level lead to the following revelations: It is required to integrate theoretical, computational, and practical issues in the design of experiments curriculum to develop not only knowledge but also abilities in the students. Computer should be a tool to support numerical calculations and plotting, but should not be used to run an automatic ANOVA generator that keeps the students from understanding the design and analysis’ internal structure. An appropriate tool for this purpose is EXCEL. Practical issues should be addressed in the curriculum, and practical projects assigned. Students should be encouraged to face the challenges of a complete experiment design, not only the numerical calculation part of it. Both plant simulations
experience will be useful to colleagues at other institutions.Before I get into the details, however, I feel that I should provide some background aboutengineering undergraduates and the Biomedical Engineering Department at Northwestern, sincewhat is possible for us may be impractical elsewhere.Engineering students at Northwestern come from the top five percent of high school students inthe U.S., as measured by SAT scores and class rankings. They are highly motivated and havehigh expectations, anticipating that they will assume leadership roles in their careers and willingto work hard to accomplish this objective. For this reason, among others, we believe that itwould be inappropriate to straight-jacket our students with an overly rigid curriculum
Five Curriculum Tools to Enhance Interdisciplinary Teamwork Paul R. Leiffer, R. William Graff, and Roger V. Gonzalez LeTourneau UniversityAbstractAn ability to function well in a multidisciplinary team has become an expectation of modernindustry and a major goal for engineering students. Since LeTourneau University offers a generalengineering degree with five concentrations, multi-disciplinary design projects naturally arise atall levels of the curriculum. Current capstone projects involve student teams from up to threeengineering disciplines, plus computer science, design technology, and marketing. Obstacles tomulti-disciplinary teamwork, including disciplinary competition
effectively transfer subject informationto the engineering students. A number of methods have been developed for enhancing studentlearning including multimedia developments,1,2 active, problem-based learning,3 collaborativelearning,4,5 and participation in cooperative education.6 Several papers have specificallyaddressed methods for improving or supplementing the teaching of engineering including the useof spreadsheets to solve two-dimensional heat transfer problems,7 the use of a transport approachin teaching turbulent thermal convection,8 the use of computers to evaluate view factors inthermal radiation,9 implementation of a computational method for teaching free convection,10and the use of an integrated experimental/analytical/numerical approach
covered in the lectureportion of the senior design course. Only a few of the basics of batch operations might becovered in an undergraduate curriculum; unsteady material and energy balances (Stoichiometryand Heat Transfer), design of batch reactors (Chemical Reaction Engineering) and control ofsimple batch operations such as tank filling, etc. (Process Control). To complement the coverageof batch operations and to familiarize students with additional concepts relating to batchoperations such as scheduling and intermediate storage, a short module in batch operation wasdeveloped for a senior design course.Integration of Batch Operations into the Existing Senior Design CurriculumThe senior design course at our University comprises two semesters. The
the Rutgers School of Engineering Excellence in Teaching Award, and is an Associate Fellow of the AIAA. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021A Scaffolded, Semester-Long Design/Build/Fly Experience for the Mid-Career Aerospace Engineering StudentAbstract A mid-career Design/Build/Fly (DBF) project which is part of a larger Introduction toAerospace Engineering course is demonstrated to show student growth in a wide array of learningoutcomes. The DBF experience (rocket flight) is highly scaffolded, leveraging traditional systemsengineering and integrated vehicle design approaches detailed in lecture with hands-on laboratoryexperiences
the adoption of best practices within community engagement and help encourage itsfurther integration directly within the curriculum where appropriate.Reflecting on the survey methods, while the instruments are not intended to serve aspsychometric measures, we believe the study is in a strong position to produce data appropriateto answering the stated research questions. Additionally, versions of these instruments may beuseful in exploring impacts of other community-engaged learning programs. The context of thisstudy is focused somewhat on civil engineering, but the frameworks and language used indeveloping items were intentionally selected to allow broader applicability. Future work willinclude reporting the complete findings from the surveys
