Paper ID #16930Group Problem Solving Coupled with Hands-on Activities: Conceptual Gainsand Student Confidence in an Introductory Biomechanics CourseDr. LeAnn Dourte Segan, University of Pennsylvania Dr. LeAnn Dourte Segan is a senior lecturer at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, Pa. Her primary teaching focus is in the field of solid biomechanics at the undergraduate and graduate levels.Dr. Emily R Elliott, Center for Teaching and Learning, University of Pennsylvania Emily R. Elliott is an Associate Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning at the University of Pennsylvania. She received her PhD in Biomedical
addressing complex engineering education challenges by building capacity for stakeholders at the grassroots, while also informing policy. Her research seeks to transform and democratize engineering education by exploring ways of thinking, identifying effective professional development approaches, and uncovering pedagogical techniques to enhance students’ engineering curiosity, engagement, and learning.Dr. Katie McKeown, Engineering for US All (e4usa™) Dr. Katie McKeown works for Engineering for US All (e4usa™), 501(c)(3), as the Business Operations Coordinator and Director of Assessments after four years of supporting e4usa alongside her graduate school work. She is passionate about low-income and first-generation college
inFigure 5 to explore new avenues such as the needs of students with disabilities who are alsoEnglish language learners, or ways the library can support students who struggle with executivefunctioning. Beyond research, there are many avenues for librarians to engage in impactfuloutreach. As Anderson’s study indicated, many autism support entities on campus are notworking with their library, providing an opportunity for outreach and collaboration [56]. As notall campuses have dedicated autism support programs, librarians can engage with student groupsor the campus disability services office. Finally, several articles mentioned a need for greatereducation and training for library staff and student workers [55], [56], [57]. Libraries andprofessional
designed to provide global competency to students so that claimsabout the success of educational practices might be evaluated [1] in [11]. This study contributesto the body of knowledge on how to and what prepares engineering students to be ready for theglobal job market and society they will face once they graduate by understanding how studentscome to appreciate cultural differences to interact effectively with different others in the contextof a global engineering course. This research supports the lifelong learning concept and ways todevelop the five competencies rated most important by the industry, which includes appreciatingand respecting cultural differences, collaborating and working on a multicultural team, using
Paper ID #43928Promoting Equity and Cognitive Growth: The Influence of an AuthenticLearning Assignment on Engineering Problem-Solving SkillsDr. Boni Frances Yraguen, Vanderbilt University Boni Yraguen is an Instructional Consultant with the Vanderbilt Center for Teaching. Boni is passionate about engineering education. She has led and participated in various educational studies on the impact of student reflections, authentic learning assignments, the use of technology in the classroom, and graduate education.Elisa Koolman, University of Texas at Austin Elisa is a Ph. D. student at the University of Texas at Austin. They
residential treatment center for adolescent girls in Arlington MA, focusing on program evaluation and outcomes after discharge. Since 2011, Dr. Tripathy has been teaching in the Sociology department at University of Massachusetts Lowell. She received teaching awards for applied and experiential learning in 2013 and 2014, was promoted to Associate Teaching Professor in 2018, and received the UMass Lowell Teaching Excellence Award in Sociology in 2018. From 2016-2019, Dr. Tripathy was the Director of the Bachelor of Liberal Arts program, an interdisciplinary major with an enrollment of 250 undergraduate students. During 2018- 2020, she collaborated with Dr. Kavitha Chandra to utilize participatory action research (PAR) as an
researchgroup in 2024. These two non-traditional transfer scholars achieved a first for the College ofEngineering in our institution as the Goldwater scholarship is the nation’s most prestigious awardfor excellence in undergraduate research. Moreover, several of our scholars have shown interest inundergraduate research and graduate school. Currently, 5 scholars are participating inundergraduate research. Similarly, 20 scholars have completed one or two internships. In thesurvey conducted, one scholar stated, “Working with the mentors I have met through the S-STEMprogram is single-handedly the reason I have been able to make the most out of the opportunitiesavailable to me and get accepted in research labs, REUs, and even the Goldwater Scholarship
