, Plan, Implement, Test andEvaluate. Instances identified as EBR were coded based on where they occurred within theProcess of Design. Given that the focus of this study was just the engineering design challengeportion of the unit, instances of EBR that occurred during the Process of Design were given oneof three codes: Plan, Implement & Test, or Evaluate. Implement and Test were combined becausethese steps were difficult to distinguish as they were done concurrently by students due to thenature of the design challenge. The iteration aspect of the design process was also accounted for;these three codes were also noted as occurring in the initial design phase or within the redesignphase.The third step was to take a close look at how students
Physics. Dr. Suter received a Bachelor of Science degree in physics from the Free University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, a Master of Science degree in physics from Michigan State University, a Master of Science degree in electrical engineering from the University of Maryland, and a PhD degree in materials science and engineering from The Johns Hopkins University.Mr. Stanislaw Tarchalski, Johns Hopkins University Sta´s Tarchalski is a retired senior executive with more than 30 years of progressive responsibility and experience in leading strategic business planning and execution, large/complex program development and management, technical leadership and systems engineering, and organizational development in various
engineering schools [9].Studies conducted by the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) identified two high prioritycompetency gaps between manufacturing industry’s workforce needs and what is provided byeducational programs on its Manufacturing Education Plan [10]. Availability of graduates inMechatronics Engineering will help industry reduce the identified critical competency gaps [4] aswell as comply with industry requirements for professionals with interdisciplinary thinking. AMechatronics Engineering graduate will have knowledge of and be capable of applyingengineering principles for design, modeling, and implementation of manufacturing automationsystems and manufacturing process control.The main source of information for the assessment of
concepts through customer engagement*3. Thinking creatively to drive innovation† Project Planning and Development4. Learning from failure* (Freshman)5. Establishing the cost of production or delivery of a service, Project Management and Engineering including scaling strategies* Economics (Sophomore)6. Determining market risks Applied Engineering Statistics (Junior) (Junior Courses) Transport Operations II
recognized by the Ministry of Education of -- as aninstitution of higher education (Educación Superior), and authorized to offer programs of studyleading to the Professional Technologist title.This Middle Eastern industrial college is a state-owned institution under a Royal Commission. Itwas established in 1989 and was one of the first colleges of its kind in the region. The currentenrollment of the college is around 3600 students. It is located in a planned industrial town. Thecollege’s mission is to prepare young citizens for technical and managerial positions for the localindustries and for other private and public sector employers throughout the country.This south east Asian polytechnic is a statutory board under the Ministry of Education
appearing categories, concepts, and events helped theresearch team construct assertions based on the events leading up to the teachers’ conceptions ofengineering design, plans for integrating engineering design-based tasks, and the actualimplementation of engineering design tasks.Classroom observations. The aim of classroom observations was to observe and characterizedesign-informed pedagogical methods employed by SLED teachers. Initially, members of theresearch team conducted informal classroom observations that included open field notes focusingon the teacher; specifically, his/her instructional practices exhibited during a given lesson. Basedon early field notes and a review of existing classroom observational protocols (e.g., RTOP,STAMM, and
effort• Clarification questions – Single point of contact – Ask clear, specific, direct questions Proposal Kick Off• Identify team members – PI + Co-PI’s + Education Director + Diversity Director – RA + Prop Mgr + Proj Mgr + GCO – Tech transfer – DIVERSITY is key – Industry representatives• Describe roles and responsibilities• Schedule regular meetings and promote high expectations• Disseminate timeline and checklist Proposal Development• Institutional commitment – Cultural expectations – Discipline expectations – Physical and planned facilities• Use resources – Contact existing ERC PI’s – Identify staff and faculty with prior experience• Institutional team – Tech transfer – Education
doing, thereby increasing students’ interest in the field andconfidence in their own abilities. The university and community college partners work togetherto plan, execute and assess events that further students’ knowledge, skills and capabilities.Students interact closely with their peers, faculty, and industry partners at each event. The overallgoal of the project is to increase the number of well-educated STEM graduates for the benefit oflocal and global economy. One of the primary obstacles students face in degree attainment is lackof engagement with peers, faculty, campus services and career opportunities1, 2. This is addressedthrough team-building and project-based activities that involve students from all four campuses.Technology is the
facilitator from the parent 3DS organization coaches a student team.Pre-Event Activities After on-campus promotion for the event students applied to take part in the program.In addition to providing motivation for applying to the program, students submitted initialbusiness/innovation ideas. These applications were reviewed by the on-campuscommittee and applicants were selected. A total of 49 applications were received for theprogram at Western New England University. In other 3DS programs, personalinterviews were held, however this was not done at the Western New England program.In retrospect the planning committee feels that conducting personal interviews wouldhave been beneficial in setting
Paper ID #17396Chair of the Department of Economics and Management in Nizhnekamsk Chemical Engineering Institutein 2002-2012. She supervised several projects for Tatarstan chemical and petrochemical companies inthe years 2002-2007 and headed the Department of Macroeconomic Research in Advanced EconomicResearch Center in the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan in the years 2007-2010. Hercontribution to the projects was the supervision of their economic sections (including setting of researchobjectives, project supervision, economic assessment, report writing, presentations, and publishing of re-search discoveries). She was personally involved in the strategic planning of economic development at aregional level. All these research
