andOperate (CDIO) teaching framework which stresses the importance of training engineers fundamentalprinciples in the context of real-world systems and products. In some of the modules the CDIOteaching framework becomes a lens through which to facilitate problem/project based learning (PBL)activities to achieve specific outcomes. Teaching large student cohorts based on a PBL framework caneasily become ineffective if there is a lack of curriculum overview and insufficient scaffolding of PBLskills for students [1]. Kamp [2] also stresses the urgency of developing curricula that emphasises1 AREND - Aircraft for Environmental and Rhino Defencetraining communicative and innovative engineers for diverse workspaces as we move intotransformation and
in engineering education and its adverse realizations. Engineering issocio-technical in nature i.e. there is no engineering that is solely technical, and bydichotomizing or picking a side we break up a complex conceptualization into one that is neitherauthentic nor realistic. By sitting with tension as a guiding metaphorical framework for thisstudy, we attempt to break up the dualism that exposes itself in engineering education.Our discussions in this paper are informed by our ontology or sense of being. Such explorationsin ontology are not traditional to engineering. We bring in this construct from the liberal artsbecause of the lack of such a device in engineering scholarship. We discuss: 1) our conception ofthe soul of engineering
consumer products (International American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #33434Flavors and Fragrances) prior to his current role. He served on the executive committee of the ASEEWomen in Engineering division from 2010 to present. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Collegiate External Women’s Advisory Committee: Origins and the Development of a Strategic PlanAbstractGender diversity increases collaboration [1] enables better and more creative problem solvingleading to greater
portfolio as “a purposeful collection of student work that exhibits thestudent’s efforts, progress, and achievements in one or more areas”, and the authors also add that“the collection must include…evidence of student self-reflection” [1]. Knott et al. describes apilot e-portfolio (electronic portfolio) project developed at Virginia Tech. The authors note that88 percent of students wanted to continue using the e-portfolio as way of keeping samples oftheir work, recording their progress, and reflecting on their work [2]. Similar student appeal toe-portfolios is seen in [3]. Heinricher et al. also conduct a pilot project of three different portfoliomodels at Worcester Polytechnic Institute and found “portfolios increased students’goal-directedness
most in achieving 3 out of 5 student outcomes.1. IntroductionEngineering design is an important component of higher education in engineering. In mostinstances, these experiences in engineering design become incorporated into standards-baseddesign courses. In this case, the courses are designated as engineering/engineering technologycourses and the engineering design component is emphasized. Engineering design projects areproblems that may be approached and resolved using strategies and approaches commonlyconsidered to be engineering practices. The term “engineering” is used because developingsolutions to the problems involves processes similar to those used in the professional practice ofengineering, in addition to the integration of knowledge
their mode of instruction in Fall 2019, Spring 2020 and Fall 2020.Engineering 101 (ENGR101) is an introductory engineering mathematics course loosely based onthe Wright State University (WSU) engineering mathematics education model [1-3]. The courseis a 4-credit course meeting for 90 minutes of lecture (common for multiple sections of the course)two times a week, and 90 minutes of recitation and 90 minutes of lab meetings once a week. It isa required course for all engineering students who are taking pre-calculus and are one term behindthe expected starting point in mathematics. The lecture component provides an overview ofrelevant topics in engineering analytical methods that are most heavily used in core engineeringcourses [4]. These topics
, two are administered in the first year for a cohort: (1) an introductionto computer science course where teachers learn fundamental CS topics and programming in ahigh-level programming language (e.g., Python), and engage in problem solving and practicecomputational thinking, and (2) a course in pedagogy for teachers to learn how to teach K-8 CS,including lesson designs, use of instructional resources such as dot-and-dash robots, andassessments. Then, the following academic year after the summer, the PD program holds a seriesof workshops on five separate Saturdays to support teacher implementation of their lessonmodules during the academic year, reflect and improve on their lessons, reinforce on CSconcepts and pedagogy techniques, review and
Scale Integration Int Integrated1.0 IntroductionFuture aerospace advancement in the United States depends on the education of the nextgeneration. But there are warning signs that this foundation is diminishing. In the Final Report ofthe Commission on the Future of the United States Aerospace Industry (2002) [1], urgent attentionwas given to a decline in the number of new engineers and scientists entering the aerospaceworkforce. The commission described how the quality of life has been improved through the priorinnovations in aerospace engineering, giving examples such as aerial application of chemicals foragriculture, remote sensing systems, weather and climate investigations, and air vehicle design. In2011, Crawley et al. [2
