piece of the future initiative. The board Page 9.1215.2will work with the faculty and students in developing and guiding the entrepreneurial cluband will provide input and direction for the curriculum enhancement. In short, theadvisory board will ensure that the College of Technology and Aviation will become acenter of entrepreneurial education and innovation.Student Entrepreneurial ClubThe second component of our future plan of entrepreneurship is to develop the newlyformed entrepreneurial club into an active and dynamic unit.Proposed club activities include the following. • Utilize the network of support and resources possessed by the entrepreneurial
, Learning Outcomes, Project-based Learning (PBL).1. IntroductionThe role of introductory courses in engineering is commonly acknowledged to be extremelyimportant for student engagement as well as retention.4 The introductory courses in engineeringgenerally serve the purpose of raising student awareness about engineering careers and theengineering curriculum while trying to excite and motivate them by using hands-on activities,projects, etc. The core learning objectives of the introductory courses involve activities thatentail application and understanding rather than higher level cognitive outcomes involving Page 24.854.2design and analysis. An
; Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationBibliography1. Sharp, Julie E., Harb, John N., and Terry, Ronald E. Combining Kolb Learning Styles and Writing to Learn inEngineering Classes. Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 2, 1997, pp. 93-101.2. Wilczynski, V. and Douglas, S. M. Integrating Design Across the Engineering Curriculum: A Report from theTrenches. Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 84, no. 3, 1995, pp. 235-240.3. Cottrell, D. S. and Ressler, S. J. Integrating Design Projects into an Introductory Course in Mechanics of Materials.1997 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, ASEE, 1997, CD-ROM, Session 1268, Paper no. 2.4. Carroll, D. R. Integrating Design into the Sophomore and
working knowledge of each individual aspectof software engineering, and also have gained experience in how these aspects are related to, anddepend on, one another in order to successfully develop a software system. Through this process,we can help students make software testing an integral part of their coding practice with theunderstanding that testing cannot just be added on to the software at the last minute after it isproduced.Currently, we are working on a TUES (Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science,Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) Type II project funded by NSF to develop a set ofinstructional materials in the form of course modules, not confined to a particular technique ortool but generalized over different aspects of
the approach taken and experiences in teaching a junior level surfacemodeling course at ET-WWU designed to expose CAD/CAM technologists to this importantCAD domain. It will start by motivating the value of surface modeling in developing key skills Page 22.1403.2that have been identified as essential to the education of a CAD/CAM specialist. This will befollowed by an overview of the CAD/CAM curriculum taught highlighting the role that thesurface modeling class plays in supporting other junior and senior level core requirements.Details of the course will then be given. Here some attention will be given to techniques thatstudents are introduced
using ahydraulic servomechanism.Preliminary developmental efforts24, 25 in designing the carbon nanotube experiment emphasizedthe whole process including manufacturing and characterization. However, the time andequipment constraints were not adequately addressed. For example, an atomic force microscopein the Chemistry Department was used for material characterization. This created schedulingproblems and required additional time to learn how to use the instrument.Curriculum Context The Engineering of Manufacturing Processes is a required three-hour lecture two-hourlaboratory one-semester junior/senior course offered in the Industrial Engineering program at_______________. This course together with a computer-integrated manufacturing
relationship with Parametric Technology Corporation(PTC) for facilitating campus-wide use of their software. We would also like to thank CADTrainfor providing an educational license for their eLearning solution for ProEngineer. We furtheracknowledge the Curriculum Development Award from Proctor and Gamble for product andprocess design, as well as for computer-aided design integration within the curriculum. Finally,the contributions of various teaching assistants who have had significant prior CAD andindustrial experience are appreciated.References1. Herrera, R. “Problems Encountered When Substituting the Traditional Drawing Tools for CAD Systems in Engineering Graphics Courses,” IEEE, pp. 677, 1998.2. Patrick E. Connolly, Proceedings of the
Session 1463 Instruction of Manufacturing as an Honors College Seminar S. Kant Vajpayee The University of Southern MississippiAbstractAs elsewhere, our Honors College attracts in its programs some of our brightest students. Amajor component of its curriculum is HON 403: Honors Seminar. Most students in this courseare liberal arts major. Driven by my fascination of manufacturing’s impact on modern living, Isuggested manufacturing as a possible topic for the seminar. The College liked the idea, andsoon I found myself facing the question: How to teach manufacturing to a group of
