academicresources and maximizing opportunities in their college environment have a relationship withstudents’ academic achievement and the progress they make with their learning [1]–[3].Satisfaction with college outcomes has also been found to have a relationship with studentengagement in academic activities [4]. Active classroom learning strategies have facilitatedstudents’ involvement in course learning. Such pedagogical strategies that have improvedstudents’ engagement with course learning and academic achievement in engineering classroomsinclude project-based learning, problem-based learning, flipped classroom, cooperative learning,questions, and discussions [5], [6].Furthermore, it has been found that motivation has the strongest relationship with
). Its purpose is to combine information literacy skills with thescientific method. It approaches the process of assessing sources by using the following steps: • Define context. • Find a source. • Use any Evaluative Framework (like CRAAP, RADAR, or CCOW). • Critique/Apply the Scientific Method.CEI can be used as an overall framework for finding and assessing literature intended to be usedin research projects [10]. In addition to the actual evaluation process, students are able todetermine the context of the information using their own knowledge of their profession. As theylearn more about their chosen discipline, they can use CEI to improve their information literacyskills [11]. CEI makes an effort to consider the needs of
was calculated on the 14-item scale, and the resultingAlpha value was .85. Furthermore, removing any of these items would not improvereliability of the scale. Preliminary data supports a four-factor solution.Phase II: VRI Item RevisionThe project is currently at this state. Additional items were written, as it was deemed thata 14-item scale would be too brief to adequately support reliability and validity of thisconstruct; bringing the total number of items to 39. These set of items, will beadministered to groups of undergraduate students from varying STEM majors. Followingthis, the KMO factor adequacy, MSA, Coefficient Alpha, and Factor Analysis will beconducted. Depending on these outcomes, some items on the scale may be deleted if theyare
Paper ID #37428A Mentorship and Module-Based System to Ensure the Adequacy of Re-quiredPrerequisite Knowledge for Enhancing Student Success in EngineeringDr. Ricardo Zaurin, University of Central FloridaDr. Sudeshna Pal, University of Central Florida Dr. Sudeshna Pal is an Associate Lecturer in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at the University of Central Florida (UCF), where she teaches courses in the areas of system dynamics, controls, and biomedical engineering. Her current research focus is engineering education, including blended learning, project-based learning, and digital and design education. She co
reasonably expectthat most juniors have more practice and experience with computational tools than freshmen, andtherefore would have higher confidence in their abilities. Fig. 1. Plots depicting comparisons between NCS freshman and junior mean responses regardingprogramming/simulation self-efficacy (a) and valuation (b). For all questions relating to self-efficacy, the Likert scale translates to 1 = “Not at all confident” to 6 = “Extremely Confident.” For self-efficacy questions, the scale translates to 1 = “Strongly Disagree” to 6 = “Strongly Agree.”Our findings revealed a surprising similarity in NCS freshmen and junior mean responses related tomotivation and ability to strategize for programming and simulation-related projects
Alignment Model,In this paper, the authors attempted to investigate current engineering entrepreneurship educationthrough the lens of Constructive Alignment. We want to understand if this framework can capturethe nuts and bolts of the abovementioned diverse entrepreneurship education program designs. Theauthors proposed a modified model for the existing constructive alignment model to reflect thefeedback we received from the field.2. Methodology2.1 Data SourceTo obtain a comprehensive view of Canadian entrepreneurship education, we accessed the list ofdesignated educational institutions from the Canadian Federal government’s web tool provided byEmployment and Social Development Canada. We limited the scope of the project to educationalinstitutions
Paper ID #38515How much does readiness matter? An examination of student persistenceintention and engineering identityMr. Syahrul Amin, Texas A&M University Syahrul Amin is a PhD candidate in Curriculum and Instruction at Texas A&M University. He is Experi- enced in conducting numerous STEM education research projects and skilled in working in collaborative environments to collect and evaluate research data for a variety of STEM education projects. He is also experienced in K-16 teaching for over 8 years. His research interests focus on science education, engi- neering education, GT education, and international
