WeConclusion[1] P. Altbach, and M. Yudkevich, “Twenty-first century mobility: The role of international faculty,” International Higher Education, vol. 90, no. Summer, pp. 8-10,2017. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi/orMg/10.6017/ihe.2017.90.9760[ 2] A. Gahungu, A., “Integration of foreign-born faculty in academia: Foreignness as an asset,” The International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, vol.6, no. 1, pp. 1-22, Jan-Mar, 2011.[Online]. Available: http://cnx.org/content/m36649/1.2/[3] D. S. Kim, S. Twombly, and L. Wolf-Wendel, “International faculty in American universities: Experiences of academic life, productivity, and career mobility,”New Directions for Institutional Research, vol. 155, pp. 27–46, 2012. [Online]. Available: http
important. As acountermeasure to this issue, two assessment tools were applied to the SIT’s OnlineInterdisciplinary Robotics workshops held in March in AY2021 and AY2022. One is ourglobal competence assessment framework formed by combining the Miville-GuzmanUniversality-Diversity Scale - Short Form (MGUDS-S) and SIT’s student satisfaction survey.It will be used to evaluate participants’ global competence as well as to investigateweaknesses in the design of the online gPBL program. The other new tool is a new method ofassessing students’ level of engagement in group work based on an analysis of students’activity within the Slack collaboration platform. We believe that Slack-based evaluation cankeep a more effective, accountable track of student
, measure of learning. It has been suggested that instructors maybe more lenient with expectations and award higher grades that normal in an attempt tocompensate for the negative circumstances [10] and that grades during this time period wereinflated [11].To date, the majority of studies that explore student performance compare performance duringthe COVID affected semester(s) to performance pre-COVID. We sought to better understandboth the immediate and the ongoing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the associatedinstitutional response on our engineering students. We explore student performance in three largemulti-section foundational mechanics courses: Statics, Mechanics of Deformable Bodies(Deformables), and Dynamics. These courses are required
toward science and engineering we included an adapted version ofthe Middle/High Student Attitudes Toward Science, Technology, Engineering and Math(S-STEM) survey [33]. The scale measures students' attitudes toward their own proficiency inSTEM subjects (e.g., “I know I can do well in science”), the value of STEM toward futureendeavors (e.g., “Knowing about science will allow me to invent useful things”), and interest inSTE|M careers (e.g., “I believe I can be successful in a career in engineering”). The measureshad sufficient levels of reliability on the pre (ɑ = 0.87) and post surveys (ɑ = 0.87) .Additionally, to measure students' perceptions of engineers and engineering we adapted itemsfrom the “What is Engineering?” survey instrument [9]. The
Lab., 2019.[3] D. S. Touretzky, C. Gardner-McCune, F. L. Martin, and D. Seehorn, “Envisioning AI for K-12: What Should Every Child Know about AI?,” In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press, 2019.[4] J. McCarthy, “From here to human-level AI,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 171, no. 18, pp. 1174–1182, 2017.[5] S. Akgun, and C. Greenhow, “Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings, AI and Ethics, pp. 1-10, 2021.[6] J. Su, and Y. Zhong, “Artificial Intelligence (AI) in early childhood education: Curriculum design and future directions,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, 2022.[7
Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020, 17 (19), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17196960. Karimzadeh, S.; Bhopal, R.; Huy, N. T. Review of Infective Dose, Routes of Transmission, and Outcome of COVID-19 Caused by the SARS
students.Limitations and Future WorkThe frameworks must be validated through qualitative research, and the work should beexpanded to include integration pathways.AcknowledgementThis work was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) with Grant No DRLGEGI008182. However, the authors alone are responsible for the opinions expressed in thiswork and do not reflect the views of the NSF.References[1] B. Vittrup, S. Snider, K. K. Rose, and J. Rippy, "Parental perceptions of the role of media and technology in their young children’s lives," Journal of Early Childhood Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 43-54, 2016.[2] A. Sullivan, M. Bers, and A. Pugnali, "The impact of user interface on young children’s computational thinking," Journal of Information
