, pneumatics, circuits, electric motors, sensors, signalprocessing and embedded system programming. The junior level courses, RBE 3001 and RBE3002, build on this foundation to ensure that students understand the analysis of selectedcomponents and learn system-level design and development of a robotic system includingembedded design.This paper discusses the development of a two-course sequence in undergraduate roboticseducation, Unified Robotics I and II, in detail. Learning outcomes and sample schedulesillustrating our approach to designing a new robotics engineering program at the undergraduatelevel are presented. The paper exemplifies the robotics systems designed by the students withinthe scope of laboratory experiences and course projects. Finally
AC 2009-2275: RUNNING LINUX IN A WINDOWS COMPUTER LABEd Crowley, University of Houston Page 14.1039.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Running Linux in a Windows Computer LabAbstractIn many courses, the effective use of Linux, or other open source software, can expandand enhance active learning opportunities for students. Since many institutions havestandardized on Windows Computer Laboratories, implementing Linux based learningexperiences may initially seem problematic. However, with a Live Linux CD, you canquickly and easily run Linux, and related open source tools, in an existing WindowsComputer Lab.In this paper, we will explain how Linux Live CDs
. Page 14.140.2Initial results of our VoIP initiative were presented in a conference sponsored by the NationalScience Foundation (NSF), and organized by the National Center for Information andCommunications Technologies (ICT)2. In addition, related work to this VoIP initiative was astudent project3 in which we combined network simulation and laboratory experiments in anetwork modeling and simulation class.In this paper, we first provide an overview of the Electronics and TelecommunicationsEngineering Technology (EET/TET) program at Texas A&M and more specifically we addressour work in one of our classes: ENTC 315, which is a class on Local and Metropolitan AreaNetworks. The following section describes the laboratory experiments including the
AC 2009-854: TEACHING AN OPERATING SYSTEM COURSE TO CET/EETSTUDENTSXuefu Zhou, University of Cincinnati Page 14.1124.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Teaching an Operating System Course to CET/EET StudentsAbstractThis paper describes the motivation for teaching an operating system course to computerengineering technology (CET) and electrical engineering technology (EET) students. It presentscourse topics and teaching approach. The accompanying laboratory exercises are also brieflydescribed.1. IntroductionAn operating system (OS) provides a well-known, convenient, and efficient interface betweenuser programs and the bare computer hardware. As a service
, students will become further challenged to calibrate their modelsand check the accuracy of the results. “Even though information technology is a powerfulreality, an indispensable, rapidly developing, empowering tool, computers do not contain theessence of teaching and learning, which are deeply human activities. So we have to keep ourmeans and ends straight” 4. With the inevitable increase in the use of computers in engineeringapplications, a solution to this problem of inaccurate modeling is quickly needed.A unique laboratory exercise was recently developed to address the problem of inaccuratemodeling. Senior undergraduate students in their terminal analysis course were challenged withthe task of predicting the natural periods of vibration of a
employed in the teaching ofElectronics and Network Analysis. The analysis of this paper follows comparable studies onmedia-based instruction. Cohen et al1 who found that students learned additional informationfrom such instruction techniques in contrast to traditional modes of instruction. Moreover,Powell et al2 further explored this analysis and found that such instructional techniques werehelpful in raising the GPAs of the students.PSpice, an acronym for Personal Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis, is ageneral purpose analog circuit and digital logic simulation software used to check the reliabilityof circuit designs and to predict circuit behavior. SPICE3 was originally developed at theElectronics Research Laboratory of the
control requirements.Prism tests are also conducted to familiarize the students to the possibility of debonding of themasonry from the mortar. Design using the materials at a system (building) level is then taughtin a laboratory format. In this later format, the students prepare complete constructiondocuments (structural calculations, structural plans and structural specifications) for realmasonry structures using architectural plans. Understanding of the construction process ofmasonry structures is highly emphasized in the process of preparing the construction documents.As a result of this two tier coverage of design of masonry structures, graduates from this programhave earned a reputation in California of “being ready on day one” after
