throughplatform demos, usage trials, and Q&A sessions with the platform’s sales representatives. Wewill refer to the three used in the final evaluation as Platform 1, Platform 2, and Platform 3. Allthree of these do have the necessary interactivity capabilities to create active learning videos.Platform 1 was specifically created for education and can-do progression bar hotspots, branching(in-video), and multiple quiz formats. However, Platform 1’s use and campus integration isstructured for entire departments/institutions, and is only able to offer a cost estimate for theentire department, rather than on a course-by-course basis. The department proposal was tooexpensive to justify for piloting for one class. After explaining this to Platform 1’s team
students.Furthermore, information about the ACCESS program was shared with the local and statecommunities and appropriate recruiting materials were developed.3.1 Recruitment of High School StudentsRecruiting efforts focusing on high school students included making presentations to prospectivestudents and their families at the WVU Statler College High School Visitation Days eachsemester (on-campus for fall 2019 and spring 2020 and virtually for fall 2020) and sendingemails to prospective and admitted incoming students for the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022academic years. Students in the Fundamentals of Engineering Program (FEP) learned aboutACCESS through presentations given by project personnel in fall 2019 (in-person) and fall 2020(recording and live online Q&A
Studentsthrough Enhanced Mentoring and Summer Research Programs”, 124th ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June 2017[10] R. Whalin and Q. Pang, “Emerging Impact on Graduation Rates/Times From A SummerEngineering Enrichment Program”, 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis,IN, June 2014[11] J. Volcy and C. Sidbury, “Developing a Summer Bridge Course for Improving Retention inEngineering”, 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 2013[12] E. Perez and O. Castillo, “Summer Immersion Program for First-Year Engineering Studentsas a Strategy to Increase Retention: First-Year Results”, 123rd ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 2016[13] Hunter, Mary Stuart, et al. Helping
and schema theory. Educational Psychology Review, 11(4), 291-324. [10] Zhu, Q., & Zoltowski, C. B., & Feister, M. K., & Buzzanell, P. M., & Oakes, W. C., & Mead, A. D. (2014, June), The Development of an Instrument for Assessing Individual Ethical Decision Making in Project-based Design Teams: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods. Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--23130[11] Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The delphi method (pp. 3-12). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.[12] Reed, J.,Streiner, S., Burkey, D., Cimino, R., Pascal, J., & Young, M., "Mapping the Landscape of First
, 5, '| >');54 PutGPoint(White,' ',0,0,'O ');55 LabelJoint(White,0,0,xA,yA,' A');56 LabelLink(White,0,0,xA,yA,'');57 RRT_0(Magenta, xA,yA,vxA,vyA,axA,ayA, xP,yP,0,0,0,0,58 xQ,yQ,0,0,0,0, r3, +1, xB,yB,vxB,vyB,axB,ayB, Delta);59 PutGPoint(White,' ',xP,yP,'P ');60 PutGPoint(White,' ',xQ,yQ,' Q');61 PutDist(White, 0,0,xB,0, -15, '| >|');62 S:=LastDimValue;63 PutAng(White, xB,yB+20, xB,yB, xA,yA, 8, '| >');64 Theta3:=LastDimValue;65 LabelJoint(White,xA,yA,xB,yB,' B');66 LabelLink(White,xA,yA,xB,yB,'');67 WriteLn(FT,MyStr(t,9),' ',MyStr(Theta2,9),' ',MyStr(Theta2*DEG,7),' ',68 MyStr(xB,9),' ',MyStr(vxB,9),' ',MyStr(axB,9),' ',MyStr(Theta3,9));69 END;70 until
using equation (2), as shown.Qact = Qfan × Cc = 750 cfm (354 lit/s) (1)V = Q / A = 750 / 0.25 = 3000 fpm = 34 mph (2)The scaled F1 car was compared to full size F1-car. Thus, assuming the dynamic viscosity forair in the wind tunnel was the same as in real race and equating the Reynolds number gave theneeded velocity of air inside the testing section as shown in equation (3), where Vm is the modelcar velocity, Vcar is the actual car velocity, and 𝜌 is the density. With a model air velocity of 34mph inside the testing section, using a volume ratio for car-to-model of 18:1 and if density of airat 20 C is 1.2 kg/m3 then when using the ideal gas law, the velocity of the
review,” Electronics, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 272, 2020.[15] M. Prakash and A. Abdrabou, “On the fidelity of ns-3 simulations of wireless multipath tcp connections,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 24, p. 7289, 2020.[16] N. Kuse and B. Jaeger, “Network simulation with ns-3,” Network, vol. 67, 2020.[17] N. Jovanovi´c and A. Zaki´c, “Network simulation tools and spectral graph theory in teaching computer network,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 2084–2091, 2018.[18] Q. Gu, Y. Zhang, and H. Yang, “Application of “computer network teaching platform+ flipped teaching model” in online education-taking “information technology teaching method” as an example,” in International Conference on Machine Learning and Big