problems. They have learned to design,build, simulate, perform instrumentation and system integration, and/or test the developedmethods and algorithms in a multidisciplinary environment. This has resulted in improvedreadiness for careers that require multidisciplinary knowledge and skills.AcknowledgementThe project is funded by the NSF’s EEC Program. We would also like to thank LockheedMartin and Northrop Grumman Corporations for hosting the participants and giving them a tourof their research labs and facilities. We would also like to thank Northrop GrummanCorporation and Lockheed Martin Corporation for their continued support of the UAV Lab atCal Poly Pomona and its students.References[1] Bhandari, S., Tang, F., Aliyazicioglu, Z., Raheja, A
, DC, pp. 1– 77, 2012.[5] National Research Council, “Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education: Summary of Two Workshops,” The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2011. Accessed on 13 June 2016 from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13099[6] T. A. Litzinger and L. R. Lattuca, “Translating Research into Widespread Practice in Engineering Education,” in A. Johri and B. Olds. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 375–392, 2014.[7] S. Zappe, K. Hochstedt, E. Kisenwether, & A. Shartrand, “Teaching to innovate: Beliefs and perceptions of instructors who teach
time;connection, enabling them to conduct experiments even ifthey don’t have access to a physical laboratory. • web server, responsible for making system information available (signals from sensors, equipment images, WebLab's have been implemented in several institutions etc.) at interface accessible by the user remotely;since the 90's, presenting solutions for remote operationgenerally using commercially available software or dedicatednetworks [1]-[6]. At the Instituto Mauá de Tecnologia, several • user interface
37 17.45% 55 21.15% Prefer not to answer 27 12.74% 29 11.15% I identify as a person with a disability 23 10.85% 11 4.23% Group(s) not listed above: 21 9.91% 7 2.69% I identify as LGBTQ+ 7 3.30% 8 3.08% Total sample n 212 260Note: Reference sample for check all that apply is the preceding multiple choice question(gender)Group(s) not listed above: Hub Regional Pre-Survey Hub Local Pre-Survey -Black -Jewish -Veteran
-learning/. [Accessed 4 1 2021].[3] E. Cabi, "The Impact of the Flipped Classroom Model on Students' Academic Achievement," International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 19, no. 3, July 2018. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings[4] K. Viall, C. Lowrance and S. Bronikowski, "Thayer quiz method: Replacing homework with frequent quizzes in engineering classes," in Frontiers in Education Conference, 2011.[5] S. D. Hart, "Applying the ExCEEd Teaching Model in a Flipped Classroom Environment," in ASEE's 123rd Annal Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[6] B. J. Smith, "Evaluation of a Flipped Classroom
educators achieve this much-needed broader vision.References[1] M. E. Cardella, “Early childhood engineering: Supporting engineering design practices with young children and their families,” presented at the NARST 2020 Annual International Conference, Portland, OR, Mar. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340234317_Early_Childhood_Engineering_Supp orting_Engineering_Design_Practices_with_Young_Children_and_Their_Families[2] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Science and engineering in preschool through elementary grades: The brilliance of children and the strengths of educators. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2021, p. 26215. doi: 10.17226/26215.[3] S. A
Southeast Asian woman who at the time of the interview had worked asa mechanical engineer in the U.S. for 11 years. She has held several professional roles in hercareer across the energy and automotive industries. At the time of the interview, she was a crashsafety engineer at a major automotive company.In describing her current role, Radha stressed how important it was to understand the impact herwork was going to have on other parts of the system. In her engineering context of crash safetytesting, this ‘system’ was the entire vehicle and its launch. She described how, “especially asmechanical engineer[s], we’re very prone to look at parts, right?...We are really important, butagain, we’re just part of it.” She identified the dynamic between