students and, thereby, helps design inclusive learning conceptsthat will contribute to the emergence of a more diverse skilled engineering workforce.Keywords: Engineering Education, Human-centered design, conceptual framework, context-centered design, visual design tool, inclusion.IntroductionCreating value for people is crucial in major fields of human endeavor. Indeed, innovative solutionsare designed to meet the specific needs of people in a particular context [1]. In engineering, forinstance, scientific knowledge is applied to develop products, services, and systems in order tosolve problems that affect the quality of human life. Along with addressing this core value,solutions need to be technically feasible and economically viable [2
often lack a complete understanding of the contextwithin which they work and aims to improve both performance efficiency and outcomes byencouraging careful consideration of political, cultural, economic, and other non-technicalfactors that reside within the project population [1]. In this CIP case study, the authors willexamine Enactus-USA, whose clients populations are identified as the communities with whichproject teams seek to address material needs.Enactus-USA is a large entrepreneurial organization with the mission of “building a better worldwhile developing the next generation of entrepreneurial leaders” from among college studentsacross the United States. Founded in the U.S. in 1975, Enactus has since established similarnetworks in an
is perhaps the ability to solveproblems of technical, financial, interpersonal, and other types [1]. Many of these real-worldengineering problems are ill-structured and complex, containing multiple conflicting goals, andrestricted by both engineering and non-engineering constraints. That is why the first skill forengineering graduates that ABET lists in its Criterion 3. Student Outcomes [2] is “an ability toidentify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles ofengineering, science, and mathematics.”Reaching optimum solutions for practical engineering problems requires a systematic approachbased on evaluation, interpretation, and creative decision making. Mature level of criticalthinking (CT) skills are crucial
credits (6 courses), according to the formula described in Table 1.Required elements of a student’s plan of study include courses in naval hydrodynamics, controland autonomous systems, and an approved capstone project on a naval science & technologytopic, which can be either a full-year senior design elective (which also satisfies the ABETcapstone design experience requirement) or a single-semester independent investigation with afaculty advisor.Curriculum and facilitiesThe primary certificate courses are listed in Table 1, and are arranged into the categories of navalhydrodynamics courses, control & autonomous systems courses, and capstone courses. Courselearning objectives focus on technical knowledge associated with the subject as well
predictors in the first year, and race does not become asignificant predictor of dropout until the second year. The factors that influence dropout changeover time which emphasize the importance of dynamic dropout prediction models. The findingsfrom each phase of our analysis highlight the complexity of understanding the causes of dropoutand the importance of personalizing interventions for specific populations within a cohort.IntroductionNearly 20 million students attended American colleges and universities in Fall 2019, and roughly625,000 of these students were enrolled in an undergraduate engineering program[1], [2]. Thirtypercent of engineering students drop out before the second year[3], and more than 60 percent ofdropouts occur in the first two
by 19 students there were 28 cases in whichstudents were unable to correctly solve a problem using traditional methods, while in 17 of those28 cases the students were able to do so using the approach outlined in this paper. There were noinstances in which a student was successful using the traditional approach but unsuccessful usingthis new approach. All students received instruction in both methods.IntroductionThe transient (homogeneous) solution of any first-order system with constant parameters isdescribed by the following expression. Ke−t/τ (1)where τ is the time constant associated with the system and K is related to an initial condition. Inthe
all.However, faculty can and do influence the climate of the department and achievement ofstudents through choosing to implement evidence-based teaching practices like active learningand inclusive teaching [1], and having a growth mindset in relation to the abilities of students [2].It is also possible, for example, that the local climate in our department could cause students ofcolor to be driven from STEM [3], or that a chilly climate could have a disproportionate impacton female students [4].Over the course of the last several months, our department, college, and university have begun tocreate institutional structures to support these efforts. There is a new Associate Dean forDiversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) at the college level, and at the
