psychologically realisttheories of ethics, concerned with how people actually think about matters of right and wrongrather than merely how they should [48], [49]. For example, as a pluralist theory of ethicalreasoning, MFT helps to explain how different, competing goods can conflict, resulting in thekinds of conflicts of interests that are central to engineering ethics and other forms ofprofessional ethics [1]–[3].Planned analyses and hypothesesIn this study, MFQ and ESIT scores were treated as outcome variables, and education anddemographic information – such as gender, age, and field of study – were treated as inputvariables. Since relatively few studies have used the ESIT [17], [32], [50] – and only one hasused the ESIT in conjunction with the MFQ [33
mentorship programs.IntroductionWithin graduate education, there is a lack of proper mentorship and mentoring programs atinstitutional and college levels [1]. Mentorship is so highly correlated to student success andprogram satisfaction [2], as such, there is a critical need to establish and improve mentorshipprograms at these institutions. The National Academy of Sciences suggests that with improvedmentoring, “students' educational experience, morale, career planning and placement, andprofessional competence” [3, p. 65] will be enhanced. However, for this mentoring relationshipto flourish and be satisfactory, it requires effort by both parties which would ultimately create a‘mutually beneficial’ partnership between the faculty mentor and the
mentors are now required to create a SMART (Specific, Measurable,Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) goal [15] for each mentee and develop a plan to implementthat goal in the academic year. The SMART goal and plan should be completed by the end ofOctober. Project PIs now meet with mentors to discuss the goals for their mentees to make sure itis reasonable. In addition, we survey mentors monthly to document their activities and meet withmentors once a month to gather feedback, identify potential problems, and share successfulstories or tips. Based on the monthly report from peer mentors during the 2020-2021 academicyear, we have observed positive changes between mentors and mentees.4.2 Research ExperienceUndergraduate research is one of the thirteen
study through the act of teaching and mentoring youth in STEM outreachprogramming, and so it was determined that this phenomena was worth exploring further. It wasalso through a discussion with program directors that led to the second reflection question onchallenging assumptions, as they identified this as part of the learning experience for theirinstructors.A summary of key questions and themes is outlined in table 5, below, and the full reflection andinterview protocol is available upon request.Table 5: Interview and Reflection Protocol June: Interview 1 ● Why did you pursue this opportunity? ● How does it link to your future plans/field of study? ● What training did you receive this summer? What additional training would you like to
110) instead of the Calculus, at least one semester delay in thegraduation can occur. Additionally, if a student fails one or more of these pre-requisite chains,the student’s graduation will be delayed by at least one more semester. Another factor thataggravates this situation is that most of the higher division courses are only offered once a yearat CSU Chico and are not offered during the summer or at other universities across the nation.Therefore, the importance of passing the math courses at the scheduled semester is evident of thestudy plan to reduce the time-to-graduation.About 19.1% of the incoming freshman and transfer students in the College of Engineering andComputer Science did not enroll in Calculus as their first math course in
; Conklin’s article. Representational images include a flower, raindrops, and people inconversation. Relational seed shapes and page forms include dotted lines, squares, and circles.]Workshop demonstration 3: Ideating arguments using VPFsWhen beginning my dissertation in 2018, I (Erica) began to use VPFs to ideate my ownarguments and dissertation plans (see Figure 7). As mentioned in our Visualizing Arguments andSketchnotes section, the affordances of VPFs are both rhetorical and epistemological; they helpnew scholars, like myself, think across purposes and make new knowledge and developconcepts.When drawing visual metaphors or using VPFs to ideate their own arguments for the first time,students face two particular struggles: 1) thinking with the
students, and design and delivery of courses.Pedagogical design strategies and delivery practices that are carefully planned for workingprofessionals must be considered to ensure success in achieving learning outcomes as well as fullengagement of the students with the program and curriculum. The right combination of advising,administration, technology, pedagogy, and content is required to produce an environment inwhich these non-traditional students thrive and succeed in achieving learning outcomes andobjectives and persist in enrollment and degree completion in a reasonable amount of time.Literature points to effective strategies for programs that cater to non-traditional students, bestpractices in asynchronous course design, and ways to prepare
