power cycle was the Otto cycle. The team planned two weeks to complete this activity. The initial strategy was to start with one solver and, once done, to go to the next. MET students to develop Excel solvers, CSET student to code and develop the GUI interface, and CET student to manage the overall project. Visual Studios was planned for GUI programming. The initial proposed programming strategy is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Proposed GUI Programming Steps for Otto CycleResults: The GUI was developed in coordination with individual Excel solvers for each of theproposed cycles. Details about the Excel solver(s) are included below. When the GUI programbegins, the user is taken to a home page, as seen in Figure 2
Paper ID #40408Sociocultural and Sociopolitical Challenges for STEM Education in theCurrent EraDr. Sudipta Chowdhury, Marshall University Sudipta Chowdhury is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering in Marshall University. His area of research includes Critical Infrastructure Resilience, Disaster Restora- tion Planning, Supply Chain and Logistics, and formal and informal STEM Education. He has published over 20 peer-reviewed journal articles and multiple conference proceedings. He serves as a reviewer of multiple journals such as OR spectrum, Computers and Operations Research
expertise? and, 2) how did thistransition affect student performance in the course?Data collection and methodsStudy Context: The study took place at the Pennsylvania State University. The proposedresearch question was studied in senior-level undergraduate elective course (CE 423: TrafficOperations) taken by students that wish to learn more about the engineering skills and techniquesrequired to practice traffic engineering. Content includes implementation and design of trafficcontrol devices, design of signal phase and timing plans, and analysis of signalized intersectionoperations. The course is offered in one section every fall (approx. 30 students) and was split intotwo components: lectures and a lab. The lecture sessions covered material from
Langley Research Center, and Commonwealth Center forAdvanced Manufacturing (CCAM). Many MANE students receive summer internships or full-time positions from A&D manufacturers such as Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and NorthGrumman, etc. In the current curriculum, VSU MANE students receive course training related totheir A&D professions in: Manufacturing Processes I/II, CAD/CAM, Manufacturing Automation,Engineering Economy, Quality Control, Production Planning and Inventory Control, and ProjectManagement. However, they are lacking direct experience related to the aerospace industry andmanufacturing shop practices.The VSU College of Engineering and Technology has recently been awarded a NASA MUREPHigh Volume Manufacturing Supply Chain
Alliance (NCIIA). EMSresearch continued with support from the National Science Foundation (grant number 1636442).References[1] M. J. Fernandez, J. M. Trenor, K. S. Zerda and C. Cortes, "First generation college studentsin engineering: A qualitative investigation of barriers to academic plans.," in IEEE 38th AnnualFrontiers in Education Conference, Saratoga Springs, NY, 2008.[2] J. M. Trenor, S. L. Yu, W. C. L. and K. S. Zerda, "Influences for selecting engineering:Insights on access to Social Capital from two case studies.," in IEEE 38th Annual Frontiers inEducation Conference, Saratoga Springs, NY, 2008.[3] J. M. Trenor, " A phenomenological inquiry of the major choice processes of an overlookeddemographic: First generation college students in
1 deadlines for a given timeframe; documents team progress, planning and evolution of design plan ● Primary Research Lead: Plans and leads client interview, user observations, user testing; oversees documentation of this research ● Secondary Research Lead: Establishes relationships and conducts interviews with subject-matter experts, discovers and extracts standards, ideas, and opportunities from relevant and credible sources; oversees analysis, synthesis, and documentation of these findings ● Training-Building-Testing Lead: Establishes relationships with shop staff, lab directors, and key equipment vendors, arranges training on equipment, places materials orders, coordinates team
(PjBL), engineering, and culturally relevant curriculum that fit the specific needs of the studentsthey serve.To ensure the alignment of the independent RET program's goals and the NSF's objectives, variousuniversity RET programs have utilized evaluation methods that capture short-term data such as theprogram's impact on the teacher or lesson plan implementation with diverse populations. This paperinvestigates the connection between our RET program and long-term female and minority studentachievement in the forms of high school graduation rates and undergraduate STEM major selectionrates using a state agency K-12 and higher education database. As a comparison, state agency datafrom students of nonRET teachers within the same schools and grade
analysis included showing the participants a water and wastewater system and having them classify the various stages according to the Component Model elements.• Infrastructure Assessment Model- this model was developed at USMA to supplement the engineering education curriculum on infrastructure prior to being written into TR-14-14 and has been used in several Army officer education courses. The Assessment Model focuses on the following six prompts to rapidly assess and describe the status of infrastructure components and systems. 1. REQUIRED – What’s needed? 2. READY – What’s present? 3. ORGANIZED – How is the system coordinated? 4. REDUNDANT – Is there a spare? 5. PREPARED – Is there a plan for