2006-459: SO YOU SURVIVED THE ABET VISIT… HOW TO CONTINUE ASUSTAINABLE ASSESSMENT EFFORTSandra Yost, University of Detroit Mercy Sandra A. Yost, P.E., Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Detroit Mercy, where she teaches in the areas of control systems, digital and analog circuits and electronics, and design. She is currently serving on the ASEE Board of Directors as Chair, Zone II. Page 11.1134.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 So You Survived the ABET Visit… How to Continue a Sustainable Assessment
. Page 9.397.11 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationBiographiesDALE R. BAKERDale R. Baker is a Professor of science education in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at ASU. She isalso the Co-Editor of The Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Her teaching responsibilities include sciencecurricula, teaching and learning, and assessment courses with an emphasis on constructivist theory and issues ofequity. Her research focuses on issues of gender, science, and science teaching. She has won two awards for herresearch in these areas.STEPHEN J. KRAUSEStephen J. Krause is Professor and
andtechnology aspects of sustainability.Sutherland et al. (2003) reported on the development of the MTU sustainability curriculum thatled to establishing the SFI. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, coursework in traditionaldisciplines (e.g., Chemical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and the Social Sciences) beganto reflect the growing importance of the environment. An Environmental Policy graduateprogram was established that complemented the existing Environmental Engineering program.Efforts from across campus led to the Engineering for the Environment and, later,Environmentally Responsible Design and Manufacturing courses to address interdisciplinaryenvironmental issues. Involved faculty began to serve on graduate committees outside of
inclusive, reflective teaching practices on problem solving proficiencyMotivationDevelopment and implementation of inclusive teaching practices is an important educationalmovement [1]. For four years, we worked to implement three inclusive practices: standards-based grading with reflection [2], [3], co-created assessment [3], [4], [5], and peer review [2] ofwritten deliverables in a sophomore-level experimental design laboratory and lecture course.This work focuses on peer review, though it utilizes the former two practices in doing so.Briefly, standards-based grading (SBG) is a formative assessment approach that allows fortracking of objective proficiency throughout the curriculum and allows for just-in-time
justification for defining theTCEP as a high priority strategic enabler and cultural acceptance as paramount to the life of theorganization. The absence of knowledge applications relegates the TCEP to simply a set ofacademic exercises with a much lesser value to the organization.Career development integration addresses the benefit to the employee. Learning is work. Andlearning to apply is even harder work. So there needs to be a reward system in place to providethe incentive to learn. One big incentive is an advanced degree. But this alone will not realize thepotential gains without integrating the learning into career path development. Page
(more complete, advanced integration into their classroom)sections. The course utilizes online content, individual exploration (‘Find out what others in yourdiscipline are doing.’), and peer discussion/feedback (online or in person).II. faculty development Traditionally, higher education faculty receive little training in course design [9-11] andoften only receive their teacher training through trial and error experiences in the classroom orthrough occasional faculty development workshops [11-13]. In this time of historic change inhigher education, changing factors such as accountability, financial and time constraints, andassessment are revitalizing an interest in defining how faculty design instruction and teach in ahigher education
(electricalengineering) and Car Design (mechanical engineering).Although the chief goal of this project is to produce scientists, engineers, and secondarymathematics and science educators who are experienced in developing and implementingauthentic educational practices, the secondary goal is to impact student learning by relatingSTEM content to urban city issues through the use of hands-on, technology-driven, inquiry-based projects that relate to the desired curriculum. Students need an understanding of STEMand the reasons to pursue STEM careers; over 3,000 students have been exposed to STEMlessons in the past three years with Project STEP. Teachers of these students are involved in thisprocess as well, and 36 different teachers have participated in the STEP
Engineer andEngineering Technician.UK-SPEC is the standard for recognition of professional engineers and engineeringtechnicians in the UK. The standard is published by ECUK on behalf of theengineering profession.Formal education is the usual, though not the only, way of demonstrating theunderpinning knowledge and understanding for professional competence.The following qualifications exemplify the required knowledge andunderstanding required of a Chartered Engineer an accredited integrated MEng degree.or an accredited Bachelors degree with honours in engineering or technology, plus either an appropriate Masters degree accredited or approved by a professional engineering institution, or appropriate further learning
