Collection

2020 ASEE North Central Section conference

Authors

Xinyu Zhang, West Virginia University; Liangcheng Yang, Illinois State University

, which could in return enhance school achievements; while negative outcomesof student employment mainly are the reduced time available for educational activity, lowereducational achievements, and possibly resulting school withdrawal.Geolocation informationThis work was done in Normal, Illinois and Raleigh, North Carolina in the USA.AcknowledgementThe authors appreciate the Office of the Cross Chair in the Scholarship of Teaching andLearning at Illinois State University for financial support.References[1] NCES, "College Student Employment ", N. C. f. E. Statistics, Ed., ed. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_ssa.asp, 2017.[2] S. Curtis and N. Shani, "The effect of taking paid employment during term-time on students

Conference Session

Ethical Reasoning and Decision Making

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

engineering ethics: Assessment of its influence on moral reasoning skills,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 1998.[6] J. Henrich, S. J. Heine, and A. Norenzayan, “The Weirdest People in the World?,” Behav. Brain Sci., vol. 33, no. 2–3, pp. 61–83, 2010.[7] Q. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. K. Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. Oakes, and A. Mead, “The development of an instrument for assessing individual ethical decision-making in project-based design teams: Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2014.[8] R. I. Murrugarra and W. A. Wallace, “A Cross Cultural Comparison of Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2020 Gulf Southwest Section Conference

Authors

Robert Carrillo; Ricky Perez; Alex Sanchez; Ray Long; Okan Caglayan

safely store the LiPobatteries in a laboratory. Figure 1 (b) showed the hardware that included the PCM, temperature,humidity, carbon monoxide and gas/smoke sensors, which could trigger an alarm to alert thepersonnel if an abnormal condition was detected during storage. E.M.A.’s operational state isshown in Figure 2. a. b. Figure 2. ThingSpeak Dashboard (a) Normal operation (b) Detected abnormal conditionProject Volta was funded by the Autonomous Vehicle System (AVS) Laboratory under thesupervision of Dr. Michael Frye, PI and Director of the AVS Lab at the University of theIncarnate Word. This project provided the senior engineering students an invaluable opportunityto

Conference Session

Understanding Student Behavior and Experiences

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Xinyue (Crystal) Liu, University of Toronto; Yasaman Delaviz, York University; Scott D. Ramsay, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Learning Work? A Review of the Research", Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223-231, 2004.[3] S. Freeman et al., "Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering,and mathematics", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410-8415, 2014. Available: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.[4] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, "The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate EngineeringEducation, " Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121-130, 2005.[5] R. Krivickas and J. Krivickas, "Laboratory Instruction in Engineering Education", GlobalJournal of Engineering Education, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 191-196, 2007.[6] J. S. Rolston and E. Cox, "Engineering for the Real World: Diversity

Collection

AEE Journal

Authors

Smitesh Bakrania

for water similar to the treat-ment of ideal gases. In lieu of a simple mathematical relationship between the thermodynamic properties of water,property charts serve an important purpose by allowing students to visualize processes and cycles.Engineering students are already encouraged to sketch their cycles on temperature-entropy (T-s)charts and to study various modifications of the Rankine Cycle. Such property chart sketches areuseful for highlighting how most ideal engineering processes follow constant property lines suchas isobars and isotherms. However, without connecting these sketches to the property values,students fail to recognize the interdependence of thermodynamic properties. Rather than relyingon supplementary function of the

Conference Session

Capstone/ET Projects III - Mechanical and Manufacturing Focus

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Wei Zhan, Texas A&M University; Byul Hur, Texas A&M University; Yonghui Wang, Prairie View A&M University; Suxia Cui, Prairie View A&M University; Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

workincludes organization of Mini-Maker Faire with multiple courses and collaboration with anotheruniversity.References 1. Anderson, C., (2012). Makers: The New Industrial Revolution, Random House Business: New York, NY. 2. American Society for Engineering Education. (2016). Envisioning the Future of the Maker Movement: Summit Report. Washington, DC.3. Barton, A. C., Tan, C., & Greenberg, D. (2017). The makerspace movement: Sites of possibilities for equitable opportunities to engage underrepresented youth in STEM. Teachers College Record, V 119 (7).4. Bloom, B. S.; Engelhart, M. D.; Furst, E. J.; Hill, W. H.; Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. 12, 2018.[2] L. Wimsatt, A. Trice, and D. Langley, “Faculty Perspectives on Academic Work and Administrative Burden: Implications for the Design of Effective Support Services.,” Journal of Research Administration, vol 30, no. 1, pp. 77–89, 2009.[3] K. M. Hannum, S. M. Muhly, P. S. Shockley-Zalabak, and J. S. White, “Women leaders within higher education in the United States: Supports, barriers, and experiences of being a senior leader,” Advancing Women in Leadership, vol. 35, pp. 65–75, 2015.[4] E. Judson, L. Ross, and K. Glassmeyer, “How Research, Teaching, and Leadership Roles are Recommended to Male and Female Engineering Faculty Differently,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 1025–1047

