. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(84)90001-1Lent, R. W., Singley, D., Sheu, H.-B., Gainor, K. A., Brenner, B. R., Treistman, D., & Ades, L.(2005). Social Cognitive Predictors of Domain and Life Satisfaction: Exploring the TheoreticalPrecursors of Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(3), 429-442. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.429Miner, K. N., January, S. C., Dray, K. K., & Carter-Sowell, A. R. (2019). Is it always this cold?Chilly interpersonal climates as a barrier to the well-being of early-career women faculty inSTEM. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 38(2), 226-245.National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2017). Women, Minorities, and Personswith Disabilities in Science and
personal journeys as engineers. That [The older SHPE student’s] motivation translated into their school as well, into them being engineering students, and to their professional development, and you could tell every single one of these people here, these guys are going to accomplish their education, accomplish their career. –Manolo I quickly started to see the benefits of SHPE...most importantly hearing what other Latino engineers were like, and how they got there, hearing their story. –AnthonyNurturing an engineering familia Within SHPE students found more than friendship and collegiality, they found a familia(family) of engineers. The students discussed the strong ties that connected them to their peers
for training though sessions offered before the start ofthe spring semester and program kickoff, as well as “lunch-and-learn” type social gatheringswith other mentors during the duration of the program.During the first year of the program’s implementation, graduate student mentors were solicitedprimarily by asking faculty members to nominate graduate students for the program, resulting in9 graduate mentor participants. In the second year, graduate students were recruited directly viatargeted emails from the program directors and graduate advisors, flyers posted in engineeringbuildings, and word of mouth from past mentors, program directors and administrators, resultingin 13 graduate mentor participants. As the program continues to grow and
SAE Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award. Dr. Reisel received his B.M.E. degree from Villanova University in 1989, his M.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Purdue University in 1991, and his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Purdue University in 1994. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 An Exploration of the Use of Technical Electives in Engineering CurriculaAbstractA standard feature of many, if not most, undergraduate engineering programs is the requirementthat students in the program take a certain number of technical elective courses. The widespreadand long-standing use of this requirement in engineering programs may have led to a situationwhere many faculty do not even consider
Grades Influencing Decision to 68% Yes, 32% No 81% Yes, 19% No Stay at WVU Tech People Discouraging Staying in 24% Yes, 76% No 20% Yes, 80% No College Top Three Campus Services Advising, TRIO, Tutoring Advising and TRIO (tied), Used TutoringTable 5: Summary of Themes for Female Students Encouragement to Pursue College Family (with a few citing faculty, career plans, and outside sources) Encouragement to Pursue Major Family, Faculty, Mentors, and Self People Discouraging
ituniquely included three courses. While the other case study sites were bound as a singleinstructional setting, this site was defined around an instructional intervention, which wasembedded in three different course types. The courses were all offered through the chemical andbiological engineering department and included a required, foundational course (ChemicalEngineering Fluid Mechanics, n= 40 students); an upper-division technical elective (SustainableEnergy, n=37 students); and a lower-division elective open to all majors on campus (Energy andSustainability, n=65 students). The intervention was developed and taught by a team of twochemical and biological engineering faculty members at Montana State University. Detail on thedevelopment and
and establishing their careersas well, it is a valuable timeframe to investigate [1] [2] [3]. During this period, we can betterunderstand how engineering students’ personal and social identities, which are their conceptionsof themselves as individuals and group members, engineering identities, which is theirconceptions of themselves as engineers, and ethical identities, which is their conception ofthemselves as people who identify with their professional ethics, develop. Reviewing these threeidentity types is valuable in identifying both their pre-established impacts on career choice andaspirations as well as the remaining gaps in literature that need to be filled such as the connectionbetween moral behavior and vocational choice [3] [4] [5