. 45+ team-Building Activities for College Students. https://tophat.com/teaching-resources/ebooks-and-guides/45-team-building-activities-for- college-courses/ January 25th, 2023[5] K. Hall. Science of Team Science. 2019 ERC Conference, Arlington, VA https://peer.asee.org/31863[6] J. R. Morelock, and H. M. Matusovich. All Games Are Not Created Equally: How Different Games Contribute to Learning Differently in Engineering. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah 10.18260/1-2-29766[7] C. A. Bodnar, D. Anastasio, J. Enszer, and D. D. Burkey. Engineers at play: Use of games as teaching tools for undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(1), 147-200[8] S
opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Bailey, M., Baum, S., Mason, S., Mozrall, J., & Valentine, M. (2009, October). RIT EFFORT_Career_Life_Survey. Establishing the Foundation for Future Organizational Reform and Transformation: ADVANCE EFFORT@RIT. https://www.rit.edu/nsfadvance/sites/rit.edu.nsfadvance/files/docs/faculty%20career%20life %20survey.pdf[2] Bailey, M., Marchetti, C., DeBartolo, E., Mozrall, J., Williams, G., Mason, S., Valentine, M., Baum, S., & LaLonde, S. (2011). Establishing the foundation for future organizational reform and transformation at a
science calculations and design considerations. We hypothesize that theprocess of reflection and iteration inherent to hackathon competitions will strengthen theparticipant groups’ perceived EJ skills. Finally, engineering leadership (EL) skills relate to theleadership style(s) used by individuals to lead groups of engineers to achieve a common goal. Aneffective leader exercises influence at interpersonal, team, and organizational levels, whilesimultaneously building strong relationships. We hypothesize that in the absence of a well-structured project, the need to delegate tasks among team members and develop solutionsquickly will increase the perceived EL abilities of participant groups.To frame this study, we will use the Buck Institute of
understand the reasons/rules 6. Disagree behind my* suggestion 7. Strongly disagree. *the tutor’s *the tutor’s 2. To what extent do you agree to the following statements 7-level scale: about student(s) interest in your* suggestions about: 1. Strongly agree a) Grammar 2. Agree b) Style 3. Somewhat agree c) Content 4. Neither agree nor disagree d) Format 5. Somewhat disagree e) Citations
C C C C N C A A A C A C C C Student 2 C C C C C C C C C C C C A C A A Student 3 C C C C C C C C C C C C A A C A Student 4 N S C C C C A C C C C C C C S A Student 5 N C A A C C C C C C C C C C C A Student 6 C C C C C C C C C C C C A A C A Student 7 C C C C C C C C C C C C A C A A Student 8 C S C C C C N C A C C A A A A A Student 9 C C C C C C C C C C C C S C C A Student 10
impactsand sustainability, a module pre- and post-test will be performed. The tests will include wordcloud creation to ascertain common themes, as well as developing a bipolar scaling methodquestionnaire (Likert scale) to determine changes in understanding of LCA methods, uses, andimpact on engineering design. To further enhance student learning, better integration of broaderimpacts into group project requirements, with the LCA module as background material, is alsoanticipated.Sources:[1] NSPE “NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers; Code III,2d” National Society of ProfessionalEngineers. 2023 < https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics>[2] Burnley, S., Waglang, S., Longhurst, P., “Using life cycle assessment in environmentalengineering
necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References[1] C. Singleton, C. DeBeck, J. Chung, D. McMillen, S. Craig, S. Moore, C. Hammond, J. Dwyer, M. Frydrych, O. Villadsen, R. Emerson, G.-V. Jorudan, V. Onut, S. Carruthers, A. Laurie, M. Alvarez, S. Wuttke, G. Prassions, J. Zorabedian, M. Mayne, L. Kessem, I. Gallagher and A. Eitan, "X-Force Threat Intelligence Index 2022," IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, 2022.[2] S. M. Loo and L. Babinkostova, "Cyber-Physical Systems Security Introductory Course for STEM Students," ASEE 2020 Annual Conference, 2020.[3] J. Ekong, V. Chauhan, J. Osedeme, S. Niknam and R. Nguyen, "A framework for Industry 4.0 workforce training through project-based and experiential learning approaches," ASEE Annual
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Math to Makerspace: Evolution of a bridge program to support cohort developmentIntroductionThis paper shares the evolution of a summer bridge program designed to support NationalScience Foundation S-STEM scholarship students as they transition to college. The bridgeprogram, taught before the start of the fall quarter, is a week-long intensive course designed toprovide incoming first-year students with a strong and focused start to college life. The aim is toprovide a venue to help students socially and academically integrate into the campus community.Over the course of 4 years, the summer bridge program evolved from a lecture-heavy math-focused course to a project
