaches. Thestudents crave new strategies which encompass authentic exploration and learning, visualstimulation and community-based practices [1].Several pedagogical paradigms have been proposed to help better engineering education;Constructivist, constructionist, and action-based learning theories help lay the pedagogicalfoundation needed to adapt instruction in higher education to meet this need [2]. The foundationfrom these theories provides instructional methods that help promote critical-thinking,experimental inquiry and collaboration while the use of technology plays a vital role incontributing to access and manipulation of information along with knowledge retention [3]–[5
IntroductionThis paper presents design, development, and implementation of a new online Engineering Dynam-ics class for post-secondary sophomores. This online class was offered for the first time at StonyBrook University (SBU) in the summer of 2016 to 70 students who came from 11 different uni-versities. For its development, the OSCQR (Open SUNY Course Quality Review) Rubric [1] wasfollowed, which was created by the Open SUNY Center for Online Teaching Excellence (COTE).The OSCQR is an openly licensed rubric that addresses both the instructional design and accessi-bility of an online course. Engineering Dynamics, which deals with the science of motion is generally a core, requiredclass in Mechanical Engineering major at undergraduate level. The
focuson deeper investigation of core concepts. While PYroMat has previously been reported as aclassroom tool, the present study reports on development of a set of online calculators based onthe PYroMat package to eliminate the need for students to learn programming skills alongsidethe thermodynamics content. Results from a survey indicate potential for the tool, butinterpretations are somewhat limited by a small sample size. We believe that dissemination ofthese tools have the potential to facilitate student learning and encourage exploration ofthermodynamics concepts.1. IntroductionThermodynamics is a core topic in a number of traditional undergraduate engineeringdisciplines, so in the transition to Open Educational Resources (OER), it is
job placement rates through mandatory paid co-op experiences, and (iv)to serve as a model for other universities to provide vertical transfer students access to thebaccalaureate degree.VTAB project is funded by a five-year grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF) thatbegan in September 2017. In its program solicitation [1], NSF stated its goals to be: (i) toincrease the number of low-income academically talented students in STEM, (ii) to improve theeducation of these STEM students, and (iii) to generate knowledge to advance understanding offactors that lead to the success of these students. VTAB is leveraging the lessons learned from anearlier TiPi (Transfer Pipeline) project to achieve the first two goals [2]. The third goal
, after seeingan article in The New York Times on 3D printed hands [1], reached out to our department in late2017 seeking assistance in building a prosthetic for her 5th grade student, who was a congenitalamputee, missing an arm just below the elbow. A 3D arm was printed from a model on the e-Nable website [2] and fitted to the student, who was more than thrilled. The new hand providedthe ability to grasp with fingers by flexing the elbow joint. This allowed the child to hold smallobjects, such as a water bottle, fruit, a book, and even a basketball. With this success, andlearning of this need in the community, the project was expanded with funds from a small grantto build ten more limbs for children in the area. This paper is a presentation of
results also exhibit a high degree of variability between types offeedback provided on student work. The findings of this study are useful in informinginstructional design and changes to assessment practices.IntroductionIt has been established that not all forms of feedback are equally effective in promoting learning[1]–[6]. Using only grades to improve learning, for example, is not an effective approach [7],[8]. Black and Wiliam’s review of 250 studies pertaining to formative assessment found thatdescriptive feedback targeted to specific solution errors can improve student learning andretention, particularly for underperforming students, as compared to grades alone [9].There is growing interest in assessment for learning as a conceptual
Engagement Data from U.S. World News Report Regarding Online Graduate Engineering Programs Over the past decade, online education has become much more prevalent, enabling workingprofessionals to earn advanced degrees without ever stepping foot on a traditional brick-and-mortar campus. Although convenient for employers and employees, there remain a number ofquestions regarding effectiveness and quality of distance instruction as compared to that offeredin traditional classrooms. As indicated by many studies exploring student and educatorperceptions regarding distance education [1] [2] [3] [4], the potential for greater convenience,autonomy, and affordability render it ideal for many students. However, a persistent
individual students to complete the task were also revealed. The study showsthat a custom user-tracking system, like the one developed in this study has the potentialto overcome several limitations of the google-analytics based user-tracking system byproviding fine-grained individualized student data that can help in understandingstudents’ engagement behaviors within a cyberlearning system. Finally, the study hasimplications of how a cyberlearning tool, like the OWLS, can be utilized in a hybridclassroom setting for helping students gain environmental monitoring knowledge, andskills in real-time data analysis, leveraging the idea of technology-enhanced laboratoryinstructions within a classroom environment. 1. IntroductionAdvancements in computing
many ofthe EML objectives that are in the EML curriculum framework. Details about the analysisprocess are included so other educators can follow a similar process to analyze their own existingcourses and key lessons learned through the process.IntroductionIn response to declining retention in engineering programs, a number of large engineeringschools began incorporating first-year engineering laboratory and project-based coursework toincrease student retention and expose students to engineering disciplines outside their major [1-2]. Since then, Entrepreneurial Minded Learning (EML) has gained prominence and has beenhypothesized to allow students to be more versatile and solve more modern, open endedproblems. Indeed, Duval-Couetil [3] found