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Emel Cevik, Texas A&M University; Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University; Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University; Jennifer Whitfield, Texas A&M University; Mathew Kuttolamadom, Texas A&M University; Jay R. Porter, Texas A&M University; Joseph A. Morgan, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

activities. The DET survey is a five-point Likert-scale that consists of 40 items.The instrument focused on measuring the participants’ perceptions and familiarity with the DETconcepts. A S-STEM survey was also administrated to the teachers’ students at the beginning andthe end of the school year. The S_STEM survey is a five-point Likert-scale with 37 items. TheS_STEM survey captured the students’ attitudes towards the STEM fields and the 21st-centuryskills. In the paper we will describe the research conducted and discuss the implications forcultivating STEM literacy and integrated STEM education. Both pre- and post-comparison resultsand correlation results are presented.IntroductionSTEM fields play a crucial role in generating technological

Conference Session

K-12 and Bridge Experiences in Engineering Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sabina Anne Schill, University of Colorado, Boulder; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

these programsthrough learning how participants in K12 STEM outreach programs define mentoring. Thispaper focuses on one research question from our pilot study: How do university student mentor definitions of “mentoring” compare to those of faculty / staff program coordinators?Theoretical FrameworkTo categorize participants’ definitions of mentoring, the research team utilizes Pfund et al.’s [14]attributes of effective mentoring relationships, which are “supported by the literature andsuggested by theoretical models of academic persistence” [p. S238]. This framework was chosenbecause of the ample existing metrics and examples of measurable learning objectives provided,which can be mapped to experiences participants share in their

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Learning Tools (Hands On)

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College; Lee W. Singleton, Whatcom Community College; Todd Haskell, Western Washington University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

subgroups.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grantnumbers DUE #1834425 and DUE #1834417. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe NSF.References[1] O. Ha and N. Fang, "Spatial Ability in Learning Engineering Mechanics: Critical Review," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 142, no. 2, p. 04015014, 2015.[2] J. G. Cromley, J. L. Booth, T. W. Wills, B. L. Chang, N. Tran, M. Madeja, T. F. Shipley and W. Zahner, "Relation of Spatial Skills to Calculus Proficiency: A Brief Report," Mathematical Thinking and Learning, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 55-68, 2017.[3] S. A. Sorby

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: REU 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Subodh Bhandari, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Fang Tang, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Zekeriya Aliyazicioglu, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Amar Raheja, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Erika DeJonghe, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

motivating them to choose a career path in thearea of UAV technologies.AcknowledgementThe project is funded by the NSF’s EEC Program. We would also like to thank Lockheed MartinCorporation and Northrop Grumman Corporation, and NASA Armstrong Flight Research Centerfor hosting the participants and giving them a tour their research labs and facilities. We wouldalso like to thank Northrop Grumman Corporation and Lockheed Martin Corporation for theircontinued support of the UAV Lab at Cal Poly Pomona.References[1] S. Bhandari, Z. Aliyazicioglu, F. Tang, and A. Raheja, “Research Experience for Undergraduates in UAV Technologies,” Proceedings of American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 25-28 June 2018

Collection

2019 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Md. Nizam Uddin; Yeshaswini Baddam; Polo Osornio-Cornejo; Eylem Asmatulu

. Schofield, J. P. S Badyal, Three-Dimensional HierarchicalStructures for Fog Harvesting, Langmuir, 27, 3798-3802 (2011).4. J. Ju, H. Bai, Y. M. Zheng, T. Y. Zhao, R. C. Fang, L. A. Jiang, Multi-structural and multi-functional integrated fog collection system in cactus, Nat Commun, 3, 1247 (2012).5. A. Khadak, M. N. Uddin, M.M. Rahman, and R. Asmatulu, Enhancing the De-icing Capabilitiesof Carbon Fiber-reinforced Composite Aircraft via Super-hydrophobic Coatings, The Compositesand Advanced Materials Expo (CAMX), October 16-18, Dallas, TX, (2018).6. M. Salahuddin, M. N. Uddin, G. Hwang, and R. Asmatulu, Super hydrophobic PAN Nanofibersfor Gas Diffusion Layers of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells for Cathodic WaterManagement, Int J Hydrogen Energy