, improvements to reflect updates to industry-academic curriculumrecommendations subsequently published by IEEE Computer Society, INCOSE (International Council onSystems Engineering), and others as well as improvements to better address faculty and student inputssuch as a richer treatment of Bayesian, and future plans to embrace industry advisory board inputs suchas treatment of Big Data Analytics.In the BeginningBoeing approached us in 2002 with the observation that the US defense and aerospace industry wouldbe experiencing a large number of retirements of systems engineers in the very near future and thatAcademia needed to step up to the challenge and provide the education needed by their replacements.Conversations were held then with representatives
embedded system by systematically flowing requirements down from system specifications. Create plans for addressing power, timing and live-ness (concurrency) of the system. Create plans for addressing system-level constraints including performance, reliability, safety, security and evolve-ability. Develop a trade-space analysis for one or more key system element (possibly CPU or other hardware selection, operating system selection, OTS software, etc.)The syllabus from the initial course offering is shown below in Table 2.Table 2: Design of CPS Course Syllabus Topic(s) Class exercises (Optional) Module 1 CPS Engineering Processes Module 2 Prioritizing and Allocating
Engineering programs; however, itwas unknown as to whether such a topic is being covered in the form of a course in EngineeringTechnology programs at graduate level specifically. Discrete Simulation models may be used aspart of other courses (i.e. Production Planning, Design of Experiments, etc.) however, if studentsare expected to develop their own models, at least a whole course for a full semester would benecessary. The authors believe that it is crucial to teach modeling and simulation in engineeringtechnology particularly, at graduate level. The main reason is that the majority of graduatesassume managerial/supervisory positions as they grow in their field and modeling and simulationis a useful technique that helps them make better decision when
workplace competencies (similar to a personality test and DISC assessment combined), and a written reflection on the students’ visit to the engineering career services center. Academic success planning, including making a personalized major map and annotating an ABET student outcomes rubric with information on what parts of his/her college experience would help the student master that outcome. Listening and writing summaries of talks, for each of four faculty presentations and two alumni talks. The faculty presented on their career trajectories and research; the alumni focused on next steps for getting into medical school, and intellectual property law as a career path. In-class written surveys administered during the first and
. Over 60 ETKs have been developed to date; about 20 have been widely distributed and used in schools and summer programs. We have adapted ETKs to both elementary and high school audiences. To learn more, please visit our Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/theengineersway/) or contact us at lgr@virginia.edu to gain access to the complete lessons plans. Trash Sliders was
Paper ID #14539MAKER: From 2-D Projective Geometry to 3-D Object Recognition and 3-DPrinting Processes for High School StudentsMr. Bart Taylor M.Ed., A&M Consolidated High School A Dedicated career and technology teacher with fifteen years of experience in the classroom. Offer a proven track record of commended performance in teaching, and leadership, with a passion for educa- tion and a commitment to continually pursue student, school and district success. Experience includes classroom teaching, motivational speaking, district curriculum and instructional coaching, professional development planning/presenting, high
planning and execution of the faculty development program.Dr. Louis A Martin-Vega, North Carolina State University Dr. Martin-Vega joined NC State University as its Dean of Engineering in 2006. He has also served as Dean of Engineering at USF in Tampa, Florida, as Chair of the Department of Industrial & Mfg Systems Engineering at Lehigh University, as the Lockheed Professor at Florida Institute of Technology, and as a tenured faculty member at the University of Florida and the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez. He has also held various positions at the National Science Foundation including Acting Head of its Engineer- ing Directorate. He is currently President-Elect of ASEE and his research and teaching interests
across all 26-items for all three strategies (i.e., 78 itemscollectively). However, VECTERS can be considered as three sub-instruments addressing thestrategies of formative feedback, real-world applications, and student-to-student discussion.Therefore, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient calculations were applied to each of the three sub-instruments. As recommended by DeVallis 16, Cronbach’s alpha levels of 0.7 or higher weredesired.Construct validity. VECTERS construct validity was evaluated by examining relationshipsbetween respondents’ self-reports of extent to which the three strategies are currently beingimplemented and are planned to be implemented. For each strategy, a 2x3 matrix was produced;these indicated the relationship between
design and analysis,emphasizing in signal processing and conditioning gives students’ better hands-on experience asthe fundamentals are covered in ME335/L. The assessment plan, which is discussed in the nextsection, will help both the faculty tune the curriculum even further. Fundamental concepts taught in ME335: measuring signals, error identification, uncertanity analysis, intro to data acquisition
the USA. To add to theconfusion, there is not consistency across the UK, as again the separation of governance inEngland and Scotland has led to different systems. During a 2015 Fulbright Visiting ScholarExchange, the author had the opportunity to teach at an English University and visit threecolleges in Scotland. Figure 1 shows the general flow of the four-year curriculum which led tothe awarding of degrees of Bachelors in Engineering (BEng) and Masters in Engineering (MEng)at an English university.5 This plan appears to be fairly typical of engineering programs inEngland. However, Figure 2 displays one example of a four-year program at a Scottishuniversity. It should be noted, that while this program lasts four years, like the English