frame problemsassociated with thermodynamics learning, and b) identify the root causes of these problems. Theliterature outlined above reveals that students have three main learning issues: 1) conceptualdifficulties; 2) struggle with integrating concepts and principles; and 3) not recognizing therelevance of thermodynamic principles in solving problems.8,13,24,35,39,51Thermodynamic principles are not impossible to understand. Shultz and Coddington52 haveshown that around the age of 15, children were able to understand conservation of energy and theidea of entropy. The results were obtained using psychological investigations and physicalsimple apparatus. Below is an attempt to establish the root causes of the learning problems. 9.1 Conceptual
format before the pivot to remote learning.Thus, the previous two exams provide a baseline to compare student performance. Studentscompleted pre and post surveys inquiring about student perceptions of both the appropriatenessof the exam and the value of the rubric and practice exam as preparation tools. Key outcomeswere the expression of student creativity, evidence to suggest an elevation of course equity andthe identification of gaps in student understanding that would not have been apparent using amore typical assessment method.The method was also explored in Fall 2020 in Heat Transfer, a junior level course in thechemical engineering curriculum. It was the follow-on course from Fluid Mechanics. Therefore,the cohort was similar. Because the
engineering problems. By integratingsimulations across several sequential required courses in the mechanical engineering curriculum,we plan to increase students’ ability to use FEA-based simulations effectively and improve theirunderstanding of the concepts developed in these courses. Cognitive research has shown that people’s understanding lies in a spectrum from“novice” to “expert” 3. Conventional learning materials tend to relegate beginners to “novicethinking” by presenting simulation exercises as recipes handed down by authorities. Wieman’sgroup has shown that interactive simulations, when designed using a rigorous scientificapproach, are much more effective in helping physics students develop an expert cognitivestructure than lectures
research focus is in student engagement and retention in engineering and engineering technology education. Contact: talley@txstate.eduDr. Shaunna Fultz Smith, Texas State University Dr. Shaunna Smith is an Assistant Professor of Educational Technology in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at Texas State University. She holds an Ed.D. in Curriculum & Instruction with an empha- sis on technology integration and art education. Her teaching and research explore how the hands-on use of design-based technologies (e.g. digital fabrication, 3D modeling and printing, computer programming, and DIY robotics) can impact multidisciplinary learning that transcends traditional content contexts (e.g. arts-based STEM
Paper ID #9903Engineering and Engineering Education as Spiritual VocationsMs. Julia D Thompson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Julia Thompson is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her current research is focused on service-learning partnerships in engineering education. She also does extensive research in global engineering education, and has an interest in how to integrate Quaker process in engineering design. Julia received her undergraduate BS in chemical engineering from UC Berkeley, and worked as a energy consultant for a few years before starting her doctoral studies.Mel Chua, Purdue
significantimprovement in students’ writing skills [21].The primary stage for the effort of improving engineering students’ writing skills can beincorporating writing instruction into laboratory courses which require lab reports. Requiringformal lab reports is an effective tool to integrate substantive learning into a written structure aswell as integrating communication skills into curriculum. It has been suggested that increasingthe number of collaborative writing assignments in the form of lab reports will result insignificant levels of improvement [18].This paper describes a series of teaching strategies to enhance students’ technical writing in thecontext of group-based lab assignments. A description of the methodologies employed, andoutcomes of assessment
Technology or aMasters of Business Administration (MBA) can select coursework with an emphasis inentrepreneurial business practices and concepts. Faculty members from both the technology andbusiness colleges form an interdisciplinary team to help coordinate offerings for students. Tohelp facilitate cross-pollination between diverse fields of study many of these courses are duallisted in both the MBA and Technology curriculums. In addition to the master degree programs,an Entrepreneurial Leadership Graduate Certificate Program has been implemented to providenon-traditional students an opportunity to learn entrepreneurial business concepts that can beapplied directly to their careers. Coursework offered at ETSU to facilitate innovativeentrepreneurship