or schematics of potential solutions 12. Account for potential future impacts in developing a solution 13. Prepare technical communication, including written and oral reports or use of figures to represent work 14. Demonstrate social awareness, empathy, and self-awareness in interactions with others 15. Follow proper data collection procedures 16. Account for ways natural environment may affect or be affected by one's work 17. Interpret data, such as results from modeling, validation, and other data processing 18. Develop plans and procedures for experiments 19. Build tangible artifacts as models, prototypes, or working products 20. Consider ethical responsibility 21. Negotiate
proportion of students (40%) may enter BMEconsidering pathways like medical school or graduate school, many of those students (from 17%entering the degree to 45% upon graduation) end up pursuing industry positions after graduation[8]. Given the previous figures on students’ career plan changes between entry and graduation, aswell as the stigma that BME bachelor’s degree graduates experience with industry careerplacement barriers, more research is needed to understand students’ perceptions of BME industrycareer pathways, particularly at a later stage in the degree. Understanding these perceptions canhelp inform how BME programs are advertised, how programs help students explore industrycareer options, and how programs strategize partnerships with
the basics of user experience design.Mentors were given a lesson plan for all of the modules with the autonomy to update andinfluence content with socially and culturally relevant examples. An example of a modulecreated by the near-peer mentor included ways to simply teach inclusive design andaccessibility concepts to high schoolers by showing them examples from the web. Theycreated a classroom project within the Web Design activity that showed the students how toprovide constructive feedback to other projects to improve their initial design for theprototype solutions. Table 5: Camp activities showing unit name, sample lesson, and a description. Unit Activity Description Intro to CS and Given a list of 15 African
. The GPSS aims to supportgovernment decision-makers in boosting efficient large-scale intervention strategies andinvestment plans to reduce disaster risks in schools and improve learning environments forchildren.ContextIn the learning experience examined in this paper, two student teams were formed during theWinter 2020 term to collaborate with a professional team from the GPSS of the World Bank todesign a solution aimed at improving baseline data to assess the vulnerability of schoolinfrastructure. Students from an upper-division undergraduate level Human-ComputerInteraction (HCI) course and a graduate-level Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)course participated. The AI/ML team developed a back-end automatic structural
engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Mr. Joseph Murphy, University of California, Los Angeles Joseph Murphy is a graduate student of Sociology at the University of California, Los Angeles whose research interests include the mobilization of college knowledge, and the role of institutional agents in promoting college access to STEM programs. He received a B.S. in Sociology from Clemson University.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University at West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy
and the conducting of evidence-based interventions in school environments.Dr. Darryll J. Pines, University of Maryland College Park Darryll Pines became Dean and Nariman Farvardin Professor of Engineering at the Clark School on Jan- uary 5, 2009, having come to the school in 1995 as an assistant professor and served as chair of the school’s Department of Aerospace Engineering from 2006 to 2009. As dean, Pines has led the devel- opment of the Clark School’s current strategic plan and achieved notable successes in key areas such as improving teaching in fundamental undergraduate courses and raising student retention; achieving suc- cess in national and international student competitions; giving new emphasis to
Paper ID #240942018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Quantitative Analysis of Barriers to Completion of Engineering Degrees forFemale-Identifying and Under-Represented Minority StudentsNancy Mariano, Seattle University Nancy Mariano is a first generation college student, of Pacific Islander heritage, attending Seattle Uni- versity. She is currently majoring in Computer Science and minoring in Mathematics and is scheduled to graduate in June 2018. Upon graduation her plans are to spend two years gaining industry experience as a software engineer
significantly more time to explore programming and manufactur-ing. In addition, the student(s) should be able to implement assembly design modifications rela-tively quickly or test several designs during the course of the semester. The only fabricated com-ponent of this CNC machine is the modular block itself. All other components can be readilypurchased in bulk from a retailor thus reducing the cost for organizations that plan to use this inthe classroom. The remainder of this section discusses the design, development and manufactureof the modular block.The modular block (figure 3 a-f) is designed as a two-part symmetric clamshell. Each part iscomprised of an internal face (figure 3 a-c) and an external face (figure 3 d-f). The internal faceof the
Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #25044 Planning in the Community & Regional Planning program. He has served as a graduate research assis- tant on an NSF-funded project, Revolutionizing Engineering Departments, and has been recognized as a Graduate Studies student spotlight recipient and teaching scholar. Jordan studies learning in authentic, real-world conditions utilizing Design-Based Research methodologies to investigate design learning and social engineering, in which he studies urban planners who design real-world interventions for commu- nities and students who use design to learn. A member of the Grand Portage Band of
peer mentors are rising sophomores, juniors, andseniors, most of whom have previously participated in a similar summer bridge program and whoshare common academic interests and life experiences with PTG participants.Peer mentoring activities include the completion of weekly one-on-one and small group meetingsof mentors and their assigned participants. Mentors follow weekly discussion guidelines toencourage participants’ learning and reflection; topics include syllabus review, study planning,goal setting, time management, and networking on campus, among other topics.In addition to formal peer mentoring activities, the bridge program environment provides frequentopportunities for participants to create informal connections with one another and
propensity for innovative problem solving. The ESCPII is used as a predictivefactor and then a dependent variable in our research to determine whether students’ creativityand propensity for innovation predicts their college persistence or if the pedagogical practicessupport and cultivate creativity and propensity for innovation in community college engineeringand science students. Structurally, the CPPI-R is a questionnaire in which students respond toclose set questions associated with socio-demographics, type, duration, frequency, and usage ofpedagogical practices categorized as the three sub-constructs of (1) classroom and programperformance support, (2) college attendance support, and (3) program planning and executionsupport. These practices
Process: Prescribe new environmental Change Process: Empower/support stakeholders to features that require/encourage new teaching collectively develop new environmental features conceptions and/or practices. that encourage new teaching conceptions and/or practices. Examples: policy change, strategic planning Examples: institutional
and Technology Center, the Center for RemoteSensing of Ice Sheets (CReSIS). Haskell is one of six partner universities inCReSIS headed by KU. Serendipitously, my fellowship tenure at Haskell wouldcorrespond with the inaugural year of the Center. Working with faculty atHaskell, I developed and proposed a plan which included teaching, research andprogram development between Haskell, KU and NASA.“Turning Two Jobs into One”Belay B. Demoz, Ph.D., Cohort 9, assignment at Howard University (HU)I joined NASA Goddard Space Flight Center after spending several years workingwith private companies and the University of Maryland Baltimore County(UMBC). While at UMBC, I collaborated with Howard University on a grant toNOAA to do atmospheric research and
, (2) Formulation, (3) Creation, (4) Delivery, and (5) Assessment. Studentsparticipate in multimodal communication exercises that require ongoing practice and applicationof this process. This paper describes why the course was developed, the premise of the course,course content and logistics, examples and assessment of student work and perceptions, andfuture plans for long term impact and course/curriculum assessment.IntroductionSince 2000 when ABET identified outcome item (g) [students will have an ability tocommunicate effectively], academia has increasingly formalized its concurrence with industrythat effective professional communication skills are necessary for the successful engineer. 1 AsShuman et al. have described, the set of ABET
longitudinal data to inform refinements to the survey instrument, and recruit additional schools for the Broader National Sample.Part of the planning for the Broader National Sample involved selecting a nationallyrepresentative sample of institutions, in addition to the four affiliate campuses originally slatedfor sampling. Based on Carnegie classifications and other factors such as geographic diversity,researchers determined that a minimum of 14 institutions with defined characteristics wasrequired to assure a representative sample of institutions and students. Ultimately, 21 institutionsparticipated in addition to the four core schools.Workplace CohortResearch around the school-to-work transition was redefined for pragmatic reasons. Whereas
that case, how can an instructor evaluate their own performance?When developing lesson plans, laboratories or other instructional materials, on what basis doesthe faculty decide to use one or the other approach? This objection to CQI appears to reduceteaching to a random activity in which anything goes and no method is better than any other forconveying information.It has also been claimed that a student learning outcomes-based CQI system is not needed sincethe ultimate function of an engineering education is employment upon graduation and themajority of the program’s graduates are getting jobs. This objection is reminiscent of thosevoiced by American automobile manufacturers when initially faced with potential competitionfrom overseas