categoryscores made fromthe participants’responses.Results and Future WorkThe author has used this activity in a few different quarters, but not yet formally studied if ithelped learners implement better weighted decision matrices in their later projects or if it workedbetter than other activities. Anecdotally, and through informally reviewing related assignments,while it led to good classroom discussions, there are areas for improvement.For example, having results from a form processed and presented just seconds after they aresubmitted may be impressive or grab attention, but it may also be a distraction from the actualcontent or learning objectives. During one session using this form, the first question was abouthow the slides had been made rather
engineering students should provide at least five things to lead to students’further academic success and prepare them for the job market: 1) material mastery, 2)communication, and collaboration, 3) software/programming skills, 4) learning andmetacognition, and 5) confidence. Students in traditional lecture-based classrooms may not betaught these skills [1][2]. Numerous studies have shown that active and cooperative learningclasses are better at addressing these than traditional lecture-based classes [3]. Some examples ofActive learning (AL) and Cooperative learning (CL) [4] are 1) Flipped classroom, 2) Studentpresentation, 3) Student projects, 4) Student discussion, and 5) Student group work.A traditional calculus class is often content-driven and
produced include a concept map. Students leave the course with a clear listof which topics they mastered and which they are still working on. This model still permits roomfor traditional laboratory and project components.IntroductionIn standard teaching, course topics are covered on a set schedule and exams occur at set schedules.If students have not learned the material for an earlier portion of the class, the course moves alonganyway and focuses on new more difficult material that builds on the previous material thatstudent still does not understand. This promotes a fixed mindset promoting the idea that if youdidn’t get a concept, you never will. At the end of the course, students may only have a partialunderstanding of the material and may be
eprotocol utilized in this publication Ide f Determine scope of project and focus Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for search[7]. As shown in Figure 1, the Re ea ch Q e Determine relevant sources ofproposed protocol includes five ScR Ide f literature References for Study
interaction with the students. These industry sessions, therefore,provided a general, real-world contrast while students were also doing a deep dive into one specificarea to complete a laboratory research project in six weeks.A third reason, as we discussed in a previous paper [1], is consistent with some general designelements known to inspire and increase inclusion. For example, an Industry Energy Program willhelp deepen the REM student’s understanding between theory, research, and application; of howwhat they learn in class relates to what companies may be doing. For students with morecommunity-minded orientations (i.e., altruistic cultural values), this bigger picture of what ishappening in the different energy sectors, and learning about real
sustainability offers the only viable path to human safety, equity, health, andprogress” [21, p. 6]. There are strong synergies between ideas of generational equity andsustainable development, for example [22], [23]. Within civil engineering, the infrastructuresustainability rating system Envision [24] is commonly used. Envision has been integrated intoengineering education as a method to educate students about sustainability [25], [26], [27]. DEIissues are included within the Envision credits including the following examples: • QL1.2 Enhance Public Health and Safety [24, p. 32] • “Measures taken to increase safety and provide health benefits on the project site, surrounding sites, and the broader community in a just and equitable
Engineering at the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). After graduating she worked for two years in a construction management company in Dhaka, Bangladesh. She was involved in various residential and infrastructure projects. Rubaya now is a Ph.D. student at Department of Civil and Environ- mental Engineering and Teaching/Research Assistant at Moss School of Construction, Sustainability and Infrastructure, Florida International University. Her research interest includes Sustainable and resilient infrastructure, Engineering Education, and Sustainable transportation system.Mr. Mohamed Elzomor P.E., Florida International University Dr. Mohamed ElZomor is an Assistant Professor at Florida International
and epistemic curiosity, engineering identity, and self-efficacy will be used to gauge student progress [2]. As a result, the Industrial Engineering (IE)department adopted the ECP idea with a focus on implementing home-based hands-on activitiesfor two courses. Learning a specific idea can start at any point, but the ECP concept starts withthe presentation of an experiment to teach the students a theory. This greatly improves thestudent's ability to retain the taught theoretical topic. The ECP concept is based on the MobileStudio project designed by the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute to boost students' interest andsuccess in electrical engineering [3]. Since then, many colleges, including 13 HBCUs in the USA[4], have adopted it as a
