societalneeds and social impacts, and teachers’ development in engineering education through hands-onactivities, provides better understanding of engineering education professional development forK-12 STEM teachers.Key words: STEM integration, precollege engineering education, professional development,STEM teacher self-efficacyIntroductionEducation policy and reform have placed a major emphasis on STEM college and careerreadiness for national economic success [1]-[3]. Integrated STEM approaches in K-12 scienceand math instruction can be more engaging and meaningful for students and often meet thecurriculum content and practice goals better than single-subject lessons. In addition, studentengagement and motivation increase in math and science classrooms
were received. Selection was based on a reviewof high school transcript for academic performance, a recommendation letter from a STEMteacher, transcripts, and stated interest in exploring transportation engineering careers in anapplication essay. Of the 128 participants accepted to the NSTI program, 123 attended. As a partof the application process, the program collected demographics (see Tables 1, 2, and 3) andrelated measures such as self-reported enrollment in free and reduced-price lunch program andfirst-generation status based on parent/guardian education level.Table 1. Participant demographics by Sex and Race/Ethnicity Number Percent Total Number of Participants 123 Sex Female
engineering education practices to create more inclusive engineering professionals with thebroader impact of increased diversity in the field. This Work-in-Progress paper will detail thebackground and current progress of a 2-year National Science Foundation Professional Formationof Engineers: Research Initiation in Engineering Formation (NSF PFE:RIEF) project including theproject framing, team formation, research training, and questionnaire development.BackgroundThe engineering field has not always been welcoming of diversity despite attempts and calls byorganizations to change this in recent years [1-5]. Women and non-white people have showninterest and capacity for success in engineering but often become discouraged due to unnecessarybarriers in
the following goals for this 3-yearcycle: (1) Excite, empower, and educate 30 undergraduate participants in traditional/advancedmetrology and NDI, (2) for the undergraduate participants to experience an immersive research-training through a related transformative project, (3) to mold the undergraduate participants asboth independent/collaborative researchers capable of effective communication, (4) for theundergraduate participants to learn to ask the right questions, formulate plans, pragmaticallyinterpret data, and (5) inspire and enable the undergraduate participants to pursue advanced studyand related STEM careers. This site was a direct response to a recurring concern raised byindustry partners and technical workforce recruiters about the
the computer science department. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Summer Coding Camp: Curriculum, Experiences, and Evaluation Paea LePendu* 1 , Cecilia Cheung2 , Mariam Salloum1 , Pamela Sheffler2 , and Kelly Downey1 1 Department of Computer Science & Engineering, UC Riverside 2 Department of Psychology, UC RiversideAbstractMany education-related organizations in the U.S., from the National Science Foundation down tolocal districts, have been pushing to introduce computer science concepts
learning and motivation.However, in our goal to create inclusive classrooms, we realized that students’ experiences inteams were a space with enormous potential for harm [e.g., 1]. Studies of teamwork find gendereffects on teamwork satisfaction [2], talk time and conversational roles in teams [3, 4],perceptions of voice safety [5,6] and task allocation [7-10]. We are aware of fewer studiesinvestigating how race/ethnicity affects student team experiences in undergraduate engineering,but Cross and Paretti [11] find African American men report feeling hypervisible on their teams,needing to disprove negative stereotypes, and feeling less likely to develop close friendships withteammates. Cohen and Garcia [12] note that African American students are at
, University Park 31. Table 1 shows the demographiccharacteristics of the Cohort 5 participants. Seventy-three percent are male. Forty-seven percentare racially underrepresented. Thirty-seven percent of the bridge students are first-generationcollege students.Table 1. Background Characteristics for Cohort 5 Bridge Students Bridge Students Variables N % Gender Male 61 73 Female 23 27 Ethnicity African American 19 23 Asian 11 13
improveSTEM education at the University of South Florida, a large, public university. The STEERproject, funded by NSF-IUSE, seeks to achieve this improvement by (1) advocating andincentivizing the adoption of Evidenced Based Teaching (EBT) methods in STEM courses and(2) facilitating change to a culture in which student-centered learning is valued within research-driven STEM departments. A number of synergistic thrusts have been implemented to supportthese efforts and include:(1) Facilitating and Incentivizing Adoption of EBT Methods: Faculty can apply fordevelopment grants to incorporate EBT methods into their course. They can apply for travelgrants to learn more about adopting EBT within their discipline. A peer observation programplaces STEM