(3–5). Teacher with student team. Teams Students act across or between teams. Teacher with multiple teams. Class Students act as whole class. Teacher with whole class. Code Student Action or Teacher (Instructor) Action Answer Answer question(s) posed by other(s). Ask Ask question(s) and wait for other(s) to answer. Discuss Talk back and forth (more than one question and answer). Speak Talk by one person with no interaction. Manage Pass out or collect papers, assign groups, take attendance. Distracted Distracted or off task. Watch/Listen Watch or listen (e.g., to lecture or presentation). Work Write, take notes, work on
. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10999 4. National Academy of Engineering (2005) Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11338 5. Surovek A, Rassati GA. Is Structural Engineering Education Creating Barriers to Innovation and Creativity? In: 6th Structural Engineers World Congress. Cancun, Mexico: EERI; 2017. 6. Kazerounian K, Foley S. Barriers to creativity in engineering education: A study of instructors’ and students’ perceptions. J Mech Des. 2007;129(7):761-768. doi:10.1115/1.2739569 7. Sola E, Hoekstra R, Fiore S, McCauley P. An Investigation of
gratefully acknowledge the alumni participants in this study and the contributions ofour research team. Finally, we acknowledge the generous support of this work from theHasso Plattner Design Thinking Research Program.References1. National Academy of Engineering, U. S. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.2. Wigner, A., Lande, M., & Jordan, S. S. (2016). How can maker skills fit in with accreditation demands for undergraduate engineering programs?. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.3. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.4. ABET Student Learning Outcomes, Retrieved from
is a paradox of knowingwhat exactly wholly “Scientific” and “Non-Scientific” is and where everyone’s teaching,learning, and research practices lie on this spectrum. Deciding on important technological andpedagogical/philosophical underpinnings for “Indigenizing the curriculum” may help situate therole of AI more transparently and equitably. Using AI programs to thematize the perspectivesand experiences of individuals, groups, and organizations, and using them as a starting point toaddress Indigenous-related concerns in the curriculum may also be useful.References[1] M. Fee, “The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Canadian Literature,” 2012.[2] M. Belarde-Lewis, S. Cote-Meek, M. Parkhurst, N. A. D., Duarte, M. Dutta
engineering transfer partnership when we began our S-STEMproject. We now know our preconceived notions only lightly orbit the current reality.” Thissaying has become symbol of our NSF DUE (Division of Undergraduate Education)-funded S-STEM project, the Kansas City Urban Renewal Engineering (KCURE) scholarship program.Now in its third operational year, the KCURE program supports the transfer of low-income civiland mechanical engineering students. When our research team applied for S-STEM funding, weassumed we had a solid engineering transfer student partnership between MetropolitanCommunity College (MCC) and University of Missouri-Kansas City (UMKC).However, the MCC engineering coordinator’s retirement three years into KCURE programoperations
inelectrical engineering and information technology [20]. In September 2022, we presented aworkshop and paper at the Southern Association for Institutional Research (SAIR) Conference inNew Orleans, LA [21 , 22]. In October 2022, we presented a paper about international anddomestic students in the five most popular engineering disciplines, chemical, civil, electrical,industrial, and mechanical, at the Frontiers in Education (FIE) conference in Sweden [23].AcknowledgmentsWe are grateful for the support of the National Science Foundation through Grants 2142087 and214903.References[1] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. A. Layton, “Persistence, engagement, and migration in Engineering,” J. Eng. Ed., vol. 97
design their class.Among the multiple ways to reveal collaborative problem-solving processes, temporal submissionpatterns is one that is more scalable and generalizable in Computer Science education. In thispaper, we provide a temporal analysis of a large dataset of students’ submissions to collaborativelearning assignments in an upper-level database course offered at a large public university. Thelog data was collected from an online assessment and learning system, containing the timestampsof each student’s submissions to a problem on the collaborative assignment. Each submission waslabeled as quick (Q), medium (M), or slow (S) based on its duration and whether it was shorter orlonger than the 25th and 75th percentile. Sequential compacting and