-methods research on and for people at work, ensuring that organizations intentionally center the human experience. Sreyoshi has spoken at over 100+ global venues, addressing diverse audiences ranging from academics, NSF PIs, in- dustry leaders, entrepreneurs, and professionals to students or high-schoolers starting out with Computer Sciences, helping them strategize and broaden participation, as well as explore, understand, and apply emerging technologies. Sreyoshi is committed to broadening participation among underrepresented mi- norities in engineering and serves as a Senator at the Society of Women Engineers. She is also part of the Advisory Board at the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech and serves as an
faculty mentorship, the pathway into and through graduate education, and gender and race in engineering.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an associate professor in the Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at Cornell University. She is also the Engineering Workforce Development Director for CISTAR, the Center for Innovative and Strategic Transformation of Alkane Resources, a Na- tional Science Foundation Engineering Research Center. Her research focuses on how identity, among other affective factors, influences diverse students to choose engineering and persist in engineering. She also studies how different experiences within the practice and
lecture.IntroductionThis research paper explores the ways in which engineering postdoctoral scholars describe theappeal of pursuing a career in the professoriate. Scholarship concerning engineering careertrajectories presently lack the depth necessary to understand the arc of the career from student topostdoctoral scholar to professor (Jaeger et al., 2017; St. Clair et al., 2017; Su, 2013). Aninvestigation of this trajectory is critical for those invested in increasing the number ofunderrepresented minorities (URMs; African American, Latinx, and Native American) andwomen entering the professoriate and earning tenure. Researchers have found postdoctoraltraining is crucial for a scholar’s productivity and ability to compete for professorships (Andalibet al., 2018
perspective, we can also usediscourse identity to determine students’ internalization of the discipline’s ethical canons anddisciplinary identity based on how they discursively position themselves in relation to the valuesof the profession. For example, research conducted by Dannels [17] and Douglas and colleagues[43] explored the discursive practices utilized by students throughout a variety of academiccontexts. They found that students did not perceive themselves as engineers; they perceivedthemselves as students working for a grade that would lead them to graduate from an engineeringprogram. In these studies, these students utilized discourse to maintain their student identitiesand separated themselves from engineers. To strengthen the link
international students. The analyses for answeringour two research questions were conducted independently in this exploratory study.Study ParticipantsStudy participants were students from a first-year engineering course in the spring semester andmost students were in their first year of study (more than 91%). This data consist 1477 studentsworked on 409 teams. Among the participants 370 were females,1102 were males, and 5students selected other or not prefer to answer. 1166 students were US-citizen and 311 wereinternational. Also, 899 students were White, 338 Asian, 33 Black, 129 Hispanic, 1 NativeAmerican, and 48 “Other.” There were 29 students who declined to answer. We are focused atteam-level effects rather than individual-level experiences, so we
students. In 2018 and 2019, she collaborated with Dr. Kavitha Chandra to utilize participatory action research (PAR) as an evaluation approach for the Research, Academics, and Mentoring Pathways (RAMP) summer program for first-year female engineering students.Prof. Kavitha Chandra, University of Massachusetts, Lowell Kavitha Chandra is the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Professor of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering in the Francis College of Engineering at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. She directs the Research, Academics and Mentoring Pathways (RAMP) to Success program that aims to estab- lish successful pathways to graduate school and interdisciplinary careers for new undergraduate students
external to internal ability to define theself assists in the social and professional development of students.25Context of CourseProgram and Course DescriptionThe University of Michigan’s Multidisciplinary Design Program was established in 2007. Asseen in Conger et al., students were excited to begin their engineering programs at the university,but there was a disconnect from what they learned in their courses to their professional practiceafter graduation.26 MDP is but one piece of the university’s commitment to prepare engineersfor the 21st century and beyond. Recognizing the need for cooperation and collaboration amongdifferent disciplines in the design process, a common experience for all engineers, MDP, wascreated to allow students and teams
incorporate AI into educational curricula and teaching methods. Additionally, Aggrawal mentors students at various levels and is actively seeking collaborative opportunities in her field. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Assessing and Characterizing Perspective-Taking Abilities in Undergraduate Students: A Case Study ApproachAbstractThis Empirical Research Paper (Full Paper, 10 pages) investigates the development ofperspective-taking abilities in undergraduate students utilizing a case study approach.Background: The increasing emphasis on preparing graduates for a globalized workforcenecessitates the development of intercultural communication skills. Perspective-taking is key