, 95% 107, 88% Yes No Yes No Figure 5: Student Self-Assessment of Project UnderstandingThe response to the second and third questions on the exit survey assessed student interest andconfidence in their ability to major in science or engineering. The percentage of students whoresponded that they plan to study science or engineering, if they go to college, was highest in theMakerspace class. This is shown in Figure 6, and responses for the other courses ranged from59% – 93%. However, the next question on the survey (“did summer change their mind”)impacts the interpretation of those responses and is shown in Figure 7. A
Paper ID #16129Engineering Students’ Self-Concept Differentiation: Investigation of Identity,Personality, and Authenticity with Implications for Program RetentionMs. Kylie Denise Stoup, James Madison University Kylie Stoup is a senior honors engineering student at James Madison University. Ms. Kylie Stoup grad- uates with a BS in Engineering in May 2016. She is in the second year of her 2-year-long engineering capstone project so far, involving the design and implementation of a greenway system in Harrisonburg. Her career interests include transportation infrastructure and city planning with a focus in social equity, as
research group members, the amount of time spent with researchmentors, and the advice given about graduate school. Improvement was suggested for theelement of amount of time spent doing meaningful research. REU program participants indicatedanticipated completion of a presentation, talk, or poster at a professional conference (25%) andinvolvement in co-writing a paper for either an academic journal or an undergraduate researchjournal (33%). Approximately 58% of participants indicated plans for some level of graduateschool at program completion.Interviews of program participants corroborated the indication of research-based gains andprovided a more in-depth understanding of impact of the program. Specifically, interviewsprovided information about
Value Delivery 30 Start Innovating 30 Challenge Plan 60 Closure 15 Figure 1: Workshop framework Architecture - The central trunk provides the core contents of workshops. The branches are optional and all the timings (given in diamonds) are indicative.We then move on to case studies that are mainly drawn from
phases:development, deployment, and improvement. Important measurable goals and objectives areshown in the framework. The importance of strategic alliances is emphasized in the early stageduring the Plan-Do-Check-Act feedback loops that provide non-linear improvementopportunities. The importance of experiential learning in achieving the professionaldevelopment growth in students at all levels is a common theme. The need for mentoring,especially among our first generation college students, is a critical success factor in the culturaltransformation of parents and communities. Although not explicit in the framework, there is ablending of art and science. For example, in the specific application discussed in this article,the students creatively and artfully
there was any need for change, students modified the design andmanufactured a new prototype, and then performed the surgery again to validate if the newdesign worked better with the existing surgical procedure/tools.In final presentations, all groups presented problem definition, market analysis and potentialcustomer, project timeline, design input and output. Verification and validation plan, engineeringspecifications, and results were also included in the presentations. Especially the groups whowere introduced surgical procedure presented how the knowledge and experience of surgicalprocedure changed the final design outcomes compared to the original design.ResultsThis new approach was implemented to the capstone design course for the first
Interactive Planning Continuous organizational planning to design desirable futures Ackoff 31 32 33 34 and develop strategies to achieve that future through participation, management structures, planning, and process Soft Systems A process of inquiry focused on formulation of ill-structured Checkland 35 36; Methodology problems appreciative of multiple perspectives Wilson 37 Systems of Systems An approach to design, analysis, operation, and transformation Adams and Engineering of metasystems, composed of multiple embedded
than 300 students. Studentresponses to short-answer survey questions were analyzed using a web-based application formixed methods research. 31% of respondents indicated that the research program diverted themfrom a summer job or other plans that were not aligned with their academic or career goals, andrespondents consistently cited the faculty-mentored research experience as highly valuable.IntroductionEngaging in undergraduate research is significantly correlated with students’ selection of ascience-related program of study and pursuit of a postgraduate degree in science.1 Undergraduateresearch experiences can also help students increase self-confidence;2 identify a career focus;3enhance analytical skills and improve oral and written
graduate profile. 2016 ASEE International Forum 3. Upon graduating, the student must have acquired all the learning outcomes considered in the graduate profile. 4. The achievement of the learning outcomes must be assessed at any time.The School of Engineering (“Facultad de Ingeniería”, or “FACING”) of the University ofValparaíso, was established in 2011, gathering engineering careers formerly scatteredbetween Science, Business and Architecture Schools: Construction Engineering, CivilEngineering, Computer Engineering, Oceanic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering,Industrial Engineering and Environmental Engineering. FACING’s strategic plan for theperiod 2012-2016, defines a focus on quality assurance of the
institution, what programs had you heard of?” Inresponse to this question, students ranked the entrepreneurship LLC fifth (n = 141) among thetop ten programs identified, Table 1. Table 1 Response to freshman questionnaire: “Prior to coming to our institution, what programs had you heard of?To amplify our in-person marketing effort, we plan to enlist current program participants asguides for tours with prospective students and parents. This may increase the eventual numberof applications if more students join our institution specifically because we have this program.The freshman survey sought to address the issue of program attractiveness with the question,“Which of the following programs had an impact on your decision