with the centermanager.In order to promote the new space, a grand opening event was held at the start of the fall 2013semester. University administrators and all students, staff, and faculty in the College of EMSwere invited to attend and learn about the space and its services. Email communications, acampus press release, and flyers were used to promote the open house and the new space. Thespace is also advertised continuously through a website and Facebook page.Initially, CenterPOINT was open and staffed seven days per week for a total of 81 hours perweek. Hours were Monday through Thursday from 8:00 am to 10:00 pm, Friday from 8:00 am to5:00 pm, Saturday from 1:00 to 8:00 pm, and Sunday from 1:00 to 10:00 pm. After analyzingusage during the
announced in June 2012. The federal and state agencies providedinfrastructure funding, which was augmented by funds from NYIT and the support ofnumerous industry partners.The ETIC is an illustration of the SoECS’ core beliefs and mission. The School’s high-quality undergraduate and graduate programs prepare students for advanced studies andchallenging positions in business, government, and industry. The SoECS is guided in thismission by the three tenets embraced by NYIT: 1) professional preparation of students; 2)applications-oriented research; 3) access to opportunity for all qualified students. Toaccomplish its mission, the SoECS offers a broad range of outstanding, accreditedacademic programs; supports faculty members who are effective teacher
be related to some models of educational feedback 1-6 wherethe two-feedback-loop model presented by Narciss 6 is an example that shows how instruction,tasks, feedback, and new instruction are interconnected in a cycle. But, the relation to feedbackmodels is not the focus of this paper. The emphasis of this paper is to measure all the actions ofa student in the entire learning cycle where the instruction is provided using a flipped course withtry-again feedback used with the practice problems. The measurement will be used to assesshow a student uses both the instruction and feedback provided.An instructor controls a lot of variables in a learning cycle and therefore can governor manyfactors that occur during learning. These variables include
diversity, particularly the recruitment of womento that particular program. Aligning with the goal, the following objectives were developed.Objective 1: Increase the enrollment and retention of the female engineering students.Objective 2: Improve female students’ attitudes and perceptions toward careers in engineeringfields.Objective 3: Enhance female students’ self-efficacy in the learning of engineering.Objective 4: Increase the six-year graduation rate of female students (currently at 53% for theuniversity). The department placed an emphasis on increasing the general graduation rate of allwomen students as opposed to just women engineering students to be aligned with theuniversity's strategic goals.In alignment with these objectives, from 2011
to approximateeliciting problem solving skills that would be utilized in an actual workplace setting (althoughnone would actually be defined as ill-defined). Table 1 details the data collection for the study.Student commentary was coded by researchers for evidence of metacognition and strategy use.Students were included in the count for contributing codes if their work was coded for eithermetacognition or strategy use.Table 1: Data collection by semester Semester Total Number of students Number of students Number of students students in contributing codes contributing codes for contributing codes for sample for story problem open-ended problem exercise problem Fall
undergraduate engineering degree, and in this study are limited to students age 25 and older. The presence of adult students enriches undergraduate engineering programs because their added life experience allows them to approach their studies with unique perspectives, motivations, and strategies compared to their 1younger peers. Because of the added challenges that adult students face, their presence in undergraduate programs must be supported to improve retention of this valuable group of 2students. Prior studies have shown that identifying with engineering is linked to both 3educational and professional persistence. Our research focuses on the development of engineering
the most productive at exchanging heat. The green-energy solar collectorswere set up and made fully functional.Energy Efficiency Design MethodologyFigure 1 shows a graph of both panels’ efficiency percentage versus the difference of inlet andambient temperatures. The most productive operation of a collector is when the temperature of theinlet liquid (Ti) is the same as the surrounding temperature (Ta). Flat panel collectors are usuallyare 75% effective when Ti equals Ta, whereas evacuated tubes have a proficiency of around 50%.Collectors tend to operate 30°F to 80°F above surrounding temperatures to deliver end-usetemperatures from 100°F to 130°F. Efficiency is poor when the inlet temperatures have risen. Thiscauses the heat exchange from the
most useful for addressingchallenges that are complex, require many people, and in which there is a high degree ofuncertainty about the best approach.1 This set of conditions holds true far beyond productdevelopment.One such scenario is that of planning and implementation of organizational interventions –anenvironment in which “strategic planning” is often the tool of choice but one which is ineffectivein a networked (rather than hierarchical) context. An alternative approach described in this paperis “strategic doing”. As in agile product development, the approach uses iterative cycles ofimplementation, learning and reflection, and improvement, with a focus on rapidexperimentation and gradual scaling up of solutions. While not designed for