thesetechnologies. The two columns of data reflect participant group preferences. Thus, the first row(under Autonomous Robots) in Table 2, “Programming”, was among the top five selections for34% of the manufacturers and 52% of the college faculty.The plan for the data analysis was to address the five questions summarized in Table 3. The orderof the questions in the table does reflect the analysis progression through the aggregated data.Thus, the first order of events was to determine the popular skill selections for manufacturers andeducators. Once those selection percentages were reviewed, the degree of popularity by groupwas explored. After reviewing aggregated responses, the fourteen skills were grouped based ondifferences between the manufacturers’ and
, students in thesections that were taught remotely (all but Spring 2019) reported greater increases in confidencethan those in the in-person section (Spring 2019). All students in the remote sections wererequired to build and share individual prototypes using a kit of supplies that they received,whereas in the in-person section students built prototypes as a team. We plan to continue torequire every student to build at least one prototype on their own in future in-person sections ofthe course. Pre 3.831 (=1.99) Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Fall '20 Post
response to itemsmeasuring engineering identity, belonging in engineering, belonging in class, physics identity,mathematics identity, and controlled regulation. The fourth interview focused on students’ short-and long-term career plans and asking them to reflect on their involvement in the CAREER project.Lastly, in response to the dynamic shift in engineering education, the fifth interview probed onstudents’ school environment (e.g., traditional in-person, virtual, or hybrid modalities), co-curricular support (e.g., plans to participate and how their plans changed over time), and the impactof COVID-19 on their journey as an engineer, career plans, and belonging in engineering.In addition to conducting narrative interviews each semester, we
invitation to “make the space their own” [3]. Senses of playfulness andcommunity is also a key component of game jams to generate creativity and innovation [28].The structure should align with the type of participants recruited and intended educationaloutcomes. If a hackathon decides on an open format with little facilitation, which is more typicalof technical events, preliminary planning can ensure inclusivity in team formation and idea-pitching [9]. Understanding priorities, such as technical education versus ideation, can bebeneficial. Think Global Hack Local partnered teams with local organizations to produce webtools, reducing potential harm by directly providing a requested product while increasing drivefor civic participation [4]. On the
up the pace with the rest of the class. The remaining students in Math 152are either transfer students or students who are trying to advance to Calculus III in the fall bytaking Calculus II in the summer session. Meeting three times a week for 150 minutes each classand planning appropriate engaging activities is also difficult for the instructor. Given the widerange of students’ backgrounds and twin demands of depth and scope of coverage of thecurriculum, teaching Math 152 as a flipped classroom seemed to be a viable pedagogical strategyin which to offer all students increased opportunities for self-directed learning and instructorfeedback.Flipped Classroom StructureThe flipped classroom instructional design employed in this course allowed
been introduced. Other functions, such as offset, revolve, creating geometricforms in different plans, and sweep are all used in this project.The second project was mostly related to several types of Legos with different sizes, colors, andfunctionality. In this project, students learn how to create a composite system using several shapesof Legos, such as cars, planes, robots, or even animals. Later, the students perform 2D and 3D-plans and views representing their projects.The third project was mostly related to a realistic design project, where the students need toselect three to four hooks for separate tools, from a bank of tools brought to the classroom by theinstructors. The instructors brought tools from their homes (figure 4), as well as
: Impact of the student-faculty relationship in a highly challenging course,” Coll. Teach., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 41–47, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1080/87567555.2011.627576.[7] L. E. Davis, I. Ajzen, J. Saunders, and T. Williams, “The decision of African American students to complete high school: An application of the theory of planned behavior,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 810–819, 2002, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.810.[8] C. J. Armitage, P. Norman, and M. Conner, “Can the theory of planned behaviour mediate the effects of age, gender and multidimensional health locus of control?,” Br. J. Health Psychol., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 299–316, 2002, doi: 10.1348/135910702760213698.[9] C. H. C. Drossaert, H. Boer, and E. R. Seydel