required for the course areprogramming using a high level language such as C/C++ or Java and an understanding of logicdesign, both which a typical undergraduate computer engineering student acquires at thesophomore or the junior level. An associated laboratory component was also developed, whereweekly hands-on laboratory sessions serve to reinforce the ideas learned in the lecture. Thecourse projects are drawn from a variety of disciplines which use high performance computingincluding bioinformatics, scientific computing, and signal processing. The course was assessedthrough pre and post tests, focus groups, and external evaluators drawn from faculty from otherdepartments. Our assessments indicate that the course has had a significant impact on
laboratories, and freehand sketching tutorials. The threecomponents run in parallel: lectures introduce new topics; labs develop CAD and solid modelingskills; and tutorials teach technical freehand sketching and visualization skills. While each waseffective, students had some difficulty resolving the connection between each component. Thedissection approach was introduced to tie lecture, laboratory, and tutorial into a cohesive targetto enhance motivation and overall learning.2.2 McMaster Engineering CornerstoneThe McMaster Engineering Cornerstone project uses the dissection/reverse engineeringapproach. Groups are restricted 3 members within the same lab section and the dissectionproduct is assigned based on laboratory day. There are ten lab sections
requiredfor the design of systems which haveelectrical, mechanical, and programmableaspects. A laboratory-driven approach wasdeveloped to bring together the differentsubjects and to relate classroom theory toreal world application. Four laboratoryexercises develop the students’understanding of the material, reinforceprerequisite knowledge, and develophands-on skills. Engineering mathematics,dynamic modeling of physical systems,Matlab / Simulink simulation, andteamwork are applied to solve several realworld problems. The first activity is aresistance-heating thermal system with on-off control for temperature regulation. The Figure 1: Mechatronics students learn through hands-onsecond activity requires students to write activities.program code to
, classrooms, project labs and offices for faculty, staff, and support personnel asneeded. Most, although not all, courses in the engineering core curriculum and electives arebetter taught with laboratory sessions or in studio format with hands-on activities. To this end,the following list provides examples of required facilities: 1. Circuits and Electronics studio This laboratory and its equipment can support several courses such as circuits, analog electronics, signals and systems, instrumentation and related elective courses. 2. Digital Systems Studio Several courses in the digital electronics and computer systems areas can be
@csupomona.eduProceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Regional Conference 81AbstractThis FPGA course is designed for junior level students who are pursuing a baccalaureate degreein electronics and computer engineering technology. Exercises were adapted for use of the AlteraDE-26 development board, which were donated by Altera cooperation. Software used wasQuartus II, which is freely available from Altera website. The board was found to be useful andstudent-friendly for majority of the laboratory exercises and for simple design projects.IntroductionUse of a hardware description language, such as VHDL or
university/college/majorsSoph. ME 201 – Thermodynamics ME 222 – Deformable SolidsYear Student communication survey, refresher for past Short reports on lab activities grammatical expertise Tools: MS Word, Email, WWWJunior ME 332 – Fluid Mechanics ME 371 – Machine Design IYear Laboratory Reports: (Approx. 9 @ 4-6 pages each) Short Technical Reporting Brief narrative of procedure, measured data, Design Analysis Reports (2 @ 4- deduced and analyzed data, plotted results with 6 pp. Individual); Technical discussion and conclusions. Analysis
AC 2009-1731: WATER/WASTEWATER TECHNICIAN TRAINING INSTITUTE:THE FIRST YEAR RETROSPECTIVEChristal Wade, Western Kentucky University Ms. Wade holds a Master of Science Degree in Biology from Western Kentucky University. She began working in the WATERS Laboratory as an undergraduate in 2004 and accepted full-time employment as a laboratory analyst upon graduation in 2006. Ms. Wade currently holds certification under the Kentucky Microbiological Laboratory Certification Program and is an EPA Approved Principal Cryptosporidium Analyst under the Long-Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule. She manages both the Microbiological and Cryptosporidium programs at the WATERS Lab. Ms. Wade
virtual laboratories. Newcyberlearning environments have the potential to extend learning from traditional classrooms andphysical laboratories to include informal environments such as social networks and virtualspaces. Despite these significant advances, a larger theoretical framework of learning thatincludes cyberinfrastructure at its very core has not yet evolved.The purpose of this research is to provide a synthesis of the fundamental characteristics ofcyberlearning environments that are being created to facilitate student learning withinengineering disciplines. Furthermore, we examine in-depth how educators are definingcyberlearning within the context of learning theories in general, and engineering education inparticular.Our methodology