, pp. 34–50, 2019, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2019.1567521.[5] T. Brown and B. Kats, Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Collins Pusblishers, 2009.[6] ISO, “ISO 6385:2016(en) Ergonomics principles in the design of work systems,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:6385:ed-3:v1:en.[7] O. Crosby, “Usability engineer,” Occup. Outlook Q., vol. 44.4, no. 202, pp. 48–49, 2000.[8] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs 2020-2021.” https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2020-2021/.[9] J. Rubin and D. Chisnell, Handbook of usability testing [electronic
metric from the “Topical Content Post-Tests”will then be used to test the learning effectiveness by performing another two-way ANOVA between thepost-test survey results and the topical post-test results. The learning engagement will be measured based Table 1: RIMMS 2015 Questions Plus Two Rewrites (RIMMS++) RIMMS ARCS Prin- Original RIMMS Ques- RIMMS++ Question Q ciples tion [22] R7 Confidence - As I worked with these huser As I worked with this industry standard Learning re- instructionsi, I was confident tool or practice, I was confident that I quirements that I could learn how to work could learn how to
. Ladeji-Osias, P. James-Okeke, F. Moazzami, C. Scott, K. Connor, A. Saka “Improving and Expanding Engineering Education in the Middle East and Africa Using Mobile Learning Technology and Innovative Pedagogy in Advances in Engineering Education in the Middle East and Africa, Current Status, and Future Insights,” Abdulwahed, M., Hasna, M., Froyd, J., Ed (2016)9. L. Zhang, I. Dabipi, Y. Jin, P. Matin, "Improving Undergraduate Engineering Education with Educational Module Library and Vertical Integration Projects," ASEE Conference 2016, Jun. 2016, New Orleans, LA.10. O. Nare, Q. Le, N. Halyo, Z. Hayes, and Z. Sun, “Assessing Potential Impacts an Experimental Centric Approach Can Have in an Introduction to Digital Electronics
students in the geosciences. Advances in Engineering Education. 8(4).Fey, S. B., Theus, M. E., & Ramirez, A. R. (2020). Course-based undergraduate research experiences in a remote setting: Two case studies documenting implementation and student perceptions. Academic Practice in Ecology and Evolution. 10(22): 12528-12541.Foertsch, J. A., Alexander, B. B., & Penberthy, D. L. (1997). Evaluation of the UW-Madison’s summer undergraduate research programs: Final report. Madison, WI.Gates, A. Q., Teller, P. J., Bernat, A., Delgado, N., & Della-Piana, C. K. (1998). Meeting the challenge of expanding participation in the undergraduate research experience. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 1998. FIE’98
. Conf. Proc., 2018.[14] A. M. Cruz, A. R. Rincon, W. R. R. Dueñas, N. F. Luna, and D. A. Q. Torres, “The impact of an introductory biomedical engineering course on students’ perceptions of the engineering profession,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 136–149, 2016.[15] A. Wigfield and J. S. Eccles, “Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 68–81, 2000.[16] J. D. Ortega-Alvarez, S. Z. Atiq, and H. E. Rodriguez-Simmonds, “A qualitative study investigating how first-year engineering students’ value beliefs influence their choice of selecting an engineering major,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2016-June, 2016.[17] B. D. Jones
. Kinshuk, “Augmented Reality Trends in Education: A Systematic Review of Research and Applications,” Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 17, pp. 133–149, Oct. 2014.[17] E. N. Asiimwe and Å. Grönlund, “MLCMS actual use, perceived use, and experiences of use,” Int. J. Educ. Dev. Using Inf. Commun. Technol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 101–121, 2015.[18] S. Dart, S. Cunningham-Nelson, and L. Dawes, “Understanding student perceptions of worked example videos through the technology acceptance model,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1278–1290, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1002/cae.22301.[19] X.-F. Lin, C. Deng, Q. Hu, and C.-C. Tsai, “Chinese undergraduate students’ perceptions of mobile learning: Conceptions, learning profiles, and approaches
