adopting a different look, feel andperformance for the classroom. While the project does contain some general information onA/CL, the bulk of the content is specific to engineering education, and was derived frominterviews with engineering faculty on multiple campuses. Materials are organized so that theywill serve as a useful guide to faculty who have never used cooperative learning, but will alsoprovide sufficient depth that more experienced faculty and faculty developers may benefit fromthem as well. The CD contains essentially the same content as the website, but will be providedto those whose Internet connections will not easily access large video or audio files.Active/Cooperative Learning was developed by the Foundation Coalitiona through
Students and Teachers (ITEST) project,DeSIRE is a school-university-community collaboration (SUCC) with goals to broaden participationin engineering and strengthen the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) identityof minoritized middle school students and teachers in a rural southeastern state. Operating in twomiddle schools since 2020, DeSIRE features a formal, three-part manufacturing engineeringcurriculum that was designed around the commodities of local industry partners in the areas ofbiopharmaceuticals, food process engineering, and energy systems. Through collaboration withcompanies including Pfizer, Cummins, Kaba Ilco Corporation, LS Cable & System, Hitachi, andPoppies International, students were exposed to project
] was completely CRP, it developed the three CRP’s competence, but it did not use anysociocultural theory. Kern [26] designed, planned, and developed a curriculum and classintervention based on the interest in using Native American students’ background knowledgeabout the traditional construction of fish weirs. Through this pedagogy strategy, the teachercould connect students to culturally significant practices. This curriculum also had the goal ofdeveloping community involvement and social activism [26].The only research I found that was developed outside of the U.S. was from Malaysia. The studyused a curriculum from the Museum of Science of Boston to design their informal settingsactivities. Shahali [27] called the projects a real-world
Chair ofthe Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech – Savannah. He was also the FoundingDirector of the Systems Realization Laboratory at Georgia Tech.Farrokh’s current research focus is the model-based realization of complex systems by managing uncer-tainty and complexity. The key question he is investigating is what are the principles underlying rapid androbust concept exploration when the analysis models are incomplete and possibly inaccurate? His questfor answers to the key question is anchored in three projects, namely,Integrated Realization of Robust, Resilient and Flexible NetworksIntegrated Realization of Engineered Materials and ProductsManaging Organized and Disorganized Complexity: Exploration of the Solution
relationship to get work done efficiently with excellent research and analytical capability. • Strong ability to work across multiethnic environment and global technological collaboration across disciplines. • Transferable high level expertise in process engineering, project development, and innovative research from industrial setting to academia. QUALIFICATIONS: Ph.D. Chemical Engineering, Lehigh University, 1989 M.S. Chemical Engineering, Lehigh University, 1986 B.Sc. Chemical Engineering, University of Ife, Nigeria, 1980 TEACHING EXPERIENCE: PRAIRIE VIEW A &M UNIVERSITY, Prairie View, TX , USA 2012 - Present Assistant Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering 2018 - Present Adjunct Faculty Position, De
andperceived failure, to then shape their perspective and engagement with learning remains under-investigated. The current study explored children and parents’ perceptions of and reactions tofrustration and failure within an out-of-school, home-based engineering program. Specifically,we asked 1) How was failure perceived by participating families? and 2) What was thesubsequent action/reaction to that failure? Data were derived from post-program interviews withchildren and parents who participated in a home-based, elementary engineering programinvolving take-home kits and self-identified engineering projects. Findings derived fromdescriptive qualitative methods and thematic analysis illustrated development of parent thinkingaround failure and
practitioners.Cynthia D. Anderson, Alula Consulting Cynthia (Cindy) Anderson (she/her/hers) is the founder and CEO of Alula Consulting. Cindy specializes in innovative sustainability- and online-focused research and curriculum projects for academic institu- tions, non-profits, government and corporations. Cindy has taught thousands of people through courses and workshops, around the world and online, in the fields of biology, sustainability and biomimicry. She is honored to be a collaborative partner on the Engineering for One Planet initiative since its inception, co- author of the EOP Framework and new framework integration guides, and active EOP Network Member. Cindy holds a MS from Oregon State University, a MEd from Griffith
