skin, convenient accessibility, and prox-imity to blood vessels and systemic circulation make skin an obvious candidate for a route of drug admin-istration. In this module, students will explore the permeability of porcine skin, easily obtainable at a gro-cery store and cost-effective. Porcine skin has been shown to be histologically and biochemically similar 9to human skin, and have a similar permeability[ ]. In parallel, students will measure mass transfer across Page 24.963.6biomaterials using artificial skin and also determine the effects of various permeation enhancers on themass
Technology and a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Bucknell University.Dr. Eric C Pappas, James Madison University Eric Pappas is Professor of Integrated Science and Technology at James Madison University and formerly a faculty member in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech (1993-2003).Dr. Jesse Pappas, James Madison University Jesse Pappas studied self-insight, intentional self-development, and the role of emotion in self-perception at University of Virginia, where he received a Ph.D. in social psychology in 2012. His dissertation project involved adapting established professional development tools to facilitate the personal and academic suc- cess of college students. Jesse currently serves as Assessment Director and
from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Dr. Jana Bouwma-Gearhart, Oregon State University Jana L. Bouwma-Gearhart is an associate professor of STEM education at Oregon State University. Her research widely concerns improving education at research universities. Her earlier research explored en- hancements to faculty motivation to improve undergraduate education. Her more recent research concerns organizational change towards postsecondary STEM education improvement at
traditionally marginalized engineering students from an asset-based perspective. Homero’s goal is to develop engineering education practices that value the capital that tra- ditionally marginalized students, bring into the field, and to train graduate students and faculty members with the tool to promote effective and inclusive learning environments and mentorship practices. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, and was inducted into the Bouchet Honor Society. Homero serves as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chair for the
peer reviewed conference proceedings articles in these areas. He has B.S. in ME, and both M.S. and Ph.D. in IE. He is a member of ASEE, INFORMS, and a senior member of IIE.Dr. Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and In- dustrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product development engineer at the 3M Corporate Research Laboratory in St. Paul, Minnesota. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Michigan State University and his S.M. and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr. Johnson’s research focuses on design tools
scholars willremain in engineering. Assuming the students do earn their BS in an engineering field, the statisticssuggest that the scholarship program is doing a better job attracting underrepresented groups toengineering that the average national program.2.1.2 Professional Development: To develop community, all scholars enroll in the University 301in the first year of the program. During this one credit-hour course, scholars engaged in a widerange of enrichment activities. Career Services conducted workshops on writing resume/CV,exploring career opportunities online, preparing for career job fairs and interviewing skills.Scholars engaged in interactive sessions on responsible conduct of research, identifying andengaging with mentors, technical
roles in an individual’s academic and career choices. The SCCT framework argues that these choices are influenced by three main factors: selfefficacy (the degree to which one believes that one can succeed at a given activity), outcome expectations (one’s beliefs about the outcomes of certain behaviors), and personal interests (i.e., intentions). Researchers have used SCCT to demonstrate that selfefficacy plays a crucial role in recruiting 10,11women into collegelevel STEM program. Other studies have explored handson STEM activities within the framework of SCCT and have found that it
higher education-workforce infrastructure for sustained, innovative Industry 4.0 workforce preparation. The factors being evaluated primarily involve objectives related to curriculum development, course integration, career pathway establishment, building partnerships and dissemination. Faculty Outcomes: To increase community college faculty members’ skills and comfort level with teaching Industry 4.0 curricula. The evaluation factors involve objectives related to the use of industry 4.0 curricula, and faculty and student satisfactions. Student Outcomes: To increase the number of workers (including underrepresented students) qualified to merge manufacturing OT & IT skills for an Industry 4.0
seeming onerous or impossible, and steer clear of unnecessary social and personal triggers.Developing such a curriculum, enabling students to see a direct application to their lives increasesmotivation and fosters interaction. Such inclusion of students’ lives can help to break down racialand gender barriers regarding students’ beliefs about who can be a data or computer scientist.NJ is at a crossroads with K-12 Computer Science Education. The state is still developing itscomputer science education standards and outlining required faculty expertise for school districts,making the student and teacher experience variable across the region and even within districts.While many faculty are taking advantage of services and opportunities from
results will be given. Each projectwill be briefly introduced and outcomes will be shared. Finally, we will conclude with theoverall lessons we learned from this experience and discuss next summer’s plans as a result ofour analysis and self-reflections. We hope that our shared experiences (struggles,accomplishments, and mistakes, etc.) will help the engineering education community developmore effective relationships with K-12 by using the models we implemented.IntroductionOne of the biggest challenges for the engineering faculty in college is to teach the freshmen, i.e.students who have just graduated from high school. Student grades decrease in average due tothe transition from high school to the college. Engineering programs in particular face
World Technologies, a company started by former students of the capstone class that he teaches. His interests include engineering and entrepreneurship pedagogy and assessment, technology development, and clinical applications of biomedical instrumentation.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Washington State University Shane Brown conducts research in conceptual and epistemological change, social capital, and diffusion of innovations. In 2011, he received the NSF CAREER Award to investigate how engineers think about and use concepts that academics consider to be important.Dr. Brian F. French, Washington State University Brian F. French is an Associate Professor of educational leadership and counseling psychology and Co- Director
, and ethnic diversity. Among its 3100 undergraduate students,around 39% are recipients of Pell grants, and 29% are pursuing majors in STEM fields. Thecampus faces challenges as a significant number of students come from K-12 systems thathaven't adequately prepared them for college-level math and science. Additionally, manystudents work over 20 hours per week, often off-campus, and spend an average of 2 hours dailycommuting on public transportation.These circumstances contribute to lower retention and graduation rates, particularly affectingstudents from racial and ethnic minorities who are already underrepresented in the STEMworkforce. Notably, recent data shows that only about 45% of all majors manage to graduatewith a bachelor's degree
National Science Foundation(NSF) venture to develop a nanotechnology-based educational intervention to increase a large(~2,000 students per year) number of future practicing engineers’ awareness of nanotechnology.One of the primary goals of this NSF grant was to expose the next generation of engineers tonanotechnology through the creation and implementation of nanotechnology interventions in acollege-wide first-year engineering (FYE) course, while adhering to the current learningobjectives and time constraints of the course. This endeavor required an effective partnershipbetween chemical engineering and engineering education faculty members such that realisticimpacts could be had in the FYE classrooms. In this way, the subject experts could