existing studies andwill inform the development of a study on the experiences of female faculty of color incomputer science and engineering related to workplace climate.1. IntroductionIn recent years, the focus on Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)education has resulted in an increase in the number of studies about underrepresented faculty inSTEM fields. These studies have focused on several areas including recruitment, retention andworkplace climate. Women, one of the underrepresented groups, are even less represented inEngineering and Computing fields compared to other STEM fields. Far less research hasfocused on female faculty of color in engineering and computer science. In addition to thebarriers related to gender, this
multiple factors [1]. A key assumption of factor analysis is that factors areunique and uncorrelated with another. This assumption naturally leads to the idea that variablesare only correlated because of their common factor [2]. Detailed explanations of the CATME dimensions and the factor analysis method used canbe found in the paper by Loughry, Ohland, and Moore (2007) [3]. Analyzing individualdimensions of teamwork is not unique to the CATME system. Solansky (2010) developed a setof factors to describe teamwork, identifying the five factors of agreeableness, team meanconscientiousness, openness to experience, collectivism, and preference for teamwork [4].Greguras, Robie, and Born (2001) also developed a five factor system of cooperation
recipient of 2014-2015 University Distinguished Teaching Award at NYU. His scholarly activities have included 3 edited books, 9 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 62 journal articles, and 154 conference pa- pers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 35 M.S., and 5 Ph.D. thesis students; 58 undergraduate research students and 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 500 K-12 teachers and 118 high school student researchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 59 graduate GK-12 Fellows. Moreover, he di- rects K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach programs that enrich the STEM education of over 1,000 students annually. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
homogeneous groups [1, 2]. Yet, little empirical research has been devoted tointernational heterogeneous groups composed of different ethnicities and races, namely to howthese differences effect group effectiveness. Therefore, this research tries to narrow this gap andshed light on an exploration of international group analysis. At best, this research may serve asan engine to initiate more research with non-European American groups and understand theexpansive nature of human relations and interaction within international heterogeneous groups’domains. The aim of this paper is to examine the group dynamics of an international research groupcomposed of heterogeneous members. In this study, group dynamics refer to group effectivenesswhich is defined
development, and performancemanagement [1]. Competency models’ content is widely used in business for defining andassessing hard and soft competencies within organizations. Some competency model creatorschoose to build visual depictions of competencies; however, competency model creators rarelyexplain how these illustrations are to be interpreted or comparative advantage their visual modelprovides readers. Likewise, researchers have not explored how or whether these illustrationseffectively transmit their intended messages.Among the industries that have embraced competency models is advanced manufacturing (AM).AM covers new industrial processes that improve upon traditional methods in quality, speed, andcost. High-performance computing harnesses
integrated into web-based interactive textbooks and been viewed 30 million timesby over 500,000 students across 600 universities. The philosophy includes two general actions:Unveiling a complex concept, and visualizing a dynamic process. This paper describes thatanimation format philosophy, including pedagogical considerations made in designinganimations, multiple examples, and reasons for implementing an animation.1. IntroductionAnimations have increasingly been incorporated into learning materials to help explain difficultor hard-to-visualize concepts. Video-based animations have long been used to teach science andliberal arts topics [1][2][3], but as computer use has increased in classrooms, computer-basedanimations have been introduced to
focus primarily on mobile applicationdevelopment itself. These students, the makers of the future mobile technology, who areinvolved in app creation – from defining the concept to requirements gathering, to finalimplementation – takes into consideration how the app will work successfully and effectively.However, their design decisions are not always made thinking about how the application willinfluence the user, the community, and the society at large. To address this critical issue, in thispaper, we report our experience with weaving the notion of social and ethical computing whiledesigning and developing an upper-level computer science course on mobile questionnairedevelopment. Our primary course goals were twofold: 1) Teach students the
(TUEE) effort, representatives from industry rated systems thinking as ahigh priority for engineering education [1]. Even more noteworthy, this industry survey ratedsystems knowledge as more critical than “understanding of design.” According to these industryrespondents, “problems and challenges are generally system problems.” Industry representativesalso advocated for introducing students to systems concepts early in undergraduate engineeringprograms [1].Systems thinking also provides a means to develop the technological and engineering literacy ofnon-engineers. In Technically Speaking: Why all Americans need to know more abouttechnology [2], the NAE advocated a wider understanding of technology broadly defined as theproducts of all the
