included statements aboutteam work, critical thinking and problem solving, and personal skills. For example, one studentsaid, “The most important thing I learned was to stay focused and while doing research you haveto keep an open mind.”The strength of agreement items asked the participants to share some summary perceptionsregarding their experiences (Table 9). The students indicated that they had found value in the cross-disciplinary set of peers they had worked with. They liked the style of problem-based learning theyhad experienced in the REU. Although not necessarily in transportation, students were able to seethemselves in graduate study, academia, or research-based careers. That four of the fiverespondents “strongly agreed” that they were
engineering programs in the nation, we are building an innovative program aligned with the university mission of Pro Humanitate (For Humanity). We are committed to educating the whole person and the whole engineer with fearlessness and virtuous character. With inclusion being a core value, our engineering team represents 60% female engineering faculty and 40% female students, plus 20% of students from ethnic minority groups. Prior to joining Wake Forest University, Olga served as a Program Director at the National Science Foundation in the Division of Undergraduate Education and founding faculty of the Department of Engineering at James Madison University. As a 2009 NSF CAREER Awardee, her expertise and interests focus on
components commonly attract students from underrepresented groups [13-14]. 5. Our course is focused on the positive social impact of engineering, which makes engineering more accessible to underrepresented students, as the potential to make a positive societal impact is especially important to underrepresented students in career selection [15-16].HuskyADAPT: Accessible Design and Play TechnologyHuskyADAPT was co-founded in 2016 by University of Washington (UW) faculty and studentsfrom Bioengineering, Computer Science, Human Centered Design and Engineering, MechanicalEngineering, and Rehabilitation Medicine [1]. HuskyADAPT has grown to include a studentorganization with over 100 active members. Our initial work was focused
questions, female undergraduates at the University of Georgia (UGA)in the southeastern United States were invited to complete a 20-question survey that asked themto identify their reasons for enrolling as an engineering major, as well as their personal andfamily educational backgrounds. A majority of survey participants chose engineering becausethey were interested in it or because they thought it would lead to a successful career. About halfof the students had at least one family member working as an engineer. In a study by Mativo andGeorge [47], it was found that engineering women have a great influence on the career choice oftheir daughters. In particular, among women engineering professionals who had daughters whowere attending college, 54
sabbatical or otherwise on leave should also belisted. The program will need to supply a curriculum vitae for each person listed in the tables.Thus, plan ahead and gather these documents during the semesters prior to the visit. Trackingdown an adjunct used once months later to obtain their CV can be very challenging.The accreditation team members are likely to visit classrooms to both observe teaching andspeak with students. Think about course scheduling in advance, ensuring that key subjects willbe available during the weekdays most likely utilized for a visit. If a group of students, sayseniors, will not have classes during the visit days, consider planning a pizza party or othergathering to offer evaluators the opportunity to meet with these
includes a focus on student teamwork, a greaterconsideration of social factors, improved communication with diverse constituents, andreflection on ethical decision making and problem solving. This vision of engineering willproduce graduates who can address a wider range of societal problems bringing new perspectivesto traditional areas.Summary of Curriculum DevelopmentOne of the goals of our NSF RED grant is to: “Develop the foundation of a revised engineeringcanon and empower faculty to develop and deliver a professional spine that prepareschangemaking engineers.” Efforts to address this goal include creating new classes anddeveloping lectures, active-learning exercises and assignments that contextualize engineeringthrough social justice
-semester rush and latch onto a solutionwithout fully exploring existing solutions and competing ideas.Figure 3: Sample reminder slide for all Design I sectionsChallenges in Scheduling the Reinforcement LessonThe most difficult point of consideration, both for interviewed faculty and the research team, isthe placement of the reinforcement lesson within the course schedule. The assignment needs tobe properly placed to help students get maximum benefit. All of the interviewees had an opinionon the timing of the reinforcement lesson. Both control faculty would like to see the lessonplaced approximately halfway through the course, a week or two prior to the subsystems report.This is where the fall 2019 reinforcement pilot was located. According to one