Paper ID #37108Where Are We, and Where to Next? ’Neurodiversity’ in EngineeringEducation ResearchTheo Sorg, Purdue University Theo Sorg (they/them) is a third-year PhD student and National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. They received their Bachelor’s de- gree in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering at Purdue University. As an undergraduate, they also received a Cooperative Education Program certificate for their work as a Pathways Intern at NASA’s John- son Space Center. Their research interests focus on challenging problematic conceptions and
enhance analytical abilities and promote problem-solving skills usingmultiple levels of abstraction [15]. Institutes define the CT according to unique goals and standards, meaning no unifiedCT definitions exist among researchers. For example, the International Society for Technologyin Education (ISTE) defines CT as a systematic approach for solving problems in computersciences and other subject areas and careers [16]. According to the K–12 Computer ScienceFramework, CT is closely related to computer sciences, specifically the capabilities ofcomputers for solving various problems using algorithms. The framework includes corepractices for promoting the computing culture, collaborating using computing, definingcomputational problems
teaching approachesand students’ experiences. Lattuca and her colleagues’ [12] research on the culture and values ofengineering disciplines demonstrated that disciplinary contexts shape faculty members’ attitudesand behaviors. Recent research explores the idea of the culture of engineering education and theneed to understand this culture before we can effect systemic change [13, 14]. For example,Godfrey [15] showed that different engineering disciplines exhibited different cultures, or“cultures within cultures,” affecting the participation of women.Our project explores the different disciplinary cultures of EE, CpE, and ME as these fieldsprovide a sharply contrasting picture of engineering matriculation, persistence, and attrition forBlack
multi-cultural and multi-disciplinary settingthat provides the basis for robust and sustainable solutions. In this proceeding, we present ourobservations, challenges, and learnings garnered over eight years of hosting the summer schooland detail the current program design, which has evolved to reflect lessons learned.1. The ProgramThe US-Denmark research and education program, funded for the first three years by the DanishAgency for Science, Technology and Innovation and the following five years by US-NSF PIRE,is a cooperative and collaborative partnership between two US universities: Universities ofCalifornia, Santa Cruz and Davis (UCSC, UC Davis), and two Danish universities: AalborgUniversity (AAU) and the Technical University of Denmark
participating in studies on technologies for disability, overlookingtheir much-needed insight, and treating them as unequal engineering partners in the design andresearch processes [2]. Another literature survey focused on ASEE publications noted that therewas a significant lack of research focusing on disability as an identity and on the experiences ofstudents with disabilities in engineering education [3].Several works have explored the stigma, social exclusion, systemic marginalization, devaluation,and feelings of “otherness” experienced by students with disabilities in engineering education[4], [5]. These consequences were attributed to a variety of reasons, including the lack of rolemodels with disabilities, educators’ misconceptions about the
two phases of a one-yearplanning project, funded by the National Science Foundation, to increase the representation ofcivil engineers with disabilities in the workforce. The purpose of this project is to build capacityfor engaging industry partners in a long-term collaboration under a shared goal of increasingworkforce accessibility for students with disabilities pursuing careers in civil engineering.Specific objectives for this project include: (1) synthesizing relevant literature; (2) identifyingand engaging industry stakeholders; (3) exploring collaborative tensions and synergies amongindustry stakeholders; and (4) developing a robust research agenda for the next phases of theproject.BackgroundDespite calls from the National Science
, personality, and assessment. He is director of the Individual and Team Performance Lab and the Virtual Team Performance, Innovation, and Collaboration Lab at the University of Calgary, which was built through a $500K Canada Foundation for Innovation Infrastructure Grant. He also holds operating grants of over $300K to conduct leading-edge research on virtual team effectiveness. Over the past 10 years Tom has worked with organizations in numerous industries includ- ing oil and gas, healthcare, technology, and venture capitals. He is currently engaged with the Schulich School of Engineering at the University of Calgary to train, develop, and cultivate soft-skill teamwork competencies in order to equip graduates with strong