moved to a blended format and students were coming in-person in theLAB from potential different locations and environmental settings, it could have been disastrousand may spread the virus. Several precautions and security measures were taken to mitigate thesechallenges. Face covering was mandated during LAB hours. Each LAB was equipped with a handsanitizer dispenser and sanitizing wipes stations. Instructors included few extra notices in thecourse syllabi as below, in addition to daily class briefing.1. Students will work in group of 12, rotating between weeks. You MUST show up on yourassigned day and may not join with other groups on alternate days due to social distancing.STRICTLY ENFORCED.2. MUST wear “MASKS” through the duration of LAB
librarians at Northeastern University partnered with the First Year Engineeringprogram to develop and refine an interactive in-person workshop series designed to introducenew engineering students to key research resources at the start of their degree programs. Theprogram has grown rapidly, serving more than 500 first year engineering students in fall 2019with positive outcomes including high perceived value by students, high participation rates, andfaculty noting improvement in the quality of students’ research. When the COVID-19 pandemicforced Northeastern University to adopt a hybrid learning model, the team redesigned theworkshop for remote delivery with the goal of maintaining high participation rates and positivestudent outcomes.This paper (1
originally constructed for in-person student groups to work on their projectseither in pairs or individually. Providing remote access was not originally planned but after themove to remote instruction the laboratory stations were modified to accommodate the newreality.The diagram below shows the layout of the laboratory station equipment required for the remotecourse. The following sections provide descriptions for each of the major components. Figure 1: Laboratory Station ArchitectureThe laboratory plays an important role in this course due to the technologies used in the projectassignments. The workstation computers provide the computation, memory, and storagerequirements needed to build a full, cross-compiled Linux
requiresthe material covered up to a point in the course. A project phase is assigned once a topic iscovered in the lecture and reinforced through homework and quizzes.IntroductionEngineering design, defined by ABET [1], “is a process of devising a system, component, orprocess to meet desired needs and specifications within constraints. It is an iterative, creativedecision-making process in which the basic sciences, mathematics, and engineering sciences areapplied to convert resources into solutions. Engineering design involves identifyingopportunities, developing requirements, performing analysis and synthesis, generating multiplesolutions, evaluating solutions against requirements, considering risks, and making trade-offs toobtain a high-quality
enhance the curriculum of a graduate-level engineering ethics course, Engineering Ethics and the Public, at Virginia Tech, a large land-grant, Research 1 university. The course is a three-credit elective course offered annually to engineering students. The overall course itself was originally co-conceived and co-developed by an engineer, one of the authors of this paper, and a medical ethnographer, with the support of the National Science Foundation (NSF) [1]. The learning objectives, topics, and assignments are presented in Table 1. The course aims to address relationships between engineering, science, and society by incorporating listening exercises, personal reflections, individual
continue to collect research data in subsequent cohorts in (cur-rently) Spring 2021 and (upcoming) Fall 2021 sections, our early studentresponses show that new design has improved overall course reviews, whileachieving curriculum guideline goals for common computer organization andarchitecture course design. In addition, course materials that include coreknowledge areas (KAs) have been kept intact, and student feedback showsthat they understand each KA at comparable levels to classical computerorganization and architecture course content.2 MethodIn typical computer organization and/or computer architecture courses,knowledge areas are composed of the following concepts [1]: • Digital logic • Digital systems • Machine level
education. Thisredesign demonstrates that a mastery-based course structure is consistent with our updated modeland TPS principles. In this redesign, a continuous and iterative process was employed to ensurecontinuous improvement, and it follows a closed loop pattern of diagnosis, analysis, design,implementation, and evaluation (diagnosis).I. IntroductionThe factory model for education is based on Taylorism and principles of ‘scientific management’[1]. This factory management system was developed in the late 19th century and emphasized ontop-down management and power, and standardization and simplification of tasks in order tomaximize efficiency [2], shown in Figure 1. Parts and materials enter an assembly line andundergo numerous processes applied
unrealistic. To address the problem, we developed a novel virtual lab environmentthat sheds light on computer networking by showing students components of typical computernetworks with both hosts and backbone infrastructure using Wireshark and Mininet. The tools weutilized are a packet sniffer and emulated networking testbed. Even though students do notphysically build a computer network as was done in the real lab, they still got insights into apacket’s journey from a source host through routers before getting to the destination host. Ourdata analyses provided the information about the perceptions of these tools for online computernetwork laboratory from students’ perspectives and its associated factors.1 IntroductionThe computer networking