for members ofunderrepresented populations (i.e., women and minorities), and is further exacerbated when enteringgraduate students come from different schools than those which they are entering to pursue a graduatedegree 1. In other words, while the transition to graduate school is a challenge for everyone, certainfactors can amplify this challenge for different individuals. Thus, this article articulates a framework of apilot summer graduate engineering bridge program and the assessment of its impact.The transitions to new educational contexts are not unique to graduate education, and studies haveexamined the transition from high school into undergraduate program, particularly among engineeringstudents 2, 3. Conclusions from these studies
three areas in whichengineering education must justifiably direct considerable attention.4 The Enterprise model, bydesign and in practice, requires a high degree of interaction among team members and betweenstudent team members and faculty advisors and industry mentors. Research establishes that theseinteractions are the most predictive measures of positive change in college students’ academicand personal development and satisfaction.1 The Enterprise program, as a core imperative foreducating engineers for the future, teaches and trains students for professional practice – withpractice understood as the “complex, creative, responsible, contextually grounded activities thatdefine the work of engineers at its best”.7The program, with its emphasis
communication is challenging on several fronts. Students have notacquired the necessary object language, they, like many, struggle to describe shapes, and theylack sufficient repertoire.Study context and methodsThis study was conducted in a private undergraduate university within its Engineering Schoolunder the approval of the Institutional Review Board. The seven students who volunteered toparticipate, four males and three females, were Mechanical Engineering juniors within a requireddesign course.Each student was asked to describe three common items from a hardware store: The first was alow-flow garden sprinkler assembly, the second was a steel electrical junction box, and the thirda pair of slip joint pliers. These items are shown in Figures 1-3
threats, and implications includingnext steps.II. Background and context for change in faculty perspectivesThe PRD process follows eight basic steps, and seeks to center the curriculum on the learner,rather than the educator (Fowler, Macik, Turner, & Hohenstein, 2015). The steps are describedas the CVEN department faculty, students, and administration involved in this study experiencedthem.Step 1) Select team members and orient them to the process. The department chair andcurriculum team leadership met with the educational developer on PRD to review and furtherdefine the steps of the process and reach agreement. A graduate student, pursuing a professionalmaster’s degree in civil engineering, was hired to support the effort in September of
the ways first-year engineering students develop their identity.Research on first-year students suggests the first semester plays a major role in student retention,particularly in fields such as engineering, as many students know whether or not they willcontinue studying engineering by the end of the fall semester and few students transfer intoengineering after the first year.1 Motivational psychologists such as Deci (1995) have argued thatautonomy is essential to student identity development, as well as lifelong learning.In this study researchers investigated how first-year students spent six hours of free time as partof a first year, first semester course at a small engineering college. The instructor designed thesesix hours to encourage
of Education (HCDE), and the Southeast TennesseeDevelopment District (SETDD). The holistic approach taken by the partnership addresses allaspects of workforce development: recruiting high school students into the power sector careers;training the next generation of technicians, engineers, and managers; and instructing the existingworkforce in new technologies.UTC is ideally situated for collaborations with the power industry. Situated less than a mile fromboth TVA’s operations center and from the headquarters of EPB, the local power distributorwhich was a recipient of a $112 million DOE smart grid grant 1, UTC regularly pulls from theseorganizations for adjuncts and research partners. In 2006, UTC gathered a group of leaders fromthe local
software is loaded to perform the necessary processingand no hardware modification is required. This approach allows for ease of adaptability, shortensdevelopment effort and greatly reduces cost and complexity. The generic architecture of an SDRsystem is shown below in Figure 1. Figure 1: General SDR ArchitectureThe advantages of using SDR in commercial applications also applies to its use in an academiclaboratory setting. Many recent papers describe the use of SDR systems for academicinstructional purposes. These include various analog and digital communications experimentsand projects3,4,5,6 based on the popular Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP) platform(available from Ettus Research/National Instruments7