None N/A On-the-job Training None None N/A Number of Jobs 63,000 113,300 80% Job Outlook Over Ten Years 31% 36% 3% Employment Change Over Ten Years 20,000 40,500 202% Table 1. Quick Facts on Data Science Jobs in the United States [4,5]The Bureau of Labor Statistics [4] projected the employment change for Data Scientists to bemuch faster than the average and notes that “[e]mployment of data scientists is projected to grow36 percent from 2021 to 2031, much faster than the average for all occupations
made to be interactive and easy to use, with test points for each signal and power line allowing students to debug their projects via hardware investigation on an oscilloscope or other lab equipment. These laboratory skills are critical for students pursuing an interest in electronics, as computer simulations may not always match real-world hardware behavior, requiring debugging to comprehensively understand the design or system functions. Figure 12a: Altium Designer Schematic for the PCB. Figure 12b: PCBV. Assessment and Conclusion The laboratory setup that was created has been very beneficial for undergraduate engineering students, providing them with improved accessibility and
learn” [3]“project-based learning” [4], [5] and “design-based learning” [6], [7] frameworks and uses threeintegrated modules to promote theoretical and technical competency. Importantly, the integrationof pedagogical theory and practice is not novel in of itself [8], [9], though the integration tosupport technical skillsets that reinforce design and data analysis is a novel component to theTDA framework. • Theory: Traditional lectures that take place in the classroom and the laboratory. During this module students are engaged around a critical topic in tissue characterization. Mechanistic background related to the underlying cellular processes is provided to aid students in understanding how such processes can affect
different topics.The most recent score is weighted more heavily than the older scores. This promotes the growthmindset and the idea of continuous improvement and helps motivate the students to continuetheir work on the content rather than giving up after one or more low marks.Chemistry Challenge OutcomesThe Chemistry Challenge (CC) is a team project that the students work on throughout thesemester. Students select a topic they want to dive more deeply into and develop a procedure,perform experiments, collect and analyze data, and present their results in a poster session. Theseoutcomes are specific to this project and include aspects of teamwork. CC outcomes includeexperimental design, data analysis, and teamwork. For example: Analyze numerical
, andsection 4 closes the papers by drawing a set of conclusions.Experimentation MethodologyImplementing i4.0 technologies to 3D printing process of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) isused in this paper to observe real-time monitoring and controlling in addition to the automation ofthe interoperational processes. The current 3D printing requires users to be on-site in order toupload and start the print, change the print file, and monitor the operations. Figure 2 shows thestandard procedure to 3D print a SolidWorks design. The operation is also not a continuous cycle;when the part is finished, the door is required to be opened before the part is removed, then thedoor needs to be closed before starting a new print job. The project objectives was to
are engineering projects that specifically attempt to address animalwelfare, such as painting blades to increase their visibility at the Smøla wind-power plantin Norway, where the annual bird fatality rate was reduced at the turbines with a paintedblade by over 70% [30]. Temple Grandin’s design of a more humane cattle handlingsystem [31] is another example.STS literature has a growing body of synergistic writings pertaining to ethics and animals. Alsopertinent are the fields of Animal Geographies and Multispecies Ethnography. As Hovorkaexplains: “Animal geographies are at their core grounded in ethical commitments and emancipatory practices to improve the lives of animals. Since the late 20th century, animal geographers have
Giraffe Award (for sticking her neck out); 2014 College of Engineering In- struction Award; 2014 The University of Texas System Regents’ Outstanding Teaching Award; the 2012 NCEES Award for students’ design of a Fire Station. In her work, Dr. Santiago helps to find innova- tive engineering solutions through an understanding of the balance between sustainability, social equity, entrepreneurship, community engagement, innovation, and leadership to improve the well-being of peo- ple. A few examples include: interdisciplinary projects that provide safe drinking water to underserved communities in El Paso, Ciudad Ju´arez, Puerto Rico, and Haiti; a bridge that connected communities in Puerto Rico; a solar charging station
instrument to: 1. Generate baseline data concerning levels of AE displayed by various student populations at a large, public university. 2. Compare the levels of AE displayed by students and working professionals.The longer term goal of this project is to provide baseline data against which student gains inadaptiveness can then be measured and that will allow activities designed to improve levels ofAdaptive Expertise to be developed and assessed.IntroductionGiven the increasing degree to which engineering is becoming an interdisciplinary profession,the National Academy of Engineering (NAE), the American Society for Engineering Education(ASEE), and various other organizations have discussed the need for engineering graduates ofthe