technologies and the current multimedia Internetapplications. It should also prepare the student for the emerging new technologies andapplications in the future.The rest of the paper is organized as follows. The course development is presented in Section 2,including the course objectives, course contents and laboratory assignments. The studentfeedback and further improvement are discussed in Section 3. Section 4 concludes the paper.2. Course Development2.1 Course ObjectivesThis multimedia networking course is introduced at the graduate and senior undergraduate level,designed for the Master program in Engineering Technology.The main objectives of this new course are: ≠ Understand the underlying principles of providing QoS for multimedia networking
design and embedded system-on-chip (SoC)design.Background and MotivationA sequence of four graduate level courses was chosen for this analysis for three reasons: 1) thedependencies the courses have on laboratory based instruction, 2) applicability to thesemiconductor industry and 3) each course builds upon the previous course culminating in acapstone course that unifies the systematic design competencies that are needed to build complexsilicon systems. These silicon systems are composed of both hardware and software componentsthat implement complex algorithms and functions, and these functions determine thecompetencies required by the student.The four courses in the sequence are described in detail in the next section and include: 1) Basic
topresent to his uncles, but showed it first to his father. Daniel’s response was to fund thenew program himself. On June 15, 1925, Daniel Guggenheim announced his gift of$500,000 to NYU for a laboratory building with a wind tunnel, a propeller laboratory andother labs, as well as hiring laboratory assistants. An oversight committee was formedby Chancellor Brown and Orville Wright was selected as its head. On October 23, 1925ground was broken on the NYU Guggenheim School of Aeronautics, which opened ayear later. The Daniel Guggenheim Fund for the Promotion of Aeronautics, under HarryGuggenheim’s direction, went forward with a plan to fund $2,500,000 in gifts to assist inaviation developmentvii. Following the NYU gift, the plan was to expand
processesto produce accurate computer models for graphic visualization and communication.One laboratory section of the course was the experimental group and had access to theremediation materials, including a workbook (Introduction to 3D Spatial Visualization: AnActive Approach [1]) and practice website (VIZ; developed at Penn State Erie, The BehrendCollege [2]). Other laboratory sections made up the control group and did not have access to theadditional materials. All students took the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test-Rotations, MentalCutting Test [3], and the Modified Lappan Spatial Visualization Test [4] before the visualizationmodules were taught. Students then took these same tests at the end of the visualizationmodules. The pre- and post
SMARTpermanent and lay the foundation for a National Defense Education Program that would supportthe development of a new generation of scientists and engineers who will put their human capital Page 14.1241.2resource talents to use in our nation's defense laboratories.In the words of Dr. William S. Rees Jr., former Deputy Under Secretary of Defense(Laboratories and Basic Sciences): “We don’t own the problem of American education inscience and technology, but we have to be part of the solution. The technological superiority thatour country enjoys today is something we inherited from those who invested in research andeducation in the 1960s and 1970s and it
AC 2009-1417: EFFICIENT TEACHING OF ELEMENTARY ENGINEERINGMECHANICS COURSESHenry Christiansen, Brigham Young University Henry N. Christiansen obtained a BS degree in Mathematics from Utah State University in 1957 and MS and PhD degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Stanford University in 1958 and 1962. He began his career at the Western Development Laboratories, Palo Alto CA in 1960 and later joined the faculty of the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Brigham Young University in 1965. He served as chair of this department from 1980-1986. Professor Christiansen’s primary research has been in the field of computer graphics. He founded and served as Director of the Engineering
Full Implementation for Over 400 First-Year Engineering StudentsAbstractTwo years ago a robotics-centered sequence of three first-year engineering courses wasexpanded to include all beginning engineering students as part of an NSF CCLI grant. Theobjective of this course sequence is to immerse students in a skill-based, project-drivencurriculum that builds creativity and a can-do spirit. Students purchase a Parallax BASIC Stampcontroller, sensors, servos, and software to provide the basis for a mobile laboratory and designplatform; this mobile platform, which is owned and maintained by the students, provides amechanism for boosting experiential learning to a level that would be difficult to achieve usinguniversity