ideas rooted inSystems Engineering.The International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE)1 defines Systems Engineeringas “an interdisciplinary approach and means to enable the realization of successful systems.”The Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK), created by Body of Knowledge andCurriculum to Advance Systems Engineering (BKCASE) project2, notes that systemsengineering includes the “full life cycle of successful systems, including problemformulation, solution development and operational sustainment and use.” As noted in theSEBoK, a host of criteria such as continuous process improvement, considerations fortradeoffs, system integration, safety, recycling, etc., are needed while developing solutions fortechnical problems. In fact
(continues, ordinals, and dichotomous ones) based on detailed information aboutstudent grades in their first-year courses. Among these variables we included ratio ofpassed versus enrolled credits, variation of grades from first to second semester in bothpassed and failed courses, and difference between the final grade and the minimum gradefor passing, which in this case is 4, where 1 is the minimum and 7 the maximum of thescale. The decision about how much academic data to include in the model deserves somediscussion. In our case, a consecutive failing can only happen in the second semester. Theearlier we are able to detect those likely to fail a course twice in a row, the better. On theother hand, with more time to capture academic data
, 2016 From Problem Solvers to Problem Seekers: The Necessary Role of Tension in Engineering EducationIn this paper it is proposed that the current focus on problems in engineering education andtechnological literacy may be more constructively reframed by focusing on tensions. PriyanDias claims engineering has an identity crisis that arises from tensions inherent in: 1) theinfluence of the profession on society, 2) the role engineers play, and 3) what constitutes validknowledge in engineering. These are ethical, ontological, and epistemological tensionsrespectively, which Dias frames as a tension between identities of homo sapiens and homo faber.Beyond the tensions in engineering there are additional tensions that arise
as theirAmerican counterparts,” Grasso questioned whether it is wiser to close all the expensiveengineering colleges in the U.S. and “simply import all the engineering we need.”1 As a lifetimeengineering professor and administrator, Grasso was certainly not proposing laying off thousandsof American engineering educators. Instead, he urged his colleagues in the U.S. to pursue “afresh start” and to educate “[a] growing and increasingly diverse number of domestically trainedengineers—equipped with the broad insight and critical thinking skills the world needs” through“[the] study of the human condition, the human experience, [and] the human record.” Doing so,Grasso suggests, would give the engineers educated in the U.S. “a competitive advantage
prototype to solve the design problem. Therewas a set of general requirements that applied to all the three problems, for example, all designsneeded to be creative, aesthetically pleasing, well crafted, and the total cost should be as little aspossible and it should not exceed $100. Each problem had some specific requirements inaddition to the general requirements: in the first design problem, students were provided with asolar set-up, shown in Figure 1, which has a light bulb, simulating the “sun” that travels from“east” to “west” during a “day” at a constant rate. A solar power plant needed to be designed sothat consistent and maximum power be generated throughout the day. Only two types of solarcells could be used and all of them must be placed
material. This way, the authors did not know whichstudents chose to participate and which did not. This teamwork agreement was then changedappropriately to gain consent and converted into a document that students could completeelectronically.After gaining approval of the IRB, results of this experience were studied quantitatively in thespring semester. Approximately 110 students registered for the spring semester. These werebroken into 9 sections for undergraduates, some visiting high school students also take thecourse, but in special sections. Six sections were designated as treatment sections. A surveyusing Qualtrics was distributed to the class immediately before the teamwork skit. As seen inFigure 1, survey questions addressed several aspects
propagate documentedinnovations. Those papers emphasize three critical areas: Learning in and out of the classroom; The pathways to studying engineering, retention, and diversifying learning community; and Using technology to enhance learning and engagement.The NSF is committed to establishing and the engineering education community is in need of aresearch agenda focused on propagating documented innovations. To most effectivelyaccomplish this, it is necessary to capture needs and potential solutions through a number ofdifferent approaches that actively involve the larger engineering education community. As suchthis work addresses four major questions.1. What accomplishments have been produced to date? What new innovations have occurred over