, undergraduate and graduate. In 2002 he established Leaders of Tomorrow, a student leadership development program that led to the establishment of ILead in 2010. He is a Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineer- ing and Applied Chemistry and ILead. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Leadership-Development Ecosystem for Engineering Graduate StudentsAbstractThere is a rapidly growing body of literature on engineering leadership education forundergraduate students [1, 2, 3]. However, there is little published about leadership developmentfor graduate students. There have been calls from national bodies to create and expandprofessional development
graduates to fill these new jobs.There is currently a large gap in the number of K-12 level teachers available in the area of careerand technical education. One possible solution to this problem may come from a specificsegment of the workforce, veterans. This paper will provide an overview of different challengesthat many veterans are facing after joining career switcher programs for future teachers.IntroductionDigital transformation is leading to a shift in many current jobs. Cybersecurity has become partof any virtual job [1], which became quite clear during the Covid-19 pandemic. The pandemicalso led to more openings for cybersecurity professionals, as well as a huge growth of thatspecific industry sector since there was a large rise in the
for remote instruction that supports student agencyAbstractUnder the new ABET accreditation framework, students are expected to demonstrate “an abilityto develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and useengineering judgment to draw conclusions” [1]. Traditional, recipe-based labs provide fewopportunities for students to engage in realistic experimental design, and recent research has castdoubt on their pedagogical benefit [2]. At the same time, the COVID-19 pandemic has forcedinstitutions to move to remote learning.To address these challenges we developed a series of online labs for an upper-division mechanicsof materials course. The first three labs consist of video demonstrations of
solve the problems under a time constraint to provide them practice forexam conditions. With these ideas in mind, AMechanics Race was created.BackgroundTo make introductory engineering courses more engaging, the author has previously reported onthe success of using pop culture and themes in the classroom [1]. One way to make an associationis by including characters and scenarios from current television shows or popular movies intoengineering content. For instance, Selby published that she had more enthusiastic responses fromstudents when she related concepts in her Environmental Engineering class to the MarvelCinematic Universe [2].The Amazing Race is a multi-Emmy Award-winning reality series on the CBS network, havingcompleted 32 seasons as of
transition.And some were learned during the implementation of the hybrid model.PartnershipsThe value of campus-community partnerships has been well documented as an important supportin STEM outreach programs [1], [2], [3]. The partnerships formed among Angelo State University(ASU), Tom Green County Library (TGCL), and area community-based organizations provided awealth of resources which were essential to the program’s success. ASU and TGCL provided thecornerstone partnership needed to establish and build the program. While both institutions sharegoals of acquiring and disseminating knowledge, they have very different characters. Angelo Stateprovides technical expertise within STEM fields and extensive laboratories. However, many of itsresources are
energy technologies (especially focusing on solarenergy and wind energy), a student project assignment has been developed wherein studentsdesign, build, and test a model passive solar home. Following an in-class lesson on passive solardesign strategies, students choose a location on Earth where their model home will be “located.”Next, the students must design their passive solar home so that it incorporates good passive solardesign principles and includes, at minimum: 1) roof overhangs that are long enough to shademore than 2/3 of the home’s south-facing windows at solar noon on the summer solstice, butshort enough that they shade no more than 1/3 of the home’s south-facing windows at solar noonon the winter solstice, and 2) at least one other
change at the atomic and molecular level.It is a central process in materials science and engineering (MatSE) as well as in chemistry,chemical engineering, molecular biology, and any other science dealing with atomic scalephenomena. Therefore, all students of atomic-scale sciences ideally should acquire a deepunderstanding of diffusion, but such understanding has proven difficult to achieve across age-groups and subjects [1]–[5]. One core reason for the difficulty is that it is not obvious how themacro-scale behavior—net movement of particles from regions of high concentration to regionsof low concentration—emerges from random-walk behavior at the submicro-scale. This leads to“levels-slippage” [6] in which a person assumes the behavior at the