interdisciplinary re- search institute called the Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science (ICTAS) at Virginia Tech. He is the founding director of an interdisciplinary lab called Learning Enhanced Watershed Assessment System (LEWAS) at VT. He received a Ph.D. in civil engineering from VT. His research interests are in the areas of computer-supported research and learning systems, hydrology, engineering education, and international collaboration. He has served as a PI or co-PI on 30 projects, funded by the National Science Foundation, with a $8.4 million research funding participation from external sources. He directed/co- directed an NSF/Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site on interdisciplinary water
engineering.This career may vary drastically from their peers in terms of industry, specialization, project scope, orexpectations. The purpose of this study is to analyze the breadth of job responsibilities within a wide range ofmechanical engineering positions in order to gain an understanding of the typical activities a mechanicalengineer is expected to complete in the field.This study analyzed 923 job postings collected through the job search and posting site “Indeed.com”, duringa one-week period in the summer of 2020. The jobs represent various industries, geographic locations, andposition titles. Design activities were used as a guiding framework to develop an ontology of engineeringactivities. This study developed an increased understanding of the
institutionalarrangements necessary to help students develop these skills have not yet settled into a widelyadopted standard. Many engineering programs have turned to STS to provide students withconceptual tool kits to think about engineering problems and solutions in more sophisticatedways. Some programs feature standalone courses on the sociocultural aspects of technology andengineering, often taught by faculty from outside the engineering school. Others incorporate STSmaterial into traditional engineering courses, e.g., by making ethical or societal impactassessments part of capstone projects. This work in progress paper draws on the research team’s personal experience to examinethe character of an atypical, but potentially very powerful, model: STS
commercial/residential development company, and work as a research engineer for the National Association of Home Builders Research Foundation. He recently completed his Ph.D. at Purdue University’s College of Technology, concentrating on reconstruction and demolition with a cognate specialty in education. Dr. Shaurette served as a part-time instructor in Building Construction Management from 2002 to 2006. He recently developed and taught Introduction to Demolition and Reconstruction Management, the first college level course in the nation with an emphasis on the management of demolition projects. He currently teaches Construction Accounting and Financial Management in addition to
Task Force. Throughout her career, Sabick has been passionate about improving undergraduate engineering education. She has been highly involved in efforts to transform STEM teaching practices at both Saint Louis Univer- sity and Boise State, where she helped mentor faculty members to infuse courses with more interactive and hands-on learning experiences. She is currently working on a Boeing-funded project to infuse more math content into the middle school curriculum in the St. Louis Public School System. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Introduction to Entrepreneurial Minded Learning for Faculty of Foundational STEM Courses Using the KEEN FrameworkIntroduction
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Novel Approach to Mastery-Based Assessment in Sophomore-Level Mechanics CoursesAbstractThe Mechanics Project is a reimagination of the foundational mechanics courses that engineeringstudents generally take in their sophomore year. The courses associated with the project (statics,dynamics, and deformable solids) were converted to a student-centered engaged learningenvironment with students spending most of their class time in a flipped recitation environment.The pedagogical transformation was complemented with the implementation of a novelassessment system based upon redundant demonstration of mastery of the course objectives. Theassessment system
technological solutions that focus heavily onstudents’ technical skills. However, for innovations that create an impact, it is essential tolink this technical knowledge to societal considerations. This paper describes a problem-centered approach towards introducing mechanical engineering students to sustainable,ethical and collaborative innovation, through an analysis of student work and feedbackgathered from a ten-week long pilot conducted as part of a compulsory, Master’s level,academic year-long Mechanical Engineering course.During the pilot, student groups worked on broadly phrased challenges derived from anongoing EU project on developing societal applications for technology, choosing one ofseven challenges ranging from changing rain patterns in
Embedded in Junior Level Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics CoursesAbstractIn collaboration with the National Fluid Power Association (NFPA), the faculty at LawrenceTechnological University developed and implemented fluid-power based modules (i.e.,classroom exercises) for two BS Mechanical Engineering (BSME) core courses:Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics. The project aims to teach students the basic theories andconcepts in fluid power and expose them to real-world hydraulic and pneumatic applications.Modules designed for the Fluid Mechanics course focus on addressing hydraulics relatedapplications, and modules designed for the Thermodynamics course focus on pneumatic systems.Fluid power modules include homework to be completed