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: REU 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Pavan Kumar Moturu, Texas A&M University; Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M University; Prabhakar Reddy Pagilla, Texas A&M University; Satish Bukkapatnam, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

manufacturing systems; control of large-scale complex systems; robotics/mechatronics; and adaptive and robust control of nonlinear dynamic systems.Prof. Satish Bukkapatnam, Texas A&M University Satish T. S. Bukkapatnam received his Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in industrial and manufacturing engineer- ing from the Pennsylvania State University. He currently serves as Rockwell International Professor with the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering department at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. He is also the Director of Texas A&M Engineering Experimentation Station (TEES) Institute for Manufacturing Systems. His research in smart manufacturing addresses the harnessing of high-resolution

Conference Session

Student Motivation, Identity, and Resilience

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Saira Anwar, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ahmed Ashraf Butt, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

' judgment of his or her abilityto perform the task) play a more significant role. These results are novel given that all examsvaried based on content only, and there was no variation in format and difficulty level of theexams.AcknowledgmentWe want to thank Dr. Morgan Hynes for helping us in the data collection process.References[1] S. Y. Chyung, A. J. Moll, and S. A. Berg, "The role of intrinsic goal orientation, self- efficacy, and e-learning practice in engineering education.," J. Eff. Teach., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 22–37, 2010.[2] J. M. Dennis, J. S. Phinney, and L. I. Chuateco, "The role of motivation, parental support, and peer support in the academic success of ethnic minority first-generation college students," J. Coll. Stud

Conference Session

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division Technical Session 2 - Development, Assessment, and Impact of Experiential Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Beata Johnson, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Joyce B. Main, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative and Experiential Education

beneficial involvement. Threshold theories of studentinvolvement predict diminishing or negative returns at higher levels of involvement. These studieshave measured level of involvement as either number of activities or number of hours involved inactivities [58], [63], [64]. These studies fit nonlinear functions of involvement with respect ofacademic outcomes, finding that at high levels of involvement the benefits leveled off or evendeclined slightly. Vetter et al.’s [17] findings about the significance of quality of involvement overquantity of involvement echo these findings, concluding that “co-curricular programs andactivities are of greatest benefit when they encourage students to engage more deeply… only oneor two meaningful co-curricular

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 10

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Katherine L Walters, University of Georgia ; John M Mativo, University of Georgia; Uduak Zenas George, San Diego State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

inengineering specifically [12-15, 28-29, 31-33, 38]. There were cross-cultural differences in the studies’ findings. In the study from UAE[26], women with higher SES were less likely to choose STEM majors and careers (Fig. 1),unlike in the US and UK where studies found higher SES to significantly impact the likelihoodof persisting in and choosing a STEM major, respectively [22, 24]. In Caspi et. al.’s study [16] inIsrael, they found no gender difference in ninth grade students’ choice of a STEM major whereasgender differences were found early on (i.e., prior to intervention) in STEM attitudes in USstudents [13]. Fig. 1 Likelihood of persisting in and choosing a STEM major Importantly, these studies support the

Conference Session

2-Year College Division: Transferring and Smoothing Transitions

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cynthia Kay Pickering, Science Foundation Arizona; Caroline Vaningen-Dunn, SFAz Center for STEM, Arizona State University; Anita Grierson, SFAz Center for STEM at Arizona State University; Anna Tanguma- Gallegos Gallegos

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College

Mission College S-STEM ATE* S-STEM HSI* Laredo College IUSE AISL HSI* ATE Miami Dade College S-STEM S-STEM* ATE* Palo Alto College IUSE S-STEM* ATE* West Hills CC S-STEM ATE* S-STEM S-STEM* Central Arizona 2 College ATE* HSI* LA Harbor College S-STEM Lee College IUSE HSI-F19 NMSU Grants ATE HSI* Phoenix College DRK12 HSI* HSI-F19 San Joaquin Delta S-STEM

Conference Session

ET Curriculum and Programs II

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Yoonill Lee, Purdue University Northwest