is a standardized test used to assess studentknowledge near graduation in seven different disciplines, including civil engineering. Studentsare encouraged to take the exam at most universities, and some require it for graduation.Fourteen topic areas are tested on the multiple-choice exam [1]. Programs prepare students totake the exam in various ways, including: requiring specific courses in the curriculum, requiringstudents to take a course on every FE topic, providing optional review sessions outside of normalclass, requiring students to pass a university-version of an FE-style exam before graduation, orrequiring an FE-style review course or seminar.Few studies have directly linked student perception of successfully passing the FE exam
.” Journal of Physics. Conference Series, vol. 1567, no. 3, 2020, pp. 32084-, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/3/032084.14. Kohen, Zehavit, and Doron Orenstein. “Mathematical Modeling of Tech-Related Real- World Problems for Secondary School-Level Mathematics.” Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 107, no. 1, 2021, pp. 71–91, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020- 10020-1.15. Dolapcioglu, Sevda, and Ahmet Doğanay. “Development of Critical Thinking in Mathematics Classes via Authentic Learning: An Action Research.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 53, no. 6, 2022, pp. 1363–86, https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1819573.16. McLure, Felicity I., et al. “What Do Integrated
essence, effect, and potential of new teachingenhancements in real-time can be a challenge. Of course there are many factors, some named andmost not, which can affect this kind of study or alter the results. Still, with that being wellknown, this work is developed in an attempt to help push forward potential ways to establishclear, tangible, and effective approaches for determining positive enhancements in the deliveryof curriculum in the classroom. For example, if there is to be developed, a method whichdemonstrates much more than incremental improvements to teaching and learning, andsupersedes all instructor-, environment-, and student-related variables, then an accompanyingeffective assessment method utilizing a Pre-requisite Exam with
Paper ID #41945Intercultural Attitudes and Behaviors as Exhibited by Cybersecurity StudentsDr. Aparajita Jaiswal, Purdue University Aparajita Jaiswal is an Intercultural Research Specialist with CILMAR, Purdue University. Her research endeavors revolve around exploring strategies for seamlessly integrating intercultural learning into both regular curriculum and study abroad programs. Aparajita actively engages in offering guidance in developing research studies, curriculum enhancements, and assessment methods pertaining to integration and cultivation of intercultural competence. Her expertise extends to facilitating
professional skill integration, and assessment-driven continuous improvement.John Jackman, Iowa State University Dr. John Jackman is an Associate Professor in the department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering at Iowa State University. His work in engineering problem solving has appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education and the International Journal of Engineering Education. He is currently investigating how engineers use and create information during the development process in order to improve their productivity and reduce development time.K. Jo Min, Iowa State University Dr. K. Jo Min is an Associate Professor in the department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems
entering AcES students believed theywere prepared for these courses and did not appreciate the extra review provided in the program.The Summer bridge curriculum was modified, first, to lessen the focus on math and chemistryreview in favor of a more in-depth project, and then was restructured to increase directinstruction on specific chemistry and specific math topics along with a continuation andexpansion of the in-depth project.The student rejection of review and assistance very early in their college experience is notsurprising. One study showed that students who ultimately were dismissed from an engineeringcollege or left it voluntarily entered college with higher average engineering and math self-efficacies than students who were retained [4
presentations and report writing. The studentsdevelop their own operating procedure for running the experiment. The procedure and safetyconsiderations are combined into a Job Safety Assessment Form (JSA).A safety program, initiated in 1982, has evolved into an extensive safety program, PAWS(Prevent Accidents With Safety), with a high level of student involvement. During eachexperimental cycle, a group is designated to serve as the student Safety Committee as itsassigned experiment. Among other duties, the Safety Committee conducts safety audits of the unit Page 6.260.1 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
prepare the graduate for life-long learning and professional advancement in a broadrange of career choices. The Master’s degree programs emphasize research experience and theacquisition of specialized skills, on a full-time basis, or part-time allowing concurrentprofessional practice. The curricula adopt, whenever appropriate, an integrative,multidisciplinary, and multifunctional approach that underscores the environmental, social,economic, and management aspects. An ample selection of elective courses provides flexibilitythat accommodates particular interests of students.”“Comprehensive professional preparation is combined with a liberal education that enriches themind and spirit, broadens the outlook of students, fosters an understanding and