and teacher self-efficacy. She received her B.A. from Pomona College and her M.A. and Ph.D. in Educational Studies from Emory University.Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Meltem Alemdar (PhD) is Associate Director and Senior Research Scientist at Georgia Institute of Tech- nology’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on improving K-12 STEM education through research on curriculum development, teacher pro- fessional development, and student learning in integrated STEM environments. Dr. Alemdar is currently co-PI for research on various NSF funded projects. In addition, she has been external evaluator for various NSF Projects over the
influence the downstream design and testing processes. Materials, methods,and tools are outlined, including the use of servomotors and microcontroller-basedcontrol systems. Students in the Engineering Technology program are required to workwith this robotic experiment as part of a laboratory session in the “MET 205 Roboticsand Mechatronics” class. The project provides students with such robot design experienceand enables them to improve their robotic skills by using wireless microcontrollers forperforming different robotic applications.Introduction This paper presents the design of a cell phone-controlled walking robot forteaching and research integrated with the emerging fields of bionics through an NSFproject involving undergraduate and
processes as they work through a project and thereby see ways to improve theircreativity8. However, the infusion of open-ended design activities in the engineering curriculumhas been limited to “synthesis” exercises using known methodologies or exercises9. In thissituation, students mostly follow well-proven design techniques that were covered in thetextbooks or lectures rather than being challenged to think through a new process or create aunique solution. To have more and better distributed opportunities to develop their creativeproblem-solving skills as an integral part of their four-year college education, various pilotstudies have been conducted to reform the learning environment within regular courses to affectthe students’ creative problem
current RED projects. Next it moved into two hypothetical cases, to allow for an in-depthdiscussion of revolutionary and not-so-revolutionary ideas. The session concluded with tips for arevolution.In this session, Villa began by explaining that a revolutionary curriculum is one that substantiallyshifts fundamental understandings of learning and the content, practices, and structures ofeducation. This includes a systems level approach that addresses social, contextual, andorganizational processes in addition to curriculum. The approach needs to address coreentrenched historical and cultural norms and core beliefs and values of faculty, students, andother stakeholders in the community.Next Koretsky and Salzman discussed traditional ways of thinking
College during the fall of 2014 in the Incubator experience. Although the pilot study did notfind an advantage of teaching integrated courses, it was an important step towards the re-envisioning of the existing curriculum. The Purdue Polytechnic Incubator operated as a facultynetwork that explored best practices on education by deconstructing the models of traditionaldisciplines. This allowed for re-visioning of the traditional educational model by including co-teaching and group reflections as a core component of the experience. The integration ofhumanities and technology provided with a rich ground for student development. Rather thanfocusing only in a mechanistic approach to technology, students were able to draw parallels withtheir cultural
the TTA Solution constructs and tools needed for the design, construction,start-up and pilot product production of TTA Knowledge Production Process. The first paper (A1)mainly focused on developing the needed core frameworks and models. The second and the fourthones (A2 and A4) presented the customized version of TTA solution by developing a genericthinking toolbox. The third and fifth articles focused on presenting numerous practical TTA pilotproducts. The sixth paper ended this long documentation of TTA by presenting an integratedframework to accommodate TTA constructs, concepts, processes, and tools. TTA is alreadyconceptualized (A1), customized (A2 and A4), operationalized (A3 and A5) and integrated (A6), asvisually illustrated in Figure
needs of thediversity of students and represent a more real-world view of science as opposed to traditionalcourses that emphasize each area of science standing alone. As integrated science unifiesconcepts and looks at the reality of the natural world, the science is more relevant and betterconnected to students’ lives, which can increase student interest and motivation to learn.5 Project2061 discussed the use of integration in the curriculum, highlighting three key reasons whyintegration is essential: integrated planning, interconnected knowledge, and coherence.6Integrated planning merges teachers of many disciplines including science, mathematics, andtechnology. This collaborative effort eliminates dividing subjects per person, and may