Materialscourse at Santa Clara University [31]. Nilsson set out to present course content through examplesthat students were familiar with in their everyday lives, rather than via applications that theymight have had very little personal experience with. She utilized E3 developed by otherresearchers through a National Science Foundation-funded research project, ENGAGE [32] [33].One of the most impactful E3 that Nilsson used was to illustrate axial loading and deformation ofcomposite members. When teaching this topic, faculty and textbooks often cite the example of aconcrete/steel composite column. Nilsson points out that most college sophomores typically havevery little personal experience with the construction and behavior of such columns. Instead
to inspire human-centeredinnovation, the lead instructor presented material on how to design and implement a survey, andteams created a brief survey; the brief survey presented in the Appendix is an example of a team-designed survey. As a team, team members also created an interview protocol to learn about eachother. Each student interviewed at least one other team member and reflected on how theinterview had unfolded. Typical interview questions included, “What brought you to thisuniversity?”; “What activities are you involved in on and off campus?”; “What do you plan tomajor in and why?”; and “What are your long-term career goals?” Common interview reflectionsincluded, “I rushed through questions; I won’t do that next time”, “We should
in Fig 1), ECD projectshave been motivated by faculty and students desire to help, personal and career goals, desires tostudy and work abroad, and desires to solve problems and to gain hands on experience onimpactful work [1][2]. Since then, some scholars have called our attention to how the focus ofwell-intentioned ECD projects on technological fixes and deliverables tend to leave out criticalreflections of engineers’ motivations to be in these projects, and of the processes required tobuild trust and determine communities’ priorities and desires [3][4]. Unfortunately, these calls tocritical reflection in the ECD space are often overshadowed by the continued emergence ofmilestones and challenges (e.g., UN Sustainable Development Goals, NAE
and decisions impact (Meiksins, 1988; Rulifson, 2019).Further, the organizational structure and culture of an entity may not support thisobligation, if the collective assumptions, beliefs, and values are inconsistent withengineering ethics.Engineering graduates must be better prepared to negotiate this complex organizationallandscape while supporting sustainable development, as their responsibility to the publicdemands it. Sustainability encompasses technical feasibility supported by economic,environmental, and safety objectives, regulations, and risk management. “Sustainabledevelopment ... meets the needs of the present, without compromising the ability of futuregenerations to meet their own needs,” Brundtland Commission (Andrews, 2009, p
systems. As a tenure-track faculty member and Chair of the University of Detroit Mercy Mechanical Engineering department, he has developed a program of instruction that promotes student-lead design of assistive technology products for people with disabilities. The guiding principle is that student project work is more meaningful and fulfilling when students have the opportunity to experience interaction with real live ”customers.” Dr. Kleinke is currently the Director of the Graduate Engineering Professional Programs, emphasizing Systems Engineering and Graduate Product Development programs. In addition to academic work, Dr Kleinke continues his involvement in industry as he conducts seminars on innovation which are
their writing decisions pushes students to think critically about how they approached theassignment and can deepen their engagement and understanding of their writing process.Example 3: Scaffolding the processes of writing a literature reviewOur third example describes how atmospheric sciences faculty member Nicole Riemer taughtwriting for the first time. When she began working with our project team, Dr. Riemer had been afaculty member for over ten years but had not explicitly taught writing in her courses. She didnot have any training in the teaching of writing prior to enrolling in Writing Across Engineering.After completing the workshop series, she requested and received mentoring for an advancedgraduate course in atmospheric sciences
, fault detection and anticipation, embedded computing, safety-critical computer systems, and statistical and machine reasoning. Dr. Kim is active in faculty-student team project through the Vertically Integrated Projects program. Also for years he’s been in practicing experiential learning through the Inclusive Engineering Consortium in engineering education with personal instrumentation such as mobile studio.Dr. Patricia D Koman, University of Michigan College of Engineering Trish Koman is the faculty research program manager at the University of Michigan College of Engineer- ing Multidisciplinary Design Program. She supports over a dozen research teams engaging an average of 200 students and conducts educational
, IEEE Globecom, IEEE ICC, and IWCMC.Dr. Abd-Elhamid M. Taha, Alfaisal University Abd-Elhamid M. Taha is an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering At Alfaisal University. His research spans radio resource management, Internet of Things (IoT) services, and modeling in networked cyber-physical systems. Abd-Elhamid is a senior member of the IEEE, and a recipient of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Early Career Researcher Award as well as several awards at Alfaisal University for distinction in teaching and research.Prof. Kok-Lim Alvin Yau, Sunway University KoK-Lim Alvin Yau received the B.Eng. degree (Hons.) in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from Universiti Teknologi Petronas