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

) C(S) P(S) y(t) - Figure 1. PID Controller Feedback Systemwhere x(t) is the desired value (i.e., set point) e(t) is the error (i.e., x(t) – y(t)) w(t) is the controller output (i.e., actuator output) y(t) is the actual output (i.e., process variable (PV)) C(s) is the transfer function of the PID controller in the Laplace domain P(s) is the transfer function of the plant in the Laplace domainLet F(s) be defined as the Laplace transform of a function f(t): ∞ 𝐹𝐹(𝑠𝑠) = ℒ {𝑓𝑓(𝑡𝑡)} = ∫0 𝑓𝑓(𝑡𝑡) 𝑒𝑒 −𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑where s is the transform variable.Taking the Laplace

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Janille A. Smith-Colin, Southern Methodist University; Jeanna Wieselmann, Southern Methodist University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

Agenda for Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2014.[3] B. London, S. Rosenthal, S. R. Levy, and M. Lobel, “The influences of perceived identity compatibility and social support on women in nontraditional fields during college transition,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, vol. 33, pp. 304-321, 2011.[4] N. D. Watkins, R. W. Larson, and P. J. Sullivan, “Bridging intergroup difference in a community youth program,” American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 51, pp. 380-402, 2007.[5] R. F. Catalano, M. L. Berglund, J. A. M. Ryan, H. S. Lonczak, and J. D. Hawkins, “Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs,” The

Conference Session

ECCD Technical Session 5: Energy and Wind and Design

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Maher Shehadi, Purdue Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

                 (2)where I is the improvement factor, and the subscripts s and u stand for shaded and unshadedCOP, respectively.     Figure 1. Thermocouples wrapped on the refrigerant pipes across the condenser. Note the temperature of the pipe leaving the condenser was used; the one entering the condenser was measured for reference purposes only    Figure 2. Canopy used to shade the condenser For the simulated part of the study, data for a 3-TR unit were simulated from Carrier website[10] and the results were compared to the experimental

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: Workforce Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Danielle Wood, University of Notre Dame; Alisa Zornig Gura, University of Notre Dame; Jay B. Brockman, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

explore. For this paper, researchers present findings from theanalysis of the final cohort(s) of the original pilot program with an emphasis on characteristics ofinterest, as well as an exploration of the factors involved in place-attachment for alumni.IntroductionThe Bowman Creek Educational Ecosystem (BCE2) in South Bend, Indiana is a community-university, cross-institutional partnership [1] developed with a multiplicity of outcome aims – toattract and retain underrepresented groups in engineering and science; to improve the quality oflow-income neighborhoods; and to build STEM literacy across the regional workforce. Corepartners in the BCE2 pilot have involved a diversity of higher education institutions (Ivy Techcommunity college, Indiana

Conference Session

Flight and Control Simulators for Virtual Learning

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eric Joseph Davies, Saint Louis University; Sagar Calnoor Rajashekar, Saint Louis University; Srikanth Gururajan, Saint Louis University

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

advances in virtualreality (VR) tools – including inexpensive hardware and open source software, there is anopportunity to incorporate the use of virtual environments into this traditional course and bridgethe disconnect between classroom material and realistic flight dynamics and controls. This paperoutlines the development of a virtual reality environment to aid in teaching the design andevaluation of flight controllers using classical control techniques. This environment is beingdesigned to provide a collaborative space where user(s) can manipulate the locations of poles andzeros of a controller for a dynamic system (such as an aircraft) and visualize its response. Such anenvironment will enable the user(s) to visualize how controller design

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University; Rachel D. Mosier, Oklahoma State University; Sandeep Langar, University of Texas, San Antonio

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

among construction industrystudents to a) evaluate their experience of natural disasters, b) examine the source of knowledgeof resilience on natural disasters, c) measure knowledge of post-disaster evacuation, and d)evaluate disaster preparation from university education. The study found that the population of thestudent body existed that had not experienced a natural disaster and were unaware of its impactseither on a personal or familial basis. Further, the majority of the responding students felt that theirmajor(s) and universities did not prepare them in terms of handling natural disasters and extremeweather events. Finally, a correlation was found between the location students live and a desire forknowledge about extreme weather events at

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Merredith D. Portsmore, Tufts University; Jessica Watkins, Vanderbilt University; Rebecca D. Swanson, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

teachershaving meaningful engineering experiences with their development of epistemic empathy thatadds to the conversation about productive learning experiences in K-12 teacher preparation inengineering.AcknowledgementsWe thank the research team members and participants who made this study possible. Thismaterial is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1720334. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.REFERENCES[1] L. S. Nadelson, J. Pfiester, and J. Callahan, “Who Is Doing the Engineering, the Student or the Teacher? The Development and Use of a Rubric to

Conference Session

Lessons Learned about Faculty Development!