experiences.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com- munication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication
promoting the retention and persistence of students of color in STEM” The Journal of Negro Education, vol. 80 no. 4, pp. 491–504, 2011.11. L. R. M. Hausmann, J. W. Schofield, and R. L. Woods, “Sense of belonging as a predictor of intentions to persist among African American and White first-year college students,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 48 no. 7, pp. 803-839, 2007.12. S. Hurtado, J. F. Milem, A. R. Clayton-Pedersen, and W. R. Allen, “Enhancing campus climates for racial/ethnic diversity: Educational policy and practice,” Review of Higher Education, vol. 21 no. 3, pp. 279-302, 1998.13. S. Hurtado, J. F. Milem, A. R. Clayton-Pedersen, and W. R. Allen, “Enacting diverse learning environments: Improving the climate for
-10 school year and the ASEE Pacific Northwest Section Outstanding Teaching Award in 2014.Ms. Tessa Alice Olmstead, Highline College Tessa holds a bachelor’s degree in Bioengineering from the University of Washington, and a second bach- elor’s degree in Dance. She is currently researching the use of reflective practices to improve engineering education at Highline College. She also serves as a research scientist for the Department of Neurosurgery at the University of Washington.Ms. Judy Mannard PE, Highline Community College c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Changing Student Behavior through the Use of Reflective Teaching Practices in an Introduction to
better equipped for ethical design. Asan active force, love could also shape communication and collaboration in design, fostering careand a more expansive vision for diverse forms of engagement.This research examines the theoretical foundations and classroom applications of love as a coretopic of knowledge in secondary and postsecondary engineering education. It explores how love,both as a subject of study and conceptual lens, shapes students’ self-reflection, ethicalunderstanding, and relational dynamics in life and design contexts. The paper presents atransdisciplinary framework for love, applies it to holistic design thinking, and outlines theresearch methodology, classroom insights, and potential for future educational pedagogies.It
structures.To increase students’ learning, two teaching methods were used: case studies and problem-basedlearning (PBL). These methods were well-suited for teaching prospective scientists and engineersbecause they focus on cooperative sharing of ideas as well as healthy discussion and resolution ofproblematic issues [10, 11]. PBL-structured case studies promote higher-order learning skills, suchas application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. During case study-based learning modules,students were presented with a selected case to resolve the core issue by critically evaluating theinformation they had researched. They had opportunities to find the latest developments in a fieldand associate them with most recent social issues. This approach overcame
and in person summer community development projects.Celebrate diversity of faculty and students while reducing gaps in opportunities andresources. In similar ways that we invite our graduate students in the [program deleted forreview], recognizing and valuing differences among Colombian faculty and students allowedthem to position themselves with respect to the histories of development and with specificstruggles of vulnerable communities. For example, during participatory workshops with students,they mapped their perspectives, began to position themselves and their histories in relation to thehistories of struggles in their territory, such as violent conflict around gold mining or Stateneglect in delivering basic services to their communities
Engineering Experiment Station, TAMUS TEES Research Scientist, Texas A&M University System Internal Evaluator and Data Collector for TAMUS LSAMPDr. Shannon D. Walton, Texas A&M University Shannon D. Walton, PhD, is the Director of Recruiting for the Office of Graduate and Professional Stud- ies and the Director of Educational Achievement for the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Holding dual positions, Dr. Walton’s responsibilities range from the recruitment and retention of a talented and diverse graduate student population to the management of science, technol- ogy, engineering and mathematics (STEM) programs, like the NSF-funded Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation
learning experiences and students designing to learn.Dr. Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico Abhaya Datye has been on the faculty at the University of New Mexico after receiving his PhD in Chem- ical Engineering at the University of Michigan in 1984. He is presently Chair of the department and Distinguished Regents Professor of Chemical & Biological Engineering. From 1994-2014 he served as Director of the Center for Microengineered Materials, a strategic research center at UNM that reports to the Vice President for Research. He is also the founding director of the graduate interdisciplinary program in Nanoscience and Microsystems, the first program at UNM to span three schools and colleges and the Anderson