, whichincludes 6,521 undergraduate and graduate students. Within the demographics,international students are identified as Non-Resident Aliens according to the Cal PolyPomona Institutional Research, Planning, and Analytics office. Twenty point eightpercent of students are female, 79.154% are male and 0.046% identify as nonbinary. 11The pie chart (figure 3) above reflects engineering undergraduate and graduatestudents and their first-generation status. The pie chart reflects students that identifyas first in their family to attend college in pursuit of a degree, no response and notfirst-generation status
inout-of-class activities. Figure 2. Factors that hinder involvement with out-of-class activities.Figures 3 and 4 summarize the positive and negative outcomes perceived by students fromout-of-class activities. Again, there is remarkable similarity in the survey results. From Figure 3,we can see that PosSE university students are more likely to appreciate the intellectual, academicor professional gains from their out-of class activities whereas Cal Poly students derive a largersense of belonging to their college.Perhaps troubling for Cal Poly, as seen in Figure 4, students were more likely to cite negativeoutcomes to their GPA and health than PosSE university students.Discussion, Limitation and Future WorkWe plan to issue a modified
being featured. The SEL’s also used the departmentsocial media to share and promote events hosted by the department and associated studentorganizations. The department Instagram page saw a steady increase in engagement and thenumber of followers doubled over the course of the year.Focus Groups: During spring quarter, the SEL team organized and facilitated a focus group inresponse to student request with the goal of gaining insight to the non-dominant experience inthe engineering disciplines. The first focus group aimed to learn about the non-male experiencewith the goal of finding ways to better support non-male students (note: results of this focusgroup not yet available). The SEL’s plan to continue this effort in the future. Future focus
the design experience and recognition of the winning team.Recently, we began providing some teams with tools (i.e., tape measures and scissors) to useduring the design challenge. Anecdotally we observed during the January 2019 event that someteams spent excessive amounts of time using the tools to measure and cut straws while failing tocomplete their structures. Out of curiosity we planned the November 2019 and January 2020 I2Eevents to explore this phenomenon by using half of our ME breakout sessions as Control groups(No Tools) and the other half as Test groups (Tools). Our reported findings include analysis ofdifferences between Control and Test groups in both load bearing capacity and variety of designconcepts. Our null hypothesis was that
Helmsley Foundation with a number of interventions that focused onthese success variables. FYrE@ECST interventions included (i) a redesigned introduction toengineering course with focus on design and hands-on learning (Tufenkjian et al., 2017); (ii)Mathemagics (Sharif, Menezes, Schlemer, & Won, 2016), a series of workshops integratingphysical processes and phenomena to math; (iii) a new comprehensive advisement tool calledGolden-Eagle Flight Plan (GEFP) (Sun, Won, Allen, & Gadhia, 2016); and (iv) SupplementInstruction (SI) workshops for physics and calculus for a freshman cohort. This paper reports onthe implementation and assessment results of the Supplemental Instruction workshops as part ofthe FYrE@ECST program in a student population
students focused on their project: due to theirinexperience, some students cannot visualize their final product and become overwhelmed withproject uncertainties, while some students find critical thinking difficult, such as ‘how do I apply 2018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Spring Conference, April 6-7, 2018 – University of the District of Columbiawhat I know to the customer needs?’ To help students overcome pre-program hurdles, recruitmentstrategies should include: introducing yourself and your program at student organizations, onlineand on-campus classes, and study abroad fairs. During these sessions, PBL program objectives,extracurricular and academic activities, should be discussed along with, how this course fits intotheir graduation plan. Faculty can
Building using Fiber Composite Jacketing Yasser S. Salem1 and Felipe J. Perez2 1 Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Cal Poly Pomona 2 Associate Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Cal Poly PomonaAbstractAs a senior capstone project, students worked on the vulnerability assessment and seismic retrofitof a six-story non-ductile reinforced concrete dual system building comprised of perimeter non-ductile reinforced concrete moment frames and non-ductile core shear walls. Students were giventhe as-built plans and specification of an existing building in Southern California that is consideredto be at risk, from an earthquake resistant standpoint. Students performed
course is introductory, no room in the curriculumpresently exists for a sequence allowing further advanced specialization. Further, the course hasno official lab component assigned with it, meaning that any hands-on lab or project activity mustbe planned within the limits of expected student time spent outside of class and/or compensatedby reduced lecture time in-class. Besides these constraints for coms, the instructor has other upperdivisional EE courses to teach, including undergraduate project supervision, and typicalrequirements regarding educational scholarship and institutional service.As a unique solution satisfying these constraints, and a work in progress, this paper reports on atelemetry/SDR project implemented in an introductory coms