recognized the value ofFMEA in designing policies that focus on the training of engineers and other professions whosework can have an impact on human lives. The group made a statement that many of therecommendations made by the USCG, Department of Transportation, and ABS, did not requirelarge investments of capital but rather well-written policies. A post-survey of the students upon completion of this project found that students werenow familiar with root-cause and failure mode and effect analysis. [See Appendix F] Studentsfelt confident in using these methods to further define the requirements and constraints of theengineering design process. The students recognized that during the testing of these designswhether that be a product, process
. There is a big leap at three secondsand the heart rate jumps from 65 to 82 bpm. Although this jump is not impossible, it is unlikelybecause at rest the heart rate does not normally fluctuate that much. Therefore, this indicates apotential source of error from our heart rate. With a better quality heart rate monitor there wouldlikely be less jumps in the heart rate over time.ConclusionIn this project, we were able to successfully create a chest strap that generates power from theuser's own body temperature. This demonstrates the potential of thermoelectric panels combinedwith wearable technology. However, due to time and money constraints the device was notdeveloped as much as we would have liked. Our current model does not produce enough
leads articulation and the curriculum alignment effort of 53 gateway courses between UCF and DirectConnect partner institutions. Prior to joining UCF, Har- rison worked for three years at West Virginia University (WVU) as a project specialist in Undergraduate Academic Affairs and an adjunct professor in WVU’s College of Education and Human Services where he taught undergraduate and graduate-level courses. Harrison holds a B.A. in Education (Kenyatta Uni- versity, Kenya), a M.A. in Special Education (WVU), and Ed.D. in Curriculum and Instruction (WVU). His research focuses on the role of curriculum on student access, success, and persistent.Dr. Shawn A Putnam, University of Central Florida Dr. Shawn A. Putnam joined
selection. The current project proposed as a technicalelective/independent study class in mechanical engineering expands over multiple semesters.Undergraduate students taking the class recognize the importance of materials resistance toerosion, abrasion, wear/ scratch, and perform related testing. They work with existing equipmentin Mechanical Engineering Department: erosion, wear, hardness testers, heat treatment furnaces,magnetron sputtering equipment and profilers. Professors guide the students in using appropriatestandards and tools for experiments. The independent study class involves mechanicalinvestigation of materials: polymers, metals and heat-treated metals (coated and uncoated) anddata analysis in conformity to Outcome 6 requirement
believe support your learning. 2. Briefly describe what you dislike about the course–the characteristics that you believe hinder your learning. 3. What suggestions can you offer that would enhance your learning? 4. What can you (as a student) do to improve your learning?SGID FeedbackSample SGID results from the Fall 2022 offering are shared below in Figure 2 and Figure 3, focusing onthe “What do you like?” about the course. In Figure 2, the first key aspect the students identified was (a)atmosphere and assistance. The students are picking up on the relevance of the Design Tool project tohelp with complicated analysis, where 87% of the responses indicate neutral or agreement about thehelpfulness of this project. In Figure 3
. Tanjina Afrin earned her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Clemson University. She is currently an Assistant Professor at Virginia Military Institute (VMI) and one of the faculty advisors of American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)-VMI chapter. She teaches water resources engineering courses. She enjoys helping students with their class/research/community projects. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference Entry-level mathematics and engineering course grades as indicators of success in a Civil Engineering program Rebekah L. Martin, Tanjina Afrin, Rodney Wilkins Civil
mentorship/supervision. While the consistency of theSpring 2022 semester was voluntary among Instructors A, B, and C, the department is seeking toimplement a more formalized approach to course consistency requirements. Future work towardconsistency in this course may yield standardized exams, required assignments/project,competency quizzes, or similar measures after reviewing the full results of this pilot study, aswell as after allowing time for identifying pandemic issues versus instructional issues. Thispaper is only reviewing a preliminary analysis of the pilot consistency semester, Spring 2022,which employed consistent homework assignments and exams, with all faculty contributing atleast one problem per exam. While faculty autonomy is important