[Lent etal., 2002]. The SCCT explains that several factors such as person background, self-efficacy,outcome expectation, and environmental supports and barriers either directly or indirectly impactstudents’ career choice and future work performance. In this study, we utilized SCCT tounderstand how CE students perceived environmental supports and barriers is related toparticipating in research, which in turn may impact research career decision makings. Forexample, Dolan (2016) reported that proving an UG research opportunity for engineeringstudents benefits them to explore the research and pursue research career. Thus, supportingundergraduate students to participate in research can be one way of supporting students to pursueresearch career
important for transfer participants. In addition, community collegecharacteristics influenced college choice for transfer students, specifically affordability (i.e.,lower tuition, community college access programs, ability to live at home) and personal/social fit(i.e., close to home, small class sizes).The key difference in the decision-making process of transfer and non-transfer students was thattransfer students tended to view college as an investment in their future. Transfer studentsfrequently discussed the costs and benefits of higher education but very few non-transferstudents were influenced by these factors. Several transfer students were concerned about thecost of higher education and shared that their parents were unwilling or unable to
intelligent (“I have always been smart”), being persistent and working harder thanothers, or developing a dogged determination to prove the stereotyping wrong (“well, now I’mgoing to go...like, just watch me!”)One student identified her female status as a benefit as well as a barrier. This student describedhow a female faculty member referred her to a female scientist career network. Through thisnetwork she was able to make advances in her research and her career development.No faculty in the focus group mentioned gender as an impact on their work with students. Thisdoes not mean faculty were unaware of gender and the experiences of women in science,however, in the limited time of the interview, gender did not come up as a topic.Nontraditional, older
management projects. She works extensively with food banks and food pantries on supply chain management and logistics focused initiatives. Her graduate and undergraduate students are integral part of her service-learning based logistics classes. She teaches courses in strategic relationships among industrial distributors and distribution logistics. Her recent research focuses on engineering education and learning sciences with a focus on how to engage students better to prepare their minds for the future. Her other research interests include empirical studies to assess impact of good supply chain practices such as coordinated decision making in stochastic supply chains, handling supply chains during times of crisis and
had a verypositive experience, and for some it even reinforced their decisions to pursue graduate school. BackgroundDifferent types of engineering and engineering technology undergraduate research experiences havebeen offered from the NSF Research Experiences for Undergraduate summer programs to smallindividual projects undertaken during the semester. Research indicates that numerous benefits fromundergraduate research accrue to the student as well as to the sponsoring faculty member.As noted by Zhan et al, faculty in engineering technology do not typically have access to graduatestudents for research, but they are expected increasingly to engage in greater amounts of researchand scholarly work.1
active member of ASEE since 1998. She joined as a graduate student, after working on an engineering education project and presenting that work and student chapter activities at annual conference. As a faculty member, she regularly publishes and presents at the ASEE Annual Conference. Her interests are in design education and assessment in mechanical and biomedical engineering. She previously served ASEE in leadership roles in the ERM and Mechanics Divisions and as PIC-III Chair.Miss Alissa Papernik Undergraduate Student at Rowan University’s College of EngineeringAmanda Ferreira Dias-Liebold, Rowan University Undergraduate Student at Rowan University College of Engineering American
personal attributes), the skills they mayneed to use, such as communication and collaboration, and how they enact their use of EM(shown under the process category). The working EM master concept map also captures“what” may be involved within having an EM as illustrated with the category branchbeginning with “knowledge & skills”. This branch includes elements that as faculty wewould think are necessary to develop in our students as we seek for them to build an EM.Examples of the concepts that fell under these higher-level categories include fields of studysuch as engineering, marketing, science, and liberal arts, as well as broader career preparationskills, which include leadership, creativity, professional skills, and having a global view