about the experience at the event center: “Disney in our town… The guy was really cool who met Presidents, and rocks stars, not a stereotypical engineer.” “Interesting to learn more about the (event center) and to be able to use engineering with planning. It shows me that we can use our degree for more than just engineering.” “I would love that job - Take away. Gave me a new side to what my degree can do.” “It is a new experience to consider. Yes! It allowed me to experience more in an engineering career field so I would know what I would potentially be doing.” When classes began, student availability was more limited, which posed some challenges. The next tour was a short walk by the students to the
activities which areassessed based on a point-based method. Two undergraduate students, one IE and one ME, wererecruited to document their activities and serve as the coordinators. The two student assistantsare not SCOPE Scholars. At the beginning of fall 2016, another SCOPE orientation was held with similaractivities. One student assistant graduated and was replaced by another student. According to the proposed plan, SCOPE Scholars are expected to receive enhancedmentoring and participate extracurricular activities. During the orientation, the scholars are givena list of elective activities. The activities are categorized into five categories as planned in ouroriginal proposal. Each category has one required activity and several
-60 minutes of continuous use. For this reason, we planned to limit the timeparticipants were wearing the cap to 45 minutes. Flexible wires connect the cap to the fNIRSmachine which limits large movements, but does not restrict typical movements associated withprogramming, i.e. hand movement, leaning back while remaining to sit, etc.As part of the setup process, a researcher started screen-capture recording hardware. Because wedid not want to require that participants install special software we needed an external means torecord screen capture data. For the first two participants we used a camcorder pointed at theparticipant’s computer screen. The resulting video was only moderately useful as the camcorderdid not consistently focus on the
course as well.Product Planning (Week 1-2): In this phase, design teams are expected to understand theunderlying problem that is intended to be addressed by the final product and develop the projectsmission statement. The mission statement of the project contains the broad description of theproduct, the main assumptions, the key business goals, the primary and secondary markets forthe product, and the main stakeholders of the product. The design teams are cautioned that theproduct description that is created in the product planning phase should only identify theproduct’s basic functions and it should avoid implying any specific concept. The missionstatement serves as the project contract that defines the scope of the project and its
practical opportunity tofeel the “temperature” of the classroom in order to decide to either review some conceptsor move forward to another subject. There are many cases in literature about the use ofclickers as an immediate feedback system. The clicker itself is neither a tool to directlyteach concepts, nor it is meant to replace quality lesson preparation and planning. Theclicker is a powerful tool to augment and enhance active learning in classroom, and mostimportantly, it is a mean to provide accurate situational awareness to the instructor.However, implementing this solution is usually expensive, since it costs about US$ 50each one. Kahoot is an online classroom-response system that eliminates the need to givestudents handheld clickers
more of our graduate programs inthe college. Most recently, we were asked to create a plan for the university. As changescontinue, we will evaluate outcomes and impact within the college and across the university overtime, which we hope will inform best practices for improving completion of graduate degreesand diversity of graduate programs.IntroductionFor decades, graduate programs have evaluated students for admission based in considerable parton the standardized graduate record examination (GRE) and grade point average (GPA). Thesemetrics, however, have limited correlation to success in graduate school. Moreover, based on a2008 Council of Graduate Schools study, only about 50% of PhD students in science completetheir degree in seven years
alignment with the goals of thegreater change initiative. In summer of 2017, all studio instructors were invited to participate in aweek long intensive workshop that was facilitated by two learning scientists with deepknowledge in instructional design for ambitious, equitable instruction. Instructors from eightstudio courses were able to attend. Work centered around building understanding of pedagogicalpractice and on leaving the workshop with at least one Studio 2.0 course activity for 2017-18.To help faculty develop activities that incorporate meaningful aspects of practice, we developeda material tool for planning and explaining, shown in Figure 1. This “quad design tool” askedinstructors to identify the context and engineer’s role in