as a planning team member for an NSF sponsored grant on engineering education. Similar contacts led to Gordy’s participation in reviewing grants for NSF on two occasions. • Ezzell now participates in board meetings for the local NSPE chapter and was voted as 1999 Engineering of the Year. • Gordy was voted 2002 Professor of the Year at TCC.Integrating Team Projects into the Engineering CurriculumTCC’s involvement in competitions has been highly beneficial to the program, but not allstudents have been directly affected as participation has been primarily on a volunteer basis.Gordy and Ezzell feel that the next step is to provide similar opportunities to all TCCEngineering students by integrating design projects and competitions into
Paper ID #42361Unpacking Student Workload through Elicitation Techniques: Perspectivesfrom Engineering Faculty and StudentsDr. Isabel Hilliger, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile Isabel Hilliger is Assistant Professor of Practice and Associate Director for Assessment and Evaluation at the Engineering Education Unit in Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile (PUC-Chile). Isabel received a BEng and PhD in Engineering Sciences from PUC-Chile, and an MA in Policy Organizations and Leadership Studies from Stanford Graduate School of Education.Prof. Marietta Castro, Universidad San Sebasti´an Marietta holds a
this course on high school students14. Theirfinding indicate that life skills and consumer’s education courses ultimately increase the rate inwhich students save and accumulate wealth throughout their lives.As an extension of financial curriculum and Consumer’s Education provided in high school,courses in engineering colleges have been developed to teach students about life and careerskills15. In respect to the number of students who take high school courses for life skills andpreparation, few universities provide professional development through specific classes andsmall groups. Harvard University began offering these life courses before 2007; and providedclasses for soft and life skills such as “How does health insurance work?, When should I
challenge. Accordingly, there are numerous pedagogical approaches for teaching ethicsand/or contemporary issues with a wide range curriculum implementation strategies includingmodules, individual stand alone courses, integration throughout the curriculum, through extracurricular experiences, or as a component of the required capstone experience. The approachtaken by the author’s department was to utilize a stand alone senior level course to reinforceethical behavior and to discuss a wide range of contemporary issues associated with the aboveoutcomes. The key idea, of course, is to reinforce these topics immediately prior to graduation.The Civil Engineering Department at Lawrence Tech covers these outcomes in other coursesbeginning with an
approaches for dealing with them. The case studies in this course will helpstudents understand the needs of different stakeholders and create a list of priorities that willenable them to achieve project goals in practice. The course will also cover the integrated designprocess (IDP), which is a specific tool and approach for holistic and systemic design thinking.For the success of a complex, sustainable built environment project, which could involvehundreds or even thousands of actors, it is necessary to have a clear understanding of the marketin which the designer is operating. Therefore, the course will address questions such as "Whatare the goals and interests of different stakeholders?”, "What is the role of an IDP coordinator?","How do you
Paper ID #39876Enhancing Student Engagement and Skillsets towards TransportationCareers Using Digital Badge Program: A Case StudyDr. Venktesh Pandey, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Venktesh Pandey is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering at North Carolina A&T State University. His research integrates intelligent transportation systems and emerging mobility services in traffic operations, congestion pricing, and transportation plan- ning models with a focus on sustainability. Dr. Pandey has broad interests in improving Engineering
with other topics.Analysis of the data found that participants’ institutions offer an average of 6.29 courses inengineering and technical graphics in a regular academic year. The combined total of courseslisted by the 48 participants who responded to this part of the survey was 302.When asked if they taught GD&T in their program, 68 % (or 35 participants out of the 51respondents) stated they did. Of these 35, 32% offered a separate course in GD&T and 65%integrated it into other courses. Three percent both integrated it into other courses as well astaught it as a separate course. The data revealed that these respondents offered an average of1.96 courses that included GD&T, with a range from one to five. The survey in 1998 survey,by
a deeper understanding of topics like logic gates,components, computer architecture, and assembly language. It does this through the gamificationof standard digital logic and computer architecture curriculum elements via a skill tree that buildsup into a significant achievement, the development of an 8-bit turing complete processor. Each leafof the tree is a separate puzzle that falls within different requisite areas of knowledge necessaryto build the components used in a processor. These areas of knowledge are delegated to sectionsof the skill tree with easy-to-understand labels such as arithmetic, memory, or logic gates. Eachpuzzle directly relies on knowledge or components developed in previous areas of the tree. In this