clients with their printing needs. Students who use ourservices most often are those requiring additive manufacturing to build prototypes or models fortheir capstone projects, entrepreneur business classes, and first-year engineering projects.Figure 1: Launch Lab maker space with AR/VR systems and 3D printersParticipation in Launch Lab is inclusive and dynamic. The group meets weekly to discuss newand ongoing business. Attendees include students, faculty, staff, and persons from outside ouruniversity. Everyone with an interest is welcome to participate in Launch Lab projects and toattend our meetings. A few founding faculty members provide a stable core of membership whilemost students, faculty, and community members participate when their
skills such as working in teams, writing,programming, applying physics to solve interdisciplinary problems, designing and developingproducts, managing complex projects, and working with clients. This is an important factorconsidering approximately 95% of physics graduates go on to careers in the private sector orgovernment labs, yet most undergraduate physics programs prepare students primarily foracademic careers. In fact, a survey of 1,407 mid-career physics PhD recipients found that theyfrequently attributed career success to their skills and abilities outside of physics (e.g.,interpersonal, problem solving, computing, and analysis skills). Conversely, some of the mostfrequently mentioned career barriers among 1,321 respondents included lack
byproviding an “artifact” for participating children to include in their career portfolios betweengrades 3-12. Developed in cooperation with school district administrators, Aspirations is ascaffold of programs strategically integrated throughout K-12 at the elementary, middle, andhigh school levels to support the awareness of, exploration of, and readiness for post-secondaryeducation and employment.Elementary - AwarenessAt the elementary level, Connected Classrooms introduces young children to a collegeenvironment by establishing partnerships between college-level and elementary schoolclassrooms. Lafayette College faculty partner with EASD elementary school faculty to determinehow their curricular activities align and how they can collaboratively
and large scale struc- tures for aerospace applications. She is the founder and adviser for the Women of Aerospace student organization at MSU. Dr. Sullivan is an Associate Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. She is the recipient of the 2019 Hermann Oberth Award and the 2014 SAE International Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award. Dr. Sullivan is a member of the MSU Bagley College of Engineering Academy of Distinguished Teachers.Miss Soundouss Sassi, Mississippi State University Soundouss Sassi is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Mississippi State University. Her advisor is Dr. Jean Mohammadi Aragh. In 2016 she earned a Master in Aerospace Engineering from the same
. IntroductionThis evidence-based paper assesses strategies for Research Experience for Undergraduates(REU) social program success. REU programs typically bring together students from across thecountry – or even around the world – to a university campus for the summer. While at thisuniversity, the students learn how to conduct real research in their discipline by actually doing it,under the supervision of a faculty mentor. Giving students exposure to conducting bona fideresearch allows them to determine whether they may be interested in pursuing a research career(and, to support this, continuing on to graduate-level education).Many students who participate in REU programs remember these programs long after theprogram is complete. The initial experience
and construction (AEC) students. In February 2019, Andrea received the prestigious National Science Foundation NSF - CAREER award to research professional identity development processes in undergraduate AEC women. She has also received grants from East Coast Construction Services, Engineering Information Foundation, and the Na- tional Association of Home Builders. Dr. Ofori-Boadu was selected to participate in the 2019 QEM-NSF INCLUDES summit. In 2018, she was selected as a 2018 National Science Foundation - NC A & T ADVANCE IT Faculty Scholar. She also received the 2018 CoST Teaching Excellence Merit Award. Dr. Ofori-Boadu received both the 2017 NC A & T - CoST Rookie Research Excellence Award and the
when architecture majors enroll in engineering coursesin the National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB) accredited degree programs. Theproblem deepens when the setting changes from a public institution to a private liberal artsinstitution. In response to these scenarios, the author explored the question, “What is thepersonal nature of the liberal arts in engineering courses and programs from a teacher’sperspective?” To examine this condition, a personal experience narrative was performed todescribe the journey of being a faculty member teaching engineering and architecture courses inABET and NAAB accredited programs, while inside public and private institutions. Theprimary purpose was to explore the nature of liberal arts in engineering
Paper ID #29158Incorporating Practical Computing Skills into a Supplemental CS2Problem Solving CourseProf. Margaret Ellis, Virginia Tech Assistant Professor of Practice, Computer Science Department, Virginia Tech My research interests include examining ways to improve engineering educational environments to facil- itate student success, especially among underrepresented groups.Dr. Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Tech Dr. Amelink is Acting Vice Provost for Learning Systems Innovation and Effectiveness, Virginia Tech. She is also an affiliate faculty member in the Departments of Engineering Education and Educational