Paper ID #26519Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Belongingness in Civil EngineeringDr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is a Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, and the Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education. Her research focuses on the interactions between student mo- tivation and their learning experiences. Her projects focus on student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, development of problem solving skills, self-regulated learn- ing, and epistemic beliefs. She earned a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of
evidence suggests that practicing engineers are increasingly expected to actas boundary spanners who can participate in and manage diverse local and global teams,translate competing stakeholder demands into effective design solutions, and leverage expertknowledge from multiple fields and specialties. The larger project represented by this paperresponds to this reality by proposing boundary spanning as a core meta-attribute for engineeringstudents and early career professionals. This paper more specifically offers a detailed descriptionof the study design for a major phase of this research project that involves conducting in-depth,semi-structured interviews about boundary spanning experiences with more than two dozen earlycareer engineers in the
: How do members of under-represented groups' identities and pathways intersect with SELECT culture to facilitate or encumber participation in SELECT?The structure of the paper is as follows. The next section will describe the research methodology.The Results section will present two separate narratives of Sarah's and Alice’s engineeringexperiences as they pertain to team competition. The Discussion section will compare andcontrast Sarah's and Alice’s experiences and interpret those experiences, including placing theseexperiences in the context of the literature. The final section will draw conclusions.2.0 MethodologyThis manuscript uses data from a large research project using qualitative and quantitativeresearch methodologies and an
AC 2007-2062: DISTINGUISHING THE ART FROM THE SCIENCE OFTEACHING WITHIN RESEARCH-BASED CURRICULUM AND ASSESSMENTWendy James, Oklahoma State University Wendy James is a PhD student in the College of Education at Oklahoma State University. Currently she has a fellowship promoting collaboration between the College of Education and OSU's Electrical and Computer Engineering department on an NSF funded curriculum reform project called Engineering Students for the 21st Century. She has her M.S. in Teaching, Learning, and Leadership from OSU, and her B.B.S. in Mathematics Education from Hardin-Simmons University in Abilene, Texas. She has taught math and math education classes at both the high
. Page 11.1347.2 1Authentic AssessmentAuthentic projects involve specific content and human interactions that promotedisciplined inquiry, also known as substantive conversation. In substantive conversation,each person is trying to express a point of view, to understand why others have theirviewpoints, or to arrive at a solution to a problem that neither has previously is the mostdifficult. Four conditions are essential for authentic professional development:collaboration, access to tools and resources, discretion and ownership, and flexible use oftime. According to Newmann, “substantive conversation is the key. It provides thecrucible for practice, for
, civil engineering, and mechanical engineering. Currently, many undergraduate andfirst-year graduate students in the aforementioned fields do not have exposure to recent researchtrends in Machine Learning. This paper reports on a project in progress, funded by the NationalScience Foundation under the program Combined Research and Curriculum Development(CRCD), whose goal is to remedy this shortcoming. The project involves the development of amodel for the integration of Machine Learning into the undergraduate curriculum of thoseengineering and science disciplines mentioned above. The goal is increased exposure toMachine Learning technology for a wider range of students in science and engineering than iscurrently available. Our approach of
(TIGER) at the University of Colorado, Boulder. TIGER is part of the national Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL) network, which is dedicated to the development of the next generation of STEM faculty. Blanford worked with the TAR fellows to facilitate the development and execution of the Teaching-as-Research projects referred to in this study.Ms. Corrina Ladakis Gibson, University of Colorado, BoulderMr. Eric Donnelly Kenney Page 25.851.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Introduction to Engineering: Preparing First-Year
pitfalls related to their particular projects. Additionally,advanced ethics topics are explored in two upper-level technical electives, examining key issuesof environment and sustainability and considering critically the role of engineering in globaldevelopment.The theme of celebrating multiple perspectives unifies this work. Not only are studentsencouraged to develop the skills of approaching ethical problems from many differentviewpoints and engaging in respectful dialogue with peers who hold different positions, but alsothis difference of perspective is modeled throughout the curriculum as students experience ethicsthrough varying pedagogies, teaching styles, and learning activities. Assessment of student progress includes evaluating student