; Spinath, B. (2010). Parents’ education and children’s achievement: The role of personality. European Journal of Personality, 24(6), 535–550.https://doi.org/10.1002/per.755 © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 35169[12] King, A., & Himonides, E. (2016). Music, Technology, and Education: Critical Perspectives. Taylor & Francis Group. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/purdue/detail.action?docID=4556346[13] Bailey, L. E., & Graves, K. (2016). Gender and Education. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 682–722. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16680193[14] Jin, Q. (2013). Modeling student success in
presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2—30432[4] Tapia, J. R., & Howard, E. A., & Sassenfeld, R. (2016, June), Student Success through College of Engineering Freshman Year Experience Program Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.25930[5] Hodge, J. Q., & Lagoudas, M. Z., & Harris, A. M., & Froyd, J. E., & Hobson, M., & Pope, J. A. (2011, June), Influencing the Academic Success of Undergraduate First-Year Engineering Students Through a Living Learning Community Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2—18160[6
projectthat contained over 150 Stakeholders. Emphasis was placed on student awareness of human-centered design, empathy and required interaction between technical and non-technical parties.Advantages of delivering the common lecture remotely (synchronously) were defined as follows:1. Delivery of the lecture can occur without excessive travel to the four institutions; 2. Deliveryof the lecture in “off-hours” provided the ability to combine many lecture sections into one; 3.By combining lecture sections, there was less required time commitment for the Instructor; 4.Synchronous delivery allowed for Q&A and interaction with the students.Based on the foregoing, it is recommended that: 1. Objectives of the First Year course shouldinclude the topic
. (2007). “Incorporation of sustainability concepts into a civil engineering curriculum,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 133(3): 188-191. Fink, L.D. (2003), Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses, Jossey-Bass Publisher, San Francisco, USA. Inokuma1, A. (2002). “Basic Study of Performance-Based Design in Civil Engineering,” ASCE Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 128(1): 30- 35. Mihelcic, J.R., J.C. Crittenden, M.J. Small, D.R. Shonnard, D.R. Hokanson, Q. Zhang, H. Chen, S.A. Sorby, V.U. James, J.W. Sutherland, J.L. Schnoor, (2003). “Sustainability Science and Engineering
Bernardi, J., & Magalhães, J. A. (2020). Visceral adipose tissue measurements during pregnancy (1.0.0). PhysioNet. https://doi.org/10.13026/p729- 7p53Sukumaran, S., Madhuvrata, P., Bustani, R., Song, S., & Farrell, T. A. (2014). Screening, diagnosis and management of gestational diabetes mellitus: A national survey. Obstetric Medicine, 7(3), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495X14536891Xiong, X., Saunders, L. D., Wang, F. L., & Demianczuk, N. N. (2001). Gestational diabetes mellitus: Prevalence, risk factors, maternal and infant outcomes. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 75(3), 221– 228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00496-9Ye, Y., Xiong, Y., Zhou, Q., Wu, J., Li, X., &
-person classesprior to the Thanksgiving break to minimize the spread of the COVID-19 virus.Peer Review Presentation ScoresLive presentations were scheduled for two days, Monday (M) and Wednesday (W). Each teamwas asked to prepare a 10-minute presentation of their solution followed by a 5-minute Q&Asection. All team members were encouraged to participate and each student was asked to gradeall the presentations with the exception of their own; the yellow cells show the student’s ownteam. In the event a team member was not able to participate, they recorded the segment using avoice over slides application. Out of the total of 37 students registered to the course, only 27students, representing 73%, submitted their scores. Figure 1 presents a
each SO will be assessed that semester. The workshops arewell attended because the Department Chair strongly encourages attendance and the workshopshave seven different faculty address each of the seven SO for 15-minutes followed by 15-minutesfor Q/A.Figure 2 shows a part of the plan which is often described as a “mapping form” since it shows the Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Baylor University, Waco, TX Copyright 2021, American Society for Engineering Education 5course-level learning objectives and the ABET SO. The syllabus is integral to the SO assessmentplan. It is
TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, VOL. 50, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 20075. E. Leung and Q. Li, "An Experimental Study of a Personalized Learning Environment Through Open-Source Software Tools", IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, VOL. 50, NO. 4, NOVEMBER 20076. I. Plaza, and C. Medrano, "Continuous Improvement in Electronic Engineering Education", IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, VOL. 50, NO. 3, AUGUST 20077. Hagler, M.O., Marcy, W.M., etc, “The making of the special issue on the application of information technologies to engineering and science education”, IEEE Transactions on Education, Volume 39, Issue 3, Aug. 1996, Page(s):450 – 4518. Z. Ye, Control System Lab Manuals (Vol. 1, Vol. 2), Southern University, November, 2005ZHENGMAO YEDr. Ye currently serves
Q = (1) h th 2 α2 Z= (2) kρThe most important measure of success for a material in thermoelectric technology is the Figure ofMerit [3][5][6] and specifically the Seebeck Coefficient, α , used in its computation. In equationsone the K is actually defined a conducting mass in which the entirety of a system is nested. Thisfurther suggest that within the
communicate their status with the instructors.This form of feedback can make the students play a significant role in their classroom educationand enhance the course outcomes.The student’s Autonomy: Student as an agent of changeThe instructor’s goal should be facilitating students’ learning, providing a creative space forencouraging engagement, discussions, and moving towards more in-depth and advanced learning,problem finding, and problem-solving. At the same time, students need to be more than just passiveparticipants, expecting to have a one-directional pathway to knowledge. Students and faculty needto have reflections, discussions, open Q/A, and examination of the expectations several timesduring the process. Students need to be honest
based learning versus project based learning in electrical- electronics engineering programs," in 2011 7th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ELECO), 2011, pp. II-40-II-40.[8] H. Q. Ngo and M.-H. Phan, "Design of an Open Platform for Multi-Disciplinary Approach in Project-Based Learning of an EPICS Class," Electronics, vol. 8, 2019.[9] I. Verner and E. Korchnoy, "Experiential Learning through Designing Robots and Motion Behaviors: A Tiered Approach*," 2006.[10] M. Zuhrie, A. Buditjahjanto, L. Nurlaela, and I. Basuki, "Do educational robotics competitions impact students’ learning?," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1810, p. 012045, 2001.[11] Y. F. Ng, K. K
each breakout group, students would work in small groups (<15 students each) to hold deeper conversations about different elements of environmental injustice. ● Friday’s class period (10/30/2020) would consist of a guest presentation by two members of UCCO, followed by a 15-minute Q&A portion, where students could appreciate the perspective of a group leading in environmental activism. Topics would include environmental racism in Connecticut and Puerto Rico as well as the climate movement taking place on the university’s campus.Figure 1. Comparison of EJ week to the rest of the course Monday Wednesday Friday Average Week in the
’ explanations of suffering,” in Morality and Health, A. Brandt and P. Rozin, Eds. London: Routledge, 1997, pp. 119– 169.[28] H. C. Luegenbiehl and R. F. Clancy, Global engineering ethics. New York: Elsevier, 2017.[29] R. F. Clancy, “The development of a case-based course on global engineering ethics in China,” Int. J. Ethics Educ., 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40889-020-00103-1.[30] P.-H. Wong, “Global Engineering Ethics,” in Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Engineering, D. Michelfelder and N. Doorn, Eds. 2021.[31] Q. Zhu and B. Jesiek, “Engineering Ethics in Global Context: Four Fundamental Approaches,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2017, doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 28252.[32] H. E. Canary, J. R
Mining Society, 2018.[22] A. Fortino, Q. Zhong, W. C. Huang, and R. Lowrance, “Application of text data mining to stem curriculum selection and development,” in 2019 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC). IEEE, 2019, p. 354––361.[23] S. Lunn, J. Zhu, and M. Ross, “Utilizing web scraping and natural language processing to better inform pedagogical practice,” in 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 2020, p. 1––9.[24] B. Rybarczyk, L. Lerea, P. K. Lund, D. Whittington, and L. Dykstra, “Postdoctoral training aligned with the academic professoriate,” Bioscience, vol. 61, no. 9, p. 699–705, 2011.[25] X. Su, “Postdoctoral training, departmental prestige and scientists’ research productivity,” J