has established collaborative agreements with otherorganizations with the purpose of reaching its goals and accomplish its mission. The work doneand the immediate future plans are presented on this paper.Homologation Agreements for Student MobilityAn early very successful effort is the homologation of courses and programs. Homologationestablishes equivalencies between courses and credits to facilitate student mobility and studentexchanges. Through the discussions at Extended Governing Board meetings, InstitutionalMembers are encouraged to partner for the purpose of exchanging students and creating dualdegree programs. Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) have been signed betweenInstitutional Members that are active and functional because the
forecasts. In additionto these results, this research will illustrate the implementation of such class projects, describecommon student strengths and weaknesses relative to energy conversion, and explain theimportance of defining appropriate prerequisites for a diversity of engineering majors.1. IntroductionEnergy touches every aspect of human behavior, spanning a spectrum of use that ranges frompowering the human body to satisfying creative and recreational needs. The complexity of itsvarious uses, forms, and means of transport is complicated further by the level of requiredinvestment, lengthy planning and implementation timelines, and public policies (includingenvironmental protection). Public awareness on energy is continuously shaped by the
biases will be worked outover time as we process the remainder of the Phase Two articles. Despite these biases, the datacurrently in the database provide insight into the state of engineering education research oninterventions and practice.Depending on the nature of the data, the data in some tables are presented in descending order offrequency, while the data in other tables are presented conceptually. Regardless of method ofpresentation, “Other” is often the most frequently coded item. We plan to analyze the text-baseditems that have been coded to “Other,” and, where appropriate, create new discrete items.Our analysis of the current content of our database is structured as follows: First we discuss theinterventions. Second, we present data on
implementation of an assessment plan toevaluate the effectiveness of this tool in promoting higher order thinking skills. The NorthwestRegional Educational Laboratory is providing support for the project evaluation and assessment.A five-member advisory committee consists of engineers and statisticians from academia(Oregon State University, University of Oregon) and industry (LSI Logic, Intel, WaferTech).The VirtualCVD Learning Platform is available now for use in approved courses. Instructorswho are interested in adopting this software into their curriculum can go to the following webpage for information: http://che.oregonstate.edu/research/VirtualCVDMotivationProficiency with statistical methodologies such as Design of Experiments (DOE) is
the GIT Digital Photography Laboratory.These essential components were not ordered for the SME, because the grant funding wasdepleted.Media Room DecisionsThe next remaining hurdle to overcome was to identify a location for the room for the studioreside; like most universities, space is at a premium and often a challenge. Currently the studiois housed on an interim basis in 200 square foot office space located in the Technology CenterBuilding. A permanent laboratory and studio space are being planned by the ES.V. FindingsBenefits and SuccessesPolitical factorsThe overriding benefit of the SME study was the interdepartmental collaboration that wasspawned. Like many departments within a large university system, the opportunity to
presented all commands and necessary instructions foreach project. Thereafter, the instructor was continuously involved in assisting the participants incarrying out their design projects. Completed projects were printed or plotted and checked bythe instructor for correctness. Participants wanted to save their work and were encouraged tokeep a portfolio of their projects.The first mechanical project was to draw a clamp body of specified dimensions.The participant then designed the moveable jaw portion. In the architectural project theparticipant drew an elevation view of a house of specified dimensions using architectural units.Other projects included drawing a gear actuator-mechanical and creating a floor plan-architectural. A project that really
activities on campus. In fact, several InVenture Challengeparticipants, frequently girls and as young as 6th grade, are already pursuing patentingopportunities. The competition has continued to grow; the 2016-17 cohort has reached morethan 2000 students in 15 counties with 80 teams planning to present their inventions at the statefinals.In the IC, students are free to work on a project of their choosing—there are no required themesor disciplines. We believe that keeping the projects in a currency of the students’ choosing helpsboost student engagement and willingness to see a difficult challenge through to completion9.Different teachers approach project selection or problem finding differently; this is an importantskill for innovation and something