and small team levels as a basisfor personal engineering practices. While this supports our desire to develop a professionalcultural mindset in our students, it is simply too burdensome to introduce this process into thisenvironment. The PSP/TSP also seems to lack the flexibility that RUP and the Spiral Model atthe process meta-level. Agile methods are also not a fit. There is too much of a reliance onexperience and constant integration to provide a suitable framework for student learning ofsoftware engineering in an outsourced project setting. Students do not spend enough time on asingle course to allow for the daily interactions needed for XP.One of the major challenges in incorporating process-centered project experiences is determininghow
distributed. First, Management and Leadership, by complementingtheir engineering knowledge with the necessary professional and managerial skills. Second,Emerging Technologies by embedding practical technical knowledge with an essential bundle ofglobal competencies. Third, Innovation and Entrepreneurship by fostering global mindsets andhands-on opportunities. Collaboration with industry and educational institutions, recognizedcredentials, internationally certified courses, competitions, hackathons, one-on-one consultation,and collaborative workspaces are all integral parts of the initiative.In this work-in-progress paper and poster, we present the design paradigm of the studentprogram, and elaborate on its execution and key success factors
based on active experiential consistent with program goals and validated by learning methods program stakeholders 9. Enhancement of Faculty CDIO Skills 3. Integrated Curriculum Actions that enhance faculty competence in personal, A curriculum designed with mutually supporting interpersonal, and product and system building skills disciplinary subjects, with an explicit plan to integrate 10. Enhancement of Faculty Teaching Skills personal, interpersonal, and product and system Actions that enhance faculty competence in providing building skills integrated learning experiences, in using
, the value of establishing amathematical model became apparent; this proposed model is planned to account for andmeasure such phenomena. Toward this objective, introducing an expansion of the binary systemto include “depth of coverage” or emphasis of a topic is an integral component of the model.Application 2: Testing the SchemeAnother study of applying the classification scheme occurred during a National ScienceFoundation sponsored workshop at the First Year Engineering Experience Conference in 2013.During the workshop, samples from 28 different classified courses were collected and analyzed.4The study used two different methodologies, namely by course and by outcome analysis. Bycourse analysis involves the examination of the whole course
group activity in terms of relational leadership, students can integrate a more relational approach to their interpersonal interactions. Finally, guided class discussion provides an avenue through which technical leadership may be scaffolded and practiced.Each prong addresses multiple developmental characteristics, so that the student learningenvironment integrates multiple modes of engagement, as outlined in Figure 3.In summary, the 3-pronged intervention proposed here includes characteristics of impactfulleadership experiences for undergraduate engineering students, grounded in the findings of thisstudy as summarized in Figure 3. Chickering and Gamson’s [52] seven principles for goodeducational practice
design process and observeand reflect each step with a complete unit (the previous existing product) to compare theirresults. The following sections build on our theme of reverse engineering and redesign. We firstsummarize a number of recent advancements in the teaching of engineering design methods,followed by our approach, its implementation, and an assessment.2 Related WorkA wide variety of methods for teaching engineering design are in use today. A review of papersfrom a number of universities, both domestic and international, reveals several interestingtechniques, summaries of which follow. In response to the suggestion of ABET that design be integrated into all portions of thecurriculum, a number of universities have
(Associate Professor) Dr. Meagan R. Kendall is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and Leadership at the University of Texas at El Paso. As an NSF Graduate Research Fellow, she received her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, with a concentration in Biomechanics, from The University of Texas at Austin. An engineering education researcher, her work focuses on enhancing engineering students' motivation, exploring engineering identity formation, engineering faculty development, developing integrated course sequences, and methods for involving students in curriculum development and teaching through Peer Designed Instruction. Dr. Kendall's scholarship emphasizes the professional formation of