and system integration and risk management. He is the director of the Dynamics Environment Simulation (DES) Laboratory and the Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) Laboratory. He is the supervisor of the capstone senior design project team on the Autonomous Surface Vehicle (ASV) which has competed in the international competition in the last three years. During his tenure, he has the privilege of developing 3 new undergraduate and 6 new graduate courses in the areas related to computational methods and design.Xiaoxiao Hu, Old Dominion University Xiaoxiao Hu is an Assistant Professor in the Psychology Department at Old Dominion University. She received her PhD in Industrial/Organizational psychology from George Mason
engineering with the languages, it has in recent years added the opportunityfor students to do hands-on, experiential research before they start their internship in a company.This research experience, if it is carefully matched with the students' engineering discipline, andalso integrated into the curriculum they follow abroad, can be an excellent preparation for theirinternship in a company abroad, which follows the semester of study and research.The paper will discuss How the IEP and its students go about finding the right match between their major and the appropriate institute at the partner university What the nature of these research projects is, what students have to submit to get credit and how credit transfer for
noted here: very often, the course in engineering economics imposed to Canadian engineering schools by the CEAB is taught by engineering professors. However, it is also to be mentioned that the expertise students develop in this course is seldom used in other courses except, perhaps, in design courses or projects.3 Contrary to ABET requirements which are based on a programme’s outcome, CEAB requirements are linked to the process, to the programmes themselves. According to CEAB, engineering programmes must include a minimum of 1 8000 AU (accreditation units) and this number is broken down as follows: mathematics (195 AU), basic sciences (225 AU), engineering sciences and engineering design (minimum total of 900 AU and
workshops focusing on the Scientific Method are typically included as a one or two class period discovery-based activity. Most students schooled in the US learn the Scientific Method in grade school, but lose track of it or consider it to be something for grade school science projects, not for the real world and not for engineers. The instructors emphasize that discovery is really the application of the Scientific Method, regardless what age or discipline. In addition, a workshop on team formation is generally conducted, wherein teams are formed. The interdisciplinary nature of the subject matter is emphasized and since the class size is very small, teams are generally formed based on common interest in a
AC 2011-1627: MYSTERIES AND HEROES: USING IMAGINATIVE ED-UCATION TO ENGAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL LEARNERS IN ENGINEER-INGLucy McAuliffe, Smith College Lucy McAuliffe is the senior editor and an instructional designer for the Talk to Me Project. Lucy is currently a student at Smith College, majoring in American Studies and Environmental Science & Policy. She is a First Group Scholar, and recipient of awards including the Newton Arvin Prize in American Studies and a grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. She plans to enter the publishing industry upon her graduation in 2012.Glenn W Ellis, Smith College Glenn Ellis is an Associate Professor of Engineering at Smith College where he teaches courses in engi- neering
University. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Texas. His major areas of inter- est include wireless networking and embedded microcontroller-based data acquisition, instrumentation, and control systems. Morgan has also served as Director of Engineering and as a Senior Consultant to the private sector where he has been involved in several design, development, and system integration projects sponsored by the FAA, USAF, and major airport authorities. As a Texas A&M faculty member, he established the Mobile Integrated Solutions Laboratory (MISL), a joint university-industry partnership focusing on the design and development of hardware and software products Morgan served 22 years in the Air Force
process as it is a technical one, and that compromise is a key part of creating asuccessful design. To play the game, four students, each with a different role, form a design teamand are tasked with developing a structure that meets the different sets of constraints posed byeach role. The four roles are the structural engineer, thermal engineer, project manager, andarchitect. Each team must design a residence in an imaginary world which they build with redand blue triangles on a diamond grid. The red and blue tiles mean different things to each player.For example, the thermal engineer sees the red triangles as heat-producing elements, while theproject manager sees them as a representation of cost. Each player also has different constraintsthat