, constructing one’s sense of self throughconstant development and self-reflection [5]. It includes the traits and characteristics, socialrelations, roles, and social group memberships that define who a person is within a particularsetting. Engineering identity, especially for students, reflects their acceptance of and recognitionas part of the engineering field, influencing their decision to enter and persist in the field [6].When students possess a strong engineering identity, they tend to perceive themselves as futureengineers, fostering their commitment to their pursuit of an engineering career [7]. This identitycontinues to impact their learning, serving as a guiding force throughout their studies [8]. Morelock synthesized the disperse
responses, we do not wish tosuggest that these are the “wrong” career experiences. Career pursuits entail a number of unknownvariables that may result in undesirable outcomes, and recognizing discontent may be a first stepto finding career interests that are more enriching.Future work from this project will include expanding the analysis to other engineering major. Wealso plan to interview faculty members and students to understand their perceptions of careerpreparation and potential career pathways leading from an engineering degree.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the Purdue University Davidson School of Engineering, whosePipeline Center funded this project. This work was also supported by the National ScienceFoundation (DGE
fSession XXXX] Brillantes: Exploring Students Changing Perceptions of Mathematics and Engineering through an Integrated Engineering Design and Algebraic Program for Students in Honduras Araceli Martinez Ortiz, PhD. Engineering Education Graduate Programs Klesse College of Engineering and Integrated Design University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA) M. Alejandra Sorto, PhD. Mathematics Department
the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to an academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94 – 122.Austin, A.E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles. In: Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Volume 22, p 397 – 456.Blume-Kohout, M.E. & Adhikari, D. (2016). Training the scientific workforce: Does funding mechanism matter? Research Policy, 45, 1291 – 1303.Burt, B. (2014). The influence of doctoral research experiences on the pursuit of the engineering professoriate (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan).Carlone, H.B. & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science
Natascha Trellinger is a first year PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity. She received her BS in aerospace engineering from Syracuse University. At Purdue, Natascha is a part of the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) and is interested in global teaching and learning at both the undergraduate and graduate levels.Prof. M. D. Wilson, Purdue University MICHAEL WILSON is an Adjunct faculty member in the College of Technology and Ph.D. candidate at Purdue University in the College of Engineering. He earned a Bachelors of Science from the University of Massachusetts and a Masters from the University of Chicago; his broad research interests include Engineering Education
AC 2010-118: SUPPORTS AND BARRIERS THAT RECENT ENGINEERINGGRADUATES EXPERIENCE IN THE WORKPLACESamantha Brunhaver, Stanford University Samantha Brunhaver is a second year graduate student at Stanford University. She is currently working on her Masters in Mechanical Engineering. Her research interests include engineering education and design for manufacturing. She earned a BS in Mechanical Engineering at Northeastern University in 2008.Russell Korte, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Russell Korte is an Assistant Professor of Human Resource Education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He is currently a Fellow with the iFoundry project in the College of Engineering at
) recognize that small personal decisions can have an effect ongroup dynamics and institutional decisions; (3) develop habits of mind; (4) educators need tocreate a space and opportunity to discuss these kinds of issues; (5) demonstrate the importance ofmoral imagination; and (6) encourage students to recognize their own biases and weaknesses.There was general agreement that helping graduate students understand the various contexts theywill be required to work in and make decisions about is key to producing more ethical engineersand scientists.One of the most exciting benefits of the workshop for the PI and Co-PIs was the detailedfeedback we received on the instructional models we have been developing. We receivedvaluable feedback regarding
into practice. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 WIP -Exploring and Expanding Support for International Students in Engineering: Faculty Reflections Beyond Academic BoundariesAbstractExpanding on our previous work [1], this research delves into self-reflection among engineeringfaculty members who were international students. Our primary objective is to extend learningfrom using an autoethnographic lens to understand the experiences of faculty members who wereonce international students themselves, towards the development of a research study tounderstand how (if at all) faculty members in the United States address the unique needs of theinternational student community.The Challenge and