funds of knowledge into their teaching without sometimes beingaware of it. However, there were certain institutional barriers that prevented its fullimplementation in the curriculum. These results indicate that although teachers see thesignificance of funds of knowledge in engineering, the teachers and teaching practices are stillembedded in a deficit-oriented educational structure that may prevent some of these changesfrom occurring.IntroductionWith the emergence of the Next Generation Science Standards [1], middle school teachershave been called to integrate engineering into their classes. However, there has been littlediscussion on how middle school teachers can be supported to effectively adopt instructionalpractices that combine both asset
areinvolved in.The students are taught the basic function of the Autodesk Inventor program and carried outseveral activities to expound the students' understanding of Autodesk Inventor. Among theprojects, the students researched and designed tool holders for standard household tools. Theyalso designed and virtually assembled a weathervane prototype. Several projects have beenperformed, including 1) designing and 3D printing tools holder; 2) designing safe childrenplayground equipment.To have a better understanding of Additive Manufacturing, students watched various videoson several 3D printing technologies. Also, students researched various concepts surroundingAdditive Manufacturing. As advanced topics, stress analysis, the use of 3D-scanner
COVID19, this foundation aided the University’s pivot to remote learning in Spring 2020, as well as helped faculty prepare for the transition of 300+ courses to various instructional delivery modes with TLC’s design and delivery of an institution wide faculty training initiative called RISE: Reframing Instruction for Success Everywhere in Summer 2020. These and other efforts led to a successful restart of class instruction for the Fall 2020 term. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021AbstractClarkson University’s BR200 is a highly interactive and well-subscribed (~50 students per term)face-to-face entry-level biomedical engineering class.1 Its title is
environmental racism, as well as students whohave been involved in climate activism in their non-academic lives, in the delivery of the coursematerials. Collaboratively, the 4-student, 1-instructor cogen team co-developed course contentrelating to the role of chemical engineers in advancing awareness of environmental injustice andits local, national, and global impacts on public health, economic security, racist violence, mentalhealth, and more. By starting an in-class dialogue about the responsibilities of the members of our discipline,we hope to engage students in broader issues such as diversity, equity, and inclusion of Black,Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) individuals within STEM fields as well as the disparitiesin access to housing
concepts of First Order Differential Equations through the use of intuitive and example-based approaches as they relate primarily to electrical engineering. This paper seeks to simplify theintroduction to the topic of First Order Differential Equations into something that is clear and easy tocomprehend. To accomplish this, the paper starts with a visual background of first order systems and anexplanation of exponential growth vs. exponential decay. It then moves into (1) electrical examples,including the charging rate of cell phones and the idea of transient response in electrical systems such asRC and RL circuits, (2) electromechanical examples, including DC motors and heat transfer rates ofdifferent types of stoves, (3) various topics from other
, andassignment descriptions online [link blinded for peer review]. The curricular materialsand insights from this paper are interdisciplinary and transferable to many courses inBME and related fields.In order to make our curriculum more accessible to engineering educators who do nothave backgrounds in critical theory (and because we are not experts in these fieldsourselves), in this paper we do not provide an extensive background of critical theorieson race, gender, sexuality, or disability. However, we do recommend the followingresources: Donna Riley’s book, Engineering and Social Justice [1], The Center forCritical Race and Digital Theories [2], “Critical Race Theory: An Introduction” [3], andLangdon Winner’s “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” [4]. As we
specific application, without too much mathand theory. Once the student has reached a certain level of confidence in their knowledge, wemove on to other stages where more theoretical concepts are introduced. Our methodology isbased on three tasks: (1) field visits; (2) literature; (3) computer applications; (4) mathematicsand science. In this work, we used the existing campus facilities to introduce students to the systemsused to heat the campus. Our aim is to expose the early college students to the installation of thepower plant, without focusing on theoretical aspects, thermodynamic cycles, and properties offluids, but focusing on understanding the functionality of systems, as it comes from the driverswho take care of the power plant