programs, etc.) haveimpacted the success of these women, it was important to have distinct research sites so that Icould examine the effects of various policies and procedures on the careers of the researchparticipants within the context of each institution’s programs and policies.Population and Sample I interviewed women faculty who have their primary appointment in the engineeringschool each campus (since some faculty have dual appointments). The objective for each site was to interview at least fifty percent of the faculty so that my sample would reflect the variedexperience of tenured women faculty at each site. Table 1-1 describes the population and sampleat each research site and Table 1-2 provides employment and demographic
literacies on the part ofemployees and employers. The use of communication technology can be found among thefour ‘mega trends’ that Shuman et al.[1] specifically identify for the field of engineering,alongside changes forced by the fragile world economy, student and professional mobility,and the increasingly loud voice of the social imperative. This poses challenges foreducational institutions which, beyond helping students become subject experts, need to takethe responsibility for preparing them to ‘deal with global communicative practices online, inall their complexity’[2]. This trend toward developing skills needed to fully operate in highlyglobalised and cross-cultural settings as a necessary top-up to ‘technical core competencies’[3]has become
engineering. Rather, the vastmajority of the engineering student population at University of Calgary, where this is the mostpopular course out of three courses that fulfills a degree requirement, is exposed to thismethodology. The other two courses are in the process of being phased out and this will be theonly course to fulfill the requirement in the near future.I.Course DesignThe course consisted of two 75-minute lectures a week for the entire class, with the class brokenup into three 75-minute weekly sections of between 29 to 51 students over the course of a 13-week semester. The goals, or learning outcomes, of the course are to increase the student’sability to 1) evaluate the impact of technology on multiple facets of society such as
Learn how things work. Aladdin Effect reverse engineering. Oral and Logbook, meetings, written Good communication skills. innovation contests. communication Table 1. Approach used in the Para didactic Laboratory.Failure managementThe typical student comes to university from a school tradition that penalizes mistakes andfailures, and this is a heavy burden on his/her ability to take risks. It is an interesting paradox, thestudent
decades (or longer) to help performers develop their skills. This training canembody a range of formats, many resembling schoolyard games4; but nearly all successfulimprov training activities are united by a common thread of providing a scaffolded opportunityfor creative, interactive and unscripted performance within a safe and supportive environment(figure 1). Figure 1: “Yes, And”, a classic improv activity There are many variations to this game, but the essential rules are that one player starts a story or scene: “There was a giant slug outside our house.” The other players must add another sentence to the story, beginning with “Yes, and”: “Yes, and it was bigger than the man who was holding its leash!” “Yes, and the man
and the creative role of patents in today’s engineering and design education. Asthe philosopher of science, Thomas Kuhn, once stated, “Traditional engineering curriculumcreates people who are efficient researchers and highly productive, but this approach does notencourage creativity or innovation” [1] Teaching novel problem solving is challenging,especially with students who lack real world experience in engineering practices, or creativedesign. Focusing on design in engineering education is an opportunity to encourage creativityand technical innovation arising from an engineering discipline.While Kuhn’s comment is still relevant some 20 years later, this educational philosophy hasevolved. Contemporary engineering education is addressing this
environment [1-9]. While theseoutcomes and their importance are widely articulated, there is less discussion about themechanisms by which these benefits actually develop. In other words, because the positiveoutcomes of a liberal education are often observed and articulated in retrospect, the pedagogicalconstructs and cognitive models that scaffold these later behaviours are often unexplored. Amore comprehensive understanding of how and why these skills develop can be gained byobserving the student behaviours and instructional practices that govern some studentexperiences in the liberal arts.Representing Science on Stage, a theatre elective for engineers at the University of Torontoprovides one space in which these interactions can be observed. In
the currentpaper.We embedded four first-year GTAs in a senior-level course for secondary mathematics educationmajors and used classroom mathematics case studies as a central component of the course. In thiscontext, we seek to answer these questions: 1. To what extent, and in what manner, did the nature of the graduate students’ comments during case analysis change over time? 2. To what extent, and in what manner, did the graduate students’ perceptions of teaching and of themselves as teachers shift over time? 3. How did the graduate participants perform as first-time teachers of record, compared to first-time teachers of record who were not embedded in the secondary education course?Two of our research questions are