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Emily Peterek Bonner; Vittorio Marone, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Timothy Yuen, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Robin Nelson, University of Texas at San Antonio; Joann Browning P.E., The University of Texas at San Antonio

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

collaboration.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.#1525345. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. This work is done in collaboration with the University of Kansas, Indiana University,Queen’s University at Kingston, University of British Columbia, University of California, Davis,University of Colorado Boulder, and the University of Texas at San Antonio.References [1] C. Baillie and G. Fitzgerald, “Motivation and attrition in engineering students,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 145–155, 2000. [2] B. N. Geisinger and D

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division 4: Teaching and Learning in Engineering Management

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Yi-hsiang Isaac Chang, Illinois State University; Dave Yearwood, University of North Dakota

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

-dirty prototypes to gain quick feedback. Functionalprototypes are built for benchmarking purposes while at the same time verifying whether theproposed solutions actually resolve the issue(s). Through the design-build-test process, it isexpected that students would develop the knowledge and experience of the “subject matterexperts”, and thus various activities at the project planning stage will become more meaningful.Using the test result(s) of functional prototypes, the team(s) will revise their solution(s) anddevelop a project plan to scale up their proposed solution(s), either with a product productionline or a service model. The paper will conclude by discussing the outcome of this approach,identify possible limitations, and provide

Conference Session

Relationships Between Skills and Knowledge Domains

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ryan H. Koontz, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Daniel F. Dolan, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Kimberly Karen Osberg, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

. Atman and K. M. Bursic, “Verbal Protocol Analysis as a Method to Document Engineering Student Design Processes,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 121- 132, 1998.[2] C. J. Atman, R. S. Adams, M. E. Cardella, J. Turns, S. Mosborg and J. Saleem, “Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 359-379, 2007.[3] C. J. Atman, M. E. Cardella, J. Turns and R. Adams, “Comparing freshman and senior engineering design processes: an in-depth follow-up study,” Design Studies, pp. 325- 357, July 2005.[4] G. Mathews, M. Zeidner and R. D. Roberts, Emotional Intelligence, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2002.[5] R. S. Adams and C. J. Atman, “Cognitive Processes

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Huseyin Sarper P.E., Old Dominion University; Nebojsa I. Jaksic, Colorado State University, Pueblo; Ben J. Stuart, Old Dominion University; Karina Arcaute, Old Dominion University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics

each other out. The final speed of the rocket is found by dividing the total momentum forthe exhaust or the opposite rocket momentum by the mass of the rocket. This simple explanationignores gravity and air resistance. In this project, many model rockets were launched, and thestudents clearly observed that expelled gases push against something (the launch pad) only duringthe brief ignition and lift-off moment. In Figure 12, model rocket ZE-1’s flight trajectory showsthe rocket thrusting without having to push against anything for up to 53 meters.Energy Source for Propulsion for Model Rocket Engines The The Chemical Side Physical

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division 3: Teaching and Learning in Engineering Management

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Michael Sollitto, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi; Mehrube Mehrubeoglu, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

, J. M. Caputo, E. A. Ford, R. Fu, S. A. Leibowitz, T. Liu,…C. Wu, “Investigating workplace communication behaviors,” Journal of Business Communication, vol. 50, pp. 152-169, 2013[5] J. R. Meredith, S. M. Shafer, and S. J. Mantel, Project Management: A Strategic Managerial Approach, 10th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2018.CONFLICT NEGOTIATION TRAINING[6] ABET. (2020, Jan ). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. [online] Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2019-2020/[7] A. L. Mello, and L. A. Delise, “Cognitive diversity to team outcomes: The roles of cohesion and conflict management,” Small Group Research, vol. 46, pp. 204-226, 2015.[8] J

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Morteza Nagahi, Mississippi State University; Raed Jaradat, Mississippi State University; Samaneh Davarzani, Mississippi State University; Mohammad Nagahisarchoghaei, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Simon R. Goerger, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

, namely interaction, independence,change, uncertainty, complexity, systems worldview, and flexibility, as shown in Table 4. Basedon these dimensions, the ST skills of an individual are evaluated. Table 4: Seven Dimensions of Systems Thinking (ST) Skills Instrument [17] Less Systemic (Reductionist) Dimension More Systemic (Holistic) Complexity (C): Expect uncertainty, work Simplicity (S): Avoid uncertainty, work on linear Level of Complexity: Comfort with on multidimensional problems