slight differences in their team projectexperiences. In this work-in-progress paper, we perform a more focused study of two studentteaming aspects that have been shown to vary for students from different backgrounds: (a) rolesthat students play on their project teams [1], and (b) their psychological safety.[2]Our research questions are: (1) How are the roles on student-led project teams chosen orassigned? (2) How do engineering project teams foster psychological safety for diversemembers?To answer these questions, we collected and analyzed student survey data regarding how roleswere determined on their team and their level of psychological safety when interacting with otherteam members, team leads, and project advisors. While the survey results
similar to pre-pandemic semesters and have far fewer U (unsatisfactory) grades than inSpring 2020 when the whole campus went online midway.IntroductionTeam-teaching has a long history when many educators had attempted integration acrossdifferent disciplines [9], curriculum [4] [14], and even country borders [12]. Besides traditionallecturing, projects [1]-[3],[5][6], and service-learning [8] could also be used in team-teaching.Despite the challenges in implementation, team teaching provided a wide array of benefits, evenfor faculty mentoring [13] and team-building [11]. Communication [10] and faculty help hadbeen deemed important ever since the remote-working technology was emerging [7].Traditional team-teaching may involve multiple instructors
. These results will inform future data collection and analysis as we return to in personlearning to better distinguish the impacts of exam and learning formats on diverse students’anxiety and academic performance.IntroductionThe role of anxiety on performance of mathematics has been explored by many researchers overthe years. Numerous studies have correlated increased anxiety levels to more frequent errors incomplex math problems [1–4]. This led to the concept of processing efficiency theory, whichsuggests that anxiety occupies some of the “working memory” that an individual has forperforming mental calculations, leading those with higher anxiety to have less available mentalresources to perform the task and thus perform poorly. Other
necessity for activities that allow both, lecturer and student, generate aclass dynamic that promotes active interaction.In order to achieve the academical objectives in all types of scenarios, not only in thecontingency one, teachers must take into consideration that the new generation of students needsfrequent stimulus in order to acquire their attention and optimize their acquisition of knowledgeand competencies development. Adding interactive elements to class session can increase thestudents’ attention span [1]. In online courses, this can present itself as a challenge or anopportunity. Institutional learning has entirely changed its dynamic process as consequence ofthis necessity, introducing methods as: gamification, flipped-classrooms
development sessions. This poster details survey evidence of theeffectiveness attributed to the sessions presented between 2019-2020 from the point of view ofthe 11 postdoctoral scholars participating in the project. This study is guided by the followingresearch questions: 1. How do the engineering postdoctoral scholars rate the relevance and benefit of the personal and professional development sessions? 2. What do the postdoctoral scholars identify as most valuable about the personal and professional development sessions? 3. In what areas of the personal and professional development sessions do the postdoctoral scholars feel more informed? 4. What recommendations do the postdoctoral scholars offer in terms of
University of Notre Dame.Simran Moolchandaney, University of Notre Dame Simran Moolchandaney is a class of 2023 undergraduate student at the University of Notre Dame major- ing in Computer Science and minoring in Bioengineering. Outside the classroom, Simran is an NCAA Division 1 Fencer, and an active SWE member who zealously engages in community service work.Gabrielle Tanjuatco, University of Notre Dame Gabrielle Tanjuatco is a graduate of the University of Notre Dame in Mechanical Engineering in the Class of 2021.Caroline Lubbe, University of Notre Dame Caroline Lubbe is a Chemical Engineering student in the University of Notre Dame Class of 2023. American c
roleofsocialjusticeandthedangerofignoringitinourdailylivesanddesigns. Introduction Forthelastseveraldecadesitseemsthatthemainfocusineducationhasbeenalmostexclusively onSTEMinitiatives.ParticularlyintheU.S.,STEMinitiativesfrominstitutionalorganizations togovernmentagencieshavepushedthenarrativethatreceivingSTEMeducationiscriticalto informandpreparefuturegenerationstobemorecompetitiveinaglobalizedworld[1].Inthis sense,STEMeducationistoutedasacure-alltopreparecitizensforthe21stcentury,andweas educators“atethisup”withoutasmuchasacritique.ThecurrentmodelofSTEMeducation narrowlyfocusesonscienceasbothnon
State Physics Department and the Center for NanoscaleScience, a National Science Foundation Materials Research Science and Engineering Center(NSF-MRSEC), made a rapid pivot of our Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU)program from an in-person 10-week research experience to a virtual research preparation andprofessional development program which was designed to prepare science and engineeringundergraduate and master’s students for entrance into the workforce or their continuation in agraduate program. The overarching goal of this virtual experience was to develop and refineprofessional skills that are often not explicitly taught in science and engineering classes. Theprogram had three distinct areas: (1) Career Preparation (Professional