-day lectures, followed bypractical hands-on experience with a variety of portable and laboratory radiationinstruments. Half of each day will be devoted to practical hands-on exercises, which willcover instrument calibration collection of survey and dosimetry measurements.The course will cover the following: ≠ Radiation Counting Statistics; Discuss briefly the calculation of o Standard deviation of counts, o Confidence Limits, o ε2 Criterion for data rejection, o Chauvenet’s Criterion for data rejection, o Optimizing source count time for a given background, o Instrument efficiency, o Lower Limits of Detection (LLD), and o Minimum Detectable Activity
engaging laboratory and continuous assessment oflearning outcomes; c) utilizing students’ pre-existing knowledge, providing examples andteaching subject matter in depth; and d) sharing ideas and materials so that projects can be builtand connected to enhance the work of each other within a group. As such any coursedevelopment activity needs to take these factors into account in order to ensure its success.Students in Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering are introduced to Digital Logic asthe first course that lays the foundation for many other courses. Such courses includeMicroprocessors / Microcontrollers, Assembly Language Programming, and ComputerArchitecture to name a few. With the knowledge built through this chain of courses
to a more efficient curriculum by eliminating unnecessary redundancies.The authors made an index card for each topic, which included the topic name, associatedlearning outcomes, traditional course area, and scores (Figure 2). The cards were then treatedlike trading cards when developing the modules. It was easy to move a topic from one module tothe next to see where it fit best.Step 6The modules developed in Step 5 are the ideal way to group topics together. This step addresseshow to bring different modules together to fit into the overall semester course structure. Thecourse format is determined; lecture, laboratory, or a combination. The sequence of moduleswithin a semester and from semester to semester must be determined. This step should
past 15 years at various capacities. He served as chair of Manufacturing Systems Development Applications Department of IEEE/IAS. He authored more than 25 refereed journal and conference publications. From 2003 through 2006, he was involved with Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL in developing direct computer control for hydrogen powered automotives. He is also involved in several direct computer control and wireless process control related research projects. His interests are in the area of industrial transducer, industrial process control, wireless controls, statistical process control, computer aided design and fabrication of printed circuit board, programmable logic controllers
AC 2009-422: INTEGRATING REAL-WORLD MEDICAL-DEVICE PROJECTSINTO MANUFACTURING EDUCATIONSusana Lai-Yuen, University of South Florida Susana K. Lai-Yuen is an Assistant Professor of Industrial & Management Systems Engineering at the University of South Florida, USA. She received her Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. (Summa Cum Laude) degrees in Industrial Engineering from North Carolina State University, USA. Her research interests include computer-aided design (CAD), computer-aided molecular design (CAMD), human-computer haptic interfaces, computational geometry for design and manufacturing, and engineering education. She is the director of the Virtual Manufacturing and Design Laboratory for Medical
AC 2009-1334: ON THE USE OF LABVIEW IN SIGNALS AND SYSTEMSJayaraman Jayaraman Thiagarajan, Arizona State UniversityKostas Tsakalis, Arizona State UniversityAndreas Spanias, Arizona State UniversityHarvey Thornburg, Arizona State University Page 14.932.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 ON THE USE OF LABVIEW IN SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS1. Introduction Computer based data acquisition and instrumentation control packages are embedded inseveral industrial and education applications. The National Instruments Laboratory VirtualInstrument Engineering Workbench (LabVIEW) package is tailored for data acquisition, dataprocessing and instrumentation control. LabVIEW
programs are in an ideal position to support the packaging industry. This paperdescribes the first Mechatronics Engineering Technology bachelor program specifically designedto serve the packaging industry. The paper describes the program’s development process, thefinalized curriculum, industry partners, and laboratory development efforts.I. IntroductionWith global economy, consumer, industrial and commercial goods need to be packaged andshipped to different locations. The package must protect the content, deliver proper informationabout the content and in certain applications be appealing to customers. Packaging industries areunder continuous challenges as the cost of energy and material increases. More efficientpackages with less material are
380 Expanding Engineering Education through Undergraduate Research Experience in Micro-Robotic Drug Delivery Eniko T. Enikov 1 , Malcolm T. Gibson 2 Advanced Micro and Nano Systems Laboratory, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Arizona. 1 Principal Investigator, 2 Undergraduate StudentAbstract This paper examines the use of MEMS research in bio-medical micro-robotic drugdelivery as an education vehicle for expanding the effectiveness of undergraduate engineeringeducation in order to meet advancing challenges of the future