KSU in August 1999, Dr. Warren was a Principal Member of the Tech- nical Staff at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, NM. He directs the KSU Medical Component Design Laboratory, a facility partially funded by the National Science Foundation that provides resources for the research and development of distributed medical monitoring technologies and learning tools that support biomedical contexts. His research focuses on (1) plug-and-play, point-of-care medical monitoring systems that utilize interoperability standards, (2) wearable sensors and signal processing techniques for the determination of human and animal physiological status, and (3) educational tools and techniques that maximize learning and
are compiled and presented in this paper, and show broadimprovement across a variety of subjects. The introduction of project-based learning with anemphasis on engineering communication skills in AE 100 has improved the experience of thestudents in the Aerospace Engineering Department at the University of Illinois.1. IntroductionFirst-year students in the aerospace engineering program at the University of Illinois are stronglyencouraged to take Aerospace Engineering 100, a two-hour introductory course during their firstsemester. This class introduces students to aspects of aeronautical and astronautical engineeringthrough team-based competitive projects. Prior to this effort these projects had majordeficiencies, and the researchers used the
paper presents the results of converting several modules in an undergraduate engineeringcourse in a “flipped classroom”. The target course is EET 316 - Digital Design. This course is afour credit junior level course (theory-3 credits, lab-1 credit) for electrical and computerengineering technology majors at Farmingdale State College-State University of New York. Thecourse introduces students to VHDL Hardware Description Language as the design entry methodfor digital circuits and to Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA) platforms for theimplementation of the circuits, using Xilinx design tools.The students enrolled in this course have a large range of skills in term of experience withlaboratory equipment, computer-based-tools, programming
: persistence, peer interaction, belonging, international studentsIntroductionThe United States (U.S.) faces an urgent national need to increase both the diversity and numberof graduates to meet science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) workforcedemands and address societal problems [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. The need for more constructorsis timely due to the role of these professionals in repairing and rebuilding nationalinfrastructure—an enormous U.S. challenge given the number of infrastructure systems ratedbelow a C grade on the ASCE Infrastructure Report Card [7]. One way to increase the numbersof constructors is by improving the quality of their educational experiences.While there are a multitude of ways to frame quality of
changed how products are built. Products can now becustomized to meet the unique demands of the consumer. Automobiles, for example, were onceassembled to be identical, whereas now customers are able to purchase cars online, select from apallet of colors, and install unique features and equipment, whereby no two of the same product,make, or model are identical [1].While both types of manufacturing remain essential to the industry, advanced manufacturing hascreated a need for technicians with new skillsets. Technologies such as 3D printing, the Internetof Things (IoT), nanotechnology, cloud computing, augmented reality, and next-level robotics,have made a home in advanced manufacturing, resulting in increased speed, customization,precision, and
in order to equip students to create various practical applicationsusing ARM Cortex M4F processors as well.The microcontroller architecture course (ESET 349) covers Verilog Hardware DescriptionLanguage (HDL), MIPS (Microprocessor without Interlocked Pipelined Stages), and ARMarchitectures. Students learn about these Instruction set architectures (ISAs) through assemblylanguages [1-3]. This course is a prerequisite for the next microcontroller application course,Embedded System Software (ESET 369). In this course, a TI MSP430 architecture is coveredfirst, and students learn the ISA through a low-level assembly language. Next, the ARM Cortex © American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
recommendations observed appeared to be better applied to a typical business administration orconstruction management course of study. The amounts and types of credit recommended by ACEreviewers is also discussed, and recommendations are made to help direct warrant officers exiting theservice towards the shortest path to a four-year degree.IntroductionWarrant officers in the United States Army are a special type of soldier. The job specialties filled bywarrant officers are technical, the Army’s mechanics [1]. These specialties do not require a four-yeardegree prior to entering the service as is typical for commissioned officers. Many warrant officers do nothave four-year degrees. They work in technical job fields and receive military training in their
demands for qualified science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)workers continue to increase, supporting diverse groups of students towards success in STEMmay help mitigate future shortfalls in the STEM workforce. Education benefits like the post 9/11GI Bill may provide a viable pathway for increasing the STEM-qualified, engineering technician,engineering technologist, and engineer (ETETE) workforce through the nation’s veteranpopulation. Supporting student veterans along ETETE pathways may involve three key tasks: 1)building early awareness of ETETE pathways; 2) ensuring academic recognition for priormilitary work experience; and 3) providing seamless support from government agencies,academic institutions, and industry. Student
Cooperation Committee. Recently, he has been appointed as a member of the Science, Technology and Innovative Technology Policies Committee of the Presidency. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019ASELSAN ACADEMY: A NEW MODEL IN INDUSTRY-ACADEMIA PARTNERSHIPIntroductionFrom the past to the present, technological and economic development has been stronglylinked with productive industry-academia partnership (IAP) [1]. Countries have tried todevelop methods that suits well to their own resources, geography, culture and principles andthen improve them in time.In this paper, Aselsan Academy, formed by Aselsan Inc. and four major Turkish researchuniversities is introduced. Firstly, employed