as it relates to this careerpath.Data are being collected on Fellows’ reactions to individual grant activities and their overallparticipation. In addition to Fellow data, participating faculty are surveyed to provide furtherinformation on student growth in key areas of concern (teaching, research, and multiculturalawareness to work with diverse populations). Fellow surveys will continue to be collected beyondgraduation to further understand how Fellows transition into and exist within academic settings.The research on career decision-making is being conducted through a Social Cognitive CareerTheory lens. This lens focuses on three aspects of career development and decision-making: (1)how an individual develops their career interests, (2) how
2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Exploring High DFW Rates in an Engineering Statics Course: Insights from Faculty and Teaching Assistants. Ibukunoluwa Eunice Salami1, Segun Samuel Oladipo2, Dr. Logan Perry31: Graduate Student Researcher, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nebraska- Lincoln 2: Graduate Student Researcher, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 3: Assistant Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nebraska-LincolnAbstractEngineering statics is a branch of engineering mechanics that focuses on the effects of forceson
onDeveloping a Personal Brand, Creating Healthy Boundaries, Promotion and Tenure Process, aDeans Panel, and an Agency Panel. Open to all with free participation and registration, thisinitiative aims to make a significant impact on representation of Hispanic faculty. By offeringvaluable insights and resources, the conference seeks to empower early career faculty membersand enhance their professional journey. The provision of free participation not only breaks downfinancial barriers but also contributes to fostering a more inclusive academic community.Importantly, this initiative recognizes the profound influence of diverse faculty onHispanic/Latinx students, offering them positive role models and mentors. By strengthening thefaculty body's diversity
. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson (he/him) is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. His lab’s design-based research focuses on how to re-contextualize engineering science engineering courses to better reflect and prepare students for the reality of ill-defined, sociotechnical engineering practice. Their current projects include studying and designing classroom interventions around macroethical issues in aerospace engineering and the productive beginnings of engineering judgment as students create and use mathematical models. Aaron holds a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering
developing a comfortable active-learning environmentin their classroom. It is arguable that harnessing this compassionate and humanistic disposition atthe early stages of an educator’s career can be further complemented by gaining exposure toEBIPs and guidance on how to specifically implement them. This momentum may then carry onand resonate with colleagues and other faculty members in the department. The foregoingstatements related to the challenges of in-class demonstrations illustrate several factors related toresource availability and EBIP implementation which are bulleted below: • Providing teaching opportunities for graduate students creates a path for individuals of a younger generation to try out alternative teaching methods and
and instructors and learners’ engagement arenot easily achieved. The online education process, including organization and management,occurs differently than in conventional teaching. The paper provides insight into onlineeducation technologies and techniques for an engineering graduate program and how onlinelearning has evolved using a case study. The article presents over 25 years of history of the casestudy program providing data results of alums, students, and faculty surveys across five years toanswer three critical questions for Software Engineering learners. These three research questionsaddress learning resource deployment, organization and management, and new learning andteaching activities. The results of the surveys revealed that
. Page 15.263.914. Fortenberry, N.L., Sullivan, J.F., Jordan, P.N., Knight, D.W. (2007). Retention: Engineering education Research aids instruction. Science, 317(5842), 1175-1176.15. Rhoten, D., Pfirman, S. (2006) Women in interdisciplinary science: exploring preferences and consequences. Research Policy, 36, 56-75. Page 15.263.10Appendix ACareerWISE: An Interdisciplinary Experience for Graduate StudentsQuestions for Team Members The following questions will be used to help us better understand the experiences of students and faculty members who work on a large, interdisciplinary research team. Please respond to the
Paper ID #42477Bridging the Gap: Exploring Real-Life Experiences of Engineering Facultyin Implementing EBIPsStephanie Adams, Oregon State University Stephanie Adams is currently enrolled as a doctoral student at Oregon State University, where she is working towards her PhD in Civil Engineering with a concentration in Engineering Education. Her current research focuses on the adoption of evidence-based instructional practices (EBIPs) among engineering faculty members. Additionally, she is investigating the identity development of engineering students in capstone courses.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University