Techie Times, a STEM summer camp centered around doing activities froma home environment created.Techie Times was developed by Purdue Polytechnic Institute Faculty, Graduate Students, andUndergraduate Students to create a new opportunity for camp participants to learn more aboutthe STEM field, execute fun and engaging projects, and network with fellow students fromaround the country. The program was held from July 27th to August 5th, 2020, stimulatingSTEM ideation before heading back into the school year. The program activities were completedall together at home, supported using virtual meeting platforms [1]. Techie Times was accessibleto all participants, eliminating finances as a participation barrier. Participants were able to signup and
,feeding to their fear about saying the wrong thing.The disconnect between the two groups often results in explicitly marginalizing classroomenvironments, i.e., environments where students feel unwelcome from blatantly marginalizing ordiscriminatory behaviors [1]. The data demonstrates that faculty are interested in developingimplicitly inclusive classrooms but fear that their lack of expertise on these topics will lead tofailure and having a negative impact on students. However, students voiced strong support andinterest in having faculty discuss and teach about inclusivity and ethics in their engineeringclassrooms. To create implicitly inclusive environments, faculty are encouraged to acknowledgeand discuss such topics in their classes and
Education Organization and Leadership from the University of Illinois. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Early Research Scholars ProgramBackgroundResearch experiences for undergraduates has shown to increase retention in scientific fields [1],and the NSF Summer REU program provides great support for such experiences. Most REUs aredesigned for advanced students with strong foundations in Computer Science. The EarlyResearch Scholars Program (ERSP) was designed to provide a structured research experience forstudents early in their CS career (pre-data structures when they apply). The goal is to increaseretention of women and under-represented
the region of fluid near a surface where a velocity gradient naturallyexists due to the viscosity of the fluid [4]. Due to no-slip boundary condition, the velocity of thefluid that is adjacent to the surface of the body is zero. The velocity of the fluid eventuallyreaches the free stream velocity as the vertical distance increases (Fig. 1). The vertical distancefrom the surface to the point where the local velocity is 99% of the free stream velocity isdefined as the boundary layer thickness [4]. Figure 1: Boundary layer thickness illustrationFor the flow over an airfoil, due to its curvature, the incoming fluid will reach a maximumvelocity, and up until this point it witnesses a favorable pressure gradient (high to
paper reports on a survey of all engineering faculty at San José State University (SJSU) inSpring 2020. The purpose of the survey was to determine the impact of the shelter-in-place onfaculty. Overall, 104 faculty completed this survey. Based on the number of COE faculty inSpring, 287, this equates to a confidence level of 95% with a margin of error of 8%. Because ofthis low margin of error, we can be fairly confident that this survey is representative of thefaculty teaching in the College in Spring 2020. The majority of the respondents who answeredthe question about rank were lecturers (58); there were fewer tenure-track (18), tenured (13),adjunct (1), and Teaching Associates (1) responding. Of the faculty who responded to identifytheir gender
portions of the population which are greatlyunderrepresented in the STEM fields, and what the data tell us is that family income matters.Overall, only 32% of 2009 ninth graders from families in the lowest fifth of income levelenrolled in college within a year after graduation, compared to 51% of those from the middlefifth and 79% of students from families in the highest income group. And of that population, thepercentage of low-income students who attained a degree within 8 years was only 14%,compared to 29% for middle-income students and 60% for high-income students [1] . Moreover,low-income students are likely to be less prepared in math and science than their high-incomepeers coming out of high school, which makes them less likely to choose
a socio-technical(rather than techno-centric) approach. In this paper, we share: 1) the ExSJ framework, 2) theinfrastructure, mechanisms, and activities we are using to apply this framework, and 3) thechallenges and complexities we are facing as we apply it. The foundational values of the ExSJ canbe applied to all engineering contexts, providing a platform for change that moves away fromnarrowly constructed and techno-centric epistemological approaches, and an expansion to engagesocial and environmental justice, humanitarian goals, peace, and sustainability in engineeringthrough equitable partnership exchanges.IntroductionIn 2019, seven faculty and staff members in the University of San Diego’s (USD) Shiley-MarcosSchool of Engineering (SMSE