advanced engineering degree, in lieu of an MBA, law or medical degree, or a non-engineering M.S. • The decision to apply for admission to certain M.S. or Ph.D. programs at certain universities. • The decision to enroll in a specific program.Batson, Merrit, and Williams4 highlight the role of the faculty member in recruiting studentscurrently enrolled in B.S. programs in engineering and the sciences to be full-time graduatestudents. Many students never get to the first stage in the process of attending graduate school:they never consider graduate school! Many good engineering students never consider graduateschool for themselves because no one ever encourages them to consider graduate school.5Reichert and Absher6 believe the main
computational power is greatly expanding its impactand influence in leadership, i.e., data, and computation on it, is used to enhance the practice ofleadership. These developments have wide-ranging impacts for organization and will force us toaddress thorny ethical challenges.This work will address a small slice of the overall picture, i.e., an initial exploration in the Fall 2023semester of student and industry perceptions about specific ethical questions on Gen AI’s impact oncareers and the workplace. The intent is to help students in our undergraduate Engineering Leadershipclass at Texas A&M University to be resilient in their own careers and to navigate the ethical watersof Gen AI in decision making in their workplaces.We use a flipped
discourse identity. Although the rationale for developing engineering judgment inundergraduate students is the complexity they will face in professional practice, engineeringeducators often considerably reduce the complexity of the problems students face. Student workintended to train engineering judgment often prescribes goals and objectives, and demands a one-time decision, product, or solution that faculty or instructors evaluate. The evaluation processmight not contain formal methods for foregrounding feedback from experience or reflecting onhow the problem or decision emerges; thus, the loop from decision to upstream cognitiveprocesses might not be closed. Consequently, in this paper, our exploration of engineeringjudgment is guided by the
, mismatched expectations for what theirgraduate school experience would be like and conflicting personal and professional identitiesinfluenced their decision process. Peters and Daly [15] studied engineering students who returnedto graduate school after working for a time, showing that the utility of the degree was a majordriving force in persistence. The decision to stay in the degree was viewed through an analysis ofcosts, saying that “the question was not whether they could successfully complete a graduatedegree program but whether it was worth doing” (p. 262). A more comprehensive model of theattrition decision process was developed by Berdanier et al. [16]. The GrAD model not onlyexposed the major factors in engineering graduate student
strategic plans were developed to serve as the starting point for career preparationsince many graduate students do not feel sufficiently prepared, especially for careers outside ofacademia [1]. The graduate students were encouraged to think about where they sought to beemployed upon graduation and to be mindful that more than a doctoral degree would be requiredto obtain employment. Guided conversation allowed them to think of the yearly activities theyshould consider undertaking. The strategic planning also extended to the broader vision of theresearch group. Part of the change vision of the faculty member was establishing an organizationbuilt on mutual benefit. By articulating visions and strategies on an individual and collectivelevel, the
this summer.’ For me, thatlifestyle is not realistic. Finally, my department already has 25 tenured or tenure-track personnelwho have a research focus – what we really need is at least one faculty member who has thetime, energy, and desire to focus on undergraduate students.”Faculty Member #2. The second faculty member is 38 years old and graduated with a B.S. inConstruction in 1995 and an M.S. in Construction Management in 1999. She joined the CivilEngineering Department at Montana State University in 2000 as an Adjunct Instructor inConstruction Engineering Technology (CET). She teaches both undergraduate and graduateclasses; advises 45 undergraduate CET students; serves as the Director of the Internship programat MSU for both Civil and
detailsof teaching hidden behind the curtains, nor did these training programs prepare us for how muchwe would grow. Specifically, these training programs did not prepare us for the difficulty indeveloping material, designing and utilizing active learning, or navigating student emotions. Ourexperiences included an abrupt learning curve we had to navigate to learn these skills whilepracticing them. These skills cannot be entirely taught without practice. If we had not engaged inthis apprenticeship, we would have encountered these facets of teaching while we were engagingin teaching for the first time. Our experiences and the themes which emerged from that processsuggest that more graduate students, particularly those interested in a faculty career